Case: Jones v. City and County of San Francisco

3:91-cv-03453 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: Oct. 2, 1991

Closed Date: Aug. 18, 2000

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The plaintiffs originally filed this action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 2, 1991. The plaintiff class, consisting of certain pre-trial detainees housed at San Francisco Jail Number 3 (Jail No. 3) in San Bruno, California, brought suit challenging the constitutionality of the conditions of their confinement. The original action, entitled William Besk v. City and County of San Francisco, lead to a Stipulation of Dismissal ("B…

The plaintiffs originally filed this action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on October 2, 1991. The plaintiff class, consisting of certain pre-trial detainees housed at San Francisco Jail Number 3 (Jail No. 3) in San Bruno, California, brought suit challenging the constitutionality of the conditions of their confinement. The original action, entitled William Besk v. City and County of San Francisco, lead to a Stipulation of Dismissal ("Besk Stipulation") filed by Senior Judge William H. Orrick on May 24, 1993, in which plaintiffs agreed to dismiss the action if defendants complied with the thirty-three requirements contained therein. Besk v. City and County of San Francisco, 1993 WL 181496 (N.D.Cal. 1993). The defendants' alleged violations of the Besk Stipulation requirements prompted the plaintiffs to reopen the case and file an amended complaint charging noncompliance. On April 22, 1994, the court appointed Allen F. Breed as Special Master to aid the court in determining whether the defendants complied with the terms of the Besk Stipulation. According to the Special Master's report of August 30, 1994, the defendants had improved some of the living conditions at Jail No. 3, but in many cases they failed to substantially comply with the Besk Stipulation.

On the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Senior Judge William H. Orrick) granted the motion in part. Jones v. City and County of San Francisco, 976 F.Supp. 896 (N.D.Cal. 1997). Judge Orrick held that the detainees had established due process violations based on defendants' inadequate response to fire safety risks at the jail, excessive risks of harm from earthquakes, physical defects in the jail's water, plumbing, and sewage systems, excessive noise levels, and poor lighting. The court found that fact questions precluded summary judgment as to alleged deficiencies in ensuring personal safety, in the jail's air quality, ventilation and heating, and in the privacy of attorney-client consultation. The court enjoined the defendants to draft a plan to remedy the described constitutional violations.

Judge Orrick subsequently approved the defendant's settlement plan on August 30, 1999. On March 27, 2000, Judge Orrick issued an order stating that if the defendants did not enter into a binding a contract to build a new jail by June 15, 2000, the court would vacate the stay of the action and order the City to close Jail No. 3 and to house those inmates elsewhere. On May 15, 2000, Judge Orrick found that the defendants had complied with the later settlement terms, and on May 31, 2000, Judge Orrick referred the case to the Federal Pro Bono Project. On August 18, 2000, the case was dismissed.

Summary Authors

Kristen Sagar (12/9/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/9602452/parties/jones-v-sf-city-county/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Cohen, Morton P. (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Aftergut, Dennis (California)

Baumgartner, Margaret (California)

Greenman, Martin L. (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

3:91-cv-03453

Docket (PACER)

Sept. 18, 2000

Sept. 18, 2000

Docket
36

3:91-cv-03453

Stipulation of Dismissal

Besk v. City and County of San Fransisco

May 24, 1993

May 24, 1993

Order/Opinion

1993 WL 181496

251

3:91-cv-03453

Opinion and Order

July 18, 1997

July 18, 1997

Order/Opinion

976 F.Supp. 896

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/9602452/jones-v-sf-city-county/

Last updated March 18, 2026, 5:20 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Oct. 2, 1991

COMPLAINT (No Process) Fee status pd entered on 10/2/91 in the amount of $ 120.00 ( Receipt No. 89430) Class Action (th, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/02/1991)

RECAP
2 Oct. 2, 1991

EXHIBITS re complaint [1-1] (th, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/02/1991)

RECAP
3 Oct. 2, 1991

DEMAND for jury trial by plaintiffs (th, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/02/1991)

RECAP
4 Oct. 2, 1991

NOTICE by plaintiff of related case(s) 78-2774-WHO & 91-3453-SBA (th, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/02/1991)

RECAP
5 Oct. 15, 1991

RESPONSE by defendants re related case notice [4-1] (th, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/16/1991)

RECAP
6 Oct. 23, 1991

ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick granting related case notice [4-1]. Relating 78-2774-WHO and 91-3453-SBA to reassign to Senior Judge William H. Orrick ( Date Entered: 10/25/91) (cc: all counsel) (th, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/25/1991)

