Case: Pargo v. Elliott

4:92-cv-20781 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Iowa

Filed Date: Nov. 19, 1992

Closed Date: Oct. 7, 1996

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On November 19, 1992, women incarcerated at Iowa Correctional Institute for Women (“ICIW”) filed this class-action lawsuit in the Southern District of Iowa. Represented by Legal Services of Iowa, the plaintiffs (suing on behalf of a class of all women at ICIW) sued Iowa Department of Corrections officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the defendants violated the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause by maintaining policies, programs, and facilities that were not “substantially equ…

On November 19, 1992, women incarcerated at Iowa Correctional Institute for Women (“ICIW”) filed this class-action lawsuit in the Southern District of Iowa. Represented by Legal Services of Iowa, the plaintiffs (suing on behalf of a class of all women at ICIW) sued Iowa Department of Corrections officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that the defendants violated the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause by maintaining policies, programs, and facilities that were not “substantially equivalent” to those at the men’s state penal institutions. They sought declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and attorneys’ fees and costs.

The plaintiffs alleged that women were unconstitutionally treated in comparison with their male counterparts: women prisoners were classified in a different manner, lived in more confined housing, had fewer furlough and off-ground work opportunities, enjoyed less library time and yard privileges, participated in different substance abuse programs, and saw visitors in more restrictive settings. A six-day trial was held in March and April 1994. The plaintiffs argued that, since the classification differences were based on sex discrimination, they should be subject to traditional heightened scrutiny requiring that the classification be substantially related to an important governmental interest.

The district court found in favor of the defendants on September 23, 1994 in an opinion written by Judge Bremer. Pargo v. Elliott, 894 F. Supp. 1239 (S.D. Iowa 1994). Instead of the traditional equal protection analysis sought by the plaintiffs, the court applied a deferential standard laid out in Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 84 (1987). Under the Turner standard, the court afforded “great deference to the prison officials’ discrimination.” Judge Bremer found that ICIW female prisoners were not similarly situated to male inmates in Iowa because of ICIW’s small population. Additionally, although there were differences in the programming between the men’s and women’s prisons, Judge Bremer found that the plaintiffs failed to establish a discriminatory animus for the difference.

The plaintiffs appealed to the Eighth Circuit. There, the court found that the district court did not provide sufficient factual findings upon which to review the legal standards applied to the discrimination. Pargo v. Elliott, 69 F.3d 280 (8th Cir. 1995). Judge Diana Murphy wrote the opinion and noted that the deferential Turner standard is not always applicable, but could not determine whether it should be applied in the case at bar due to the insufficient record. After examining the transcript and discussing the record with both parties, the Eighth Circuit remanded the case to the district court to make detailed factual findings and formulate conclusions based on such findings.

Upon remand, the district court greatly expanded on its factual findings, but still found in favor of the defendants on July 14, 1995. Pargo v. Elliott, 894 F. Supp. 1243 (S.D. Iowa 1995). Judge Bremer again wrote the opinion. The court considered population, average security levels, types of crimes, and average length of sentence as key factors in determining that ICIW’s female prisoners were not similarly situated to male prisoners in other Iowa state prisons. ICIW held fewer prisoners for shorter sentences, and the female prisoners there were not grouped in as large or as divided of classifications as male prisoners.

Although the groups were not sufficiently similarly situated for purposes of an equal protection analysis, the court proceeded to consider whether the differential treatment had a rational basis to a legitimate state interest. Judge Bremer determined that the challenged discrimination should not be subject to heightened scrutiny because the plaintiffs did not establish that the policies were motivated by discriminatory intent.The court did not find any indications of invidious discrimination, but rather any differences between male and female state prisons were rationally related to legitimate penological interests.

The plaintiffs again appealed the district court’s decision to the Eighth Circuit. On November 8, 1995, the Eighth Circuit affirmed the decision. Pargo v. Elliott, 69 F.3d 280 (8th Cir. 1995). After the Supreme Court denied certiorari in October 1996, the case closed. 519 U.S. 831 (1996).

