Case: Angela R. v. Clinton

4:91-cv-00415 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas

Filed Date: July 8, 1991

Closed Date: 2001

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

Plaintiffs, represented by the National Center for Youth Law, Central Arkansas Legal Services, and Ozark Legal Serices, brought this class action suit in 1991, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, against the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS). Plaintiffs complained that DHS child welfare programs failed to investigate complaints of abuse and neglect, to make reasonable efforts to keep families together, to provide adequate care to children in foster home…

Plaintiffs, represented by the National Center for Youth Law, Central Arkansas Legal Services, and Ozark Legal Serices, brought this class action suit in 1991, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas, against the Arkansas Department of Human Services (DHS). Plaintiffs complained that DHS child welfare programs failed to investigate complaints of abuse and neglect, to make reasonable efforts to keep families together, to provide adequate care to children in foster homes, and to train foster parents. Plaintiffs alleged that these failures were in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment; the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. §§ 620-28, 670-79; and the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA), 42 U.S.C. § 5101-06.

In 1991, the District Court certified a class consisting of all children who, since July 1, 1988, were known to DHS by reason of a complaint of abuse or neglect, and all children who are in the custody of DHS as the result of emergency 72-hour placement or an abuse, neglect, or Family In Needs of Services (FINS) petition.

On February 27, 1992, after months of negotiation, the parties filed a joint motion for a proposed settlement. The same day, the Governor signed into law Act One of the First Extraordinary Session of 1992, which adopted the Arkansas Child Welfare Reform Document, a detailed plain governing defendants' operation of DHS in all major areas addressed by the plaintiffs' complaint. Act One also provided funds necessary to execute the Arkansas Child Welfare Reform Document.

Meanwhile, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Suter v. Artist M, 503 U.S. 347 (1992) holding that the Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act did not create a private cause of action. In response, the state defendants in this case subsequently filed a motion suggesting that the District Court did not have jurisdiction over the claims of the plaintiffs. The District Court denied the motion and ordered entry of the proposed settlement as a consent decree. The U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals found that the District Court had valid jurisdiction, but it vacated the consent decree because of its ambiguous enforcement provisions. Angela R. v. Clinton, 999 F.2d 320 (1993).

On remand, the parties jointly filed a motion for approval of a settlement agreement in fall 1994, and to dismiss the case except for enforcement of that agreement. The settlement agreement provided a five-year implementation period to address child protective services, family preservation services, least restrictive possible placements, sibling unification, resources for foster families, health care for foster children, and caseworker caseloads. Upon the five-year period expiration in 1999, the parties amended the settlement agreement to extend the jurisdiction of the Court over enforcement of the settlement until December 31, 2001. The case then ended.

In 2004, a non-party moved to reinstate the settlement agreement, contending that parents possessed documentation that would have prevented the initial settlement of the case. The District Court dismissed the motion as untimely and lacking standing.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Homan (11/25/2012)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6120154/parties/angela-r-v-clinton/


Judge(s)

Howard, George Jr. (Arkansas)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Grimm, William L. (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Hopkins, Breck G. (Arkansas)

Hurlbut, Bruce Paul (Arkansas)

Jegley, Angela S. (Arkansas)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

4:91-cv-00415

Docket

Feb. 27, 2004

Feb. 27, 2004

Docket

92-02459

Opinion (8th Cir.)

