Case: Sharr v. NCS Pearson, Inc.

3:02-cv-01513 | U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon

Filed Date: Nov. 7, 2002

Closed Date: Aug. 29, 2006

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The plaintiffs in this case were former employees of Huntleigh USA Corporation who worked as screeners at Portland International Airport and were not retained as employees when airport screeners became federal employees. They filed suit individually and as a putative class on November 2, 2002, against NCS Pearson, Inc. and the Department of Transportation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. Nothing in the record indicates that the suit was ever certified as a class action, bu…

The plaintiffs in this case were former employees of Huntleigh USA Corporation who worked as screeners at Portland International Airport and were not retained as employees when airport screeners became federal employees. They filed suit individually and as a putative class on November 2, 2002, against NCS Pearson, Inc. and the Department of Transportation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon. Nothing in the record indicates that the suit was ever certified as a class action, but class action status was not ever denied. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought monetary relief, claiming violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The case was assigned to Judge Robert E. Jones.

According to the complaint, plaintiffs entered into an agreement with the Transportation Security Administration [TSA] that they would receive hiring preference, and did not look for new jobs as a result. TSA hired the defendant, NCS Pearson, to administer the employment screening test. Plaintiffs alleged that the screening test was a pretextual basis for discrimination on the basis of race, gender, age, and other protected classes, and furthermore, that the test was not fairly administered. Plaintiffs further alleged that the defendant’s employees harassed them throughout the process, and that they were not hired as a result of the screening. The former Huntleigh employees who were rehired alleged that they were paid less than other similarly situated employees. Plaintiffs also filed a breach of contract claim, alleging that they were third-party beneficiaries of the contract between the defendant and TSA, and that the defendant breached the contract with TSA.

On the same day as filing the complaint, plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction, which requested immediate retesting of all class members under court supervision and the immediate hiring of all who passed the test. On March 3, 2003, Judge Jones denied plaintiffs' request for preliminary injunction on the grounds that the available evidence did not demonstrate unlawful discrimination sufficient to justify pre-litigation relief. Plaintiffs additionally failed to satisfy various administrative requirements that were necessary for bringing their claims.

Between March and December of 2003, plaintiffs amended their complaint. Defendants also successfully sought the dismissal of several plaintiffs through hearings.

On December 15, 2003, the defendant moved for summary judgment. On March 30, 2004, Judge Jones granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment in part and denied it in part. This judgment dismissed all of the plaintiffs’ claims against the government. Plaintiffs’ breach of contract claim was dismissed on February 14, 2005.

Various plaintiffs were dismissed from the complaint throughout the following months, it is unclear why, but it was presumably due to a lack of evidence to suggest the defendant interfered with future employment opportunities. After a lengthy discovery process, a jury trial began on April 10, 2006 and lasted until April 19, 2006. The jury found that the defendant intentionally interfered with twenty-two of the twenty-three remaining plaintiffs' prospective economic relationship with TSA, and awarded monetary relief based on economic and non-economic damages to those individual plaintiffs. In total, the plaintiffs won over $500,000 -- about $25,000 per plaintiff. All requests for attorneys’ fees were denied. The case is now closed.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Heise (9/25/2018)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5128080/parties/sharr-v-ncs-pearson-inc/


Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

3:02-cv-01513

Docket [PACER]

Sharr v. NSC Pearson, inc.

June 19, 2006

June 19, 2006

Docket
103

3:02-cv-01513

Opinion and Order

March 3, 2003

March 3, 2003

Order/Opinion
229

3:02-cv-01513

Opinion and Order

Feb. 14, 2005

Feb. 14, 2005

Order/Opinion
230

3:02-cv-01513

Sixth Amended Complaint

Feb. 24, 2005

Feb. 24, 2005

Complaint
417

3:02-cv-01513

Opinion and Order

Feb. 24, 2006

Feb. 24, 2006

Order/Opinion
536

3:02-cv-01513

Opinion and Order

March 28, 2006

March 28, 2006

Order/Opinion
560

3:02-cv-01513

Verdict

April 19, 2006

April 19, 2006

Other
562

3:02-cv-01513

Judgment

May 30, 2006

May 30, 2006

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5128080/sharr-v-ncs-pearson-inc/