Summary Authors

Justin Hill (6/8/2020)

People


Judge(s)

Arnold, Richard Sheppard (Arkansas)

Bremer, Celeste F. (Iowa)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Frerichs, Thomas (Iowa)

Gosnell, Emily L (Iowa)

Attorney for Defendant

Ensign, Kristin W. (Iowa)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

4:92-cv-20781

Docket [PACER]

July 23, 1999

July 23, 1999

Docket
140

4:92-cv-20781

Opinion and Judgment

Pargo v. Elliot

Sept. 23, 1994

Sept. 23, 1994

Order/Opinion

894 F.Supp. 1239

18

94-03399

Opinion

Pargo v. Elliot

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

March 15, 1995

March 15, 1995

Order/Opinion

49 F.3d 1355

151

4:92-cv-20781

Opinion on Remand

Pargo v. Elliot

July 14, 1995

July 14, 1995

Order/Opinion

894 F.Supp. 1243

32

94-03399

Opinion

Pargo v. Elliot

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Nov. 8, 1995

Nov. 8, 1995

Order/Opinion

69 F.3d 280

95-08906

Opinion

Pargo v. Elliot

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 7, 1996

Oct. 7, 1996

Order/Opinion

519 U.S. 831

Docket

Last updated March 25, 2025, 8:12 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Nov. 19, 1992

COMPLAINT IN EQUITY (Summons(es) issued) ; Scheduling Report/Order due 4/18/93 ; Dismissal ddl (service) set for 3/25/93 (rh) (Entered: 11/19/1992)

PACER
Nov. 19, 1992

FILING FEE PAID: on 11/19/92 in the amount of $ 120.00, receipt # 39210. (rh) (Entered: 11/19/1992)

PACER
2 Nov. 27, 1992

RETURN OF SERVICE of summons and complaint, executed upon defendant Joni Keith, defendant Harold McCormick, defendant Jean Klingman, defendant Johnny Brown, defendant Jim Schweisow, defendant Jeanette Buckley on 11/20/92, and on defendant Barbara Olk on 11/23/92 (ld) (Entered: 11/27/1992)

PACER
3 Dec. 10, 1992

ANSWER by defendant Mildred Elliott, defendant Richard Vander Mey re: complaint [1−1] (rh) (Entered: 12/10/1992)

PACER
4 Dec. 14, 1992

ANSWER by defendant Joni Keith, defendant Harold McCormick, defendant Jean Klingman, defendant Johnny Brown, defendant Jim Schweisow, defendant Jeanette Bucklew, defendant Barbara Olk re: complaint [1−1] (rh) (Entered: 12/14/1992)

PACER
5 Jan. 19, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff Cathy Pargo to substitute parties before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 01/21/1993)

PACER
6 Jan. 22, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer granting motion to substitute parties before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [5−1] substituting defendant Sally Chandler Halford for defendant Jeanette Bucklew (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 01/22/1993)

PACER
Feb. 25, 1993

REMARK: rec'd. and forwarded to Mag. CFB, with deficient order, Combinded Mtns. and memsup.; 1 COPY ONLY of mtns.; and only 1 org. , no copy of brief. (rh) (Entered: 02/25/1993)

PACER
7 Feb. 26, 1993

ORDER RE: FILING by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer − the combined mtns. submitted by pla. atty. is deficient, and therefore to be returned to atty. (Non compliance with Local Rule 10 & 10(e). (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 02/26/1993)

PACER
8 March 4, 1993

COMBINED MOTIONS by plaintiff to refer to a U.S. Mag. , & for order permitting conferring between members of class, and prohibiting interference w/atty. client , and to compel discovery , and for Pretrial conference before Chief Judge Charles R. Wolle (rh) (Entered: 03/04/1993)

PACER
10 March 11, 1993

SUPPLEMENT TO COMBINED MOTION by Cathy Pargo, Dale Bahmer, Sandy Frank, Kim Frazier, Sheryl Snodgrass, Christine Lockheart, Molly Bissen, Willetta Davis, Linda Thompson, Michele Neary, Unknown Persons IA, Unknown Plaintiffs re motion to refer a U.S. Mag. [8−1] (sm) (Entered: 03/11/1993)

PACER
11 March 11, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer re [8−1] ; In−court hearing (MAG) 4/12/93 Tele. Conf. (cc: all counsel) (sm) (Entered: 03/12/1993)

