Case: Murphy v. Madigan (Murphy v. Raoul)

1:16-cv-11471 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Dec. 12, 2016

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On December 12, 2016, seven prisoners in the custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) filed this class-action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiffs sued the State of Illinois and its attorney general under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Represented by private counsel, they sought declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that Illinois, by its policies regarding individuals convicted of sex-related offenses, had violated their rights under t…

On December 12, 2016, seven prisoners in the custody of the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) filed this class-action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The plaintiffs sued the State of Illinois and its attorney general under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Represented by private counsel, they sought declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that Illinois, by its policies regarding individuals convicted of sex-related offenses, had violated their rights under the Eight and Fourteenth Amendments. The case was assigned to Judge Virginia M. Kendall.

Individuals convicted of certain sex-related offenses under Illinois law are subject to overlapping statutory and regulatory schemes that make it difficult for prisoners to satisfy conditions required for their release from prison. The Illinois Unified Code of Corrections provides that for all felony convictions, the sentencing court must provide within the sentencing order a term of parole or mandatory supervised release (MSR). Individuals convicted after July 1, 2005 of predatory criminal sexual assault of a child, aggravated sexual criminal assault, or criminal sexual assault, and individuals convicted after January 1, 2009 of aggravated child pornography or manufacturing or dissemination of child pornography were subject to a mandatory indeterminate term of MSR. The indeterminate duration of MSR could range from three years to life: an individual could only apply for termination of his indeterminate MSR sentence after completing three years of MSR outside of prison. A prisoner could not receive credit for MSR time served while in custody.

The Prison Review Board (PRB) required that before inmates could be released from IDOC custody, they had to have an approved “host site” to reside at while serving their MSR term. IDOC only approved host sites that met all housing restrictions imposed by statute, by IDOC, and by the Prison Review Board. Illinois did not provide housing resources for inmates, and halfway homes and homeless shelters automatically rejected individuals with sex-related convictions. Each plaintiff had either submitted multiple host sites and been denied by the IDOC, or was indigent and had no housing options to select for their host site. The plaintiffs alleged that the multiple restrictions created an unmeetable condition that forced them to spend the duration of their MSR term incarcerated. For the plaintiffs that were given an indeterminate MSR sentence, the unmeetable conditions resulted in life imprisonment.

 

On February 17, 2017, IDOC moved to dismiss the complaint on three grounds:

  1. Two of the plaintiffs’ claims lacked standing because they had not yet completed their incarceration sentences;
  2. The plaintiffs’ claim against the duration of their confinement should have been raised as a habeas action, not under 42 U.S.C. §1983; and
  3. The plaintiffs’ claims failed to allege sufficient facts for their constitutional claims.

On August 18, 2017, the court granted in part IDOC’s motion to dismiss, holding that the plaintiffs did not need to file a habeas action in order to receive the requested relief, and that all constitutional claims were appropriate except for the due process claim. The court granted, however, IDOC’s motion to dismiss with respect to two plaintiffs because their claims were based on post-release conditions and the plaintiffs had not yet been released. She further granted the motion with respect to the plaintiffs’ procedural due process claim because of vagueness.

On December 6, 2017, the plaintiffs moved for class certification and appointment of class counsel. They sought to certify a class of inmates who had completed their sentenced term and were currently detained in the IDOC and denied release because of their inability to find an approved host site. The court approved the unopposed motion on April 6, 2018, defining the class as all individuals sentenced to serve “three-years-to-life” on MSR, currently detained in IDOC, who have been approved for release on MSR but have been denied release from IDOC custody because of their inability to obtain an approved host site. Once discovery ended, both parties sought summary judgment. On March 31, 2019, the court granted the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in part and denied IDOC’s cross-motion for summary judgment.

The court held that the state’s host site requirement resulted in the continued deprivation of the plaintiffs’ Eighth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment equal protection rights. The court also addressed whether the proper vehicle to bring the plaintiffs’ claims was 42 U.S.C. §1983 or a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and determined that the plaintiffs properly brought their claims under 42 U.S.C. §1983 because they were not seeking release from custody, but rather the proper application of law to their situation. The court found that there was a genuine issue material fact as to whether IDOC offered a procedure for determining the validity of a decision to deny a host site, and denied summary judgment on that claim.

