Case: Families for Freedom v. Chertoff

1:08-cv-04056 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York

Filed Date: April 20, 2008

Closed Date: 2009

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On April 20, 2008, Families for Freedom and the National Immigration Project filed a lawsuit under the Administrative Procedures Act against the Department of Homeland Security in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs complained that the defendants had failed to promulgate regulations governing facilities in which DHS detains immigrants, despite the fact that the plaintiffs had previously petitioned them to establish such regulations. Plaintiffs alleged…

On April 20, 2008, Families for Freedom and the National Immigration Project filed a lawsuit under the Administrative Procedures Act against the Department of Homeland Security in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs complained that the defendants had failed to promulgate regulations governing facilities in which DHS detains immigrants, despite the fact that the plaintiffs had previously petitioned them to establish such regulations. Plaintiffs alleged that DHS' failure to respond to the petition violated § 706(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), requiring a reasoned and timely response to the petition and that the constructive denial of the petition was arbitrary, capricious, and an abuse of discretion under § 706(2) of the APA.

On June 25, 2009, the court (Judge Denny Chin) denied the defendant's motion to dismiss, holding that the plaintiffs properly stated a claim that DHS violated the APA. Further, the court found that the defendants' delay in responding to the petition was unreasonable. Because it held that the defendants had not yet responded to plaintiffs' petition within the meaning of the APA, the court dismissed plaintiffs' constructive denial claim as moot. The court ordered the agency to decide plaintiffs' petition within 30 days and closed the case.

Summary Authors

Kristen Sagar (8/19/2009)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4342049/parties/families-for-freedom-v-chertoff/


Judge(s)

Chin, Denny (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Wishnie, Michael J. (Connecticut)

Attorney for Defendant

Bober, David (New York)

Dassin, Lev L. (New York)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Lute, Jane Holl (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:08-cv-04056

Docket

Oct. 1, 2009

Oct. 1, 2009

Docket

1:08-cv-04056

[Letter - Petition to Initiate Rule Making]

No Court

Jan. 24, 2007

Jan. 24, 2007

Correspondence
1

1:08-40567

Complaint

April 30, 2008

April 30, 2008

Complaint

1:08-40567

Press Release

No Court

May 1, 2008

May 1, 2008

Press Release
29

1:08-cv-04056

Memorandum Decision

June 25, 2009

June 25, 2009

Order/Opinion

628 F.Supp.2d 535

1:08-cv-04056

[DHS Letter - Denial of Petition to Initiate Rule Making]

No Court

July 24, 2009

July 24, 2009

Correspondence

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4342049/families-for-freedom-v-chertoff/

Last updated April 6, 2025, 2:37 p.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
April 30, 2008

SUMMONS ISSUED as to Michael Chertoff. (jfe) (Entered: 05/01/2008)

PACER
April 30, 2008

Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck is so designated. (jfe) (Entered: 05/01/2008)

PACER
April 30, 2008

Case Designated ECF. (jfe) (Entered: 05/01/2008)

PACER
1 April 30, 2008

COMPLAINT against Michael Chertoff. (Filing Fee $ 350.00, Receipt Number 649428)Document filed by Families for Freedom, National Immergration Project of the National Lawyers' Guild, Rafiu Abimbola, Camal Marchabeyoglu.(jfe) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/6/2008: # (1) complaint pt 2) (mbe).

RECAP
2 April 30, 2008

RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by National Immergration Project of the National Lawyers' Guild.(jfe) (mbe).

RECAP
3 April 30, 2008

RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Families for Freedom.(jfe) (mbe).

RECAP
4 May 22, 2008

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by David Vincent Bober on behalf of Michael Chertoff (Bober, David)

RECAP
5 June 9, 2008

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint,. Michael Chertoff served on 5/20/2008, answer due 7/21/2008. Service was accepted by A. Charles. Service was made by Mail. Document filed by Families for Freedom. (Attachments: # (1) Affidavit Service on Attorney General, # (2) Affidavit Service on Secretary of DHS, # (3) Affidavit Service on US Attorney)(Wishnie, Michael)

RECAP
6 Aug. 11, 2008

NOTICE of Hearing: Pretrial Conference set for 8/26/2008 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 11A, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Denny Chin. (tve)

RECAP
7 Aug. 14, 2008

ENDORSED LETTER addressed to Judge Denny Chin from Mike Wishnie dated 8/14/08 re: Request for an adjournment of the 8/26/08 pre-motion conference. ENDORSEMENT: Adjourned to 9/12/08 at 10:00 a.m. SO ORDERED. (Pre-Motion Conference set for 9/12/2008 at 10:00 AM before Judge Denny Chin.) (Signed by Judge Denny Chin on 8/14/08) (db)

RECAP
8 Oct. 9, 2008

Endorsed Letter

RECAP
9 Oct. 15, 2008

Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction

RECAP
10 Oct. 15, 2008

Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion

RECAP
11 Oct. 15, 2008

Declaration in Support of Motion

RECAP
12 Nov. 25, 2008

Response in Opposition to Motion

RECAP
13 Nov. 25, 2008

Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages

RECAP
14 Nov. 25, 2008

Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

RECAP
15 Dec. 3, 2008

Endorsed Letter

RECAP
16 Dec. 10, 2008

Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion

RECAP
17 Dec. 17, 2008

Memo Endorsement

RECAP
18 Dec. 17, 2008

Memo Endorsement

RECAP
20 Jan. 9, 2009

Transcript

RECAP
19 Jan. 20, 2009

Endorsed Letter

RECAP
21 April 3, 2009

Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan Report

RECAP
22 May 15, 2009

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
23 May 15, 2009

Remark

RECAP
24 May 15, 2009

Remark

RECAP
25 May 15, 2009

Remark

RECAP
26 May 15, 2009

Remark

RECAP
27 May 15, 2009

Remark

RECAP
28 May 15, 2009

Remark

RECAP
29 June 25, 2009

Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction

RECAP
June 25, 2009

Transmission to Judgments and Orders Clerk. Transmitted re: 29 Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, to the Judgments and Orders Clerk. (tve) (Entered: 06/25/2009)

PACER
30 June 26, 2009

Clerk's Judgment

RECAP
31 June 26, 2009

Order

RECAP
32 Aug. 19, 2009

Endorsed Letter

RECAP
Aug. 19, 2009

Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 9/7/2009. (tve) (Entered: 08/21/2009)

PACER
33 Sept. 9, 2009

Endorsed Letter

RECAP
34 Sept. 9, 2009

Endorsed Letter

RECAP
35 Sept. 22, 2009

Endorsed Letter

RECAP
36 Oct. 1, 2009

Stipulation and Order

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

New York

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 20, 2008

Closing Date: 2009

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Families for Freedom, the National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild, and two individuals who had been held in detention facilities

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization (Yale)

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

Department of Homeland Security

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Other Dockets:

Southern District of New York 1:08-cv-04056

Southern District of New York 1:08-40567

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Issues

General/Misc.:

Conditions of confinement

Immigration/Border:

Detention - conditions

Detention - criteria

Detention - procedures

Undocumented immigrants - rights and duties

Recommended Citation