Case: ARC v. O'Meara

3:01-cv-01871 | U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut

Filed Date: Oct. 2, 2001

Closed Date: 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On October 2, 2001, Arc/Connectibut (a non-profit advocacy organization) and ten individual plaintiffs filed a lawsuit under the Medicaid statute, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the U. S. Constitution, against various state officials in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that their rights had been violated. Specifically, Plaintiffs claimed that t…

On October 2, 2001, Arc/Connectibut (a non-profit advocacy organization) and ten individual plaintiffs filed a lawsuit under the Medicaid statute, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and the U. S. Constitution, against various state officials in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that their rights had been violated. Specifically, Plaintiffs claimed that the state failed to provide adequate services under the waiver, failed to provide them with a choice between institutional and home and community-based services, failing to provide services in a reasonably prompt manner, and failing to provide services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs.

On August 20, 2002, the Court (Judge Janet B. Aterton) granted Plaintiffs' motion to amend their complaint and that fifteen additional disabled individuals would be allowed to intervene in the action. ARC/Connecticut v. O'Meara, 2002 WL 31106383 (D. Conn. Aug. 20, 2002).

The parties reached a settlement agreement, and on March 31, 2005, the Court issued an order of dismissal notifying the parties that the case was being administratively closed pending the completion of notice to class members following the Connecticut General Assembly's approval of the parties' settlement agreement.

The Court (Magistrate Judge Joan G. Margolis) preliminarily approved the settlement on April 1, 2005. The Court also entered various orders relating to class notice and the process by which the Court will make a final determination as to whether the settlement agreement will obtain final approval.

The Court approved the settlement agreement during a fairness hearing on May 20, 2005 and dismissed the case on May 31, 2005. The Court retained jurisdiction for enforcement purposes. The case was closed, and there has been no additional substantive litigation.

Summary Authors

Haley Waller (2/12/2011)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4200164/parties/arc-v-omeara/


Judge(s)

Arterton, Janet Bond (Connecticut)

Margolis, Joan Glazer (Connecticut)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Shaw, David C. (Connecticut)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

3:01-cv-01871

Docket

July 2, 2009

July 2, 2009

Docket
59

3:01-cv-01871

Ruling on Pending Motions [Docs.21 & 43]

ARC of Connecticut v. O'Meara

Aug. 20, 2002

Aug. 20, 2002

Order/Opinion

2002 WL 31106383

245

3:01-cv-01871

MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FOR AN ORDER REQUIRING NOTICE TO THE CLASS AND SCHEDULING OF A FAIRNESS HEARING

ARC of Connecticut v. O'Meara

March 31, 2005

March 31, 2005

Pleading / Motion / Brief
246-2

3:01-cv-01871

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

March 31, 2005

March 31, 2005

Order/Opinion
248

3:01-cv-01871

ORDER (Approving settlement)

ARC of Connecticut v. O'Meara

April 1, 2005

April 1, 2005

Order/Opinion
251-1

3:01-cv-01871

MEMORANDUM OF LAW RELATING TO THE STANDARDS FOR APPROVING THE SETTLEMENT OF A CLASS ACTION

ARC of Connecticut v. O'Meara

May 20, 2005

May 20, 2005

Pleading / Motion / Brief
255

3:01-cv-01871

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

ARC of Connecticut v. O'Meara

May 31, 2005

May 31, 2005

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4200164/arc-v-omeara/

Last updated April 7, 2025, 11:11 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Oct. 2, 2001

COMPLAINT Filing Fee $ 150.00 Receipt # H4467 (D'Onofrio, B.)

RECAP
2 Oct. 2, 2001

ORDER on Pretrial Deadlines handed to counsel Discovery cutoff 4/3/02 ; Dispositive Motions due 5/3/02 Amended Pleadings due 12/2/01 Motions to Dismiss due 1/2/02 (D'Onofrio, B.)

RECAP
Oct. 2, 2001

SUMMONS(ES) issued for Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson−Coker (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 10/03/2001)

PACER
3 Oct. 9, 2001

SUMMONS Returned Executed on 10/2/01 as to Peter H. O'Meara (Warner, R.)