Both parties met on May 1, 2019, for a settlement conference and held further status hearings on June 18, 2019, October 1, 2019, December 3, 2019, January 2, 2020.

On January 15, 2020, the court granted a permanent injunction. According to the order, IDOC was required to present a plan, as well as quarterly reports outlining steps that would be taken to ensure that by January 2, 2021, no class member would remain in IDOC custody due to an inability to locate a host site.

On January 29, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a bill of costs, and on February 18, 2020, the court awarded costs to the plaintiffs in the amount of $3,015.41.

On February 27, 2020, IDOC presented a compliance plan to the court, pursuant to the injunction. The plan outlined the steps that IDOC had already taken to assist class members, such as host site policy changes and a review of host site denials. It also outlined additional steps that IDOC was then undertaking to release class members, such as finalizing a Request for Proposal for licensed transitional housing locations for sex offenders, and cooperation with the Illinois Department of Human Services to identify appropriate placements and/or services for class members who would likely qualify for that department’s services upon their release.

On June 15, 2020, IDOC presented a quarterly report further outlining the steps that it was then taking to release class members. Further quarterly reports were presented on September 14, 2020, December 14, 2020, and March 15, 2021.

On September 29, 2021, the defendants were ordered by the court to prepare a written report explaining why they should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the permanent injunction order to use sex therapists’ opinions to make host site determinations. The report was submitted to the court on October 27, 2021.

As of November 4, 2025, the court’s supervision of the settlement and injunction is ongoing.

 

 

Summary Authors

Kimberly Goshey (6/9/2019)

Bogyung Lim (7/21/2020)

Rayhan Younas (11/9/2025)

Related Cases

Barnes v. Jeffreys, Northern District of Illinois (2020)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6141583/parties/murphy-v-madigan/


Judge(s)

Kendall, Virginia Mary (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Nicholas, Adele D. (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Ioppolo, Thomas A. (Illinois)

Newman, Sarah Hughes (Illinois)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Only, Prisoner Correspondence (Illinois)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:16-cv-11471

Docket

Murphy v. Madigan

July 10, 2020

July 10, 2020

Docket
1

1:16-cv-11471

Class Action Complaint for Civil Rights Violations, Declaratory Judgment and Other Injunctive Relief

Murphy v. Madigan

Dec. 19, 2016

Dec. 19, 2016

Complaint
31

1:16-cv-11471

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Murphy v. Madigan

Aug. 18, 2017

Aug. 18, 2017

Order/Opinion

2017 WL 3581175

63

1:16-cv-11471

Order

Murphy v. Madigan

April 8, 2018

April 8, 2018

Order/Opinion
132

1:16-cv-11471

Memorandum Opinion and Order

Murphy v. Raoul

March 31, 2019

March 31, 2019

Order/Opinion

380 F.Supp.3d 731

156

1:16-cv-11471

Permanent Injunction Order

Murphy v. Raoul

Jan. 15, 2020

Jan. 15, 2020

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6141583/murphy-v-madigan/

Last updated April 16, 2026, 4:58 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Dec. 19, 2016

COMPLAINT filed by Alfred Aukema, J.D. Lindenmeier, Kevin Tucek, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy, Keenon Smith, Jasen Gustafsen; JURY DEMAND. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-12679809. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 12/19/2016)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 Dec. 19, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Alfred Aukema, Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy, Keenon Smith, Kevin Tucek by Adele D. Nicholas (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 12/19/2016)

RECAP
3 Dec. 19, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Alfred Aukema, Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy, Keenon Smith, Kevin Tucek by Mark G. Weinberg (Weinberg, Mark) (Entered: 12/19/2016)

RECAP
Dec. 20, 2016

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier. (lcw, )

Dec. 20, 2016

case assigned

4 Dec. 22, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alfred Aukema, J.D. Lindenmeier, Kevin Tucek, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy, Keenon Smith, Jasen Gustafsen as to John Baldwin on 12/22/2016, answer due 1/12/2017. (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 12/22/2016)

RECAP
5 Dec. 22, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Alfred Aukema, J.D. Lindenmeier, Kevin Tucek, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy, Keenon Smith, Jasen Gustafsen as to Lisa Madigan on 12/22/2016, answer due 1/12/2017. (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 12/22/2016)

