Case: Ramos v. Ashcroft

1:02-cv-08266 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Nov. 15, 2002

Closed Date: 2007

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On November 15, 2002, eleven immigrant plaintiffs filed this class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the Chicago office of the INS violated laws, regulations, and INS procedures by accepting prematurely-filed applications for residence between January 29, 1997 and April 30, 2001. Plaintiffs alleged that after processing the applications, the INS kept the application filing fees and then used information in the applications to inves…

On November 15, 2002, eleven immigrant plaintiffs filed this class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the Chicago office of the INS violated laws, regulations, and INS procedures by accepting prematurely-filed applications for residence between January 29, 1997 and April 30, 2001. Plaintiffs alleged that after processing the applications, the INS kept the application filing fees and then used information in the applications to investigate and institute removal proceedings against the applicants, in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706; procedural and substantive due process; and equal protection. Attorneys with the Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund, the Midwest Immigrant & Human Rights Center and private firms represented plaintiffs. They sought declaratory and equitable relief.

A different group of plaintiffs had previously challenged the same conduct in a 2001 lawsuit which asserted a different legal theory. That case, Ramos v. Ashcroft, No. 01-CV-2633, was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Ramos v. Ashcroft, 2002 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 1918 (Feb. 2, 2002) Three of the plaintiffs in the 2001 suit, along with 8 new plaintiffs filed the 2002 case.

Defendants again moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The District Court (Judge David H. Coar) denied that motion. See Ramos v. Ashcroft, 2003 F.Supp.2d, 2004 WL 161520 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 14, 2003). Defendants then moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Judge Coar denied the motion as to plaintiffs' Administrative Procedures Act but granted it as to plaintiffs' other claim. Ramos v. Ashcroft, F.Supp.2d, 2004 WL 22282521 (N.D.Ill., Jan. 16, 2004). The case was then transferred to Judge Mark Filip.

Extensive and lengthy settlement negotiations followed, and the parties ultimately reached a resolution. The Court (Judge Filip) preliminarily approved the settlement, pending a fairness hearing on June 10, 2005. Final approval was granted by an order dated August 11, 2005.

Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the government stipulated to certification of the case as a class action, with the class consisting of: "all persons who applied for permanent residence (a green card) pursuant to Section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act between 1/29/97 and 4/30/01 in the Chicago Office of the former INS, but who were not then eligible to be approved, because (1) a visa petition was filed before April 30, 2001, but was not yet "current" when the residence application was filed (Class 1); or (2) a visa petition had not been filed for the applicant (Class 2)." The Agreement provided that class members (1) could apply for a credit for application fees for their residence applications; (2) if they were in removal proceedings, could seek the government's agreement to terminate those proceedings for humanitarian reasons within six months of the agreement; and (3) if were not then in removal proceedings, could benefit from a decision not to begin removal proceedings on the basis of their applications. The government also agreed to pay $90,000 in fees to the class counsel for plaintiffs.

Summary Authors

Dan Dalton (11/18/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5301974/parties/ramos-v-ashcroft/


Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:02-cv-08266

Docket [PACER]

Aug. 12, 2005

Aug. 12, 2005

Docket

01-02633

Memorandum Opinion and Order [Re: Dismiss]

Feb. 7, 2002

Feb. 7, 2002

Order/Opinion

2002 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 1918

1

1:02-cv-08266

Complaint

Nov. 15, 2002

Nov. 15, 2002

Complaint
11

1:02-cv-08266

Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Feb. 14, 2003

Feb. 14, 2003

Complaint
24

1:02-cv-08266

Memorandum Opinion and Order [Re: Motion to Dismiss]

Sept. 30, 2003

Sept. 30, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 17426

31

1:02-cv-08266

Memorandum Opinion and Order [Re: Dismiss]