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

July 13, 1993

July 13, 1993

Order/Opinion

999 F.2d 320

124

4:91-cv-00415

Order of Dismissal and Approval of Settlement

Oct. 13, 1994

Oct. 13, 1994

Order/Opinion
130

4:91-cv-00415

Amended Order of Dismissal and Approval of Amended Settlement Agreement

Aug. 31, 1999

Aug. 31, 1999

Order/Opinion
133

4:91-cv-00415

Second Amended Order of Dismissal and Enforcement of Amended Settlement Agreement

Oct. 25, 2001

Oct. 25, 2001

Order/Opinion
147

4:91-cv-00415

Order

Feb. 20, 2002

Feb. 20, 2002

Order/Opinion
157

4:91-cv-00415

Order

Angela R. v. Arkansas

Feb. 26, 2004

Feb. 26, 2004

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6120154/angela-r-v-clinton/

Last updated March 28, 2026, 5:32 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 July 8, 1991

COMPLAINT - Class Action; (Summonses issued) and returned to: atty (bfw) (Entered: 07/10/1991)

RECAP
July 8, 1991

UTILITY EVENT: Added attorney Marcia McIvor for pltfs (bfw)

2 July 10, 1991

MOTION by plaintiffs to proceed by fictitious names (former empl) Modified on 07/11/1991 (Entered: 07/11/1991)

RECAP
3 July 10, 1991

BRIEF by plaintiffs in support of motion to proceed by fictitious names [2-1] (former empl) Modified on 07/11/1991 (Entered: 07/11/1991)

RECAP
4 July 26, 1991

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. granting motion to proceed by fictitious names [2-1] (cc: all counsel) (jap) (Entered: 07/29/1991)

RECAP
5 July 29, 1991

MOTION by plaintiffs to certify class action (former empl) (Entered: 07/30/1991)

RECAP
6 July 29, 1991

Memorandum by plaintiffs in support of motion to certify class action [5-1] (former empl) (Entered: 07/30/1991)

RECAP
7 July 29, 1991

ANSWER by defendants Bill Clinton and Terry Yamauchi to the complaint (former empl) (Entered: 07/31/1991)

RECAP
July 29, 1991

UTILITY EVENT: Add attorney(s) (former empl)

8 Aug. 6, 1991

SCHEDULING ORDER: ; trial set for 9:30 3/23/92 ; discovery due 1/27/92 ; status report due 2/10/92 ; pretrial info sheet due 2/10/92 witnss/xhbt list due 02/10/92 mtn filing ddl 02/10/92 (cc: all counsel) (plm) (Entered: 08/06/1991)

RECAP
9 Aug. 6, 1991

MOTION by defendant Bill Clinton, defendant Terry Yamauchi to extend time until 09/16/91 to respond to motion to certify class action (former empl) (Entered: 08/08/1991)

RECAP
10 Aug. 8, 1991

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. granting motion to extend time until 09/16/91 to respond to motion to certify class action [9-1]; [5-1] (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 08/12/1991)

RECAP
11 Aug. 13, 1991

Response by defendants Bill Clinton and Terry Yamauchi to motion to proceed by fictitious names [2-1] (former empl) (Entered: 08/13/1991)

RECAP
12 Aug. 20, 1991

MOTION by plaintiffs David M, Charles S and Damon T for protective order (former empl) (Entered: 08/21/1991)

RECAP
13 Aug. 20, 1991

BRIEF by plaintiffs David M, Charles S and Damon T in support of motion for protective order [12-1] (former empl) (Entered: 08/21/1991)

RECAP
14 Aug. 21, 1991

Memo to file: finding the motion for protective order [12-1] moot as the deposition has been cancelled (former empl) Modified on 02/06/1992 (Entered: 08/22/1991)

RECAP
15 Sept. 9, 1991

MOTION by Merry Alice Hesselbein counsel for plaintiffs to withdraw as attorney (former empl) Modified on 11/21/1991 (Entered: 09/12/1991)

RECAP
16 Sept. 13, 1991

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. granting motion by Merry Alice Hesselbein, Esq. to withdraw as attorney for plaintiffs [15-1] (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 09/17/1991)

RECAP
17 Sept. 16, 1991

Joint MOTION by plaintiffs & defendants to extend time for responding to the motion to certify class (former empl) (Entered: 09/18/1991)

RECAP
18 Sept. 16, 1991

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. granting motion to extend time until 10/04/91 for responding to the motion to certify class [17-1]; [5-1] (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 09/18/1991)

