Case: Ulibarri v. City and County of Denver

1:07-cv-01814 | U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado

Filed Date: Aug. 28, 2007

Closed Date: 2012

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On August 28, 2007, three deaf individuals and two deaf advocacy groups filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado against the City and County of Denver, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Rehabilitation Act. The plaintiffs, represented by attorneys from the Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition, the Center for the Rights of Parents with Disabilities, and private counsel, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, …

On August 28, 2007, three deaf individuals and two deaf advocacy groups filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado against the City and County of Denver, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and the Rehabilitation Act. The plaintiffs, represented by attorneys from the Colorado Cross-Disability Coalition, the Center for the Rights of Parents with Disabilities, and private counsel, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, money damages, and attorney's fees and costs, claiming that Denver violated the plaintiffs' rights when it denied them access to American Sign Language (ASL) interpreters, or other effective forms of communication, resulting in the death of one plaintiff and injury to the others.

The complaint alleged that each plaintiff, on separate occasions, was arrested and processed without the assistance of an ASL interpreter or provided an alternative means of communication during and after booking, resulting in harm. The first listed plaintiffs, a mother and the Estate of her son, claimed that the detention facility and jail where the decedent was held negligently caused the decedent's suicide. The Order on Pending Motions, 742 F. Supp. 2d 1192 (D. Colo. 2010) explains that the decedent was arrested on felony charges and subsequently processed and screened for mental health issues, with no noted concerns. After being held in the local jail for about a month, segregated from the general population and without access to a TTD phone, closed captioning television, or an ASL interpreter, the decedent hung himself. Nurse rounds note no concerns for depression or other possible mental illnesses, but these were not conducted through an interpreter.

The second listed individual on the complaint, hereinafter referred to as "K," was arrested at a Greyhound station after he got into a scuffle with a security guard. After being treated for a broken ankle, plaintiff K was processed and placed in a segregated cell at the local detention facility. He was arraigned the same day and pled guilty to three charges, without the assistance of counsel or an interpreter, and via handwritten notes.

The final plaintiff listed on the complaint, hereinafter referred to as "B," was arrested in her home on a bench warrant. According to the Order on Pending Motions, the police used her daughter and notes to communicate the reason for her arrest. Plaintiff B tried to communicate her diabetic condition and need for meds, but the officer refused to accept her medications. While waiting at the police station, her blood sugar became dangerously low but she remained unable to communicate her status to the police. was not given food or an interpreter to further discuss her medical needs. The jail released Plaintiff B at 2:00am, without affording her access to a functioning TTD phone to arrange transportation, and she returned home via train at 5:30am. She narrowly escaped an attempted sexual assault on her way home.

On September 30, 2010, the District Court (Judge Walker Miller) granted in part and denied in part the defendants' motion for summary judgment. The District Court granted the motion for summary judgment on the constitutional claims, and on the claims against the individual defendants in their personal capacity, but denied in part the defendants' motion as to plaintiffs' claims based on the Rehabilitation Act and the American with Disabilities Act, and denied the motions for summary judgment as to the state negligence and wrongful death claims.

On September 7, 2012, the parties reached a private settlement. The defendants, City and County of Denver, agreed to pay the sum of $695,000 to the plaintiffs in order to settle any and all claims. The plaintiffs agreed to release the defendants from all claims arising out of the alleged incidents. On October 4th, 2012, the District Court (Judge Miller)dismissed the case with prejudice after having been informed of the parties' settlement agreement. This ended the case.