RECAP
8 Oct. 25, 1991

CLERK'S NOTICE ; Status conference set for 2/5/92 2:00 (dm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/15/1991)

RECAP
7 Nov. 1, 1991

PROOF OF SERVICE by plaintiffs William Besk, Pete Morales, Mauricio Palacio, Manuel Rojas of notice of order (as, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/07/1991)

RECAP
9 Dec. 6, 1991

ANSWER by defendant SF City & County, defendant Art Agnos, defendant Michael Hennessey, defendant Board of Supervisors to complaint [1-1]; jury demand (dm, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/09/1991)

RECAP
10 Jan. 24, 1992

STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT by defendants (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/27/1992)

RECAP
11 Jan. 29, 1992

STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT by plaintiffs (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/30/1992)

RECAP
12 Jan. 30, 1992

PROOF OF SERVICE by mail by plaintiffs of status conference statement (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/30/1992)

RECAP
13 Feb. 5, 1992

MINUTES: ( C/R Jo Ann Lauritzen) ; Status conference held on 2/5/92 (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/06/1992)

RECAP
14 Feb. 18, 1992

ORDER by WHO : status conference held on 2/5/92 and continued to 2:00 3/19/92; counsel are to hold a series of meetings on 2/12/92, 2/18/92, 2/28/92, 3/6/92, the first two meetings concern discovery and class certification, the second two meetings for purposes of discussing settlement; the Court will hear all discovery matters (cc: all counsel) (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/20/1992)

RECAP
15 March 20, 1992

CLERK'S NOTICE ;Status conference set for 2:00 3/26/92 (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/23/1992)

RECAP
16 March 24, 1992

LETTER dated 3/23/92 from James Severson on behalf of plaintiffs re rescheduling of status conference (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/25/1992)

RECAP
17 March 31, 1992

LETTER dated 3/30/92 from James Severson on behalf of plaintiffs re rescheduling of status conference to 4/20/92 at 2:00 pm (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/01/1992)

RECAP
18 April 8, 1992

STIPULATION and ORDER by WHO re Class Certification motion pending the outcome of the parties' settlement negotiations (see order for details) (cc: all counsel) (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/09/1992)

RECAP
19 April 10, 1992

CLERK'S NOTICE ;Status conference continued to 2:00 5/21/92 (mcl, COURT STAFF) Modified on 04/13/1992 (Entered: 04/13/1992)

RECAP
20 April 20, 1992

PROOF OF SERVICE by mail by plaintifsf of Stipulation and Order re class certification motion (mcl, COURT STAFF) Modified on 04/22/1992 (Entered: 04/21/1992)

RECAP
21 May 18, 1992

CLERK'S NOTICE ;Status conference continued to 2:00 6/18/92 (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/19/1992)

RECAP
22 June 4, 1992

CLERK'S NOTICE ;Status conference continued to 2:00 7/15/92 (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/05/1992)

RECAP
June 4, 1992

RECEIVED letter dated 6/1/92 from Dennis Aftergut re rescheduling of status conference in the Besk case and hearing on attorney's fees in the Stone case (mcl, COURT STAFF)

23 July 8, 1992

STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT by defendants (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/09/1992)

RECAP
24 July 9, 1992

STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT by plaintiffs (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/10/1992)

RECAP
25 Dec. 7, 1992

STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT by defendants (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/11/1992)

RECAP
26 Jan. 20, 1993

LETTER dated 12/18/92 from Dennis Aftergut re status conferencefor 2/18/93 (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/25/1993)

RECAP
27 Jan. 20, 1993

CLERK'S NOTICE Status conference set for 2:00 2/18/93 ; (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/25/1993)

RECAP
28 March 26, 1993

LETTER dated 3/19/93 from Dennis Aftergut re request for status conference to be held on 4/15/93 (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/01/1993)

RECAP
29 March 26, 1993

CLERK'S NOTICE Status conference set for 2:00 4/15/93 ; (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/01/1993)

RECAP
30 April 8, 1993

JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/09/1993)

RECAP
31 April 16, 1993

MINUTES: ( C/R Angie Roberts) Status Conference held on 4/15/93 ; fairness hearing will be held 2:00 5/13/93 ; (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/20/1993)

RECAP
32 April 22, 1993

ORDER by WHO hearing re settlement will be held 5/13/93 at 2:00 pm ; response to settlement due 5/6/93 (see order) ( Date Entered: 4/28/93) (cc: all counsel) (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/28/1993)

RECAP
33 May 3, 1993

CLERK'S NOTICE fairness hearing continued to 2:00 5/20/93 (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/03/1993)