PACER
12 March 16, 1993

PARTIAL RESISTANCE by defendant re: motion to refer to a U.S. Mag. [8−1], re: motion for order permitting conferring between members of class, and prohibiting interference w/atty. client [8−2], re: motion to compel discovery [8−3], re: motion and for Pretrial conference before Chief Judge Charles R. Wolle [8−4] AND TO supplement. (rh) (Entered: 03/16/1993)

PACER
13 March 17, 1993

REPLY by Cathy Pargo, Dale Bahmer, Sandy Frank, Kim Frazier, Sheryl Snodgrass, Christine Lockheart, Molly Bissen, Willetta Davis, Linda Thompson, Michele Neary, Unknown Persons IA, Unknown Plaintiffs, Mildred Elliott re [12−1] to Dfts' resistance to combined motions. (sm) (Entered: 03/22/1993)

PACER
March 17, 1993

RESPONSE TO DFTS' RESISTANCE TO COMBINED MOTIONS by Cathy Pargo, Dale Bahmer, Sandy Frank, Kim Frazier, Sheryl Snodgrass, Christine Lockheart, Molly Bissen, Willetta Davis, Linda Thompson, Michele Neary, Unknown Persons IA, Unknown Plaintiffs re: [12−1] motion response (sm) (Entered: 03/17/1993)

PACER
14 March 24, 1993

AFFIDAVIT of Cathy Pargo regarding motion for order permitting conferring between members of class, and prohibiting interference w/atty. client [8−2], (rh) (Entered: 03/24/1993)

PACER
15 March 25, 1993

ORDER by Chief Judge Charles R. Wolle granting motion to refer to a U.S. Mag. [8−1] Case referred to Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 03/25/1993)

PACER
16 April 7, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer ; In−court hearing rescheduled to (MAG) CFB on 4/26/93 @ 9:00 am by telephone conf. placed by the Court. (cc: all counsel) (sm) (Entered: 04/07/1993)

PACER
17 April 9, 1993

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff class by EMILY L GOSNELL. (ld) (Entered: 04/09/1993)

PACER
18 April 15, 1993

ORDER Rescheduling Hearing by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer hearing set for 9:00 a.m. on 4/26/93 rescheduled to ; In−court hearing (MAG) CFB 4/20/93 at 8:15 a.m. (cc: all counsel) (ld) (Entered: 04/15/1993)

PACER
19 April 22, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer granting motion for order permitting conferring between members of class, and prohibiting interference w/atty. client [8−2] (SEE ORDER FOR SPECIFICS); hrng. by phone on M/Class to be 5/25/93 @ 1:30 pm call made by ct; ; Final pretrial cnf (MAG) 3/1/94 ; Evidentiary hearing (MAG) 3/22/94 @ 9:00 @ Mitchellville , ; Dispositive Motion ddl set for 12/1/93 ; Discovery ddl 11/1/93 (cc: all counsel, consent form to pla. cnsl; cc: cal) (rh) (Entered: 04/22/1993)

PACER
20 May 3, 1993

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of class certification (rh) (Entered: 05/03/1993)

PACER
21 May 7, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff for FURTHER ORDER re [8−2] before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) Modified on 05/07/1993 (Entered: 05/07/1993)

PACER
22 May 10, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff for discovery before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 05/10/1993)

PACER
23 May 14, 1993

RESISTANCE by defendant re: motion for discovery before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [22−1] (rh) (Entered: 05/14/1993)

PACER
25 May 18, 1993

PARTIAL RESISTANCE by defendant to M/for classification (rh) (Entered: 05/18/1993)

PACER
26 May 25, 1993

REPLY TO REQUEST FOR ENTRY ON LAND FOR INSPECTION PURPOSEES (no mtn. for entry on file) by defendant (rh) (Entered: 05/25/1993)

PACER
27 June 4, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer granting motion for discovery [22−1] denying motion for FURTHER ORDER [21−1] Pla. M/for class cert. is Granted . (see order for many specifics) (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 06/04/1993)

PACER
28 June 10, 1993

STIPULATED STATUS REPORT (rh) (Entered: 06/10/1993)

PACER
29 June 15, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff for discovery (to allow class members on site visits to ICIW) before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