RECAP
6 Dec. 22, 2016

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial status hearing set for 1/26/2017 at 9:00 a.m. Joint Status Report due by 1/23/2016. The parties are directed to Judge Kendall's web page found at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov for information about the Initial Status Report and for information regarding all standing orders for cases on Judge Kendall's docket. The parties shall follow all of the standing orders for Judge Kendall and all Local Rules which can be found at the same web page. For the Initial Status Report, the parties are to report on the following: (1) Possibility of settlement in the case; (2) if no possibility of settlement exists, the nature and length of discovery necessary (with specific dates) to get the case ready for trial; 3) whether the parties jointly consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge. Prior to the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties are to exchange initial disclosures (Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1)). At the Initial Status Hearing, the Parties shall be prepared to inform the Court about the extent of monetary damages in order for the Court to address the proportionality of discovery as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26. Lead counsel is directed to appear at this status hearing. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 12/22/2016)

RECAP
Dec. 22, 2016

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan (pg, )

Dec. 22, 2016

summons issued

7 Jan. 3, 2017

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Lisa Madigan by Sarah Hughes Newman (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 01/03/2017)

RECAP
8 Jan. 4, 2017

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Lisa Madigan by Thomas A. Ioppolo (Ioppolo, Thomas) (Entered: 01/04/2017)

RECAP
9 Jan. 9, 2017

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant John Baldwin by Sarah Hughes Newman (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 01/09/2017)

RECAP
10 Jan. 10, 2017

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant John Baldwin by Thomas A. Ioppolo (Ioppolo, Thomas) (Entered: 01/10/2017)

RECAP
11 Jan. 11, 2017

MOTION by Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint, 1 unopposed (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 01/11/2017)

RECAP
12 Jan. 11, 2017

NOTICE of Motion by Sarah Hughes Newman for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer, motion for relief 11 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 1/23/2017 at 09:00 AM. (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 01/11/2017)

RECAP
13 Jan. 12, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion for extension of time to answer 11 is granted. Answer due by 2/17/2017. Joint Status Report due by 2/27/2017. Initial Status hearing reset for 3/2/2017 at 9:00 AM. Motion hearing set for 1/23/2017 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 01/12/2017)

RECAP
14 Feb. 17, 2017

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 02/17/2017)

RECAP
15 Feb. 17, 2017

NOTICE of Motion by Sarah Hughes Newman for presentment of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 14 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/27/2017 at 09:00 AM. (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 02/17/2017)

RECAP
16 Feb. 17, 2017

MOTION by Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan for leave to file excess pages (unopposed) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, Proposed memorandum in support of motion to dismiss)(Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 02/17/2017)

1 Exhibit A, Proposed memorandum in support of motion to dismiss

View on PACER

RECAP
17 Feb. 17, 2017

NOTICE of Motion by Sarah Hughes Newman for presentment of motion for leave to file excess pages 16 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/27/2017 at 09:00 AM. (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 02/17/2017)

RECAP
18 Feb. 21, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Briefing schedule set as to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 14 . Responses due by 3/7/2017. Replies due by 3/14/2017. Status hearing set for 5/2/2017 at 9:00 AM. Initial Status hearing set for 3/2/2017 stands. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 02/21/2017)

RECAP
19 Feb. 22, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendants' Unopposed Motion for leave to file excess pages 16 is granted. Motion hearing set for 2/27/2017 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 02/22/2017)

RECAP
20 Feb. 22, 2017

MEMORANDUM by John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 14 (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 02/22/2017)

RECAP
21 Feb. 23, 2017

STATUS Report (Joint Initial Status Report) by Alfred Aukema, Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy, Keenon Smith, Kevin Tucek (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 02/23/2017)

RECAP
22 March 2, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Initial Status hearing held on 3/2/2017. Parties' oral motions to extend briefing schedule set for Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 14 are granted. Responses due by 3/14/2017. Replies due by 3/28/2017. Status hearing set for 5/30/2017 at 9:00 AM. Plaintiffs' oral motion to file excess pages for response brief is granted to 20 pages. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 03/02/2017)

RECAP
23 March 14, 2017

RESPONSE by Alfred Aukema, Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy, Keenon Smith, Kevin Tucekin Opposition to MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 03/14/2017)

