Case: Mansorian v. Regents of University of California

2:03-cv-02591 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California

Filed Date: Dec. 18, 2003

Closed Date: 2012

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On December 18, 2003, current and former female wrestlers at the University of California-Davis ("UC Davis") filed this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The plaintiffs sued UC Davis on behalf of all current and future female Davis students denied equal athletic participation opportunities and scholarships. The plaintiffs sought damages and injunctive relief under Title IX and also asserted equal protection claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.During the 2…

On December 18, 2003, current and former female wrestlers at the University of California-Davis ("UC Davis") filed this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. The plaintiffs sued UC Davis on behalf of all current and future female Davis students denied equal athletic participation opportunities and scholarships. The plaintiffs sought damages and injunctive relief under Title IX and also asserted equal protection claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

During the 2000-2001 academic year, Davis eliminated all women from the wrestling team. After the students protested to administrators and filed a complaint with the Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR), Davis agreed to permit women again to participate in varsity wrestling, conditioned on their ability to beat male wrestlers in their weight class, using men's collegiate wrestling rules. As a result of these new requirements, the female students were unable to qualify for the wrestling team and lost the benefits associated with varsity status, including scholarships and academic credit.

In April 2006, just before the scheduled hearing on class certification, the plaintiffs requested a stay due to their attorney's serious illness. During the ten-month stay, the only named plaintiff still attending Davis graduated. The plaintiffs moved to add as plaintiffs three students, all then enrolled at Davis. On March 20, 2007, the District Court (Judge Frank C. Damrell) denied the motion, holding that the plaintiffs failed to meet the good cause required under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16 when such a motion is filed after the issuance of a scheduling order. Without any named plaintiffs currently attending Davis, the plaintiffs stipulated to dismissal of the class claims for injunctive relief.

In April 2008, the District Court dismissed the § 1983 claim as "subsumed" by the Title IX claim. The District Court then granted the University's motion for summary judgment, holding that the students had failed to perfect their Title IX claim by failing to give Davis advance notice and the opportunity to cure.

The plaintiffs appealed to the Ninth Circuit. On February 8, 2010, in a published opinion (amended on April 20, 2010), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that (1) the plaintiffs' challenge to the district court's denial of their motion to add additional plaintiffs was moot; (2) the plaintiffs were not required to give university notice and an opportunity to cure an alleged Title IX violation before bringing suit; (3) genuine issues of material fact precluded summary judgment on the plaintiffs' Title IX ineffective accommodation claim; (4) Title IX did not preclude claim under § 1983 to enforce rights under Equal Protection Clause; and (5) § 1983 claim was not barred by statute of limitations. The case was remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. 602 F.3d 957 (9th Cir. 2010).

On December 8, 2010, the Court (Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.) denied the University's renewed motion for summary judgment. A fifteen day bench trial was held beginning May 2011.

On August 3, 2011, District Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., J., held that the university failed to effectively accommodate athletic interests and abilities of members of both sexes. However, the plaintiffs lost on their other theories of Title IX liability, as well as their Equal Protection Clause claims. Specifically, Judge Damrell held that (1) the university's failure to sponsor separate women's team did not contravene Title IX; (3) the assistant athletic director could not be held liable for alleged Equal Protection violations; and (4) other officials were entitled to qualified immunity as to alleged Equal Protection violations. 816 F. Supp. 2d 869 (E.D. Cal. 2011).

On December 8, 2011, the Court ordered this case be set for a settlement conference to decide damages. After months of negotiations, the parties and their counsels reached agreement on all major terms of the settlement. The university agreed to pay $1,350,000 in attorneys' fees and costs incurred during the lengthy case. On April 6, 2012, the action was dismissed without prejudice and the case was closed.