Summary Authors

Gregory Pitt (7/19/2012)

Nick Kabat (10/2/2014)

Related Cases

Scott v. City and County of Denver, District of Colorado (2012)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4195162/parties/ulibarri-v-denver-colorado-the-city-and-county-of/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Fox, Timothy Patrick (Colorado)

Greisen, Paula Dee (Colorado)

Attorney for Defendant

Bigler, Thomas G. (Colorado)

Eberhart, Lance Garrett (Colorado)

Fasing, Suzanne A. (Colorado)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:07-cv-01814

Docket

Oct. 4, 2012

Oct. 4, 2012

Docket
1

1:07-cv-01814

Complaint & Jury Demand

Aug. 28, 2007

Aug. 28, 2007

Complaint

2007 WL 3191954

48

1:07-cv-01814

Second Amended And Supplemental Complaint

Ulibarri et al v. City and County of Denver

Feb. 25, 2008

Feb. 25, 2008

Complaint

2008 WL 7183248

265

1:07-cv-01814

Order on Pending Motions

Ulibarri v. City & County of Denver

Sept. 30, 2010

Sept. 30, 2010

Order/Opinion

742 F.Supp.2d 1192

463-1

1:07-cv-01814

Full and Final Release Agreement

Sept. 18, 2012

Sept. 18, 2012

Settlement Agreement
467

1:07-cv-01814

Order Granting Stipulated Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice

Ulibarri v. City & County of Denver

Oct. 4, 2012

Oct. 4, 2012

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4195162/ulibarri-v-denver-colorado-the-city-and-county-of/

Last updated April 7, 2025, 10:38 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Aug. 28, 2007

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Receipt

View on PACER

RECAP
2 Aug. 30, 2007

Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge

RECAP
3 Aug. 30, 2007

Notice of Entry of Appearance

RECAP
4 Sept. 6, 2007

ORDER setting Scheduling/Planning Conference set for 11/5/2007 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 9/6/07. (dln, )

RECAP
5 Sept. 15, 2007

Notice of Entry of Appearance

RECAP
6 Oct. 10, 2007

Notice of Entry of Appearance

RECAP
7 Oct. 12, 2007

Notice (Other)

RECAP
8 Oct. 12, 2007

Motion to Reset

RECAP
9 Oct. 12, 2007

Memorandum

RECAP
10 Oct. 15, 2007

Notice of Entry of Appearance

RECAP
11 Oct. 16, 2007

Order on Motion to Reset

RECAP
12 Oct. 18, 2007

Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify

1 Proposed Document

View on PACER

RECAP
13 Oct. 22, 2007

Memorandum

RECAP
14 Oct. 22, 2007

Docket Annotation

RECAP
15 Oct. 24, 2007

Minute ORDER granting 12 First MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 1 COMPLAINT by Plaintiffs and the same is accepted for filing by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 10/24/07.(dln, )

RECAP
16 Oct. 24, 2007

Amended Complaint

RECAP
17 Oct. 26, 2007

Motion to Reset

RECAP
18 Oct. 29, 2007

Memorandum

RECAP
19 Oct. 30, 2007

Order on Motion to Reset

RECAP
20 Nov. 6, 2007

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
21 Nov. 6, 2007

Summons Returned Executed

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D

View on PACER

RECAP
22 Nov. 14, 2007

Answer to Amended Complaint

RECAP
23 Dec. 14, 2007

Proposed Scheduling Order

RECAP
24 Dec. 17, 2007

Answer to Amended Complaint

RECAP
25 Dec. 21, 2007

Scheduling Conference

RECAP
26 Dec. 21, 2007

Scheduling Order

RECAP
27 Dec. 27, 2007

Summons Returned Executed

RECAP
28 Dec. 27, 2007

Summons Returned Executed

RECAP
29 Dec. 27, 2007

Summons Returned Executed

RECAP
30 Dec. 27, 2007

Summons Returned Executed

RECAP
31 Dec. 27, 2007

Summons Returned Executed

RECAP
32 Jan. 25, 2008

Motion for Protective Order

1 Proposed Order (PDF Only)

View on PACER

RECAP
33 Jan. 28, 2008

Memorandum

RECAP
34 Jan. 28, 2008

Minute ORDER granting Plaintiff's 32 Unopposed Motion for Protective Order. The written Protective Order is APPROVED as amended in paragraph 8, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/28/2008.(sah, )