RECAP
24 March 28, 2017

REPLY by John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan to response in opposition to motion 23 and in further support of motion to dismiss (Dkt. 14) (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 03/28/2017)

RECAP
25 May 25, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing set for 5/30/2017 is reset for 6/20/2017 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 05/25/2017)

RECAP
26 June 14, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing set for 6/20/2017 is reset for 6/28/2017 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 06/14/2017)

RECAP
27 June 23, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall: Status hearing set for 6/28/2017 is reset to 7/6/2017 at 09:00 AM.Mailed notice (clw, ) (Entered: 06/23/2017)

RECAP
28 July 6, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing held on 7/6/2017, and continued for 7/20/2017 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 07/06/2017)

RECAP
29 July 19, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing reset for 8/10/2017 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 07/19/2017)

RECAP
30 Aug. 9, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing set for 8/10/2017 is reset for 8/23/2017 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 08/09/2017)

RECAP
31 Aug. 18, 2017

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/18/2017. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 14 is granted with respect to Plaintiffs Aukema an Tucek's claims. The Motion is also granted with respect to the void for vagueness due process claim. The Motion is denied with respect to the remaining counts. Mailed notice(lk, )

Clearinghouse
32 Aug. 23, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing held on 8/23/2017. Answer to Complaint due by 9/20/2017. End of Fact Discovery ordered closed by 11/8/2017. End of Fact Discovery Status hearing set for 11/9/2017 at 9:00 AM. The parties shall be prepared to report to the court whether a dispositive motion will be filed, and whether expert discovery is necessary. The Illinois Department of Corrections shall permit the deposition of incarcerated Plaintiffs. Parties are directed to contact the courtroom deputy if they wish to schedule a settlement conference. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 08/23/2017)

RECAP
33 Sept. 18, 2017

MOTION by Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint, 1 Unopposed (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 09/18/2017)

RECAP
34 Sept. 18, 2017

NOTICE of Motion by Sarah Hughes Newman for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer 33 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 9/25/2017 at 09:00 AM. (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 09/18/2017)

RECAP
35 Sept. 19, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendants' Unopposed Motion for extension of time to answer 33 is granted. Answer shall be filed on or before 10/4/2017. Motion hearing set for 9/25/2017 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 09/19/2017)

RECAP
36 Oct. 4, 2017

MOTION by Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan for extension of time to complete discovery (Joint, agreed), MOTION by Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint, 1 Unopposed (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 10/04/2017)

RECAP
37 Oct. 4, 2017

NOTICE of Motion by Sarah Hughes Newman for presentment of motion for extension of time to complete discovery,, motion for extension of time to file answer, 36 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 10/11/2017 at 09:00 AM. (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 10/04/2017)

RECAP
38 Oct. 5, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Parties' Joint Motion for extension of time to complete Discovery and 36 is granted. Answer shall be due on or before 10/18/2017. End of Fact Discovery ordered closed by 2/6/2018. End of Fact Discovery Status hearing set for 2/8/2018 at 9:00 AM. Motion hearing set for 10/11/2017 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 10/05/2017)

RECAP
39 Oct. 5, 2017

MINUTE entry (Corrected) before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Parties' Joint Motion for extension of time to complete Discovery and answer Complaint 36 is granted. Answer shall be due on or before 10/18/2017. End of Fact Discovery ordered closed by 2/6/2018. End of Fact Discovery Status hearing set for 2/8/2018 at 9:00 AM. Motion hearing set for 10/11/2017 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 10/05/2017)

RECAP
40 Oct. 18, 2017

ANSWER to Complaint and Affirmative Defenses by John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan(Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 10/18/2017)

RECAP
41 Dec. 6, 2017

MOTION by Plaintiffs Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy to certify class (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 12/06/2017)

RECAP
42 Dec. 6, 2017

NOTICE of Motion by Adele D. Nicholas for presentment of motion to certify class 41 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/13/2017 at 09:00 AM. (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 12/06/2017)

RECAP
43 Dec. 11, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Briefing schedule set as to Plaintiffs' Motion to certify class 41 . Responses due by 1/3/2018. Replies due by 1/10/2018. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 12/11/2017)

RECAP
44 Dec. 11, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing set for 12/13/2017 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 12/11/2017)