Summary Authors

Xin Chen (10/2/2011)

Maria Ricaurte (10/18/2015)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5682911/parties/mansourian-v-regents-davis/


Judge(s)

Berzon, Marsha Siegel (California)

Brennan, Edmund F. (California)

Damrell, Frank C. Jr. (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Burkett, David Pontus Eugene (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Acero, George A. (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

08-16330

9th Circuit Docket

Mansourian v. Regents of University of California

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

May 10, 2010

May 10, 2010

Docket

2:03-cv-02591

Docket

Mansourian v. Regents of University of California

April 12, 2012

April 12, 2012

Docket
25

2:03-cv-02591

Memorandum and Order

Mansourian v. Regents of University of California

May 6, 2004

May 6, 2004

Order/Opinion
69

2:03-cv-02591

Plaintiff's Brief in Support of Class Certification

Mansourian v. Regents of University of California

Dec. 8, 2005

Dec. 8, 2005

Pleading / Motion / Brief
103

2:03-cv-02591

Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification

Mansourian v. Regents of University of California

April 4, 2006

April 4, 2006

Pleading / Motion / Brief
175

2:03-cv-02591

Memorandum and Order

Mansourian v. Regents of University of California

March 20, 2007

March 20, 2007

Order/Opinion

2007 WL 841739

184

2:03-cv-02591

Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Application for Court Approval of Voluntary Dismissal of Class Claims

Mansourian v. Regents of University of California

April 26, 2007

April 26, 2007

Pleading / Motion / Brief
189

2:03-cv-02591

Memorandum in Support of Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

Mansourian v. Regents of University of California

June 5, 2007

June 5, 2007

Pleading / Motion / Brief
196

2:03-cv-02591

Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings

Mansourian v. Regents of University of California

July 13, 2007

July 13, 2007

Pleading / Motion / Brief
226

2:03-cv-02591

Memorandum and Order

Mansourian v. Regents of University of California

Oct. 18, 2007

Oct. 18, 2007

Order/Opinion

2007 WL 3046034

Resources

Resources related to this case
Title Description External URL Date / External URL

Mansourian v. U.C. Regents

The Sturdevant Law Firm

This article provides a concise summary of the details of the case as well as information on the settlement. 2013

Jan. 1, 2013

http://sturdevantlaw.com/...

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5682911/mansourian-v-regents-davis/

Last updated March 26, 2026, 4:54 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
48 June 14, 2005

MEMORANDUM and ORDER, Motions terminated: 42 MOTION for EXTENSION Motion to Modify Status Order by Arezou Mansourian, Lauren Mancuso, Nancy Nien-Li Chiang, Christine Wing-Si Ng - GRANTED. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 8/1/2005. Rebuttal e xperts by 9/1/05. Discovery due by 10/28/2005. Dispositive Motion due by 1/13/2006. Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/17/2006 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2. Jury Trial set for 5/2/2006 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 6/14/05. (Price, M)

RECAP
53 Aug. 17, 2005

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 08/17/05. Designation of Expert Witnesses due by 10/28/2005. Discovery due by 12/23/2005. Dispositive Motion due by 4/21/2006. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/30/2006 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. Jury Trial set for 8/29/2006 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. (Price, M)

RECAP
59 Oct. 31, 2005

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 10/31/05 re 57 Stipulation filed by the parties - GRANTED. The following scheduling deadlines are modified as follows: Designation of rebuttal Expert Witnesses due by 3/14/2006. Discovery due by 5/12/ 2006. Dispositive Motion due by 8/4/2006. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/29/2006 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. Jury Trial set for 11/28/2006 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr.(Price, M)

RECAP
73 Jan. 5, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Peter A. Nowinski on 01/04/06 DENYING 71 Stipulation, filed by Regents of the University of California, University of California at Davis, Lawrence Vanderhoef, Greg Warzecka, Pam Gill-Fisher, Robert Franks and Lawrence Swanson . (Matson, R)

RECAP
81 Jan. 10, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Peter A. Nowinski on 01/09/06 ORDERING pltf's ex parte application for reconsideration 78 is GRANTED in part; Dfts to disclose by filing with the court no private information obtained during discovery.(Warren, P)

