Case: Bernbeck v. Gale

8:13-cv-00228 | U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska

Filed Date: July 30, 2013

Closed Date: Sept. 15, 2016

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about Nebraska's signature requirements for citizen-initiated ballot measure petitions.  On July 30, 2013, an Omaha businessman sued the Nebraska Secretary of State and the clerk of the village of Denton under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiff challenged two aspects of Nebraska's requirements for signatures on petitions for statewide ballot measures. He sought declaratory and injunctive relief and a…

This is a case about Nebraska's signature requirements for citizen-initiated ballot measure petitions. 

On July 30, 2013, an Omaha businessman sued the Nebraska Secretary of State and the clerk of the village of Denton under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiff challenged two aspects of Nebraska's requirements for signatures on petitions for statewide ballot measures. He sought declaratory and injunctive relief and attorney's fees.

The first challenged provision was Art. III, § 2 of the Nebraska Constitution (the "geographic distribution requirement"), which required a petitioner to gather signatures from at least 5% of registered voters in at least two-fifths (38) of the state's 93 counties. The second was a Nebraska statute (§ 32-630(3)(g)) that prohibited pay-per-signature compensation for petition circulators. The plaintiff claimed that these requirements violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution, namely his right to free political speech, his right to petition the government, and his rights to due process and to equal protection under the law. The case was assigned to District Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. 

The defendants both moved for summary judgment on December 2, 2013. While their motions were pending, on January 30, 2014, the court released the clerk of the village of Denton from the geographic distribution requirement claim.

Two months later, on February 19, 2014, the court granted summary judgment to the defendants regarding the statutory pay-per-signature prohibition. The court held that the plaintiff's arguments on that claim and issue were precluded. In the past, the plaintiff had brought and lost identical challenges against this statute in both Nebraska state court and this same federal court for the District of Nebraska. 2011 WL 3841602. With the statutory claim ended, no claims remained against Denton's clerk. She was released from the litigation. The court denied summary judgment on the geographic distribution claim, retaining the Nebraska Secretary of State as the sole defendant. 2014 WL 656854. 

Through the summer and fall of 2014, the parties proceeded to file their evidentiary exhibits and objections, trial briefs, and proposed findings of fact and law. Finally, on November 10, 2014, the court found the geographic distribution requirement unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The court reasoned that the requirement violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses by diluting urban votes. It issued a permanent injunction against enforcement of the requirement and the parties proceeded to file motions regarding the plaintiff's attorneys' fees and costs. 58 F. Supp. 3d 949.

On April 8, 2015, the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff's motion for fees and costs. The court awarded $87,915.00 in attorney fees and $561.54 in costs, and held that the plaintiffs' claimed fees and costs in excess of those amounts were unreasonable. 2015 WL 1549048. Final judgment in the plaintiff's favor on the constitutional challenge was issued by the district court that same day.  

The defendant moved to stay the district court's judgment pending appeal, and the district court granted the motion to stay on April 30, 2015. The Secretary of State proceeded to appeal both the district court's substantive judgment and the award of attorneys' fees on May 5, 2015.

More than a year later, on July 14, 2016, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit reversed the district court's judgment. The appellate court held that the plaintiff didn't have standing to challenge the geographic distribution requirement. The plaintiff had never attempted to complete the procedural requirements he was challenging, so he had not established an imminent threat that the Secretary of State would enforce the allegedly unconstitutional requirement against him. The case was remanded for dismissal of the claim without prejudice. 829 F.3d 643.

The plaintiff's motions for rehearing en banc or by the panel were denied, and on September 15, 2016, the district court dismissed the plaintiff's claim in accordance with the appellate court's order.

The case is closed. 

