Case: Goodreau v. Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC.

3:05-00252 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee

Filed Date: March 29, 2005

Closed Date: April 4, 2006

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 29, 2005, the U.S. Department of Justice ("D.O.J.") filed a lawsuit under Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA") in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee against the Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC ("Bridgestone"). The DOJ sought injunctive and monetary relief. The DOJ represented a Bridgestone employee who had served in the Army National Guard since August 5, 2000. On May 29, 2002, the employee commenced emplo…

On March 29, 2005, the U.S. Department of Justice ("D.O.J.") filed a lawsuit under Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 ("USERRA") in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee against the Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC ("Bridgestone"). The DOJ sought injunctive and monetary relief.

The DOJ represented a Bridgestone employee who had served in the Army National Guard since August 5, 2000. On May 29, 2002, the employee commenced employment for Bridgestone at its plant in Clarksville, Tennessee, as an Operator Banbury. Bridgestone has a progressive pay schedule which is a step rate compensation system based on time at work. The employee was hired at a pay rate of $16.14 per hour and was moved to $17.44 per hour on November 24, 2002.

During December 27, 2002 to March 24, 2004, for a total of approximately 453 days, the employee was activated as a member of the Army National Guard under Operation Enduring Freedom/Iraqi Freedom.

The complaint alleges that the defendant violated USERRA by denying the employee an advancement of approximately 453 days on its progressive pay schedule and other employment benefits due to his membership in, or obligation to perform service in, the uniformed services.

On April 4, 2005, the district court (Judge William J. Haynes Jr.) approved a consent decree requiring that the defendant grant the employee the level of seniority, status and compensation that he would have enjoyed had he remained employed continuously with Bridgestone during the time of his active duty service in the military, including loss of wages, with interest.

We have no further information on this case.

 

Summary Authors

Hyun Jeong Yang (10/28/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4849523/parties/billiot-v-cove-mountain-realty-inc/


Judge(s)

Haynes, William Joseph Jr. (Tennessee)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Brent, Derrick L. (District of Columbia)

Fenton, William B. (District of Columbia)

Palmer, David J. (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Rydzel, James A. (Ohio)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

3:05-00252

Docket (PACER)

U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee

April 4, 2005

April 4, 2005

Docket
1

3:05-00252

Complaint

March 29, 2005

March 29, 2005

Complaint
3

3:05-00252

Consent Decree

March 29, 2005

March 29, 2005

Settlement Agreement
41

3:05-00252

Memorandum and Order

Billiot v. Cove Mountain Realty

July 11, 2006

July 11, 2006

Order/Opinion

2006 WL 1899845

114

3:05-00252

Memorandum and Order

Billiot v. Cove Mountain Realty

Jan. 29, 2008

Jan. 29, 2008

Order/Opinion

2008 WL 269540

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4849523/billiot-v-cove-mountain-realty-inc/

Last updated April 22, 2026, 1:02 p.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
41 July 11, 2006

ORDER denying defendant's 14 Motion to Dismiss and/or for Summary Judgment. The plaintiff is further DIRECTED to file a complete, amended complaint in compliance with L.R. 15.1 within 10 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Thomas A Varlan on 7/11/06. (ANB)

Clearinghouse
78 Sept. 20, 2007

ORDER finding as moot 75 plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery. Signed by U.S. Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on September 20, 2007. (AYB)

RECAP
114 Jan. 29, 2008

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 83 Motion in Limine or, in the Alternative, Motion to Exclude Testimony of Mr. Alex Walker and Mr. Burton Webb. Signed by Magistrate Judge H Bruce Guyton on 1/29/08. (ANB)

Clearinghouse
130 May 12, 2016

Sealed Document

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Tennessee

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 29, 2005

Closing Date: April 4, 2006

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Department of Justice- Civil Rights Division on behalf of an Individual denied employment benefit due to his membership in uniformed services

Plaintiff Type(s):

U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Bridgestone/Firestone North American Tire, LLC

Defendant Type(s):

Retailer

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA), 38 U.S.C. § 4301

Other Dockets:

Middle District of Tennessee 3:05-00252

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 2005 - 2006

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Pay / Benefits

Discrimination Basis:

Military status discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Male

Recommended Citation