PACER
30 June 15, 1993

AFFIDAVIT of C. A. Frerichs regarding motion for discovery (to allow class members on site visits to ICIW) before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [29−1] (rh) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

PACER
31 June 15, 1993

SUPPLEMENT by plaintiff re motion for discovery (to allow class members on site visits to ICIW) before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [29−1] (rh) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

PACER
32 June 15, 1993

RENEWAL OF MOTION by plaintiff for order permitting rep. of class to meet, etc) before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

PACER
33 June 15, 1993

AFFIDAVIT of C.A. Frerichs regarding motion for order permitting rep. of class to meet, etc) before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [32−1] (rh) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

PACER
34 June 17, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff for protective order before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (ld) (Entered: 06/17/1993)

PACER
35 June 21, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer setting hearing on motion for protective order [34−1], motion for order permitting rep. of class to meet, etc) [32−1], (to allow class members on site visits to ICIW) before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [29−1] 10:00 6/29/93 by phone conf. placed by pla. atty. (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 06/21/1993)

PACER
36 June 24, 1993

RESISTANCE by defendant re: motion for order permitting rep. of class to meet, etc) before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [32−1] (rh) (Entered: 06/24/1993)

PACER
37 June 24, 1993

RESISTANCE by defendant re: motion for discovery (to allow class members on site visits to ICIW) before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [29−1] (rh) (Entered: 06/24/1993)

PACER
38 June 25, 1993

RESISTANCE by defendant re: motion for protective order before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [34−1] (rh) (Entered: 06/25/1993)

PACER
39 June 28, 1993

SUPPLEMENT by plaintiff re motion for order permitting rep. of class to meet, etc) before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [32−1] (rh) (Entered: 06/28/1993)

PACER
40 June 30, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer denying IN PART motion for order permitting rep. of class to meet, etc) GRANTING AS TO WRITTEN COMMUNICATION (see for specifics) [32−1] denying motion for protective order [34−1] granting IN SOTHAT 1 CLASS MEMBER may accompany the site visit team; The site visit shall be 7/19/93 @ 1:30 pm @ ICIW. [29−1] (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 06/30/1993)

PACER
June 30, 1993

−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− VOLUME 2 −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− −−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−−− (rh) (Entered: 06/30/1993)

PACER
41 July 2, 1993

STATEMENT by plaintiff " Confirmation of Site Visit Date" (rh) (Entered: 07/02/1993)

PACER
42 July 2, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff for reconsideration of 6/30/93 order before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 07/02/1993)

PACER
44 July 12, 1993

RESISTANCE by defendant re [42−1] (rh) (Entered: 07/20/1993)

PACER
45 July 21, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff to extend discovery ddl. before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 07/21/1993)

PACER
46 July 21, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff to extend more than 30 interrogatories before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 07/21/1993)

PACER
47 July 21, 1993

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff in support of motion to extend more than 30 interrogatories before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [46−1] (rh) (Entered: 07/21/1993)

PACER
48 July 21, 1993

RESPONSE by defendant re: [46−1] motion to extend more than 30 interrogatories before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer, re: [45−1] motion to extend discovery ddl. before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 07/21/1993)

PACER
49 July 23, 1993

RESISTANCE by defendant re: motion to extend more than 30 interrogatories before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [46−1] (cl) (Entered: 07/23/1993)

PACER
50 July 23, 1993

MEMORANDUM by defendant in support of motion response [49−1] (cl) (Entered: 07/23/1993)

PACER
51 July 27, 1993

REPLY by plaintiff re [49−1] (rh) (Entered: 07/27/1993)

PACER
52 July 28, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer granting motion to extend more than 30 interrogatories [46−1] (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 07/28/1993)

PACER
53 Aug. 9, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer granting motion to extend discovery ddl. [45−1]; Pla. have until 11/1/93 to designate experts (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 08/09/1993)

PACER
54 Aug. 13, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer re [48−1]; Dft. are granted until 11/22/93 to designate experts (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 08/16/1993)

PACER
55 Aug. 18, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer ; Telephone Hearing 9/9/93 @ 3:30 re: site visit to ICIW (cc: all counsel) (rh) Modified on 09/27/1993 (Entered: 08/18/1993)