Jan. 16, 2004

Jan. 16, 2004

Order/Opinion

2004 WL 161520

34

1:02-cv-08266

Second Amended Complaint

Jan. 26, 2004

Jan. 26, 2004

Complaint

1:02-cv-08266

Summary Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Settlement

Ramos v. Chertoff

Jan. 1, 2005

Jan. 1, 2005

Order/Opinion
65

1:02-cv-08266

Parties' Agreed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement

March 30, 2005

March 30, 2005

Settlement Agreement

1:02-cv-08266

Notice of Class Action Settlement

Ramos v. Chertoff

No Court

April 29, 2005

April 29, 2005

Press Release

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5301974/ramos-v-ashcroft/

Last updated April 6, 2025, 11:03 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Nov. 14, 2002

COMPLAINT (Attachments) - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of Patricia Mendoza, Steven I. Saltzman, Mary Margaret McCarthy, Charles G Roth, Alonzo Rivas as attorney(s) for plaintiffs (Four original and four copies summons(es) issued.) (Documents: 1-1 through 1-4) (hp) (Entered: 11/15/2002)

Clearinghouse
Nov. 14, 2002

RECEIPT regarding payment of filing fee paid; on 11/14/02 in the amount of $150.00, receipt # 10316982. (hp) (Entered: 11/15/2002)

PACER
2 Nov. 18, 2002

DESIGNATION OF ATTORNEY Sheila McNulty Entenman as US Attorney. (yp) (Entered: 11/20/2002)

PACER
3 Nov. 22, 2002

MOTION by plaintiff for reassignment ; Memorandum in support (Attachments); Notice. (jmp) (Entered: 11/25/2002)

PACER
4 Nov. 23, 2002

MINUTE ORDER of 11/23/02 by Hon. George W. Lindberg : Plaintiff's motion for reassignment is granted [3-1]. This action will be reassigned to the calendar of Judge David H. Coar. Mailed notice (jmp) (Entered: 11/25/2002)

PACER
5 Nov. 25, 2002

REASSIGNMENT ORDER of 11/25/02 This case is reassigned to the Hon. David H. Coar from Hon. George W. Lindberg pursuant to 40.3(B) (2); this case appears to involve the same parties and subject matter as case number 01 C 2633 assigned to the calendar of Judge David H. Coar and dismissed prior to the filing of this case. (For further detail see order.) Mailed notice (jmp) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

PACER
Jan. 15, 2003

SCHEDULE set on 1/15/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Status hearing set to 9:00 1/28/03 . Mailed notice (pm) (Entered: 01/15/2003)

PACER
6 Jan. 16, 2003

MOTION by plaintiffS for class certification , and to stay briefing schedule ; Notice (rmm) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

PACER
7 Jan. 16, 2003

MOTION by plaintiffs for preliminary injunction , and to stay briefing schedule (rmm) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

PACER
8 Jan. 22, 2003

MINUTE ORDER of 1/22/03 by Hon. David H. Coar: Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction [7-1] and to stay briefing schedule [7-2] and Motion for class certification [6-1] and to stay briefing schedule [6-2] are entered and continued to 9:00 1/28/03. No notice (rmm) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

PACER
9 Jan. 24, 2003

MOTION by defendants to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction (Attachments); Memorandum in support; Notice. (air) (Entered: 01/29/2003)

PACER
10 Jan. 28, 2003

MINUTE ORDER of 1/28/03 by Hon. David H. Coar: Answer brief to defendants' motion to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction [9-1] due 2/18/03. Reply to answer brief due 2/28/03. Ruling on defendants' motion to dismiss will be by mail. Status hearing held. The briefing for the motion to dismiss is regarding the issue of jurisdiction. The briefing on the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim will not proceed. Discovery is stayed pending ruling on jurisdiction. The motions for preliminary injunction [7-1] and motion for class certification [6-1] are continued until after the ruling on the jurisdictional issues. Mailed notice (air) Modified on 08/14/2003 (Entered: 01/29/2003)

PACER
11 Feb. 14, 2003

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by plaintiffs (Attachments); Notice. (fce) (Entered: 02/20/2003)

Clearinghouse
12 Feb. 18, 2003

MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction [9-1]; Notice. (fce) (Entered: 02/20/2003)

PACER
13 Feb. 28, 2003

REPLY MEMORANDUM by government defendants in support of motion to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction [9-1]; Declaration of Shirley Roberts. (jmp) (Entered: 04/30/2003)