RECAP
19 Oct. 8, 1991

Stipulation between parties regarding class certification (former empl) (Entered: 10/10/1991)

RECAP
20 Oct. 9, 1991

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr., granting motion to certify class action [5-1] (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 10/10/1991)

RECAP
21 Jan. 15, 1992

MOTION by defendants Bill Clinton and Terry Yamauchi to continue trial setting (former empl) (Entered: 01/16/1992)

RECAP
22 Jan. 27, 1992

RESPONSE by plaintiffs to motion to continue trial setting [21-1] (former empl) (Entered: 01/28/1992)

RECAP
23 Jan. 31, 1992

REPLY by defendants Bill Clinton & Terry Yamauchi to response to motion to continue trial setting [21-1] (former empl) (Entered: 02/03/1992)

RECAP
24 Feb. 5, 1992

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. granting motion to continue trial setting [21-1]; Trial continued to 9:30 on 6/29/92; Discovery ddl continued to 4/27/92; Status report ddl continued to 5/10/92 (cc: all counsel) (EOD 02/05/92) (former empl) (Entered: 02/05/1992)

RECAP
25 Feb. 27, 1992

Joint MOTION by plaintiffs & defendants for approval of settlement (former empl) (Entered: 03/02/1992)

RECAP
26 Feb. 28, 1992

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. setting motion for approval of settlement for hearing at 1:30 on 3/4/92 [25-1] (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 03/02/1992)

RECAP
27 March 4, 1992

Arkansas Child Welfare Reform Document Supplementary Relief for Named Plaintiffs [25-1] (former empl) Modified on 03/05/1992 (Entered: 03/05/1992)

RECAP
28 March 11, 1992

ORDER (DOC) fairness hearing scheduled at 9:30 on 4/30/92 (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 03/12/1992)

RECAP
29 March 18, 1992

Joint DECLARATION by plaintiffs' & defendants' regarding notice to class members & attorneys' fees (former empl) (Entered: 03/20/1992)

RECAP
March 18, 1992

Docket Modification (Utility Event) to satisfy hearing date for motion for settlement (plm)

30 March 19, 1992

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. tentatively approving settlement [25-1]; all notices concerning settlement are to be posted by 4/1/92; Settlement/Obj Hrg scheduled for 9:30 on 4/30/92 (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 03/23/1992)

RECAP
31 April 20, 1992

MOTION by defendants for review of class definition (former empl) (Entered: 04/22/1992)

RECAP
32 April 20, 1992

BRIEF by defendants in support of motion for review of class definition [31-1] (former empl) (Entered: 04/22/1992)

RECAP
33 April 22, 1992

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. directing plaintiffs to respond to the motion for review of class definition by 5:00 pm on 04/27/92 [31-1] (cc: all counsel) (EOD 04/22/92) (former empl) (Entered: 04/22/1992)

RECAP
34 April 27, 1992

RESPONSE by plaintiffs to motion for review of class definition [31-1] (former empl) (Entered: 04/28/1992)

RECAP
35 April 29, 1992

REPLY by defendants Bill Clinton and Terry Yamauchi to response to motion for review of class definition [31-1] (former empl) (Entered: 05/01/1992)

RECAP
36 April 29, 1992

Addendum by plaintiffs to RESPONSE to motion for review of class definition [31-1] (former empl) (Entered: 05/01/1992)

RECAP
37 May 5, 1992

Memorandum Opinion & ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. denying motion for review of class definition [31-1]; the Court finds the class as defined in the 10/09/91 order is appropriate; the joint motion for approval of settlement is approved; terminating case (cc: all counsel) (former empl) Modified on 05/06/1992 (Entered: 05/06/1992)

RECAP
38 May 5, 1992

Consent Decree entered by Judge George Howard Jr., pursuant to Memorandum Opinion & Order entered this date as stipulated by the parties (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 05/06/1992)