RECAP
4 Oct. 17, 2001

APPEARANCE of Attorney for Peter H. O'Meara -- Thomas M. Fiorentino (Warren, C.)

RECAP
5 Oct. 19, 2001

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 11/21/01 to respond to complaint (Warner, R.)

RECAP
6 Oct. 19, 2001

APPEARANCE of Attorney for Patricia A. Wilson-Coker -- Hugh Barber (Warner, R.)

RECAP
Oct. 23, 2001

ENDORSEMENT [5−1] motion to Extend Time until 11/21/01 to respond to complaint ordered accordingly ( signed by Clerk ) (Warner, R.) (Entered: 10/23/2001)

PACER
7 Nov. 16, 2001

REPORT of Parties Planning Meeting (Torday, B.)

RECAP
8 Nov. 20, 2001

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara to Extend Time until 12/19/01 to respond to complaint (Warner, R.)

RECAP
9 Nov. 26, 2001

MOTION by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 12/19/01 to respond to complaint (Malone, P.) Modified on 12/04/2001

RECAP
Nov. 30, 2001

ENDORSEMENT granting [9−1] motion to Extend Time 12/19/01 to respond to complaint ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.) Modified on 12/12/2001 (Entered: 11/30/2001)

PACER
13 Dec. 12, 2001

Status Conference held ( JBA) (Torday, B.)

RECAP
10 Dec. 14, 2001

SCHEDULING ORDER setting Discovery cutoff 1/1/03 ; Dispositive Motions due 2/1/03 ; Status Report by 11/26/02 . Trial Ready Date Set for 8/1/03 SEE ORDER FOR OTHER DATES ( Signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Depino, F.)

RECAP
11 Dec. 19, 2001

ANSWER and Defenses to Complaint by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker (Depino, F.)

RECAP
12 Dec. 19, 2001

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara to Extend Time until 12/31/01 to respond to complaint (Warner, R.)

RECAP
Dec. 21, 2001

ENDORSEMENT granting [12−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/2/02 to respond to complaint ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.) Modified on 01/23/2002 (Entered: 12/21/2001)

PACER
14 Jan. 2, 2002

ANSWER to Complaint by Peter H. O'Meara (Villano, P.)

RECAP
15 Jan. 4, 2002

MOTION by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, all plaintiffs to Extend Time until 1/28/02 to respond to discovery (Warner, R.)

RECAP
Jan. 8, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [15−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/28/02 to respond to discovery ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Depino, F.) (Entered: 01/08/2002)

PACER
16 Jan. 25, 2002

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker for Protective Order Regarding documents to identify individual clients or disclose confidential information (Brief Due 2/15/02 ) (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
17 Jan. 25, 2002

MOTION by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Quash subpoenas (Brief Due 2/15/02 ) (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
18 Jan. 25, 2002

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in support of [17-1] motion to Quash subpoenas, [16-1] motion for Protective Order Regarding documents to identify individual clients or disclose confidential information (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
19 Feb. 1, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Amend [10-1] Scheduling order (Depino, F.)

RECAP
20 Feb. 11, 2002

ORDER granting [19-1] motion to Amend [10-1] Scheduling order, set Discovery deadline to 3/1/03, set Dispositive Motions due by 4/1/03, set Status Report deadline to 1/26/03 ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.) Modified on 02/12/2002

RECAP
21 Feb. 15, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Amend [1-1] complaint (Brief Due 3/8/02 ) (Ruocco, M.)

RECAP
22 Feb. 15, 2002

MEMORANDUM by all plaintiffs in support of [21-1] motion to Amend [1-1] complaint (Ruocco, M.)

RECAP
23 Feb. 15, 2002

MOTION by Linda O'Neill to Intervene (Brief Due 3/8/02) (Ruocco, M.)

RECAP
24 Feb. 15, 2002

MEMORANDUM by Linda O'Neill in support of [23-1] motion to Intervene (Ruocco, M.)

RECAP
25 Feb. 15, 2002

MEMORANDUM by all plaintiffs in opposition to [17-1] motion to Quash subpoenas by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, [16-1] motion for Protective Order Regarding documents to identify individual clients or disclose confidential information by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, Peter H. O'Meara (Ruocco, M.)