PACER
14 June 10, 2003

MOTION by plaintiff for leave to conduct limited discovery Memorandum in support (Attachments); Notice. (jmp) Modified on 06/11/2003 (Entered: 06/11/2003)

PACER
15 June 10, 2003

MINUTE ORDER of 6/10/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Plaintiffs' motion for leave to conduct limited discovery is granted to the extend that this Court will allow the taking of a one and half hour deposition of Shirley J. Roberts, said deposition is limited to what's in her declaration, the remainder of the motion is denied at this time[14-1]. Mailed notice (jmp) (Entered: 06/11/2003)

PACER
16 June 23, 2003

MOTION by plaintiffs' attorney, Patricia Mendoza to withdraw ; Notice (las) (Entered: 07/02/2003)

PACER
17 July 1, 2003

MINUTE ORDER of 7/1/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Motion of Patricia Mendoza to withdraw is granted [16-1]. Leave granted Patricia Mendoza to withdraw as one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs. Mailed notice (las) (Entered: 07/02/2003)

PACER
18 Aug. 7, 2003

MOTION by plaintiffs for leave to file a surreply in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss ; Notice (hp) (Entered: 08/14/2003)

PACER
19 Aug. 13, 2003

MINUTE ORDER of 8/13/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a surreply in opposition to motion to dismiss is denied [18-1]. All briefs that are currently on file as to the motion to dismiss are stricken. Plaintiff to re-file an answer brief to the motion to dismiss within seven days; Defendants to re-file a reply brief sueven days thereafter. Mailed notice (hp) Modified on 08/14/2003 (Entered: 08/14/2003)

PACER
20 Aug. 20, 2003

STATEMENT by parties regarding compliance with Court's August 13, 2003 order; Notice. (hp) (Entered: 08/27/2003)

PACER
21 Aug. 20, 2003

MOTION by defendants to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction ; Memorandum in support (Attachment). (hp) (Entered: 08/27/2003)

PACER
22 Aug. 27, 2003

MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction [9-1] [21-1] (Attachments); Notice. (hp) (Entered: 08/29/2003)

PACER
23 Sept. 3, 2003

REPLY BRIEF by defendants in support of its motion to dismiss [21-1] (hp) (Entered: 09/08/2003)

PACER
24 Sept. 29, 2003

MINUTE ORDER of 9/29/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : For the reasons given in the attached memorandum opinion, defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. 21] is denied in its entirly. (Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order.) Mailed notice (hp)

Clearinghouse
Oct. 6, 2003

SCHEDULE set on 10/6/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Status hearing set to 9:00 10/29/03, all parties shall appear in courtroom #1419, 219 S. Dearborn Street, Chicago, Illinois. Mailed notice (pm) (Entered: 10/06/2003)

PACER
Oct. 29, 2003

SCHEDULE set on 10/29/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : The governmetn is give to 11/19/03 to file a motion. Status hearing held and continued to 9:00 11/24/03. Final Pretrial conference set to 9:00 11/24/03 in chambers. Report of planning conference pursuant to Rule 26(f) and proposed scheduling order pursuant to Rule 16(b) to be filed in chambers. (See reverse side of scheduling order. Copies of form reports of planning conference and proposed scheduling order are available in chambers or on the court's web page.) Mailed notice (pm) (Entered: 10/29/2003)

PACER
25 Nov. 19, 2003

REPORT by parties of planning conference; Notice (hp) (Entered: 11/20/2003)

PACER
26 Nov. 19, 2003

MOTION by defendants to dismiss case ; Memorandum in support (hp) (Entered: 11/21/2003)

PACER
27 Nov. 24, 2003

MINUTE ORDER of 11/24/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Filed defendants motion to dismiss. [26-1] Answer brief to motion due 12/15/03. Reply to answer brief due 01/05/04. Ruling on motion to dismiss by defendants [26-1] set for 01/14/04 at 9:00 a.m. The Court will enter the discovery and trial schedule as stated on the record. Notices mailed by judge's staff (hp) (Entered: 11/25/2003)