RECAP
86 Jan. 30, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 1/27/06 GRANTING 84 Ex Parte Application. Defendants shall be permitted to file a Memo of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification in excess of 20 pages, but not to exceed 35 pages.(Donati, J)

RECAP
89 Feb. 9, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Peter A. Nowinski on 02/08/06: The subpoenas are quashed.(Warren, P)

RECAP
99 March 22, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 3/22/06. 97 Ex Parte Application, filed by defendants - GRANTED. Defendant LARRY VANDERHOEF shall be permitted to file a Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of his Motion for Summary Judgment in excess of twenty pages, but not to exceed thirty pages. In light of this page limit increase, the page limit for Plaintiff's opposition is extended to no more than 30 pages. No increase is made as to the reply page limit.(Price, M)

RECAP
102 March 28, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 3/28/06 re 100 Ex Parte Application - GRANTED. Dft LAWRENCE SWANSON shall be permitted to file a Memorandum in Support of his Motion for Summary Judgment in excess of twenty pages, but not to exceed thirty pages. In light of this page limit increase, the page limit for ptlf's opposition is extended to no more than 30 pages. No increase is made as to the reply page limit.(Price, M)

RECAP
110 April 5, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 4/5/06. 108 Exparte Application filed by Regents dft Pam Gill-Fisher - GRANTED. Memorandum in Support of motion for summary judgment may be filed in excess of 20 pages, but not to exceed 30 pages. In light of this page limit increase, the page limit for pltf's opposition is extended to no more than thirty pages. No increase is made as to the Reply page limit. (Price, M)

RECAP
114 April 13, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 4/13/06. 111 Stipulation to Seal Exhibit W - GRANTED. The Clerk shall seal Exhibit W, as filed on April 4/4/06, as Part 5 to docket #107, Exhibits. Counsel, shall re-file exhibits U - CC excluding exhibit W in accordance with this order. (Price, M)

RECAP
125 April 18, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 4/18/06. 117 Pltf's MOTION to STAY and Extend Scheduling -GRANTED. Case STAYED. All dates are vacated. 62 Motion for Class Certification - RESET for 7/21/06 at 10:00 a.m. Status Conference set for 6/16/2006 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr.. Joint status report by 6/6/2006. Parties to refer to order for specifics on report. (Price, M) Modified on 4/18/2006 (Price, M).

RECAP
132 June 8, 2006

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 6/7/06 GRANTING 130 Stipulation. Status Conference is re-set for 7/28/2006 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. and Joint Status Report is due by 7/18/06. (Yin, K)

RECAP
143 Aug. 23, 2006

STIPULATION and ORDER 141 signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 8/23/06. The Stay of this action is CONTINUED to 11/3/06 and Status Conference is RE-SET for 11/3/2006 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD). Parties shall meet and confer to submit Joint Status Statement by 10/27/06.(Marciel, M)

RECAP
149 Oct. 20, 2006

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 10/20/06. The stay in continued to 1/26/07. Status Conference set for 11/3/06 is VACATED and RESET for 1/26/2007 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr.. A joint status report shall be filed by 1/19/2007. (Price, M)

RECAP
175 March 20, 2007

MEMORANDUM and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 3/20/07. Plaintiff's 158 MOTION for Amend the Complaint is DENIED.(Marciel, M)

RECAP
178 March 29, 2007

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 3/29/07 AGREEING to the stipulation between the parties to DISMISS w/ prejudice the claims of pltf Nancy Nien-Li Chiang as against each of the dfts; the pending motion to dismiss pltf Chiang's damages claims is OFF CALENDAR; dfts to not take further action to obtain copies of pltf Chiang's medical or mental health records; each of the parties to bear their own costs. Nancy Nien-Li Chiang terminated. (Yin, K)

RECAP
179 March 30, 2007

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 3/30/07 AGREEING to the 176 stipulation between the parties to further modify the 156 Second Amended Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order: Pltfs' Supplemental Opening Brief due 4/27/07; Dfts' Supplemental Opposition Brief due 5/11/07; Pltfs' Reply Brief due 5/18/07; Class Certification Hearing set for 5/25/2007 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr..(Yin, K)