Summary Authors

Christina Van Wagenen (2/11/2023)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4306151/parties/bernbeck-v-gale/


Judge(s)

Bataillon, Joseph F. (Nebraska)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Domina, David A. (Nebraska)

Mikolajczyk, Megan N. (Nebraska)

Attorney for Defendant

Bartel, L. Jay (Nebraska)

Comer, Dale A. (Nebraska)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

8:13-cv-00228

Complaint (Declaratory Judgment) & Jury Demand, Notice of Constitutional Challenge

July 30, 2013

July 30, 2013

Complaint
44

8:13-cv-00228

Memorandum and Order

Feb. 19, 2014

Feb. 19, 2014

Order/Opinion

2014 WL 656854

61

8:13-cv-00228

Memorandum and Order

Nov. 10, 2014

Nov. 10, 2014

Order/Opinion

58 F.Supp.3d 949

73

8:13-cv-00228

Memorandum and Order

April 8, 2015

April 8, 2015

Order/Opinion

2015 WL 1549048

82

15-01983

Court of Appeal Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

July 14, 2016

July 14, 2016

Order/Opinion

829 F.3d 643

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4306151/bernbeck-v-gale/

Last updated April 16, 2026, 4:57 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 July 30, 2013

COMPLAINT (Declaratory Judgment) & Jury Demand Notice of Constitutional Challenge against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0867-2538740), by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Kent Bernbeck(Domina, David) (Entered: 07/30/2013)

RECAP
2 July 30, 2013

Summons Requested as to John A. Gale regarding Complaint 1 . (Domina, David) (Entered: 07/30/2013)

RECAP
3 July 30, 2013

Summons Requested as to Charlotte TeBrink regarding Complaint 1 . (Domina, David) (Entered: 07/30/2013)

RECAP
4 July 30, 2013

TEXT NOTICE OF JUDGES ASSIGNED: Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken assigned. (JSF) (Entered: 07/30/2013)

RECAP
5 July 30, 2013

Summons Issued as to defendants John A. Gale and Charlotte TeBrink. YOU MUST PRINT YOUR ISSUED SUMMONS, WHICH ARE ATTACHED TO THIS DOCUMENT. PAPER COPIES WILL NOT BE MAILED. (JSF) (Entered: 07/30/2013)

RECAP
6 Aug. 8, 2013

SUMMONS Returned Executed upon John A. Gale defendant Kent Bernbeck on 8/3/2013. (Domina, David) (Entered: 08/08/2013)

RECAP
7 Aug. 8, 2013

SUMMONS Returned Executed upon Charlotte TeBrink defendant Kent Bernbeck on 8/5/2013. (Domina, David) (Entered: 08/08/2013)

RECAP
8 Aug. 12, 2013

NOTICE of Appearance by Attorney Stephen D. Mossman on behalf of Defendant Charlotte TeBrink (Mossman, Stephen) (Entered: 08/12/2013)

RECAP
9 Aug. 12, 2013

MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney Stephen D. Mossman on behalf of Defendant Charlotte TeBrink.(Mossman, Stephen) (Entered: 08/12/2013)

RECAP
10 Aug. 13, 2013

TEXT ORDER granting 9 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. Charlotte TeBrink answer or response due 9/25/2013. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (MKR) (Entered: 08/13/2013)

RECAP
11 Aug. 13, 2013

SCHEDULING LETTER: Rule 26 Meeting Report Deadline set for 10/9/2013.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB, ) (Entered: 08/13/2013)

RECAP
12 Aug. 21, 2013

MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendants John A. Gale, Charlotte TeBrink.(Bartel, L.) (Entered: 08/21/2013)

RECAP
13 Aug. 21, 2013

TEXT ORDER granting 12 Motion for Extension of Time to File a Responsive Pleading. John A. Gale answer or response due 9/25/2013. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (JSF) (Entered: 08/21/2013)

RECAP
14 Sept. 25, 2013

ANSWER to Complaint 1 with with jury demand by Attorney Stephen D. Mossman on behalf of Defendant Charlotte TeBrink(Mossman, Stephen) (Entered: 09/25/2013)

RECAP
15 Sept. 25, 2013

ANSWER to Complaint 1 by Attorney Dale A. Comer on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale(Comer, Dale) (Entered: 09/25/2013)