RECAP
34 May 20, 1993

MINUTES: ( C/R Carol Karen) fairness hearing held ; Court approves stipulation of the class and dismissal of the case (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/21/1993)

RECAP
35 May 21, 1993

LETTER dated 4/22/93 from Cornel Pierre Richmond re amount of damages (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1993)

RECAP
36 May 24, 1993

STIPULATION and ORDER by WHO : dismissing case with prejudice ; defendants to pay plaintiff the sum of $75,000.00 upon final approval of this settlement ... (see document) (cc: all counsel) (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/28/1993)

RECAP
37 May 24, 1993

STIPULATION and ORDER by WHO : certifying class action for settlement purposes (see document) (cc: all counsel) (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/28/1993)

RECAP
38 March 18, 1994

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION before WHO by plaintiff in 3:91-cv-03453 for leave to amend complaint, and to certify class action with Notice set for 4/21/94 at 2:00 pm [3:91-cv-03453] (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/22/1994)

RECAP
39 March 18, 1994

MEMORANDUM of points and authorities by plaintiffs in 3:91-cv-03453 in support of motion for leave to amend complaint [38-1], of motion to certify class action [38-2] [3:91-cv-03453] (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/22/1994)

RECAP
40 March 18, 1994

DECLARATION by Morton P. Cohen on behalf of plaintiffs in 3:91-cv-03453 re motion for leave to amend complaint [38-1], re motion to certify class action [38-2] [3:91-cv-03453] (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/22/1994)

RECAP
March 18, 1994

RECEIVED Order ( plaintiffs in 3:91-cv-03453) re: [38-1], re: [38-2] [3:91-cv-03453] (mcl, COURT STAFF)

247 March 28, 1994

AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by Plaintiffs in 3:91-cv-03453 [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/02/1997)

RECAP
April 11, 1994

RECEIVED Stipulated Order re filing of amended complaint and continuing hearing on motion for class certification [3:91-cv-03453] (mcl, COURT STAFF)

41 April 12, 1994

STIPULATION and ORDER by WHO : granting plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend complaint [38-1], resetting hearing on motion to certify class action [38-2] 2:00 6/9/94 ; plaintiffs' amended complaint shall be deemed filed as of 3/18/94, defendants have up to & incl 5/12/94 to answer ; opposition brief to motion to certify due 5/19/94 ; reply brief due 6/2/94 (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/15/1994)

RECAP
42 April 18, 1994

PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant SF City & County in 3:91-cv-03453 of Stipulation and order re filing of amended complaint and continuing hearing on motion for class certification [3:91-cv-03453] (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/21/1994)

RECAP
43 April 22, 1994

ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick Special Master Allen F. Breed is appointed for the purpose of determining whether defendants are in compliance with the settlement agreement set for in the Court's Order of 5/24/93 ( Date Entered: 4/26/94) (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/26/1994)

RECAP
44 April 28, 1994

LETTER dated 4/26/94 from Joanne Hoeper to Ms. Bowcock re amendment to service list : all orders should be served on Joanne Hoeper, Deputy City Attorney, Fox Plaza, 1390 Market Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94102, for defendant City and County of SF [3:91-cv-03453] (mcl, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/02/1994)

RECAP
45 July 1, 1994

ANSWER by defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 to amended complaint; jury demand [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/05/1994)

RECAP
46 Aug. 22, 1994

STIPULATION and ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick for deposition of plaintiff (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

RECAP
47 Aug. 24, 1994

PROOF OF SERVICE by Defendant SF City & County in 3:91-cv-03453 of stipulated order [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/25/1994)

RECAP
48 Sept. 12, 1994

OBJECTIONS by defendants in 3:91-cv-03453 to special master's report on defendants' compliance with settlement agreement set forth in order of 5/24/93 [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/16/1994)

RECAP
49 Sept. 19, 1994

CLERK'S NOTICE Status conference set for 2:30 10/12/94 ; [3:91-cv-03453] (ga, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/23/1994)

RECAP
50 Sept. 19, 1994

CLERK'S NOTICE Special Master's Report hearing will be held 2:00 10/13/94 ; [3:91-cv-03453] (ga, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/23/1994)

RECAP
51 Sept. 23, 1994

RESPONSE by Plaintiff in 3:91-cv-03453 to defendants' objections to special masters' report on defendants compliance [48-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/27/1994)

RECAP
52 Oct. 5, 1994

STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT by defendants in 3:91-cv-03453 [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/06/1994)

