Case: Gibson v. Burdette

2:78-cv-02375 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia

Filed Date: Oct. 12, 1978

Closed Date: Aug. 3, 2011

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

Plaintiffs brought suit on October 12, 1978 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia against the West Virginia Department of Welfare and Department of Child Protective Services alleging violations of federal law and the U.S. Constitution, including the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendment. The plaintiffs challenged several practices in use by the Department of Welfare, now known as the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (WVDHHR). We…

Plaintiffs brought suit on October 12, 1978 in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia against the West Virginia Department of Welfare and Department of Child Protective Services alleging violations of federal law and the U.S. Constitution, including the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendment. The plaintiffs challenged several practices in use by the Department of Welfare, now known as the West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources (WVDHHR). We only have the docket sheet beginning in 1996, and we have very few documents related to the case.

On January 8, 1979, the court certified a class consisting of all children and their parents and legal guardians who are residents of the state who are now or will in the future be subject of abuse or neglect proceedings in which the state seeks to terminate or otherwise affect custodial rights to the children.

The parties reached a settlement on June 8, 1984, which became known as the Gibson Decree. The settlement directly addressed the claimed violation of the Fourteenth Amendment by providing parents and children an opportunity to be heard in court in a preliminary pretaking hearing upon reason notice. The Decree also requires that children and parents be informed of their right of appeal.

The consent decree also addresses numerous casework practices and mandatory services for children. Foster homes must meet minimum standards that assure food, clothing, and shelter, and must avoid overcrowding. With respect to agency staffing and resources, a social service supervisor must review all protective cases within each area office regularly.

The Gibson Decree introduced the use of "Gibson payments" to purchase services for families in an effort to make their home and family environment safe for children. Use of Gibson payments are restricted to cases that are open for ongoing services. Information about the Gibson payments is integrated into the state's official child protective services policy.

Only a few notable events have taken place since the parties entered a consent decree in 1984. First, the parties amended the decree in 1989. Second, on February 21, 1996, a youth and her parents sought an order of contempt and damages as putative class members; and in 2011, another youth sought the same order. The court declined to reopen the case, concluding that the youths were not included within the class definition, because the class definition required members be residents of the state in 1979. Gibson v. Ginsberg, 989 F. Supp. 772, 774 (S.D. W. Va. 1996); Gibson v. Ginsberg, No. 78-2375, slip op. at 16 (S.D. W. Va. June 3, 2011).

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Homan (12/3/2012)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5471146/parties/gibson-v-burdette/


Judge(s)

Copenhaver, John Thomas Jr. (West Virginia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Beter, George D. (West Virginia)

Dick, J. Benjamin (Virginia)

Attorney for Defendant

Fox, Jan L. (West Virginia)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Dalby, Nancy A. (West Virginia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:78-cv-02375

Docket

Aug. 3, 2011

Aug. 3, 2011

Docket
167

2:78-cv-02375

Order and Opinion

Gibson v. Ginsberg

Aug. 2, 1996

Aug. 2, 1996

Order/Opinion

989 F.Supp. 772

189

2:78-cv-02375

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Gibson v. Allen

June 3, 2011

June 3, 2011

Order/Opinion

2011 WL 2214919

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5471146/gibson-v-burdette/

Last updated April 7, 2025, 1:54 p.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
Oct. 7, 1981

Case closed (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
Oct. 7, 1981

THIS CASE WAS CLOSED BEFORE BEING ENTERED COMPLETELY INTO THE AUTOMATED SYSTEM. FOR PREVIOUS ENTRIES, CHECK THE MANUAL DOCKET SHEET. (emb) Modified on 11/08/1996 (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
160 Feb. 21, 1996

MOTION/PETITION by Judith A. Gleichauf, Joseph A. Gleichauf and Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson for Contempt and Equitable, Legal, and Further Relief Under the Prior Orders of This Court , to Enforce the Said Orders, Decrees of This Court and for Vindication of the Power of This Court and the Rights and Liberty Interests of Petitioners and Prayer for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages Pursuant to Rule 56 and 57 of FRCP, and Per USC 2201−2, 1343 Et Seq., 1331, 1983. Against the Class Defendants and Request for Pretrial Conference. (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
161 Feb. 21, 1996