RECAP
26 Feb. 22, 2002

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 3/1/02 to respond to memo in opposition to motion to quash & protective order (Malone, P.)

RECAP
27 Feb. 25, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs for Orders concerning discovery (Brief Due 3/18/02 ) (Depino, F.)

RECAP
28 Feb. 25, 2002

MEMORANDUM by all plaintiffs in support of [27-1] motion for Orders concerning discovery (Depino, F.)

RECAP
Feb. 28, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [26−1] motion to Extend Time until 3/1/02 to respond to motion to quash &motion for protective order, Brief Deadline set for 3/1/02 [17−1] motion to Quash subpoenas, set for 3/1/02 [16−1] motion for Protective Order Regarding documents to identify individual clients or disclose confidential information ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Ruocco, M.) (Entered: 02/28/2002)

PACER
29 March 1, 2002

REPLY by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to response to [17-1] motion to Quash subpoenas by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, [16-1] motion for Protective Order Regarding documents to identify individual clients or disclose confidential information by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, Peter H. O'Meara (Ruocco, M.)

RECAP
30 March 8, 2002

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in opposition to [21-1] motion to Amend [1-1] complaint by all plaintiffs (Ruocco, M.)

RECAP
31 March 12, 2002

APPEARANCE of Attorney for Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker -- Thomas B. York (Falcone, K.)

RECAP
32 March 13, 2002

ORDER of referral to Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis for discovery purposes (signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Depino, F.)

RECAP
33 March 21, 2002

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time to file response to plaintiffs motion for orders concerning discovery 4/2/02 (Depino, F.)

RECAP
34 March 22, 2002

REPLY by all plaintiffs to response to [21-1] motion to Amend [1-1] complaint by all plaintiffs (Ruocco, M.)

RECAP
35 March 25, 2002

OBJECTIONS by all plaintiffs to [33-1] motion to Extend Time to file response to plaintiffs motion for orders concerning discovery 4/2/02 by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, Peter H. O'Meara (Ruocco, M.)

RECAP
March 25, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [33−1] motion to Extend Time to file response to plaintiffs motion for orders concerning discovery 4/2/02, Brief Deadline set for 4/2/02 [27−1] motion for Orders concerning discovery ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Brown, S.) (Entered: 03/25/2002)

PACER
36 April 2, 2002

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in opposition to [27-1] motion for Orders concerning discovery by all plaintiffs (Ruocco, M.)

RECAP
37 April 5, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time of scheduling order; discovery until 5/23/02, motion for class certification until 5/13/02, opposition until 7/5/02, plaintiffs' reply until 7/18/02 (Warner, R.)

RECAP
38 April 5, 2002

ORDER re courtesy copies: copies of all filings should be forwarded to chambers ( Signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Depino, F.)

RECAP
39 April 16, 2002

REPLY by all plaintiffs to response to [27-1] motion for Orders concerning discovery by all plaintiffs (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
40 April 17, 2002

ORDER granting [37-1] motion to Extend Time of scheduling order; discovery until 5/23/02, motion for class certification until 5/13/02, opposition until 7/5/02, plaintiffs' reply until 7/18/02, reset Discovery deadline to 5/23/02 ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
41 April 17, 2002

Discovery Conference held ( JGM) (Falcone, K.) Modified on 04/23/2002

RECAP
42 April 18, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time for an additional 45 days to amend scheduling order (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
April 23, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [42−1] motion to amend scheduling order, set Discovery deadline to 5/23/02 ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.) Modified on 04/24/2002 (Entered: 04/23/2002)

PACER
43 June 3, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs to file an Intervening complaint (Brief Due 6/24/02) (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
44 June 3, 2002

MEMORANDUM by all plaintiffs in support of [43-1] motion to file an Intervening complaint (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
June 7, 2002

ENDORSEMENT denying [17−1] motion to Quash subpoenas ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Depino, F.) (Entered: 06/10/2002)

PACER
June 7, 2002

ENDORSEMENT denying [16−1] motion for Protective Order Regarding documents to identify individual clients or disclose confidential information ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Depino, F.) (Entered: 06/10/2002)

PACER
45 June 12, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Amend [40-1] scheduling order reset Discovery deadline to 5/23/02 (Brief Due 7/3/02 ) (Villano, P.)