RECAP
53 Oct. 5, 1994

STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT by Plaintiffs in 3:91-cv-03453 [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/06/1994)

RECAP
54 Oct. 14, 1994

CLERK'S NOTICE Status conference set for 2:00 p.m. on 11/17/94 ; and that status conference statements is due 7 days before the conference [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/17/1994)

RECAP
55 Nov. 17, 1994

MINUTES: ( C/R Kay Hill) status conference held: The Court appoints Allen Breed as Special Master, Case reopened [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/22/1994)

RECAP
56 Dec. 20, 1994

ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick relating caseu to C-94-4101-WHO (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/22/1994)

RECAP
57 March 17, 1995

STIPULATION and ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick : appointing special master, Allen F. Breed (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/20/1995)

RECAP
58 April 6, 1995

ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick that the stipulation and order of appointment of special master filed on 3/17/95 is amended as follows: on page 8, line 26, insert "10/1/95" after "than." (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/06/1995)

RECAP
59 May 5, 1995

MOTION before Senior Judge William H. Orrick by Plaintiffs in 3:91-cv-03453 for class certification with Notice set for 6/15/95 at 2:00 [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/08/1995)

RECAP
60 May 5, 1995

AMENDED MEMORANDUM by Plaintiffs in 3:91-cv-03453 in support of motion for class certification [59-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/08/1995)

RECAP
61 May 23, 1995

LETTER dated 5/19/95 from Beth H. Parker in 3:91-cv-03453 re taking motion for class certification off calendar [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1995)

RECAP
62 June 20, 1995

CLERK'S NOTICE Status conference set for 2:00 p.m. on 8/3/95 [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/21/1995)

RECAP
63 June 20, 1995

STIPULATION and ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick re: class certification [see document for more info.] (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/21/1995)

RECAP
64 July 5, 1995

NOTICE by Plaintiffs of entry of order; designation of counsel [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

RECAP
65 July 11, 1995

CLERK'S NOTICE vacating status conference scheduled for 8/3/95 at 2:00 p.m. ; the court will re-schedule another status conference after receiving report from the special master's report which is due in October [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/13/1995)

RECAP
66 July 27, 1995

STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT by plaintiff Talcum Marsh [3:91-cv-03453] (tn, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/02/1995)

RECAP
67 Sept. 6, 1995

ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick; It is HEREBY ORDERED that the 10/1/95 date by which Special Master Breed is to submit his final report to the Court is VACATED. The Special Master shall provide a draft report to the parties by 11/1/95 and submit a final report to the Court by 12/1/95. ( Date Entered: 9/13/95) (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (ls, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/13/1995)

RECAP
68 Sept. 11, 1995

REPORTER'S TRANSCRIPT; Date of proceedings: 11/17/94 ( C/R: Kay C. Hill) Scheduling order status conference held: The Court appoints Allen Breed as Special Master [55-1], Scheduling order Case reopened [55-2], minutes [55-3] [3:91-cv-03453] (ls, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/13/1995)

RECAP
69 Dec. 5, 1995

ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick: It is hereby Ordered that the 12/1/95 date by which Special Master Breed is to submit his final report to the Court is continued to 12/15/95. (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (ls, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/12/1995)

RECAP
70 Dec. 11, 1995

STIPULATION and ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick : The conference to review the Special Master's Findings and Conclusions of Fact be continued to 12/8/95 (or to such other date that is convenient for the Special Master. (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/12/1995)

RECAP
71 Dec. 15, 1995

OBJECTIONS by defendant Board of Supervisors in 3:91-cv-03453, defendant Michael Hennessey in 3:91-cv-03453, defendant Art Agnos in 3:91-cv-03453, defendant SF City and County in 3:91-cv-03453 to Special Master's Findings and Conclusions of Fact. [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

RECAP
72 Jan. 10, 1996

ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick that on or before 1/16/96 the parties shall file objections, if any, to the Special Master's findings and conclusions of fact lodged with the court on 12/15/95. Replies to the objections, if any, shall be filed on or before 1/23/96. ( Date Entered: 1/13/96) (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/13/1996)

RECAP
73 Jan. 17, 1996

AMENDMENT by defendants in 3:91-cv-03453 to objection [71-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/18/1996)

RECAP
74 Jan. 23, 1996

RESPONSE by Plaintiffs in 3:91-cv-03453 re amend [73-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/25/1996)

RECAP
75 March 1, 1996

ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick setting hearing RE objection [71-1] 2:00 3/21/96 ( Date Entered: 3/4/96) (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/04/1996)