STATEMENT OF VISITING ATTORNEY by J. Benjamin Dick for Judith A. Gleichauf, Joseph A. Gleichauf and Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson, with DESIGNATION OF LOCAL COUNSEL by George D. Beter. (emb) Modified on 11/08/1996 (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
162 Feb. 21, 1996

SEALED RECORDS of Court of Claims of WV, Claim No. CC−83−197, submitted by Judith A. Gleichauf, Joseph A. Gleichauf and Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson. (emb) Modified on 11/08/1996 (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
163 Feb. 21, 1996

LETTER from J. Benjamin Dick to Clerk, dated 02/20/96, re: enclosing corrected Page 25 of Plaintiffs' [160−1] motion/petition. (emb) Modified on 11/08/1996 (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
164 Feb. 23, 1996

LETTER from J. Benjamin Dick to Clerk, dated 02/21/96, re: enclosing corrected Pages 10, 12, 25 and 26 of the [160−1] motion/petition. (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
165 May 20, 1996

RESPONSE by All Defendants in opposition to Plaintiffs' [160−1] Motion/Petition for Contempt and Equitable, Legal, and Further Relief. (This entry is incorporated with the following entry) (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
165 May 20, 1996

MOTION by All Defendants to Dismiss Plaintiffs' [160−1] Motion/Petition. (This entry is incorporated with the previous entry) (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
166 June 4, 1996

RESPONSE by Judith A. Gleichauf, Joseph A. Gleichauf, Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson to Defendants' [165−1] response in opposition to Plaintiffs' [160−1] motion/petition for Contempt and Equitable, Legal, and Further Relief. (This entry is incorporated with the following entry) (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
166 June 4, 1996

MOTION by Judith A. Gleichauf, Joseph A. Gleichauf and Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson to Reopen this Civil Action. (This entry is incorporated with the previous entry) (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
167 Aug. 2, 1996

ORDER: denying Plaintiffs' [166−1] motion to Reopen this Civil Action, granting Defendants' [165−1] motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' [160−1] Motion/Petition., dismissing Plaintiffs' [160−1] motion for Contempt and for Equitable, Legal, and Further Relief Under the Prior Orders of This Court, dismissing Plaintiffs' [160−2] motion to Enforce the Orders, Decrees This Court and for Vindication of the Power of This Court and the Rights and Liberty Interests of Petitioners, dismissing Plaintiffs' [160−3] motion Prayer for and Injunctive Relief and Damages Pursuant to Rule 56 and of FRCP, and Per USC 2201−2, 1343 Et Seq., 1331, 1983. Against the Class Defendants and Request for Pretrial Conference. ( signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver Jr. ) (cc: attys) (emb) Modified on 10/25/1996 (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
168 Aug. 7, 1996

PETITION/MOTION by Judith A. Gleichauf, Joseph A. Gleichauf and Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson to Rehear. (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
169 Aug. 19, 1996

RESPONSE by Defendants in opposition to Plaintiffs' [168−1] motion to Rehear. (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
170 Aug. 29, 1996

CONVERSION TO COMPLAINT by Judith Gleichauf, Joseph Gleichauf and Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson. (This entry is incorporated with the previous entry) (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
170 Aug. 29, 1996

REPLY by Judith A. Gleichauf, Joseph A. Gleichauf and Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson to Defendants' [169−1] response to Plaintiffs' [168−1] Petition/Motion to Rehear and Defendants' [165−1] motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' [160−1] Motion/Petition. (This entry is incorporated with the following entry) (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
170 Aug. 29, 1996

SUPPLEMENTAL PLEADING by Judith Gleichauf, Joseph Gleichauf and Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson to Plaintiffs' [168−1] Petition/Motion to Rehear. (This entry is incorporated with the previous entry) (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
170 Aug. 29, 1996

EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIM by Judth Gleichauf, Joseph Gleichauf and Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson. (This entry is incorporated with the previous entry) (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
171 Oct. 8, 1996

ORDER: denying Plaintiffs' [168−1] petition/motion to Rehear; denying request by said petitioners for oral argument; denying the Plaintiffs' [170−1] motion to convert Plaintiffs' [160−1] motion/petition to a complaint; denying Plaintiffs' motion to seal documents submitted by the defendants in support of their [165−1] motion to dismiss. ( signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver Jr. ) (cc: attys) (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
172 Oct. 18, 1996