Last updated March 28, 2026, 5:19 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Nov. 7, 2002

Complaint (filed as Class Action Complaint For Discrimination In Hiring, Denial of Veterans Preference, And Failure To Provide A Fair Process For Hiring Federal Employees) Filing Fee collected. Receipt #: 447135 issued. Filed by Mary Coco, Dana Curry, Robert Hein, Katherine Powell, Sheena Reis, Karen Sharr against Department of Transportation, NCS Pearson, Inc.. (tomg, ) (Entered: 11/07/2002)

RECAP
2 Nov. 7, 2002

Discovery and Pretrial Scheduling Order and Notice of Case Assignment: Case assigned to the Honorable John Jelderks. Discovery to be completed by 3/10/2003. Joint Alternate Dispute Resolution Report due by 4/7/2003. Pretrial Order due by 4/7/2003. (tomg, ) (Entered: 11/07/2002)

RECAP
3 Nov. 7, 2002

Motion for Order to Show Cause. Filed by all plaintiffs. (tomg, ) (Entered: 11/07/2002)

RECAP
4 Nov. 7, 2002

Memorandum in Support Of Motion For Preliminary Injunction. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 3 ) (tomg, ) (Entered: 11/07/2002)

RECAP
6 Nov. 18, 2002

Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File a Response/Reply to Motion # 3 . for a Preliminary Injunction (Show Cause). Filed by Department of Transportation. (gm, ) (Entered: 11/20/2002)

RECAP
7 Nov. 18, 2002

Declaration of John G. Knepper in support. Filed by Department of Transportation. (Related document(s) 6 ) (gm, ) (Entered: 11/20/2002)

RECAP
5 Nov. 19, 2002

Notice of Case Reassignment: Case reassigned from Judge John Jelderks to Judge Robert E. Jones. (gm) (Entered: 11/20/2002)

RECAP
8 Nov. 19, 2002

Declaration of John G. Knepper in support (original signature). Filed by Department of Transportation. (Related document(s) 6 ) (gm, ) (Entered: 11/20/2002)

RECAP
9 Nov. 21, 2002

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: (Related Doc # 3 ) A Hearings Shall take place upon the 11th day of December at 9:00 o'clock am in Courtoom #16 of the United States Couthouse in Portland, Oregon to determine whether the preliminary injunction should issue. Signed on 11/20/02 by Judge Robert E. Jones. (mja, ) (Entered: 11/22/2002)

RECAP
13 Nov. 21, 2002

CIVIL MINUTES:Record of Order -- Defendant's unopposed motion [#6] for extension of time is granted as follows: Defendant is to respond to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction by 11/26/2002. (Related documents(s) 3 ) Ordered by Judge Robert E. Jones. (mja, ) (Entered: 12/02/2002)

RECAP
14 Nov. 25, 2002

Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injuction REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 3 ) (mja, ) (Entered: 12/02/2002)

RECAP
10 Nov. 26, 2002

Return of Service (Federal Defendant) Executed upon John Ashcroft, U.S. Attorney general on 11/8/02. Filed by all plaintiffs. (tomg, ) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

RECAP
11 Nov. 26, 2002

Memorandum In Opposition To Plaintiffs' Motion For A Preliminary Injunction. Filed by Department of Transportation. (Related document(s) 3 ) (tomg, ) (Entered: 11/29/2002)

RECAP
12 Nov. 26, 2002

Declaration of In Support Of Defendant's Response To Plaintiffs' Motion For Preliminary Injunction. Filed by Department of Transportation. (Related document(s) 11 ) (tomg, ) (Entered: 11/29/2002)