RECAP
76 March 15, 1996

OBJECTIONS by defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 due to changed circumstances to special master's findings and conclusions of fact. [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/18/1996)

RECAP
77 March 15, 1996

DECLARATION by Sheriff Michael Hennessey on behalf of defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 re objection [76-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/18/1996)

RECAP
78 March 19, 1996

RESPONSE by Plaintiff in 3:91-cv-03453 re objection [76-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/20/1996)

RECAP
79 March 21, 1996

MINUTES: ( C/R Judith Dudeck) Hearing held 3/21/96 RE objections to the special master's findings and conclusions. Case continued to 6/13/96 at 2:00 p.m. for cross motions for summary judgment. The court approves the special master's report. Counsel shall file cross motions for summary judgment under the 35 day rule. [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/22/1996)

RECAP
80 March 27, 1996

ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick; The special master's findings and conclusions of law are approved as submitted; cross motions for summary judgment will be heard on 6/13/96 at 2:00 p.m. ( Date Entered: 3/28/96) (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/28/1996)

RECAP
81 April 19, 1996

FINDINGS of fact and conclusions of law by Special Master (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/23/1996)

RECAP
82 May 8, 1996

STIPULATION and ORDER by Senior Judge William H. Orrick : Extending briefing schedule and hearing on cross motions for summary judgment [SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER INFORMATION] (cc: all counsel) [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/09/1996)

RECAP
83 May 14, 1996

DECLARATION by Joanne Hoeper on behalf of defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 re motion for class certification [59-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/15/1996)

RECAP
84 May 14, 1996

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION before Senior Judge William H. Orrick by defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 to decertify class if new class representatives do not intervene with Notice set for 7/18/96 at 2:00 p.m. [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/15/1996)

RECAP
85 May 14, 1996

MEMORANDUM by defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 in support of motion to decertify class if new class representatives do not intervene [84-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/15/1996)

RECAP
86 May 23, 1996

MEMORANDUM by defendants in 3:91-cv-03453 in support of motion for summary judgment or in the alternative for partial summary judgment on class claims. [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1996)

RECAP
87 May 23, 1996

DECLARATION by Donald Seaver on behalf of defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 re memorandum [86-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1996)

RECAP
88 May 23, 1996

DECLARATION by Tim Rougeux on behalf of defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 re memorandum [86-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1996)

RECAP
89 May 23, 1996

DECLARATION by Sheriff Michael Hennessey on behalf of defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 re memorandum [86-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1996)

RECAP
90 May 23, 1996

DECLARATION by Joseph Goldenson on behalf of defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 re memorandum [86-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1996)

RECAP
91 May 23, 1996

DECLARATION by Deputy Aguilar on behalf of defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 re memorandum [86-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1996)

RECAP
92 May 23, 1996

DECLARATION by Joanne Hoeper on behalf of defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 re memorandum [86-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1996)

RECAP
93 May 23, 1996

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION before Senior Judge William H. Orrick by defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 for summary judgment or in the alternative partial summary judgment on plaintiff Miguel Villanueva's individual claims with Notice set for 7/18/96 at 10:30 a.m. [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1996)

RECAP
94 May 23, 1996

MEMORANDUM by defendants in 3:91-cv-03453 in support of motion for summary judgment or in the alternative partial summary judgment on plaintiff Miguel Villanueva's individual claims [93-1] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1996)

RECAP
95 May 23, 1996

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION before Senior Judge William H. Orrick by defendant in 3:91-cv-03453 for summary judgment, or in the alternative for partial summary judgment on plaintiff Eddie Tate's individual claims with Notice set for 7/18/96 at 10:30 a.m. [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1996)

RECAP
96 May 23, 1996

MEMORANDUM by defendants in 3:91-cv-03453 in support of motion for summary judgment [95-1], of motion for partial summary judgment on plaintiff Eddie Tate's individual claims [95-2] [3:91-cv-03453] (cs, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/1996)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 2, 1991

Closing Date: Aug. 18, 2000

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Certain pre-trial detainees housed at San Francisco Jail Number 3

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

City

City of San Francisco

County

County of San Francisco

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Due Process

Other Dockets:

Northern District of California 3:91-cv-03453

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 1993 - 2000

Issues

General/Misc.:

Access to lawyers or judicial system

Disciplinary procedures

Fire safety

Sanitation / living conditions

Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)

Totality of conditions

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Assault/abuse by staff (facilities)

Crowding (General)

Sexual abuse by residents/inmates

Sex w/ staff; sexual harassment by staff

Recommended Citation