PACER
56 Sept. 10, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff to bifurcate before Chief Judge Charles R. Wolle (rh) (Entered: 09/10/1993)

PACER
57 Sept. 14, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer Case consolidated 4:92−cv−80781 with member cases 4:93−cv−80353 All docketing to be in this case 4:92−cv−80781 (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 09/14/1993)

PACER
58 Sept. 15, 1993

REPLY by plaintiff re [57−1] (rh) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

PACER
59 Sept. 15, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer status conf. held by phone ; tour of Mitchellville will occur 10/1/93 @ 1:30, aprox. 1 hour; (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

PACER
60 Sept. 20, 1993

RESISTANCE by defendant motion to bifurcate before Chief Judge Charles R. Wolle [56−1] (rh) (Entered: 09/21/1993)

PACER
61 Sept. 20, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer vacating order consolidating 4:92−cv−80781 with member cases 4:93−cv−80353 [57−1], re [57−2]; Member case returned to Judge Vietor. (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 09/22/1993)

PACER
62 Sept. 22, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff for reconsideration of order re: Mitchellville site visit before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 09/22/1993)

PACER
63 Sept. 24, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer denying motion for reconsideration of order re: Mitchellville site visit UNLESS PLA. CNSL. CAN COORDINATE SCHEDULES AT A LATER DATE, (SEE FOR SPECIFICS), Pla. 3rd request for an addt'l. class rep. to be present is denied. [62−1] (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 09/24/1993)

PACER
64 Sept. 27, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer denying motion to bifurcate before Chief Judge Charles R. Wolle [56−1] (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 09/27/1993)

PACER
66 Nov. 1, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff to sub. class rep before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 11/01/1993)

PACER
67 Nov. 2, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer granting motion to sub. class rep [66−1], [66−2] (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 11/02/1993)

PACER
68 Nov. 5, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff for class rep. to be present re: deposition before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 11/08/1993)

PACER
69 Nov. 9, 1993

RESISTANCE by defendant motion for class rep. to be present re: deposition before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer [68−1] (rh) (Entered: 11/09/1993)

PACER
70 Nov. 9, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer setting hearing on motion for class rep. to be present re: deposition by phone conf. call [68−1] 9:30 11/10/93 (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 11/09/1993)

PACER
71 Nov. 10, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer granting motion for 4 class rep. to be present FOR DEPOSITIONS ONLY., as pla. has not complied w/LR14, the ct. did not address M/comp. answers to inter. [68−1] (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 11/10/1993)

PACER
72 Nov. 22, 1993

MOTION by Cathy Pargo, Dale Bahmer, Sandy Frank, Kim Frazier, Sheryl Snodgrass, Christine Lockheart, Molly Bissen, Willetta Davis, Linda Thompson, Michele Neary, Unknown Persons IA, Unknown Plaintiffs for protective order before Chief Judge Charles R. Wolle (sm) (Entered: 11/22/1993)

PACER
73 Nov. 29, 1993

RESPONSE by defendant re: [72−1] motion for protective order before Chief Judge Charles R. Wolle (rh) (Entered: 11/29/1993)

PACER
74 Dec. 2, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer denying motion for protective order [72−1] (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 12/02/1993)

PACER
75 Dec. 16, 1993

MOTION by plaintiff to extend discovery before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 12/16/1993)

PACER
76 Dec. 23, 1993

ORDER by Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer granting motion to extend discovery [75−1] ; Discovery ddl extended to 3/1/94 (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 12/23/1993)

PACER
77 Dec. 27, 1993

RESPONSE by defendant re: [75−1] motion to extend discovery before Magistrate Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 12/27/1993)

PACER
78 Jan. 21, 1994

MOTION by plaintiff Sandy Frank to dismiss before Chief Judge Charles R. Wolle (sm) (Entered: 01/24/1994)

PACER
79 Feb. 2, 1994

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer granting motion to dismiss party [78−1] terminating party Sandy Frank (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 02/02/1994)

PACER
80 Feb. 7, 1994

MOTION by plaintiff class for disbursement from atty. admission fund for payment of court reporter's fees before Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer (jv) (Entered: 02/07/1994)