RECAP
15 Nov. 27, 2002

CIVIL MINUTES:Record of Order Regarding Preliminary Injunction Hearing: At the hearing set for December 11, 2002, at 9:00 a.m., the court will hear plaintiff's prima facie case. The court will Schedule a hearing on the defense case at a later date. Ordered by Judge Robert E. Jones. (mja, ) (Entered: 12/03/2002)

RECAP
16 Dec. 2, 2002

Motion for Extension of Time and Request for Expedited Consideration. Filed by Mary Coco, Dana Curry, Robert Hein, Katherine Powell, Sheena Reis, Karen Sharr. (mja, ) (Entered: 12/03/2002)

RECAP
17 Dec. 3, 2002

Declaration of of Elizabeth B. Kolmstetter Ph.D. with her Original Signature.. Filed by Department of Transportation. (Related document(s) 12 ) (mja, ) (Entered: 12/05/2002)

RECAP
18 Dec. 3, 2002

Motion to Dismiss for Fulure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted Pursuant to FED.R.CIV. 12(b)(6) REQUSET FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (mja, ) (Entered: 12/05/2002)

RECAP
19 Dec. 3, 2002

Memorandum of Law In Support of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 18 ) (mja, ) (Entered: 12/05/2002)

RECAP
20 Dec. 6, 2002

CIVIL MINUTES:Record of Order -- Plaintiff's Motion [#16] for an extension of time and for a reset of hearing is GRANTED as follows: Plaintiff's Reply is due by 12/23/2002. Hearing on Plaintiff's Prima Facie case set for 12/11/02, is stricken and reset to 1/10/2003 at 01:30PM Ordered by Judge Robert E. Jones. (mja, ) (Entered: 12/09/2002)

RECAP
21 Dec. 12, 2002

Motion for Extension of Time to file response to defendant's Rule l2(b) motion to dismiss until January 31,2003. Expediated Consideration Requested. Filed by all plaintiffs. (md, ) (Entered: 12/13/2002)

RECAP
22 Dec. 12, 2002

Affidavit of Lori K. DeBobbleaere in support of motion for extension of time. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 21, 3 ) (md, ) (Entered: 12/13/2002)

RECAP
23 Dec. 12, 2002

Memorandum in Support in support of motion for extension of time to file response to defendant's Rule l2(b) motion. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 21 ) (md, ) (Entered: 12/13/2002)

RECAP
24 Dec. 12, 2002

Certificate of Service of motion for extension of time, memo in support and affidavit. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 21 ) (md, ) (Entered: 12/13/2002)

RECAP
25 Dec. 16, 2002

Memorandum of Law in Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Extension of Time and Request for Expedited Consideration. Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 21 ) (mja, ) (Entered: 12/17/2002)

RECAP
26 Dec. 16, 2002

Affidavit of Courtney Dippel in Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time and Expedited Consideration. Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 25 ) (mja, ) (Entered: 12/17/2002)

RECAP
27 Dec. 16, 2002

CIVIL MINUTES: Plaintiffs' motion [#21] for extension of time to file their response to defendant NCS Pearson's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to 1/31/03. Hearing on Plaintiffs' prima facie case set for 1/10/03, is RESET to 1/9/03 at 9:00 am. (Related documents(s) 21 ) Ordered by Judge Robert E. Jones. (mja, ) (Entered: 12/18/2002)