PACER
Nov. 24, 2003

SCHEDULE set on 11/24/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Status hearing held. Rule 16(b) scheduling conference held. All disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) have been made. Any amendments to pleadings or actions to join other parties shall be filed on or before 1/5/04. Motion Dispositive - Rule 56 Motions due on or before 6/15/04. Discovery ordered closed on 5/17/04. Final pretrial order to be submitted on 9/23/04 . Pretrial conference set to 11:00 10/1/04. If necessary, Jury trial set to 10:00 10/4/04. The parties are directed to review this court's standing orders. Copies are available in chambers or through the court's web page. Mailed notice (pm) (Entered: 11/24/2003)

PACER
28 Dec. 15, 2003

MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim [26-1] (Attachment); Notice (hp) (Entered: 12/16/2003)

PACER
29 Jan. 5, 2004

REPLY brief by defendants in support of motion to dismiss case [26-1]. (jmm) Modified on 01/13/2004 (Entered: 01/07/2004)

PACER
32 Jan. 5, 2004

MOTION by plaintiffs for leave to file second amended complaint (Attachments); Notice (ntf) (Entered: 01/16/2004)

PACER
30 Jan. 12, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 1/12/04 by Hon. David H. Coar : Ruling on the motion to dismiss is reset to 01/15/04 at 9:00 a.m. [26-1] The date of 01/14/04 is stricken. Telephoned notice (hp) (Entered: 01/13/2004)

PACER
31 Jan. 15, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 1/15/04 by Hon. David H. Coar : For the reasons given in the attached memorandum opinion and order, defendants' motion to dismiss case Doc. [26-1] is granted in part and denied in part; the motion is granted as to Count II, Count III, and Count IV, but it is denied as to Count I. Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order. No notice (eav)

Clearinghouse
33 Jan. 15, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 1/15/04 by Hon. David H. Coar : Plaintiffs motion for leave to file second amended complaint is granted [32-1]. Second Amended Complaint to be filed on or before 01/26/04. No notice (ntf) (Entered: 01/16/2004)

PACER
34 Jan. 26, 2004

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [11-1] by plaintiffs (Attachments); Notice (hp) (Entered: 01/27/2004)

Clearinghouse
35 Feb. 6, 2004

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 01/27/04 Before Honorable David H. Coar (hp) (Entered: 02/09/2004)

PACER
March 3, 2004

EXECUTIVE committee 3/3/04 This case is reassigned to the Hon. Mark Filip Mailed notice (amb) (Entered: 03/05/2004)

PACER
36 March 8, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 3/8/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : This matter is set for a status conference on 3/25/04 at 4:00 p.m. (Entered Order Requiring Status Report and Setting Status Hearing for Cases Newly Assigned to Judge Filip). Mailed notice (las) (Entered: 03/08/2004)

PACER
39 March 19, 2004

MOTION by defendants' to extend time to answer or otherwise plead to the second amended complaint ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 03/26/2004)

PACER
37 March 22, 2004

JOINT STATUS REPORT by parties; Notice. (hp) (Entered: 03/24/2004)

PACER
38 March 24, 2004

RESPONSE by plaintiffs to defendants motion to extend time to answer or otherwise plead; Notice. (hp) (Entered: 03/25/2004)

PACER
40 March 25, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 3/25/04 by Hon. Mark Filip: Status hearing held and continued to 10:00 a.m. on 5/13/04. Defendants' motion to extend time to answer or otherwise plead to the second amended complaint, to and including 4/5/04, is granted [39-1]. Plaintiffs are given to and including 4/9/04 in which to file their motion for class certification. Defendants are given until 5/10/04 to file response to class certification motion and plaintiffs are given until 6/7/04 to file reply. Ruling will be by mail. Settlement conference set for 11:00 a.m. on 5/11/04. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 03/26/2004)

PACER
41 April 5, 2004

MOTION by defendants to dismiss the second amended complaint ; Memorandum in support (Attachment). (hp) (Entered: 04/06/2004)

PACER
43 April 7, 2004

NOTICE by defendants of motion regarding motion to dismiss the second amended complaint [41-1] (Attachments). (cem) (Entered: 04/13/2004)