PACER
81 Feb. 11, 1994

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Mark W. Bennett pltfs to submit proposed consent decree to defs by 2/23/94 − pltfs relieved of this obligation if defs' counsel advises pltfs' counsel no later than 2/15/94 that defs have no interest in settlement; Telephone Hearing MWB 2/28/94 @ 9 re: stlmt status (cc: all counsel) (lc) (Entered: 02/11/1994)

PACER
82 Feb. 25, 1994

ORDER by Chief Judge Charles R. Wolle referring matter to to Magistrate Judge Piester of the Dist. of NE (cc: all counsel, CFB, MWB, Piester, Strom, clk) (rh) (Entered: 02/28/1994)

PACER
83 March 1, 1994

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer granting motion for disbursement from atty. admission fund for payment of court reporter's fees [80−1] up to $1,000.00 (cc: all counsel, financial) (rh) (Entered: 03/01/1994)

PACER
84 March 1, 1994

ORDER ON FINAL PRETRIAL by Magistrate Judge Mark W. Bennett ptch (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 03/01/1994)

PACER
86 March 4, 1994

MOTION by plaintiff Cathy Pargo to substitute party (Class Representative) before Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer statement of proposed Class representative (sm) (Entered: 03/04/1994)

PACER
March 7, 1994

REMARK: cc: dkt. #86 mailed to Mag. Piester on 3/7/94 by rh (rh) (Entered: 03/07/1994)

PACER
87 March 9, 1994

SUPPLEMENT [85−1] to order by both parties (rh) (Entered: 03/09/1994)

PACER
88 March 9, 1994

CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE U.S. MAGISTRATE AND ORDER OF REFERENCE By order of C.R. Wolle to Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer under the revised case number of 4:92−cv−80781 for all further proceedings (cc: counsel) (rh) (Entered: 03/10/1994)

PACER
89 March 10, 1994

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer ; Status hearing 3/18/94 @ 11:30 by phone call placed by pla. cnsl. (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 03/10/1994)

PACER
90 March 11, 1994

MOTION by plaintiff for reconsideration of order on expenses before Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer (rh) (Entered: 03/11/1994)

PACER
91 March 11, 1994

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer granting motion for reconsideration of order on expenses [90−1]; Clk. is authorized to pay a total amt. of $1500 toward the expense of depositions in this case. (cc: all counsel, financial) (rh) (Entered: 03/11/1994)

PACER
92 March 11, 1994

STIPULATION TO AMENDMENT OF PRETRIAL ORDER (cc: mag. Peister) (rh) (Entered: 03/11/1994)

PACER
93 March 16, 1994

Pre−TRIAL brief submitted by defendants. (ld) (Entered: 03/16/1994)

PACER
94 March 17, 1994

TRIAL briefs submitted by plaintiff (rh) (Entered: 03/17/1994)

PACER
95 March 21, 1994

SUPPLEMENT by plaintiff [94−1] to brief (rh) (Entered: 03/21/1994)

PACER
96 March 21, 1994

NOTICE OF LIST OF DEPOSITIONS TO BE INTRODUCED by plaintiff (rh) (Entered: 03/21/1994)

PACER
97 March 25, 1994

CLERK'S COURT MINUTES: courtroom clerk: Shellie Knipfer; court reporter: L. Allmon; first day trial (rh) (Entered: 03/25/1994)

PACER
98 March 25, 1994

CLERK'S COURT MINUTES: courtroom clerk: C. F. Bremer, Mag. J.; court reporter: L. Allmon; 2nd day trial (rh) (Entered: 03/25/1994)

PACER
99 March 25, 1994

WITNESS & EXHIBIT list submitted from court (rh) (Entered: 03/25/1994)

PACER
100 March 29, 1994

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Celeste F. Bremer terminating party Magistrate Piester as party has advised case will not settle. (cc: all counsel) (rh) (Entered: 03/29/1994)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Iowa

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 19, 1992

Closing Date: Oct. 7, 1996

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All women incarcerated at Iowa Correctional Institute for Women.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Legal Services/Legal Aid

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State

Chief Administrative Officer

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Southern District of Iowa 4:92-cv-20781

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 94-03399

Supreme Court of the United States 95-8906

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Classification / placement

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

Recommended Citation