RECAP
182 April 24, 2007

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 4/23/07 GRANTING 180 Stipulated Request to further modify the Second Amended Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order. The class certification hearing currently scheduled for 5/25/07 and the corresponding briefing schedule will be taken off calendar pending the resolution of plaintiffs' request for voluntary dismissal of class claims. (Donati, J)

RECAP
195 June 12, 2007

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 6/12/07. 183 Motion to Dismiss - GRANTED. Accordingly, the class claims in this action are dismissed. (Price, M)

RECAP
201 July 20, 2007

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 7/20/07. 199 Deft's Ex Parte Application -GRANTED. Deft's are permitted to file their Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition not to exceed 15 pages. (Price, M)

RECAP
214 Aug. 31, 2007

ORDER re 213 MOTION for PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/31/07. (Hinkle, T)

RECAP
222 Sept. 19, 2007

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 09/18/07 MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER as follows:Expert Discovery Cut-off is 1/11/2008, Discovery due by 12/28/2007, Dispositive Motion to be heard by 2/22/2008, Deadline to file Joint PTS is 4/11/08, Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/18/2008 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. and trial still set for 6/17/08 at 9:00 am before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. (Dillon, M)

RECAP
225 Oct. 15, 2007

BRIEFING ORDER re 224 MOTION for PROTECTIVE ORDER under F.R.C.P. 26(c). Signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/15/2007. (Hinkle, T)

RECAP
226 Oct. 18, 2007

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 10/18/07.The court makes the following orders on defts' 188 motion for judgment on the pleadings: Deft UCD's motion for judgment on the pleadings re: pltfs' first c laim for relief under Title IX based upon a theory unequal treatment - GRANTED; re: pltfs' first claim for relief under Title IX based upon a theory of ineffective accommodation - DENIED; re: pltfs' second claim for relief under Title IX - GRANTED; re: pltfs' third claim for relief for retaliation in violation of Title IX - GRANTED; re: pltfs' claims for punitive damages under Title IX - GRANTED; re: pltfs' claims for emotional distress damages under Title IX - DENIED. The individual defts' motion for judgment on the pleadings re: pltfs' claims brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 - GRANTED. Defts' motion for judgement on the pleadings re: pltfs' state law claims - GRANTED.(Price, M)

RECAP
228 Oct. 23, 2007

BRIEFING ORDER re 227 MOTION to COMPEL Further Disclosures and Discovery. Signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/23/07. (Hinkle, T)

RECAP
247 Nov. 15, 2007

BRIEFING ORDER re 246 MOTION for PROTECTIVE ORDER filed by defendants. Signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/15/07. (Hinkle, T)

RECAP
249 Nov. 19, 2007

BRIEFING ORDER re 248 Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. Signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/19/07. (Hinkle, T)

RECAP
250 Nov. 19, 2007

ORDER signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/19/07 ORDERING that Defendants' Motion for Protective Order deeming the documents unusable in this litigation 242 is DENIED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

RECAP
263 Dec. 4, 2007

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 12/4/07. 259 Ex Parte Application filed by Greg Warzecka, Robert Franks, Pam Gill-Fisher, Lawrence Vanderhoef, Regents of the University of California, University of California at Davis and Lawrence Sw anson - GRANTED IN PART. Deft REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IS permitted to file Motion for Summary Judgment in excess of 20 pages, but not to exceed 40 pages. Plts are permitted to file its Opposition in excess of 20 pages, but not to exceed 40 pages. Deft is permitted to file a reply in excess of 10 pages, but not to exceed 20 pages. (Price, M)

RECAP
267 Dec. 5, 2007

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/4/2007 GRANTING 264 Stipulation and Proposed Order to have defendant's Motion to Compel further discovery heard on shortened time.(Matson, R)