RECAP
39 May 6, 1992

Supplement to REPLY by defendants to response to motion for review of class determination (former empl) (Entered: 05/07/1992)

RECAP
40 May 18, 1992

MOTION by defendants to alter or amend a judgment (bmt) (Entered: 05/20/1992)

RECAP
41 May 18, 1992

BRIEF by defendants in support of motion to alter or amend judgment [40-1] (bmt) (Entered: 05/20/1992)

RECAP
42 May 20, 1992

RESPONSE by plaintiffs to motion to alter or amend judgment [40-1] (bmt) (Entered: 05/20/1992)

RECAP
43 May 26, 1992

REPLY by defendants to response to motion to alter or amend judgment [40-1] (former empl) (Entered: 05/27/1992)

RECAP
44 May 27, 1992

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. granting motion to alter or amend judgment [40-1]; parties to submit by 06/08/92 proposed amended consent decree for the Court's approval (cc: all counsel) (EOD 05/27/92) (former empl) Modified on 07/15/1992 (Entered: 05/27/1992)

RECAP
45 June 8, 1992

Amended Consent Decree by Judge George Howard Jr. (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 06/09/1992)

RECAP
46 June 26, 1992

NOTICE of appeal by defendant Bill Clinton, defendant Terry Yamauchi from District Court decision [37-2], [38-1], [44-1], [45-1](Appeal fees not paid) (2 certified copies to Clerk 8USCA), (cc: counsel) (dac) (Entered: 06/29/1992)

RECAP
47 July 2, 1992

MOTION by plaintiffs for alternate briefing schedule (former empl) (Entered: 07/07/1992)

RECAP
48 July 6, 1992

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. granting motion for alternate briefing schedule [47-1]; plaintiffs' motion for fees & costs shall be due within 30 days; defendants' response shall be due 30 days thereafter; plaintiffs' reply shall be due 14 days after receipt of response (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 07/08/1992)

RECAP
July 8, 1992

DOCKETING LETTER: 8 USCA Number 92-2459EALR; counsel to proceed on appendix (dac)

July 27, 1992

DOCKET NOTE: Received $105.00 for appeal filing & docket fee; Receipt No. 400 46792; copy forwarded to 8USCA (former empl)

49 Aug. 5, 1992

MOTION by plaintiffs for attorney fees (dac) (Entered: 08/05/1992)

RECAP
50 Aug. 5, 1992

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of motion for attorney fees [49-1] (dac) (Entered: 08/05/1992)

RECAP
51 Aug. 5, 1992

MOTION by plaintiffs for special appearance of Richard M. Pearl for application for an award of reasonable attys' fees (dac) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

RECAP
52 Aug. 31, 1992

TRANSCRIPT ( 1 volume) of proceedings for the following date: 3/4/92 ( [46-1] ) (dac) (Entered: 09/02/1992)

RECAP
53 Aug. 31, 1992

TRANSCRIPT ( 1 volume) of proceedings for the following date: 4/30/92 ( [46-1] ) (dac) (Entered: 09/02/1992)

RECAP
54 Sept. 4, 1992

RESPONSE by defendants to motion for attorney fees [49-1] (dac) (Entered: 09/04/1992)

RECAP
55 Sept. 4, 1992

MEMORANDUM, Appendix, and Attachments by defendants in support of motion response [54-1] (dac) (Entered: 09/04/1992)

RECAP
56 Sept. 14, 1992

MOTION by plaintiffs to extend time to file a reply memorandum regarding motion for attorney fees (former empl) (Entered: 09/17/1992)

RECAP
57 Sept. 16, 1992

RESPONSE by defts to motion to extend time to file a reply memorandum regarding motion for attorney fees [56-1] (former empl) (Entered: 09/18/1992)

RECAP
58 Sept. 21, 1992

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. granting motion to extend time until 10/02/92 to file a reply memorandum regarding motion for attorney fees [56-1], granting motion for special appearance of Richard M. Pearl on behalf of plaintiffs' [51-1] (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 09/22/1992)