RECAP
45 Dec. 28, 2017

MOTION by Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion to certify class 41 (Unopposed) (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 12/28/2017)

RECAP
46 Dec. 28, 2017

NOTICE of Motion by Sarah Hughes Newman for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply 45 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 1/3/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 12/28/2017)

RECAP
47 Dec. 29, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendants' Unopposed Motion for extension of time to file response/reply 45 regarding Motion to certify class 41 is granted. Response due by 2/2/2018. Reply due by 2/16/2018. Motion hearing set for 1/3/2018 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 12/29/2017)

RECAP
48 Feb. 2, 2018

RESPONSE by John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan to MOTION by Plaintiffs Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy to certify class 41 (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 02/02/2018)

RECAP
49 Feb. 2, 2018

MOTION by Plaintiffs Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy for extension of time to complete discovery Unopposed Motion (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 02/02/2018)

RECAP
50 Feb. 2, 2018

NOTICE of Motion by Adele D. Nicholas for presentment of motion for extension of time to complete discovery 49 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 2/8/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 02/02/2018)

RECAP
51 Feb. 5, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for extension of time to complete Discovery 49 is granted. End of Fact Discovery extended and ordered closed by 3/8/2018. End of Fact Discovery Status hearing reset for 3/12/2018 at 9:00 AM. Motion and Status hearings set for 2/8/2018 are stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 02/05/2018)

RECAP
52 Feb. 16, 2018

REPLY by Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy to MOTION by Plaintiffs Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy to certify class 41, response to motion 48 (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 02/16/2018)

RECAP
53 March 5, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing set for 3/12/2018 is reset for 4/9/2018 at 9:00 AM. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 03/05/2018)

RECAP
54 March 6, 2018

MOTION by Plaintiffs Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy to compel Defendant Lisa Madigan to Identify and Produce a 30(b)(6) Witness (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 03/06/2018)

RECAP
55 March 6, 2018

NOTICE of Motion by Adele D. Nicholas for presentment of motion to compel 54 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 3/12/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 03/06/2018)

RECAP
56 March 6, 2018

APPENDIX motion to compel 54 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 03/06/2018)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Exhibit

View on PACER

RECAP
57 March 9, 2018

RESPONSE by Lisa Madiganin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiffs Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy to compel Defendant Lisa Madigan to Identify and Produce a 30(b)(6) Witness 54 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, Notice of 30(b)(6) Deposition to Lisa Madigan, # 2 Exhibit B, Lisa Madigan's Responses to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories, # 3 Exhibit C, 3/1/2018 Letter from S. Newman to Plaintiffs' counsel)(Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 03/09/2018)

1 Exhibit A, Notice of 30(b)(6) Deposition to Lisa Madigan

View on PACER

2 Exhibit B, Lisa Madigan's Responses to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories

View on PACER

3 Exhibit C, 3/1/2018 Letter from S. Newman to Plaintiffs' counsel

View on PACER

RECAP
58 March 12, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Motion hearing held on 3/12/2018. Plaintiffs' Motion to compel 54 is referred to Magistrate Judge Schenkier. The case will be referred to Magistrate Judge Schenkier for Discovery Supervision. End of Fact Discovery extended and ordered closed by 6/8/2018. End of Fact Discovery Status hearing set for 6/11/2018. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 03/12/2018)

RECAP
59 March 12, 2018

EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ORDER: Case referred to the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier for motion 54 . Signed by Executive Committee on 3/12/18. (kp, ) (Entered: 03/13/2018)

RECAP
60 March 14, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier: The case has been referred to this Court for discovery supervision, and for ruling on plaintiffs' motion to compel (doc. # 54 ). Defendant Madigan has filed a response to the motion (doc. # 57 ). If plaintiffs wish to file a reply, they shall do so by noon on 3/16/18. We set the matter for a status and motion hearing on 3/20/18 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice. (jj, ) (Entered: 03/14/2018)

RECAP
61 March 14, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier: At the request of the parties, the status and motion hearings regarding plaintiffs' motion to compel (doc. # 54 )set for 3/20/18 before the magistrate judge are RESET to 3/28/18 at 10:00 a.m. Mailed notice. (jj, ) (Entered: 03/14/2018)