RECAP
268 Dec. 5, 2007

BRIEFING ORDER re 261 Defendant's Notice of Motion to Compel Further Discovery filed by Greg Warzecka, Robert Franks, Pam Gill-Fisher, Lawrence Vanderhoef, Regents of the University of California, University of California at Davis, Lawrence Swanson. Signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/5/07. (Hinkle, T)

RECAP
274 Dec. 13, 2007

STIPULATION and ORDER (ORDER MODIFIED FROM SUBMITTED VERSION) signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. on 12/13/07. Dispositive Motion shall be heard no later than 3/28/2008. The parties are to refer to the order for the dispositive motion briefing schedule. Final Pretrial Conference RESET for 6/6/2008 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. Jury Trial RESET for 8/12/2008 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr.. (Price, M)

RECAP
278 Dec. 21, 2007

ORDER signed by Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/21/07 denying 246 Motion for Protective Order. Chancellor Vanderhoef shall appear for deposition and defendant shall produce the documents previously withheld on the basis of deliberative process privilege. (Plummer, M)

RECAP
313 Jan. 29, 2008

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 1/29/08. RESET MOTION HEARING as to 280 MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT for 4/25/2008 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell Jr. Plaintiffs shall file their opposing papers on or before 3/6/08. Defendant shall file its reply papers on or before 3/31/08. (Price, M)

RECAP
368 April 23, 2008

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 04/23/08. Deft's 280 Motion for Summary Judgment - GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to close the file. All dates are VACATED. CASE CLOSED. (Price, M)

RECAP
375 May 22, 2008

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 5/22/08 GRANTING Plaintiff an Extension of Time until 6/19/08 to file objections to the Bill of Costs. (Krueger, M)

RECAP
381 June 19, 2008

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding financial information of pltfs signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/18/08. (Carlos, K)

RECAP
400 July 15, 2008

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/15/08 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' Motion to Deny Defendants' Bill of Costs is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Motion to Continue Consideration of Bill of Costs 396 is MOOT and the Hearing date of 8/22/08 is VACATED. (Krueger, M)

RECAP
436 Sept. 13, 2010

STIPULATION and ORDER 435 To Modify The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order, signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., on 9/13/10: The last date to hear dispositve motions shall BE 12/3/10. Discovery is to be completed BY 10/25/2010, aside from individual Dft financial status discovery. (Kastilahn, A)

RECAP
451 Sept. 20, 2010

STIPULATION and ORDER 450 signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., on 9/20/10, ORDERING that the hearing on dfts' motions for summary judgment 443 , 437 , 426 , 417 is CONT'D to 12/3/2010 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. Pltfs shall file their oppositions to the motions for summary judgment no LATER than 11/9/10; and dfts shall file their replies no LATER than 11/24/10. (Kastilahn, A)

RECAP
455 Sept. 27, 2010

ORDER GRANTING 454 Motion to File Document Under Seal signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 9/27/10. Exhibit N in support of dft Warzecka's motion for summary judgment shall be filed under seal. (Manzer, C)

RECAP
463 Oct. 27, 2010

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 10/27/10 ORDERING 462 Ex Parte Application filed by Christine Wing-Si Ng, Lauren Mancuso, Arezou Mansourian GRANTED and they shall be permitted to file a consolidated opposition to the motions for summary judgment filed by the individual dfts and to file asingle memorandum of points and authorities to address the motions of the individual dfts that exceeds the Court's 20 page limited but which is not more than 50 pages. (Carlos, K)

RECAP
465 Nov. 8, 2010

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 11/5/2010re 464 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' claims against defendant Lawrence Swanson in this action are dismissed in their entirety, with prejudice. Defendant Larry Swanson shall no t seek attorneys' fees, costs or any other relief against Plaintiffs, on their own or through counsel, based upon the filing or prosecution of this action by them. Defendant agrees that neither he nor anyone on his behalf will pursue any claim a gainst Plaintiffs or their counsel for their prosecution of this action against him, including a malicious prosecution claim. Defendant Larry Swanson will withdraw his Motion for Summary Judgment currently set for hearing on December 3, 2010. Each of the parties to bear their own costs.(Duong, D)