RECAP
35 Jan. 28, 2008

PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/28/2008. (sah, )

RECAP
36 Feb. 4, 2008

Motion to Continue

1 Proposed Order (PDF Only)

View on PACER

RECAP
37 Feb. 4, 2008

Amended Complaint

1 Proposed Document

View on PACER

RECAP
38 Feb. 5, 2008

Memorandum

RECAP
39 Feb. 5, 2008

Docket Annotation

RECAP
40 Feb. 5, 2008

Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify

1 Proposed Document

View on PACER

RECAP
41 Feb. 5, 2008

Memorandum

RECAP
42 Feb. 7, 2008

Order on Motion to Continue

RECAP
43 Feb. 7, 2008

Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

RECAP
44 Feb. 8, 2008

Minute Order

RECAP
45 Feb. 15, 2008

Response to Motion

RECAP
46 Feb. 20, 2008

Docket Annotation

RECAP
47 Feb. 25, 2008

ORDER granting 40 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint. The Second Amended and Supplemental Complaint is accepted for filing as of the date of this Order. That each party shall pay their own attorney fees and costs for this motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 02/25/2008.(sah2, )

RECAP
48 Feb. 25, 2008

Amended Complaint

RECAP
49 March 6, 2008

Summons Returned Executed

1 Return of Service

View on PACER

RECAP
50 March 6, 2008

Summons Returned Executed

1 Return of Service

View on PACER

RECAP
51 March 13, 2008

Answer to Amended Complaint

RECAP
52 March 19, 2008

Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify

1 Proposed Order (PDF Only)

View on PACER

RECAP
53 March 21, 2008

Memorandum

RECAP
54 March 24, 2008

MINUTE ORDER granting 52 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Scheduling Conference or in the Alternative to Amend Scheduling Order. Scheduling order deadlines are as follows: Discovery cut off is 1/02/2009, Dispositive motion deadline is 2/17/2009; The Final Pre-Trial Conference set for 12/15/2008 is VACATED and RESET for 3/9/2009; Proposed Final Pre-trial Order is due 3/3/2009 by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 03/24/2008.(sah, )

RECAP
55 March 24, 2008

Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

RECAP
56 April 23, 2008

Notice of Entry of Appearance

RECAP
57 June 10, 2008

Motion to Compel

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

4 Exhibit D

View on RECAP

5 Exhibit E

View on PACER

6 Exhibit F

View on PACER

7 Exhibit H

View on PACER

8 Exhibit I

View on PACER

9 Exhibit J

View on PACER

10 Exhibit L

View on PACER

RECAP
58 June 10, 2008

Sealed Document

RECAP
59 June 10, 2008

Sealed Document

RECAP
60 June 10, 2008

Motion to Seal

1 Proposed Order (PDF Only)

View on PACER

RECAP
62 June 10, 2008

Exhibits

RECAP
61 June 11, 2008

Memorandum

RECAP
63 June 11, 2008

Order on Motion to Restrict

RECAP
64 June 30, 2008

Response to Motion

1 Exhibit Exhibit 1

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Exhibit II

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Exhibit III

View on PACER

4 Exhibit Exhibit IV

View on PACER

5 Exhibit Exhibit V

View on PACER

6 Exhibit Exhibit VI

View on PACER

7 Exhibit Exhibit VII

View on PACER

RECAP
65 July 14, 2008

Motion to Continue

RECAP
66 July 15, 2008

Memorandum

RECAP
67 July 15, 2008

Order on Motion to Continue

RECAP
68 July 15, 2008

Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

RECAP
69 July 18, 2008

Reply to Response to Motion

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C

View on PACER

RECAP
70 July 21, 2008

Motion to Continue

1 Proposed Order (PDF Only)

View on PACER

RECAP
71 July 21, 2008

Memorandum

RECAP
72 July 22, 2008

Order on Motion to Continue

RECAP
73 July 22, 2008

Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

RECAP
74 Aug. 6, 2008

Minute Order

RECAP
75 Aug. 11, 2008

Notice (Other)