RECAP
59 Oct. 2, 1992

REPLY memorandum by plaintiffs' in support of motion for attorney fees [49-1] (former empl) (Entered: 10/05/1992)

RECAP
60 Oct. 6, 1992

MOTION by defendant for order to establish a briefing shedule (dac) (Entered: 10/08/1992)

RECAP
61 Oct. 21, 1992

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. granting motion for order to establish a briefing shedule [60-1]; defendants are directed to file their brief in response to plaintiff's reply within 20 days (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 10/23/1992)

RECAP
62 Nov. 9, 1992

REPLY by defts to response to motion for attorney fees [49-1] (former empl) (Entered: 11/10/1992)

RECAP
63 Nov. 23, 1992

MOTION by plaintiffs' for leave to file supplemental reply brief regarding motion for attorney fees (former empl) (Entered: 11/24/1992)

RECAP
64 Dec. 9, 1992

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. finding the motion for leave to file supplemental reply brief regarding motion for attorney fees moot [63-1] (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 12/10/1992)

RECAP
65 March 30, 1993

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. granting motion for attorney fees in the amt of $314,107.25 and costs in the amt of $32,171.93 (EOD 3/30/93) [49-1] (cc: all counsel) (dac) (Entered: 03/30/1993)

RECAP
66 April 29, 1993

NOTICE of appeal by defendant from District Court decision [65-1] (appeal fees not paid) (2 certified copies to Clerk 8USCA), (cc: counsel) (dac) (Entered: 04/30/1993)

RECAP
May 6, 1993

DOCKETING LETTER: 8 USCA Number 93-2117EALR; counsel to proceed on appendix (dac)

May 12, 1993

Receipt #400 50228 in amt of $105.00 for payment of fees by DHS (dac)

67 Aug. 9, 1993

Opinion (8USCA) vacating the consent decree entered 6/8/92 & remanding case to district court for further consideration of the proposed settlement (former empl) (Entered: 08/10/1993)

RECAP
68 Aug. 9, 1993

MANDATE from 8 USCA vacating district court's judgment & remanding the matter back to District Court for proceedings consistent with the opinion; original file to be returned shortly (former empl) (Entered: 08/10/1993)

RECAP
Aug. 9, 1993

Docket Modification (Utility Event) Case reopened (former empl)

69 Aug. 10, 1993

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr., directing the parties to file a report outlining issues curretly before the Court within 15 days of the date of this Order (cc: all counsel) (jap) (Entered: 08/11/1993)

RECAP
70 Aug. 25, 1993

Plaintiffs' report re: action to be taken upon remand (jap) (Entered: 08/26/1993)

RECAP
71 Aug. 25, 1993

Report of the separate State defts (jap) (Entered: 08/26/1993)

RECAP
Sept. 9, 1993

DOCKET NOTE: 1 vol transcript of 4/30/92 hearing returned from 8 USCA (dac)

72 Sept. 17, 1993

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr., directing the parties to attempt to resolve any differences concerning enforcement provisions in light of this Court's and the 8th Circuit's decision; the parties shall submit a proposed Consent Decree for approval w/in 30 days (cc: all counsel) (jap) (Entered: 09/20/1993)

RECAP
73 Oct. 13, 1993

MOTION by defendants for extension of time to confer (jap) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

RECAP
74 Oct. 14, 1993

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr., granting motion of defts for extension of time to confer [73-1] (cc: all counsel) (jap) (Entered: 10/15/1993)

RECAP
75 Oct. 20, 1993

Entry of Appearance/Motion by plaintiff to substitute attorney Mona Teague as co-counsel for plaintiffs in place of Marcia L. McIvor (jap) (Entered: 10/21/1993)

RECAP
76 Oct. 29, 1993

Joint motion for extension of time to confer (jap) (Entered: 11/01/1993)