RECAP
484 Nov. 12, 2010

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 11/12/10 ORDERING that Plaintiffs' Request to Seal Confidential documents is GRANTED.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

RECAP
509 Dec. 8, 2010

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 12/8/2010 ORDERING Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment 417 , 426 , 437 , and 452 GRANTED in Part and DENIED in Part. (Krueger, M)

RECAP
520 Jan. 12, 2011

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/12/11, ORDERING that 513 dfts' Motion for a Protective Order, is DENIED in PART and GRANTED in PART as discussed in this Order. Dfts Vanderhoef, Warzecka, Roberts, and Gill-Fisher SHALL r espond to the discovery demands set forth in this Order within 21 days of the entry of this Order. It is further ORDERED that the Stipulation Regarding Financial Information of Individual Defendants executed by the parties through their respective attorneys on June 18, 2008 and attached hereto as Exhibit A is hereby incorporated as part of this Order. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Kastilahn, A)

1 Exhibit A

View on PACER

RECAP
532 Feb. 22, 2011

STIPULATION and ORDER 531 signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr., on 2/18/11: The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Order is modified as follows: Final Pretrial Conference is SET for 4/21/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrel l, Jr.. Bench Trial is SET for 5/23/2011 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.. Jury Trial is tentatively SET for August 9-11, 2011 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 (FCD) before Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr.. (See order for further dates.)(Kastilahn, A)

RECAP
537 April 26, 2011

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 04/26/2011 GRANTING 535 Joint Stipulation Re Briefing Schedule on Motion For Reconsideration.(Streeter, J)

RECAP
538 April 26, 2011

PRETRIAL CONFERENCE ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 04/26/2011. (Streeter, J)

RECAP
545 April 29, 2011

MEMORANDUM and ORDER on Relevant Time Period signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 4/29/2011: The Court ORDERS Defendant's argument relating to standing is inapposite. Both plaintiffs and defendant agree that plaintiffs may only recover based upon demonstration of actual harm. Indeed, plaintiffs' ability to recover for Title IX violations are wholly separate from the determination of whether defendant was in violation of Title IX. As such, defendant's argument in support of a truncated time period is without merit. (Krueger, M)

RECAP
594 May 18, 2011

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 5/18/2011 ORDERING Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration and/or Clarification 540 DENIED. (Krueger, M)

RECAP
619 June 27, 2011

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 6/27/11 ORDERING the admission into evidence excerpts of NCAA Manuals. (Meuleman, A)

RECAP
621 July 12, 2011

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 7/12/11 EXTENDING proposed findings of facts and conclusions of law deadline from 7/15/11 to 7/19/11; plaintiffs' written response to defendants' Rule 52 Motion shall be EXTENDED from 7/15/11 to 7/22/11. (Meuleman, A)

RECAP
628 Aug. 3, 2011

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr on 8/3/2011 ORDERING that plaintiffs have prevailed on their claims against UC Davis for ineffective accommodation of female student-athletes under Title IX based upon UC Davis' failure t o demonstrate a continuing practice of program expansion. However, plaintiffs have not prevailed on any other theories of Title IX liability. Moreover, plaintiffs have not prevailed on their claims for Equal Protection Clause violations against any of the individual defendants. As such, defendants Larry Vanderhoef, Greg Warzecka, Pam Gill-Fisher, and Robert Franks are DISMISSED. (Krueger, M)

RECAP
629 Aug. 9, 2011

ORDER signed by Judge Frank C. Damrell, Jr. on 8/9/2011 ORDERING that dfts' 524 motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's discovery order re: punitive damages and dfts' Rule 52(c) motion (made orally on the record on 6/14/2011) are MOOT. (Zignago, K.)