RECAP
June 19, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [45−1] motion to Amend [40−1] scheduling order reset Discovery deadline to 5/23/02 ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.) (Entered: 06/20/2002)

PACER
46 June 20, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs to file corrected copy of proposed Intervening complaint (Brief Due 7/11/02 ) (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
47 June 27, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs for Class certification (Brief Due 7/18/02 ) (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
48 June 27, 2002

MEMORANDUM by all plaintiffs in support of [47-1] motion for Class certification (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
49 June 27, 2002

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in opposition to [43-1] motion to file an Intervening complaint by all plaintiffs (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
50 July 3, 2002

Intervenor's COMPLAINT by all plaintiffs against Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker (Villano, P.)

RECAP
July 3, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [46−1] motion to file corrected copy of proposed Intervening complaint ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Villano, P.) (Entered: 07/03/2002)

PACER
51 July 12, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs for permission to file reply brief in excess of ten pages (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
52 July 12, 2002

REPLY by all plaintiffs to response to [43-1] motion to file an Intervening complaint by all plaintiffs (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
54 July 19, 2002

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 8/5/02 to respond to motion for class certification (Warner, R.)

RECAP
July 23, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [54−1] motion to Extend Time to respond to motion for class certification, Brief Deadline set for 8/5/02 [47−1] motion for Class certification ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Brown, S.) (Entered: 07/23/2002)

PACER
July 23, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [54−1] motion to Extend Time to 8/5/02 to respond to motion for class certification, Brief Deadline set for 8/5/02 [47−1] motion for Class certification ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Brown, S.) (Entered: 07/24/2002)

PACER
July 23, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [23−1] motion to Intervene ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Brown, S.) (Entered: 07/24/2002)

PACER
55 Aug. 2, 2002

MOTION by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 8/13/02 to respond to motion for class certification (Warner, R.)

RECAP
56 Aug. 5, 2002

ENDORSEMENT ORDER granting [55-1] motion to Extend Time to respond to motion for class certification until the court rules on the pending motions ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Depino, F.)

RECAP
Aug. 6, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [55−1] motion to Extend Time until 8/13/02 to respond to motion for class certification, Brief Deadline set for 8/13/02 [47−1] motion for Class certification ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Depino, F.) (Entered: 08/06/2002)

PACER
57 Aug. 13, 2002

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in opposition to [47-1] motion for Class certification by all plaintiffs (Warner, R.)

RECAP
59 Aug. 21, 2002

RULING granting [21-1] motion to Amend [1-1] complaint, granting [43-1] motion to file an Intervening complaint (signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton) 13 Pages (Villano, P.)

RECAP
60 Aug. 21, 2002

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT by ARC, Stephen Kuziel, Kevin Ulsh, Stacey Reichenbach, Lucien Greca, Ryan O'Kane, Matthew Vigorito, Sara Austin-Small, Paula Sage, Jacob Pratt, Mary Weglowski amending [1-1] complaint (Villano, P.)

RECAP
61 Aug. 21, 2002

Intervenor's COMPLAINT by all plaintiffs against Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker (Villano, P.)

RECAP
58 Aug. 23, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time until 9/13/02 to respond to Motion for Class Certification (Rodko, R.) Modified on 08/26/2002

RECAP
Aug. 30, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [58−1] motion to Extend Time until 9/13/02 to respond to Motion for Class Certification, Brief Deadline set for 9/13/02 [47−1] motion for Class certification ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Depino, F.) (Entered: 09/03/2002)

PACER
62 Sept. 5, 2002

PROTECTIVE ORDER (signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Brown, S.)

RECAP
Sept. 5, 2002

ENDORSEMENT denying as moot and without prejudice [27−1] motion for Orders concerning discovery ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Brown, S.) Modified on 09/09/2002 (Entered: 09/06/2002)

PACER
64 Sept. 10, 2002

Discovery Conference held ( JGM) (Falcone, K.)