PACER
42 April 9, 2004

MOTION by plaintiffs for class certification ; Memorandum in support (Attachments); Notice (hp) (Entered: 04/12/2004)

PACER
44 April 12, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 4/12/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Plaintiffs to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss second amended complaint [41-1] on or before 4/27/04; defendants reply due by 5/11/04. Ruling on motion to dismiss will be by mail. Telephoned notice (cem) (Entered: 04/13/2004)

PACER
45 April 27, 2004

MEMORANDUM of law by plaintiffs in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss the second amended complaint [41-1]; Notice. (hp) (Entered: 04/28/2004)

PACER
46 May 3, 2004

MOTION by plaintiffs for a protective order ; Memorandum in support (Attachments); Notice. (hp) (Entered: 05/06/2004)

PACER
47 May 4, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 5/4/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : On plaintiffs' oral motion, [0-0] motion for a protective order [46-1] is entered and continued to 05/10/04 at 11:00 a.m. Telephoned notice (hp) (Entered: 05/06/2004)

PACER
May 4, 2004

ORAL MOTION by plaintiffs to continue motion for a protective order . (hp) (Entered: 05/06/2004)

PACER
48 May 5, 2004

AMENDED motion by plaintiffs for a protective order [46-1]; Notice. (hp) (Entered: 05/11/2004)

PACER
49 May 10, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 5/10/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Filed plaintiff's amended motion for a protective order. [48-1] Answer brief to motion due 05/24/04. Reply to answer brief due 05/31/04. Ruling on plaintiffs' amended motion for a protective order set for 06/07/04 at 11:00 a.m. Oral motion of Jorge Sanchez for leave to file his appearance as addition counsel for plaintiffs is granted. [0-1] Briefing on motion for class certification is held in abeyance pending ruling on amended motion for protective order. [42-1] Mailed notice (hp) Modified on 05/11/2004 (Entered: 05/11/2004)

PACER
51 May 10, 2004

MOTION by plaintiffs for leave to conduct limited discovery (hp) (Entered: 05/12/2004)

PACER
52 May 10, 2004

MEMORANDUM of law by plaintiffs in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss second amended complaint [41-1] (Attachments). (hp) (Entered: 05/12/2004)

PACER
May 10, 2004

ORAL MOTION by plaintiffs for Jorge Sanchez for leave to file his appearance as additional counsel (hp) (Entered: 05/11/2004)

PACER
53 May 11, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 5/11/04 by Hon. Mark Filip: Plaintiffs' motion to supplement the record is stricken without prejudice to refiling at an appropriate juncture in the case. Mailed notice (hp) (Entered: 05/12/2004)

PACER
May 11, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 5/11/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference set for 11:00 6/3/04 . No notice (tbk) (Entered: 05/11/2004)

PACER
54 June 3, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 6/3/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference held and continued to 07/06/04 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (hp) (Entered: 06/04/2004)

PACER
55 July 6, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 7/6/04 by Hon. Mark Filip: Settlement conference held. All pending motions are withdrawn without prejudice to reinstatement. Settlement conference continued to 08/20/04 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ntf) (Entered: 07/07/2004)

PACER
Aug. 17, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 8/17/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference re- set for 11:00 9/9/04 . Mailed notice (tbk) (Entered: 08/17/2004)

PACER
56 Sept. 9, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 9/9/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference held and continued to 9/23/04 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (cem) (Entered: 09/10/2004)

PACER
57 Sept. 24, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 9/24/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference held and continued to 09/27/04 at 11:00 a.m. No notice (hp) (Entered: 09/27/2004)

PACER
Sept. 27, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 9/27/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference held. No notice (tbk) (Entered: 09/27/2004)

PACER
Sept. 27, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 9/27/04 by Hon. David H. Coar : Pretrial conference scheduled for 10/1/04 before Judge Coar is stricken. Mailed notice (pm) (Entered: 09/27/2004)

PACER
Sept. 28, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 9/28/04 by Hon. David H. Coar : Trial scheduled for 10/4/04 before Judge Coar is stricken, as this case is now before Judge Filip. No notice (pm) (Entered: 09/28/2004)