RECAP
633 Sept. 2, 2011

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/1/2011. Since Judge Mueller was the Magistrate Settlement Judge in this matter, parties are ordered to inform Court, w/in 2 weeks of entry of this Order, whether they will will waive any conflict if she remains on the case as trial judge. (Marciel, M)

RECAP
643 Nov. 3, 2011

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/2/11 ORDERING that the court SETS the following schedule: Joint pretrial statement due February 1, 2012; Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/8/2012; Hearing on motions in limine sets for 2/8/2012 at 10: 00 AM; Jury Trial set for 3/5/2012 at 09:00 AM. Hearing on the proposed dispositive motion in limine set for 12/14/2011 at 10:00 AM. The court will issue a briefing schedule in accordance with this hearing date, if the hearing is confirmed. The cou rt also will refer this case to settlement. The parties are to submit a stipulation with seven (7) days of the issuance of this order indicating their availability for settlement conference. Upon receipt of the stipulation, the court will issue an order of referral. (Duong, D)

RECAP
648 Dec. 8, 2011

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/7/2011 ORDERING that this case is set for a settlement conference before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 1/3/2012, at 1:00 p.m. at the U. S. District Court, 501 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 in C ourtroom #25. The parties are directed to exchange non-confidential settlement conference statements seven days prior to this settlement conference. These statements shall simultaneously be delivered to the court using the following email address: k jnorders@caed.uscourts.gov. If a party desires to share additional confidential information with the court, they may do so pursuant to the provisions of Local Rule 270(d) and (e). Each party shall e-file a one page document entitled Notice of S ubmission of Settlement Conference Statement. See Local Rule 270(d). Each party is reminded of the requirement that it be represented in person at the settlement conference by a person able to dispose of the case or fully authorized to settle the matter at the settlement conference on any terms. See Local Rule 270. (Zignago, K.)

RECAP
649 Dec. 13, 2011

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/12/11 ORDERING that Defendant's Request 641 is DENIED. Additionally, Plaintiff's MOTION TO STRIKE [641[ is DENIED as moot. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

RECAP
655 Jan. 10, 2012

STIPULATION and ORDER 654 requesting modification of Scheduling Order signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/10/2012. The current due dates for Pretrial filings are as follows: Motions In Limine - 1/11/2012; Oppositions to Motions In Limine - 1/2 5/2012; Replies to Oppositions and Joint Final Pretrial Statement - 2/1/2012; Hearing on Motions In Limine and Final Pretrial Conference - 2/8/2012; Trial Briefs - 2/17/2012; and Responses to Trial Briefs - 2/27/2012. Parties' due date for filin g Motions In Limine and Oppositions to Motions is STAYED for period of 7 days so that they may focus thier efforts on reaching resolution of remaining issues in litigation. Parties to file a Joint Status Report no later than 1/17/2012 advising Court of status of Settlement discussions. (Marciel, M)

RECAP
657 Jan. 19, 2012

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 1/18/2012 STAYING case until 1/20/2012. A Joint Status Report is due at that time. (Michel, G)

RECAP
659 Jan. 23, 2012

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 01/23/12 ORDERING that the parties will file a further Joint Status Report by 01/24/12 advising the Court whether final confirmation of the settlement terms has been reached. If confirmation has been reached, the Court will vacate the 03/05/12 trial date, and order the parties to file either a Stipulated Request for Dismissal of the action or a further Joint Status Report by 04/09/12. (Benson, A.)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Education

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 18, 2003

Closing Date: 2012

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Current and former female students at the University of California-Davis (UCD) and former members of the UCD’s wrestling team filed a class action on behalf of all current and future female UCD students denied equal athletic participation opportunities.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

State

the Regents of the University of California at Davis

Defendant Type(s):

College/University

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1681 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of California 2:03-cv-02591

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 08-16330

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Voluntary Dismissal

Amount Defendant Pays: 1350000

Issues

General/Misc.:

Funding

Discrimination Area:

Sports

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Recommended Citation