RETURN: [171−1] order entered 10/08/96 mailed to Andrew S. Nason, 710 Virginia Street East, Charleston, WV 25301 returned by U.S. Postal Service Marked "Undeliverable As Addressed Forwarding Order Expired, Return to Sender." (emb) (Entered: 10/21/1996)

PACER
173 Nov. 6, 1996

NOTICE OF APPEAL by Judith A. Gleichauf, Joseph A. Gleichauf and Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson. FILING FEE $ 105.00 RECEIPT # 068279 Appeal record due on 12/6/96 from [167−1] and [171−1] orders. (emb) Modified on 12/05/1996 (Entered: 11/07/1996)

PACER
174 Nov. 6, 1996

Notice of Appellate Action with certified copy of docket, judgment order and notice of appeal to 4CCA: [173−1] appeal by Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson, Joseph A. Gleichauf and Judith A. Gleichauf (cc: attys) (emb) (Entered: 11/07/1996)

PACER
175 Nov. 25, 1996

NOTICE of Appellate Action received by 4CCA on 11/14/96, 4CCA # &fee status: Fee Paid 4CCA No. 96−2662 Case Manager: Sharon A. Wiley (emb)

PACER
176 Dec. 16, 1996

LETTER from 4CCA to Ronald D. Lawson, dated 12/11/96, re: informing the court that a transcript is not necessary for this appeal and requesting the transmission of the certificate of readiness in 4CCA No. 96−2662. (emb) Modified on 03/10/1997

PACER
177 Dec. 16, 1996

CERTIFICATE by Clerk of Readiness of Record on Appeal in 4CCA No. 96−2662, re: [173−1] appeal by Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson, Joseph A. Gleichauf and Judith A. Gleichauf. (emb) Modified on 12/18/1996

PACER
178 Dec. 23, 1996

ACKNOWLEDGMENT by 4CCA of receipt of certificate of readiness on 12/18/96 in 4CCA no. 96−2662. (skh)

PACER
180 Dec. 1, 1997

UNPUBLISHED 4CCA OPINION for [173−1] appeal by Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson, Joseph A. Gleichauf, Judith A. Gleichauf affirming the decision of the District Court in 4CCA #96−2662. (pdb)

PACER
181 Dec. 1, 1997

JUDGMENT OF 4CCA (certified copy) Re: [173−1] appeal by Katrina Gleichauf Jefferson, Joseph A. Gleichauf, Judith A. Gleichauf affirming the judgment of the District Court in 4CCA # 96−2662. (cc: attys, Judge Copenhaver) (pdb)

PACER
182 March 3, 2011

MOTION AND PETITION by Amanda Underwood for Contempt and Equitable, Legal and Further Relief Under the Prior Orders of this Court on Behalf of the Class Member Amanda Underwood; and to Enforce the Said Orders, Decrees of this Court and for Vindication of the Power of this Court and the Rights and Liberty Interests of Petitioner; and Prayer for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages Pursuant to Rule 57 and 65 of FRCP, and Per 28 USC 2201−2, 1343 et seq., 1331, 1983 Against the Class Defendants, or their Successors Above (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Dalby, Nancy) (Modified text to conform to filed document and to edit description of attachment #1 on 3/4/2011) (skh).

PACER
183 March 10, 2011

ORDER pursuant to movant Amanda Underwood's 182 "MOTION AND PETITION FOR CONTEMPT AND EQUITABLE, LEGAL, AND FURTHER RELIEF UNDER THE PRIOR ORDERS OF THIS COURT ON BEHALF OF THE CLASS MEMBER AMANDA UNDERWOOD; AND TO ENFORCE THE SAID ORDERS, DECREES OF THIS COURT AND FOR VINDICATION OF THE POWER OF THIS COURT AND THE RIGHTS AND LIBERTY INTERESTS OF PETITIONER; AND PRAYER FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES PURSUANT TO RULE 57 AND 65 OF FRCP, AND PER 28 USC 2201−2, 1343 ET SEQ., 1331, 1983 AGAINST THE CLASS DEFENDANTS, OR THEIR SUCCESSORS ABOVE" (motion for an order to show cause), directing that defendants or their successors are to respond to the motion for an order to show cause by 3/25/2011, addressing solely the propriety of embedding and adjudicating within this civil action the claims made in the motion for an order to show cause; plaintiff to reply by 4/8/2011. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 3/10/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (taq)

PACER
March 10, 2011

SET DEADLINE re: 182 MOTION AND PETITION (motion for an order to show cause) by Amanda Underwood. Response due by 3/25/2011 and reply due by 4/8/2011 pursuant to the court's 183 order. (taq)

PACER
184 March 14, 2011

NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL by William P. Jones on behalf of Leon H. Ginsberg (Jones, William) (Modified text to conform to filed document on 3/14/2011) (skh).