RECAP
77 Nov. 2, 1993

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr., granting motion to substitute attorney Mona Teague as co-counsel for plaintiffs in place of Marcia L. McIvor [75-1] [EOD 11/2/93] (cc: all counsel) (jap) (Entered: 11/02/1993)

RECAP
78 Nov. 3, 1993

JOINT MOTION by plaintiffs and defendants for extension of time to confer (bmt) (Entered: 11/04/1993)

RECAP
79 Nov. 4, 1993

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr., granting the parties' joint motion for extension of time to confer [76-1] [78-1]; the parties shall have through 11/15/93 (cc: all counsel) (jap) (Entered: 11/05/1993)

RECAP
80 Nov. 15, 1993

JOINT MOTION by parties to extend time to confer (bmt) (Entered: 11/16/1993)

RECAP
81 Nov. 16, 1993

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. granting motion to extend time to confer [80-1] & file their report to the Court until 11/17/93 (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 11/17/1993)

RECAP
82 Nov. 17, 1993

JOINT MOTION by parties for continuance (bmt) (Entered: 11/17/1993)

RECAP
83 Nov. 22, 1993

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr., granting the parties' joint motion for continuance [82-1] (cc: all counsel) (jap) (Entered: 11/23/1993)

RECAP
84 Jan. 14, 1994

REPORT to the Court by defendants Bill Clinton and Terry Yamauchi (jap) (Entered: 01/18/1994)

RECAP
85 Jan. 18, 1994

MOTION by plaintiff for order construing consent decree (jap) (Entered: 01/20/1994)

RECAP
86 Jan. 31, 1994

RESPONSE by defendant to motion for order construing consent decree [85-1] (jap) (Entered: 02/01/1994)

RECAP
87 Feb. 9, 1994

REPLY by plaintiffs to response to motion for order construing consent decree [85-1] (former empl) (Entered: 02/14/1994)

RECAP
88 March 30, 1994

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. denying motion for order construing consent decree [85-1]; case will be set for trial & scheduling order will be issued forthwith (cc: all counsel) (former empl) Modified on 09/12/1994 (Entered: 03/31/1994)

RECAP
89 March 31, 1994

SCHEDULING ORDER: (DOC) trial set for 9:30 on 10/17/94; discovery due 8/22/94; status report due 9/5/94; pretrial info due 9/5/94 (cc: all counsel) (former empl) (Entered: 04/01/1994)

RECAP
90 April 25, 1994

MOTION by plaintiffs to continue trial (former empl) (Entered: 04/26/1994)

RECAP
91 May 19, 1994

ORDER by Judge George Howard Jr. denying pltfs' motion to continue trial [90-1] EOD 5/19/94 (cc: all counsel) (jap) (Entered: 05/19/1994)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Arkansas

Case Type(s):

Child Welfare

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 8, 1991

Closing Date: 2001

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All children who, since July 1, 1988, are known to the Arkansas Department of Health Services (DHS) by reason of a complain of abuse or neglect, and all children who are in the custody of DHS as the result of emergency 72-hour placement or an abuse, neglect, or Family In Needs of Services (FINS) petition.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

National Center for Youth Law

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State

Arkansas Department of Human Services

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act of 1980 (AACWA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 620 et seq.

Adoption Assistance Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 670 et seq.

Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5101 et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Arkansas 4:91-cv-00415

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 92-02459

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Auditing

Other requirements regarding hiring, promotion, retention

Order Duration: 1994 - 2001

Issues

General/Misc.:

Adoption

Classification / placement

Counseling

Emergency shelter

Failure to supervise

Failure to train

Family abuse and neglect

Family reunification

Foster care (benefits, training)

Juveniles

Parents (visitation, involvement)

Placement in shelters

Siblings (visitation, placement)

Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)

Timeliness of case assignment

Benefits (Source):

Adoption Assistance and Child Welfare Act

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Crowding (General)

Recommended Citation