RECAP
62 March 28, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier: Status and motion hearings held. The parties report on the status of discovery. For the reasons stated on the record, plaintiffs' motion to compel (doc. # 54 ) is denied. The matter is set for a status hearing before the magistrate judge on 5/16/18 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice. (jj, ) (Entered: 03/28/2018)

RECAP
63 April 6, 2018

ORDER signed by the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 4/6/2018. Plaintiff's Motion to certify class and the appointment of class counsel 41 are both granted. Mailed notice(lk, ) (Entered: 04/06/2018)

Clearinghouse
64 May 16, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier: Status hearing held. The parties report on the status of discovery. The matter is set for a status hearing before the magistrate judge on 5/31/18 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice. (jj, ) (Entered: 05/16/2018)

RECAP
65 May 17, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier: The Court, sua sponte, RESETS the status hearing set for 5/31/18 before the magistrate judge to 6/05/18 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice. (jj, ) (Entered: 05/17/2018)

RECAP
66 June 5, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier: Status hearing held. The parties report on the status of discovery. The parties are further instructed to submit their proposed protective order to Judge Schenkier's proposed order box as soon as practicable. The matter is set for a status hearing before the magistrate judge on 6/20/18 at 9:00 a.m. Mailed notice. (jj, ) (Entered: 06/05/2018)

RECAP
67 June 11, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Status hearing held on 6/11/2018. Motions for Summary Judgment shall be filed by 7/11/2018. Responses due by 8/8/2018. Replies due by 8/22/2018. Ruling will be by mail. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 06/12/2018)

RECAP
68 June 20, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Sidney I. Schenkier: Status hearing held. The parties report that discovery has been completed and that they will proceed with the summary judgment motion schedule set forth by the district judge. The parties are further instructed to submit their proposed protective order to Judge Schenkier's proposed order box by no later than 6/22/18. The Court will not set a further status hearing at this time. Mailed notice. (jj, ) (Entered: 06/20/2018)

RECAP
69 July 6, 2018

MOTION by Plaintiffs Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy to set a briefing schedule (Joint Motion) (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 07/06/2018)

RECAP
70 July 6, 2018

NOTICE of Motion by Adele D. Nicholas for presentment of motion by filer to set a briefing schedule 69 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 7/11/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 07/06/2018)

RECAP
71 July 9, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Parties' Joint Motion to reset the briefing schedule on Parties' Cross Motions for Summary Judgment 69 is granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed by 8/2/2018. Defendants' response/cross Motion for Summary Judgment Responses due by 8/30/2018. Plaintiffs' response/reply due 9/20/2018. Defendants' reply due by 10/11/2018. Ruling will be by mail. Motion hearing set for 7/11/2018 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 07/09/2018)

RECAP
72 July 31, 2018

MOTION by Plaintiffs Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy for extension of time to file their motion for summary judgment (unopposed) (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 07/31/2018)

RECAP
73 July 31, 2018

NOTICE of Motion by Adele D. Nicholas for presentment of motion for extension of time to file 72 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/2/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 07/31/2018)

RECAP
74 Aug. 1, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Plaintiffs' Motion for extension of time to file Motion for Summary Judgment 72 is granted. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed by 8/9/2018. Defendants' response/cross Motion for Summary Judgment Responses due by 9/6/2018. Plaintiffs' response/reply due 9/27/2018. Defendants' reply due by 10/18/2018. Ruling will be by mail. Motion hearing set for 8/2/2018 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 08/01/2018)

RECAP
75 Aug. 10, 2018

MOTION by Plaintiffs J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy, Jasen Gustafsen for summary judgment (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 08/10/2018)

RECAP
76 Aug. 10, 2018

RULE 56 Local Rule 56.1(a) Statement by Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy regarding motion for summary judgment 75 (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 08/10/2018)

RECAP
77 Aug. 10, 2018

MOTION by Plaintiffs Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy for leave to file instanter their Summary Judgment Brief and L.R. 56.1 Statement (Unopposed) (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 08/10/2018)

RECAP
78 Aug. 10, 2018

NOTICE of Motion by Adele D. Nicholas for presentment of motion for leave to file 77 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 8/20/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 08/10/2018)

RECAP
79 Aug. 13, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for leave to file brief and statement of facts instanter 77 is granted. Motion hearing set for 8/20/2018 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 08/13/2018)