RECAP
76 Aug. 18, 2008

ORDER denying 57 Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. Each party shall pay their own attorney fees and costs. That the documents submitted, in camera, identified as Bates Nos. 000246, 000250, 000261, 000271, 000273, 000282, 000283, 00 0293, 000294, 000312, 000314, 000319, 000320, 000321, 000322, 000327, 000333, and 000334 shall be sealed and shall not be opened except by further Order of Court. If defendants have not already provided their interrogatory responses signed under oath by the Defendants to whom they were directed, they shall do so within ten days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 08/18/2008.(sah, )

RECAP
77 Aug. 18, 2008

Sealed Document

RECAP
78 Aug. 18, 2008

Sealed Document

RECAP
79 Aug. 18, 2008

Docket Annotation

RECAP
80 Sept. 2, 2008

Objection/Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court

RECAP
81 Sept. 8, 2008

Notice of Change of Address/Contact Information

RECAP
82 Sept. 10, 2008

Motion to Continue

1 Proposed Order (PDF Only)

View on PACER

RECAP
83 Sept. 11, 2008

Memorandum

RECAP
85 Sept. 11, 2008

Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings

RECAP
84 Sept. 12, 2008

Order on Motion to Continue

RECAP
86 Sept. 22, 2008

Reply to Response to Objection/Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision

1 Exhibit Exhibit 1

View on PACER

RECAP
87 Oct. 7, 2008

Reply to Response to Motion

RECAP
88 Oct. 7, 2008

Motion for Hearing/Conference

RECAP
89 Oct. 9, 2008

Supplement/Amendment

RECAP
90 Oct. 16, 2008

Motion to Compel

1 Proposed Order (PDF Only)

View on PACER

RECAP
91 Oct. 16, 2008

Motion for Hearing/Conference

1 Proposed Order (PDF Only)

View on PACER

RECAP
92 Oct. 16, 2008

Declaration

1 Exhibits 1-5

View on PACER

2 Exhibits 6-11

View on PACER

3 Exhibits 12-19

View on PACER

RECAP
93 Oct. 17, 2008

Memorandum

RECAP
94 Oct. 20, 2008

Minute Order

RECAP
95 Oct. 21, 2008

Supplement/Amendment

RECAP
96 Oct. 22, 2008

Motion for Hearing/Conference

1 Proposed Order (PDF Only) Proposed Order For Forthwith Telephone Hearing on Expe

View on PACER

RECAP
97 Oct. 22, 2008

Memorandum

RECAP
98 Oct. 23, 2008

Order on Motion for Hearing/Conference

RECAP
99 Oct. 24, 2008

Objection/Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision to District Court

RECAP
100 Oct. 27, 2008

Response to Motion

1 Exhibit 1

View on PACER

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Colorado

Case Type(s):

Disability Rights

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 28, 2007

Closing Date: 2012

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Three deaf individuals.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Civil Rights Education and Enforcement Center

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City

City and County of Denver

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Jurisdiction-wide

Law-enforcement

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

State law

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Other Dockets:

District of Colorado 1:07-cv-01814

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Attorneys fees

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Amount Defendant Pays: $695,000

Issues

General/Misc.:

Classification / placement

Communication skills

Courts

Failure to train

Food service / nutrition / hydration

Language access/needs

Pattern or Practice

Phone

Disability and Disability Rights:

Hearing impairment

Reasonable Accommodations

TTY/Close Captioning/Videophone/etc.

Discrimination Area:

Accommodation / Leave

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Solitary confinement/Supermax (conditions or process)

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Suicide prevention

Policing:

Suicide prevention (policing)

Recommended Citation