RECAP
28 Dec. 23, 2002

Reply to Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injuction. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 4 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
29 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Gloria R. Aguirre. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
30 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Hector H. Aguirre. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
31 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Amie L. Baledge. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
32 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of George Beck. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
33 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Emma Bradford. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
34 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Don Buell. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
35 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Bong Hui Burke. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
36 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Mary Coco. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
37 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Dana Curry. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
38 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Dominic Damiani. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
39 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Gail Dixon. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
40 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Sherrell Dizer. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
41 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Russell Dooley. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
42 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Karen Sue Dutter. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
43 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Usar Einart. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
44 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Sandra Espinoza. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
45 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Leroy Fich. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
46 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Amanda Fleming. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
47 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Michaela Fogerty. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
48 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Leah Garcia. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
49 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Conchita Haddenham. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
50 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Robert Hein. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
51 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Cheri Helgeson. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
52 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Josephine Hill. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
53 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Leonard Hughes. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
54 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Troy Jones. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
55 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Sharon Joslin. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
56 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Krystyna Korfanty. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
57 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Peter LaCosta. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
58 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Faith Malcolm. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
59 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Robert Marssdorf. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
60 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Janette Moldenhauer. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
61 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Linda Ocampa. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
62 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Kathyn Powell. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
63 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Terry Ann Pullen. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
64 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Belem Shankle. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
65 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Beth Randall. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
66 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Karen Sharr. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
67 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Dennis Sparks. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
68 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Bruce Strange. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
69 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Dianna Thorkildson. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
70 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Amber Vogel. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
71 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Yunie Yun. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
72 Dec. 23, 2002

Affidavit of Natalia Zhikhareva. Filed by all plaintiffs. (Related document(s) 28 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 12/23/2002)

RECAP
73 Jan. 2, 2003

Supplemental Complaint. Filed by Mary Coco, Dana Curry, Robert Hein, Katherine Powell, Sheena Reis, Karen Sharr against all defendants. (mja, ) (Entered: 01/02/2003)

RECAP
74 Jan. 2, 2003

Supplemental Affidavit of Karen Sharr. Filed by Mary Coco, Dana Curry, Robert Hein, Katherine Powell, Sheena Reis, Karen Sharr. (mja, ) (Entered: 01/02/2003)

RECAP
75 Jan. 6, 2003

Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Complaint and for Expedited Consideration. Filed by all plaintiffs. (mja, ) (Entered: 01/07/2003)

RECAP
76 Jan. 6, 2003

Second Supplemental Affidavit of of Karen Sharr. Filed by all plaintiffs. (mja, ) (Entered: 01/07/2003)

RECAP
77 Jan. 7, 2003

Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(1) & (6). Filed by all defendants. (mja, ) (Entered: 01/08/2003)

RECAP
78 Jan. 7, 2003

Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss. Filed by all defendants. (Related document(s) 77 ) (mja, ) (Entered: 01/08/2003)

RECAP
79 Jan. 9, 2003

Certificate of Compliance. Filed by all plaintiffs. (mja, ) (Entered: 01/09/2003)

RECAP
80 Jan. 9, 2003

CIVIL MINUTES:Record of Hearing on Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction [#3]:Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file supplemental complaint [#75] is granted. Plaintiffs presented evidence, including witness testimony, on their prima facie case in support of a preliminary injunction. After considering the parties'arguments and the evidence, plaintiffs' motion (#3) is denied on the ground that plaintiffs are unlikely to prevail on the merits. Plaintiffs' supplemental state law claim is under advisement pending further briefing. Plaintiffs shall have two weeks, to 1/23/03, to file their brief; defendants shall have two additional weeks, to 2/6/03, to respond. Ordered by Judge Robert E. Jones. Counsel Present for Plaintiff: Don S> Willner and Lori DeDobbelaere. Counsel Present for Defendant: John C. Knepper, Marsha Edney, Louis A. Santiago and Courtney Dippel. Court Reporter: Dennis Apodaca. (mja, ) (Entered: 01/12/2003)

RECAP
81 Jan. 23, 2003

Memorandum re: Oregon Civil Rights Statute. Filed by all plaintiffs. (mja, ) (Entered: 01/23/2003)

RECAP
82 Jan. 23, 2003

First Amended Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim upon Which Relief Can Be granted Pursuant to FED.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) & (6) Based on Plaintiffs' Supplemental State Law Claims REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (mja, ) Modified on 1/27/2003 (mja, ). (Entered: 01/27/2003)

RECAP
83 Jan. 23, 2003

Amended Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim upon Which Relief Can Be granted Pursuant to FED.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) & (6) Based on Plaintiffs' Supplemental State Law Claims. Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 82 ) (mja, ) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