PACER
185 March 23, 2011

RESPONSE AND MOTION by Leon H. Ginsberg to Dismiss 182 MOTION AND PETITION by Amanda Underwood for Contempt and Equitable, Legal and Further Relief Under the Prior Orders of this Court on Behalf of the Class Member Amanda Underwood; and to Enforce the Said Orders, Decrees of this Court and for Vindication of the Power of this Court and the Rights and Liberty Interests of Petitioner; and Prayer for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages Pursuant to Rule 57 and 65 of FRCP, and Per 28 USC 2201−2, 1343 et seq., 1331, 1983 Against the Class Defendants, or their Successors Above the Court's in Response to the Court's 183 Order.(Jones, William) (Modified on 3/23/2011 to convert event to a motion to dismiss, to add link to #182 motion and to remove memorandum and file as entry #187) (skh).

PACER
186 March 23, 2011

ANSWER TO 182 MOTION AND PETITION by Amanda Underwood for Contempt and Equitable, Legal and Further Relief Under the Prior Orders of this Court on Behalf of the Class Member Amanda Underwood; and to Enforce the Said Orders, Decrees of this Court and for Vindication of the Power of this Court and the Rights and Liberty Interests of Petitioner; and Prayer for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages Pursuant to Rule 57 and 65 of FRCP, and Per 28 USC 2201−2, 1343 et seq., 1331, 1983 Against the Class Defendants, or their Successors Above by Leon H. Ginsberg.(Jones, William) (Modified on 3/23/2011

PACER
188 April 8, 2011

REPLY by Amanda Underwood to 185 RESPONSE and MOTION by Leon H. Ginsberg to Dismiss 182 MOTION AND PETITION by Amanda Underwood for Contempt and Equitable, Legal and Further Relief Under the Prior Orders of this Court on Behalf of the Class Member Amanda Underwood. (Attachment: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Dalby, Nancy)(Modified on 4/13/2011 for clarity of text and to replace unsigned image of reply with signed image) (skh).

PACER
April 13, 2011

NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re: 188 Reply by Amanda Underwood to 185 Response and Motion. ERROR: Unsigned image attached. CORRECTION: Unsigned image of reply replaced with signed image. (skh)

PACER
189 June 3, 2011

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying movant Amanda Underwood's 182 MOTION for an order to show cause; the denial is without prejudice to movant's pursuit of any other available remedies. The court, accordingly, declines to reopen this case. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 6/3/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (taq)

RECAP
190 Aug. 3, 2011

ORDER pursuant to the 6/3/2011 189 memorandum opinion and order denying the request for an order to show cause, directing the Clerk to terminate docket entry 185 to the extent that it moves for dismissal of the request for an order to show cause; further, the court declined to reopen the case in its 6/3/2011 memorandum opinion and order, directing the Clerk to reflect on the docket the closed nature of the action. Signed by Judge John T. Copenhaver, Jr. on 8/3/2011. (cc: attys; any unrepresented parties) (taq)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

West Virginia

Case Type(s):

Child Welfare

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 12, 1978

Closing Date: Aug. 3, 2011

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

West Virginia children and their parents and legal guardians who are the subjects of abuse or neglect proceedings in which the state seeks to terminate or otherwise affect custodial rights to the children.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State

West Virginia

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Freedom of speech/association

Other Dockets:

Southern District of West Virginia 2:78-cv-02375

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Auditing

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Issues

General/Misc.:

Access to lawyers or judicial system

Access to public accommodations - governmental

Adoption

Counseling

Emergency shelter

Failure to supervise

Failure to train

Family abuse and neglect

Family reunification

Food service / nutrition / hydration

Foster care (benefits, training)

Incident/accident reporting & investigations

Individualized planning

Juveniles

Parents (visitation, involvement)

Payment for care

Relative caretakers

Siblings (visitation, placement)

Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)

Timeliness of case assignment

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Crowding (General)

Grievance procedures

Youth / Adult separation

Recommended Citation