PACER
Nov. 17, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 11/17/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Status hearing set to 9:30 11/30/04 . Mailed notice (tbk) (Entered: 11/17/2004)

PACER
Nov. 30, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 11/30/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Status hearing held. Settlement conference set for 11:00 12/14/04 . No notice (tbk) (Entered: 11/30/2004)

PACER
58 Dec. 22, 2004

MINUTE ORDER of 12/22/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : The settlement conference is rescheduled for 01/06/05 at 10:00 a.m. The government is requested to bring someone from C.I.S. to the conference with settlement authority. Mailed notice (hp) (Entered: 12/27/2004)

PACER
Jan. 6, 2005

SCHEDULE set on 1/6/05 by Hon. Mark Filip : Status hearing set to 9:45 1/20/05 . Settlement conference held. No notice (tbk) (Entered: 01/06/2005)

PACER
59 Jan. 19, 2005

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing reset for 1/28/2005 at 09:30 AM. (No notices, notified counsel by phone) (tbk, ) (Entered: 01/19/2005)

PACER
60 Jan. 28, 2005

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing held on 1/28/2005 Status hearing set for 2/9/2005 at 09:30 AM. (No notices, advised in open court) (tbk, ) (Entered: 01/28/2005)

PACER
61 Feb. 3, 2005

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing reset for 2/16/2005 at 09:30 AM. (Notified counsel by telephone) (tbk, ) (Entered: 02/03/2005)

PACER
62 Feb. 16, 2005

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing held on 2/16/2005. Status hearing set for 2/25/2005 at 09:30 AM. (no notices, advised in open court) (tbk, ) (Entered: 02/16/2005)

PACER
63 Feb. 25, 2005

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing held on 2/25/2005 Status hearing set for 3/4/2005 at 09:30 AM. No notice (tbk, ) (Entered: 02/25/2005)

PACER
64 March 4, 2005

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing held on 3/4/2005; No notice (tbk, ) (Entered: 03/04/2005)

PACER
65 March 30, 2005

AGREED MOTION by Plaintiffs for preliminary approval of settlement agreement. (rbf, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 10/27/2006 (cdy, ). (Entered: 03/31/2005)

Clearinghouse
66 March 30, 2005

NOTICE of Motion by Alonzo Rivas for presentment of motion for preliminary approval of settlement agreement 65 before Honorable Mark Filip on 4/5/2005 at 10:30 AM. (rbf, ) (Entered: 03/31/2005)

PACER
67 March 30, 2005

AGREED MOTION by parties for approval of attorney's fees and cost pursuant to settlement agreement.(rbf, ) (Entered: 03/31/2005)

PACER
68 March 30, 2005

NOTICE of Motion by Alonzo Rivas for presentment of motion for approval of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to the settlement agreement 67 before Honorable Mark Filip on 4/5/2005 at 10:30 AM. (rbf, ) (Entered: 03/31/2005)

PACER
69 April 5, 2005

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : MOTION by Plaintiffs Justino Castaneda, Efren de la Torre, Maria Rosa Ramos, Apolinar Ochoa, Argmira Ochoa, Nicolas Olivares, Fermin Gutierrez, Fernando Carranza, Gabriel Torres, Juan Rodriguez, Hector Diaz65,for Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement is Granted. MOTION by Plaintiffs Justino Castaneda, Efren de la Torre, Maria Rosa Ramos, Apolinar Ochoa, Argmira Ochoa, Nicolas Olivares, Fermin Gutierrez, Fernando Carranza, Gabriel Torres, Juan Rodriguez, Hector Diaz67for Approval of Attorneys Fees is entered and continued generally. Fairness hearing set for 6/10/2005 at 10:00 AM. Judicial staff mailed notice (tbk, ) (Entered: 04/05/2005)

PACER
70 May 27, 2005

OBJECTION by Cristano Leyva to proposed settlement agreement (gma, ) Modified on 3/1/2007 (lcw) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

PACER
71 May 27, 2005

NOTICE of Motion by Crisanto Leyva for presentment of OBJECTION to proposed settlement agreement before Honorable Mark Filip on 6/10/2005 at 09:00 AM. (gma, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