RECAP
84 Jan. 28, 2003

Motion for Leave to File Amended and Supplemental Complaint (Filed as: Motions Concerning Pleadings and Request for Expedited Consideration). Filed by all plaintiffs. (mja, ) (Entered: 01/28/2003)

RECAP
85 Jan. 30, 2003

CIVIL MINUTES:Record of Order -- Plaintiffs' motions concerning pleadings (# 84) is granted as follows: Plaintiffs' state law allegations inconnection with their motion for preliminary injunction (# 3) will be taken under advisement on 2/6/03.Plaintiffs are granted leave to file an amended complaint within 20 days of the court's ruling on the remainingpreliminary injunction issues. Defendants shall have 20 days after plaintiffs file the amended complaint inwhich to renew or amend the pending motions to dismiss or to file additional motions. Plaintiffs shall have20 days to respond to motions; replies, if any, shall be filed within 14 days. Defendants' motions andamended motions to dismiss (# 18, 77, 82) will be held in abeyance. A hearing date will be set whenbriefing is complete. (Related documents(s) 18, 77, 82, 84, 3 ) Ordered by Judge Robert E. Jones. (mja, ) (Entered: 01/31/2003)

RECAP
86 Feb. 6, 2003

Memorandum in Response to Plaintiff's Memorandum re: Oregon Civil Rights Statute. Filed by Department of Transportation. (Related document(s) 81 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

RECAP
87 Feb. 6, 2003

Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Based on State Law) (Request for Oral Argument). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 3 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

RECAP
88 Feb. 6, 2003

Declaration of of Thomas D. Joyce in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 87 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

RECAP
89 Feb. 6, 2003

Declaration of Stephen R. Greenfield in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 87 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

RECAP
90 Feb. 6, 2003

Declaration of Susan V. Nelson in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 87 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

RECAP
91 Feb. 6, 2003

Declaration of Kym LaGattuta in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 87 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

RECAP
92 Feb. 6, 2003

Declaration of Stephen Maier in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 87 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

RECAP
93 Feb. 6, 2003

Declaration of Jean McMahon in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 87 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

RECAP
94 Feb. 6, 2003

Declaration of Patience Coker in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction (Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 87 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

RECAP
95 Feb. 21, 2003

Notice of Original Signature Page of Declaration of Susan V. Nelson in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction(Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 90 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/24/2003)

RECAP
96 Feb. 21, 2003

Notice of Original Signature Page of Declaration of Kym La Gattuta in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction(Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 91 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/24/2003)

RECAP
97 Feb. 21, 2003

Notice of Original Signature Page of Declaration of Patience Coker in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction(Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 94 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/24/2003)

RECAP
98 Feb. 21, 2003

Notice of Original Signature Page of Declaration of Thomas D. Joyce in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction(Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 88 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/24/2003)

RECAP
99 Feb. 21, 2003

Notice of Original Signature Page of Declaration of Jean McMahon in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction(Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 93 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/24/2003)

RECAP
100 Feb. 21, 2003

Notice of Original Signature Page of Declaration of Stephen Greenfield in support of Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for aPreliminary Injunction(Based on State Law). Filed by NCS Pearson, Inc.. (Related document(s) 89 ) (dls, ) (Entered: 02/24/2003)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Oregon

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 7, 2002

Closing Date: Aug. 29, 2006

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Former and current employees of Portland International Airport.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

NCS Pearson, Inc.

Defendant Type(s):

Transportation

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

District of Oregon 3:02-cv-01513

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Non-settlement Outcome

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief denied

Amount Defendant Pays: 555,875.73

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Disability and Disability Rights:

Disability, unspecified

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Impact

Disparate Treatment

Hiring

Pay / Benefits

Promotion

Discrimination Basis:

Age discrimination

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Race discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Asian/Pacific Islander

Black

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Male

Recommended Citation