RECAP
80 Aug. 14, 2018

APPENDIX Rule 56 statement 76, motion for summary judgment 75 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit, # 10 Exhibit, # 11 Exhibit, # 12 Exhibit, # 13 Exhibit, # 14 Exhibit, # 15 Exhibit, # 16 Exhibit, # 17 Exhibit, # 18 Exhibit, # 19 Exhibit, # 20 Exhibit, # 21 Exhibit, # 22 Exhibit, # 23 Exhibit, # 24 Exhibit, # 25 Exhibit, # 26 Exhibit, # 27 Exhibit, # 28 Exhibit, # 29 Exhibit, # 30 Exhibit, # 31 Exhibit, # 32 Exhibit, # 33 Exhibit, # 34 Exhibit, # 35 Exhibit)(Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 08/14/2018)

1 Exhibit

View on PACER

2 Exhibit

View on PACER

3 Exhibit

View on PACER

4 Exhibit

View on PACER

5 Exhibit

View on PACER

6 Exhibit

View on PACER

7 Exhibit

View on PACER

8 Exhibit

View on PACER

9 Exhibit

View on PACER

10 Exhibit

View on PACER

11 Exhibit

View on PACER

12 Exhibit

View on PACER

13 Exhibit

View on PACER

14 Exhibit

View on PACER

15 Exhibit

View on PACER

16 Exhibit

View on PACER

17 Exhibit

View on PACER

18 Exhibit

View on PACER

19 Exhibit

View on PACER

20 Exhibit

View on PACER

21 Exhibit

View on PACER

22 Exhibit

View on PACER

23 Exhibit

View on PACER

24 Exhibit

View on PACER

25 Exhibit

View on PACER

26 Exhibit

View on PACER

27 Exhibit

View on PACER

28 Exhibit

View on PACER

29 Exhibit

View on PACER

30 Exhibit

View on PACER

31 Exhibit

View on PACER

32 Exhibit

View on PACER

33 Exhibit

View on PACER

34 Exhibit

View on PACER

35 Exhibit

View on PACER

RECAP
81 Sept. 5, 2018

MOTION by Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion for summary judgment 75 and cross-motion for summary judgment (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 09/05/2018)

RECAP
82 Sept. 5, 2018

NOTICE of Motion by Sarah Hughes Newman for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply 81 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 9/14/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 09/05/2018)

RECAP
83 Sept. 6, 2018

RESPONSE by Plaintiffs Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy to motion for extension of time to file response/reply 81 (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 09/06/2018)

RECAP
84 Sept. 7, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendants' Motion for extension of time to file response 81 to Motion for Summary Judgment 75 is granted to 11/5/2018. Response due by 11/5/2018. Reply due by 11/26/2018. Motion hearing set for 9/14/2018 is stricken. Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 09/07/2018)

RECAP
85 Nov. 5, 2018

MOTION by Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion for summary judgment 75 & Defendants' motion for summary judgment (unopposed) (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/05/2018)

RECAP
86 Nov. 5, 2018

NOTICE of Motion by Sarah Hughes Newman for presentment of motion for extension of time to file response/reply 85 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 11/9/2018 at 09:00 AM. (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/05/2018)

RECAP
87 Nov. 7, 2018

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. Defendants' Unopposed Motion for extension of time to file response 85 regarding Motion for Summary Judgment 75 is granted. Defendants' response/cross Motion for Summary Judgment Responses due by 11/20/2018. Plaintiffs' response/reply due 12/11/2018. Ruling will be by mail. Motion hearing set for 11/9/2018 is stricken.Mailed notice (lk, ) (Entered: 11/07/2018)

RECAP
88 Nov. 20, 2018

MOTION by Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan for summary judgment (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/20/2018)

RECAP
89 Nov. 20, 2018

MEMORANDUM by John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan in support of motion for summary judgment 88 and in opposition to Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 75) (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/20/2018)

RECAP
90 Nov. 20, 2018

RULE 56 (a) Statement by John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan regarding motion for summary judgment 88 (Defendants' L.R. 56.1 Statement of Undisputed Facts) (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/20/2018)

RECAP
91 Nov. 20, 2018

RESPONSE by Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan to Rule 56 statement 76 (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/20/2018)