PACER
72 May 27, 2005

MOTION by F.C. and L.O. requesting clarification of the proposed settlement agreement (gma, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

PACER
73 May 27, 2005

NOTICE of Motion by F.C., L.O. for presentment of MOTION by F.C. and L.O. requesting clarification of the proposed settlement agreement 72 before Honorable Mark Filip on 6/10/2005 at 10:00 AM. (gma, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

PACER
74 May 27, 2005

OBJECTION by Martin Barrios to proposed settlement agreement (gma, ) Modified on 3/1/2007 (lcw, ). (Entered: 05/31/2005)

PACER
75 May 27, 2005

NOTICE of Motion by Martin Barrios for presentment of OBJECTION to proposed settlement agreement before Honorable Mark Filip on 6/10/2005 at 09:00 AM. (gma, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

PACER
76 May 27, 2005

NOTICE of Motion by Leonor Garcia for presentment of OBJECTION to proposed settlement agreement before Honorable Mark Filip on 6/10/2005 at 09:00 AM. (gma, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

PACER
83 May 27, 2005

OBJECTION by Leonor Garcia to proposed settlement agreemant. (Previously Misplaced Document) (Document Not Scanned) (lcw, ) (Entered: 03/01/2007)

PACER
77 June 10, 2005

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Fairness hearing held. This Court overrules the objections of Leonor Garcia, Crisanto Leyva, and Martin Barrios. Attorney Steven Saltzman appointed as class counsel. MOTION by Plaintiffs Justino Castaneda, Efren de la Torre, Maria Rosa Ramos, Apolinar Ochoa, Argmira Ochoa, Nicolas Olivares, Fermin Gutierrez, Fernando Carranza, Gabriel Torres, Juan Rodriguez, Hector Diaz67,for approval of attorneys' fees and costs is granted. MOTION to clarify72is denied for reasons stated on the record. No notice (tbk, ) (Entered: 06/10/2005)

PACER
78 June 28, 2005

AGREED PROPOSED FINDINGS of fact and conclusions of law on the issue of attorneys fees and costs 67 by Plaintiffs ; Notice of filing. (hp, ) (Entered: 07/01/2005)

PACER
79 July 21, 2005

AGREED MOTION by parties to adopt the parties' proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (Exhibits) (las, ) (Entered: 07/22/2005)

Clearinghouse
80 July 21, 2005

NOTICE of Motion by parties for presentment of their agreed motion to adopt the parties' proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law79 before Honorable Mark Filip on 8/1/2005 at 09:30 AM. (las, ) (Entered: 07/22/2005)

PACER
81 Aug. 11, 2005

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : The Parties' Agreed Motion to adopt their Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on the Issue of Attorneys' Fees and Costs, and the Parties' Agreed Motion for Approval of Attorneys' Fees and Costs Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement (D.E. 79), are granted 79. The findings of fact and conclusions of law are entered, as modified and as stated below, and Plaintiffs are awarded $90,000.00 in fees and costs, which consist of $87,554.00 in fees and $2,446.00 in costs ($150.00 in filing fees; $1,075.45 for deposition transcripts; and $1,220.55 in copying costs). As explained further below, the Court commends all counsel for their efforts in the case. Mailed notice (rmm, ) (Entered: 08/15/2005)

PACER
82 Aug. 12, 2005

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : All matters in controversy having been settled, the above-entitled case is hereby dismissed. Any and all pending motions are dismissed as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (hp, ) (Entered: 08/16/2005)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 15, 2002

Closing Date: 2007

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All persons who applied for permanent residence (a green card) pursuant to Section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act between 1/29/97 and 4/30/01 in the Chicago Office of the former INS, but who were not then eligible to be approved.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

MALDEF

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Federal

Department of Homeland Security

Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS)

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Illinois 1:02-cv-08266

Northern District of Illinois 01-02633

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 2005 - 2007

Issues

General/Misc.:

Search policies

Immigration/Border:

Constitutional rights

Deportation - criteria

Deportation - judicial review

Deportation - procedure

Status/Classification

Recommended Citation