RECAP
63 Sept. 11, 2002

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 9/17/02 to respond to Amended and Intervening Complaint (Rodko, R.)

RECAP
65 Sept. 13, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time until 9/20/02 to respond to Motion for Class Certification (Rodko, R.) Modified on 09/17/2002

RECAP
Sept. 13, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [63−1] motion to Extend Time until 9/17/02 to respond to Amended and Intervening Complaint ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Warner, R.) (Entered: 09/13/2002)

PACER
66 Sept. 17, 2002

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Extend Time until 9/20/02 to respond to Amended and Intervening Complaint (Rodko, R.)

RECAP
67 Sept. 18, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs for Leave to File Reply Brief that Exceeds Page Limit (Brief Due 10/9/02 ) (Villano, P.)

RECAP
68 Sept. 20, 2002

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Intervening Complaint (Brief Due 10/11/02 ) (Depino, F.)

RECAP
69 Sept. 20, 2002

MEMORANDUM by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker in support of [68-1] motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Intervening Complaint (Depino, F.)

RECAP
Sept. 23, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [66−1] motion to Extend Time until 9/20/02 to respond to Amended and Intervening Complaint ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Depino, F.) (Entered: 09/24/2002)

PACER
Sept. 23, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [65−1] motion to Extend Time until 9/20/02 to respond to Motion for Class Certification, Brief Deadline set for 9/20/02 [47−1] motion for Class certification ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Depino, F.) (Entered: 09/24/2002)

PACER
70 Oct. 1, 2002

MOTION by ARC to Extend Time until 7/2/03 to complete discovery (Falcone, K.)

RECAP
71 Oct. 2, 2002

MOTION by Peter H. O'Meara, Patricia A. Wilson-Coker for Leave to File response to plaintiffs reply to memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification (Brief Due 10/23/02 ) (Depino, F.)

RECAP
72 Oct. 3, 2002

REPLY by all plaintiffs to response to [47-1] motion for Class certification by all plaintiffs (Depino, F.)

RECAP
Oct. 3, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [67−1] motion for Leave to File Reply Brief that Exceeds Page Limit ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Depino, F.) (Entered: 10/03/2002)

PACER
Oct. 7, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [70−1] motion to Extend Time until 7/1/03 to complete discovery, set Discovery deadline to 7/1/03 ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Sherman, M.) (Entered: 10/08/2002)

PACER
73 Oct. 8, 2002

OBJECTIONS by all plaintiffs to [71-1] motion for Leave to File response to plaintiffs reply to memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification by Patricia A. Wilson-Coker, Peter H. O'Meara (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
74 Oct. 8, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs to Extend Time to respond to the motion to dismiss (Sherman, M.)

RECAP
Oct. 8, 2002

ENDORSEMENT granting [71−1] motion for Leave to File response to plaintiffs reply to memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Sherman, M.) (Entered: 10/08/2002)

PACER
75 Oct. 11, 2002

ORDER denying [68-1] motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint and Intervening Complaint ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Warner, R.)

RECAP
Oct. 11, 2002

ENDORSEMENT denying [74−1] motion to Extend Time to respond to the motion to dismiss ( signed by Judge Janet B. Arterton ) (Warner, R.) (Entered: 10/15/2002)

PACER
76 Oct. 15, 2002

MOTION by all plaintiffs for Reconsideration of order dated 10/8/02 re: [71-1] motion for Leave to File response to plaintiffs reply to memorandum in opposition to motion for class certification (Brief Due 11/5/02 ) (Sherman, M.) Modified on 10/16/2002

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Connecticut

Case Type(s):

Public Benefits/Government Services

Special Collection(s):

Olmstead Cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 2, 2001

Closing Date: 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Arc/Connecticut (a non-profit advocacy organization) and individuals with disabilities.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State

Patricia A. Wilson−Coker

Peter H. O'Meara

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Medicaid, 42 U.S.C §1396 (Title XIX of the Social Security Act)

Other Dockets:

District of Connecticut 3:01-cv-01871

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Benefits (Source):

Medicaid

Recommended Citation