RECAP
92 Nov. 20, 2018

APPENDIX Rule 56 statement 90, Response 91, motion for summary judgment 88 in support of Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 88) and in opposition to Plaintiffs' summary judgment motion (Dkt. 75) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Dion Dixon, # 2 Exhibit 2, Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision Rules (excerpted), # 3 Exhibit 3, Chicago Tribune article dated Dec. 6, 2009, # 4 Exhibit 4, Chicago Tribune article dated July 17, 2015, # 5 Exhibit 5, IDOC Administrative Directive No. 04.01.114, Local Offender Grievance Procedures, # 6 Exhibit 6, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Cinszeo Doss, # 7 Exhibit 7, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Charles Dobson, # 8 Exhibit 8, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Jonathan Sparks, # 9 Exhibit 9, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Antoine Lamb)(Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/20/2018)

1 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Dion Dixon

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 2, Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision Rules (excerpte

View on PACER

3 Exhibit 3, Chicago Tribune article dated Dec. 6, 2009

View on PACER

4 Exhibit 4, Chicago Tribune article dated July 17, 2015

View on PACER

5 Exhibit 5, IDOC Administrative Directive No. 04.01.114, Local Offender Grievanc

View on PACER

RECAP
93 Nov. 21, 2018

MOTION by Defendants John Baldwin, Lisa Madigan for leave to file excess pages instanter (Unopposed) (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/21/2018)

RECAP
94 Nov. 21, 2018

NOTICE of Motion by Sarah Hughes Newman for presentment of motion for leave to file excess pages 93 before Honorable Virginia M. Kendall on 12/20/2018 at 10:00 AM. (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/21/2018)

RECAP
95 Nov. 21, 2018

APPENDIX Rule 56 statement 90, Response 91, motion for summary judgment 88 in support of Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. 88) and in opposition to Plaintiffs' summary judgment motion (Dkt. 75) (Exhibits 6-9 redacted) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Dion Dixon, # 2 Exhibit 2, Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision Rules (excerpted), # 3 Exhibit Chicago Tribune article dated Dec. 6, 2009, # 4 Exhibit 4, Chicago Tribune article dated July 17, 2015, # 5 Exhibit IDOC Administrative Directive No. 04.01.114, Local Offender Grievance Procedures, # 6 Exhibit 6, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Cinszeo Doss (redacted), # 7 Exhibit 7, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Charles Dobson (redacted), # 8 Exhibit 8, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Jonathan Sparks (redacted), # 9 Exhibit 9, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Antoine Lamb (redacted))(Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/21/2018)

1 Exhibit 1, Declaration of Dion Dixon

View on PACER

2 Exhibit 2, Interstate Commission for Adult Offender Supervision Rules (excerpte

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Chicago Tribune article dated Dec. 6, 2009

View on PACER

4 Exhibit 4, Chicago Tribune article dated July 17, 2015

View on PACER

5 Exhibit IDOC Administrative Directive No. 04.01.114, Local Offender Grievance P

View on PACER

6 Exhibit 6, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Cinszeo Doss (redacted)

View on PACER

7 Exhibit 7, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Charles Dobson (redacted)

View on PACER

8 Exhibit 8, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Jonathan Sparks (redacted)

View on PACER

9 Exhibit 9, Illinois Sex Offender Registry Record for Antoine Lamb (redacted)

View on PACER

RECAP
96 Nov. 28, 2018

MOTION by Plaintiffs Jasen Gustafsen, J.D. Lindenmeier, Stanley Meyer, Paul Murphy for extension of time to file response/reply as to motion for summary judgment 88 (Nicholas, Adele D.) (Entered: 11/28/2018)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Criminal Justice (Other)

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 12, 2016

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All persons who have been sentenced to a term of three years to natural life on Mandatory Supervised Release (MSR) who are currently detained in the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) and have been approved for release on MSR by the Prison Review Board but have been denied release from IDOC custody because of their inability to find an approved host site.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State

State of Illinois

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Illinois 1:16-cv-11471

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Non-settlement Outcome

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Reporting

Amount Defendant Pays: 3,015.41

Issues

General/Misc.:

Poverty/homelessness

Sex offender regulation

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Good time

Over/Unlawful Detention (facilities)

Recommended Citation