RECAP
16 Oct. 9, 2013

REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 10/09/2013)

RECAP
17 Oct. 10, 2013

ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR INITIAL PROGRESSION OF A CIVIL CASE - A telephone conference with the undersigned magistrate judge will be held within ten working days following the court's ruling on any motions to dismiss or for summary judgment, for the purpose of reviewing the preparation of the case to date and the scheduling of the case to trial. Plaintiff's counsel shall arrange and initiate the call. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB) (Entered: 10/10/2013)

RECAP
18 Oct. 23, 2013

DISCLOSURE Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 10/23/2013)

RECAP
19 Oct. 23, 2013

DISCLOSURE by Attorney Stephen D. Mossman on behalf of Defendant Charlotte TeBrink.(Mossman, Stephen) (Entered: 10/23/2013)

RECAP
20 Oct. 23, 2013

DISCLOSURE of Defendant John A. Gale, Nebraska Secretary of State by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Bartel, L.) (Entered: 10/23/2013)

RECAP
21 Nov. 12, 2013

MOTION to sever by Attorney Stephen D. Mossman on behalf of Defendant Charlotte TeBrink.(Mossman, Stephen) (Entered: 11/12/2013)

RECAP
22 Nov. 12, 2013

Joint STIPULATION regarding Order Setting Schedule for Initial Progression of a Civil Case, 17 Stipulation and Joint Motion to Modify Progression Order by Attorney Dale A. Comer on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Comer, Dale) (Entered: 11/12/2013)

RECAP
23 Nov. 13, 2013

TEXT ORDER adopting 22 Stipulation and Joint Motion to Modify Progression Order. The October 10, 2013, Progression Order 17 is deemed modified as requested. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL) (Entered: 11/13/2013)

RECAP
24 Dec. 2, 2013

MOTION for Summary Judgment by Attorney Stephen D. Mossman on behalf of Defendant Charlotte TeBrink.(Mossman, Stephen) (Entered: 12/02/2013)

RECAP
25 Dec. 2, 2013

INDEX in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment 24 by Attorney Stephen D. Mossman on behalf of Defendant Charlotte TeBrink. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit of Charlotte TeBrink, # 2 Affidavit of Stephen D. Mossman)(Mossman, Stephen) (Entered: 12/02/2013)

RECAP
26 Dec. 2, 2013

BRIEF in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment 24 by Attorney Stephen D. Mossman on behalf of Defendant Charlotte TeBrink.(Mossman, Stephen) (Entered: 12/02/2013)

RECAP
27 Dec. 2, 2013

MOTION for Summary Judgment of Defendant John A. Gale, Nebraska Secretary of State, In His Official Capacity by Attorney Dale A. Comer on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Comer, Dale) (Entered: 12/02/2013)

RECAP
28 Dec. 2, 2013

INDEX in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment of Defendant John A. Gale, Nebraska Secretary of State, In His Official Capacity 27 by Attorney Dale A. Comer on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit John A. Gale, Nebraska Secretary of State, # 2 Affidavit L. Neal Erickson, # 3 Affidavit Charlotte TeBrink, # 4 Affidavit L. Jay Bartel)(Comer, Dale) (Entered: 12/02/2013)

RECAP
29 Dec. 2, 2013

BRIEF in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment of Defendant John A. Gale, Nebraska Secretary of State, In His Official Capacity 27 by Attorney Dale A. Comer on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Comer, Dale) (Entered: 12/02/2013)

RECAP
30 Dec. 17, 2013

Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) Modified on 12/17/2013 to correct document type (JSF). (Entered: 12/17/2013)

RECAP
31 Dec. 17, 2013

TEXT NOTICE OF INCORRECT EVENT used when filing the Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleading 30 by Deputy Clerk. In the future, use the event Motion to Extend. (JSF) (Entered: 12/17/2013)

RECAP
32 Dec. 17, 2013

TEXT ORDER granting 30 the plaintiff's unopposed Motion for Additional Time. The plaintiff shall have until January 6, 2014, to file a response to the defendants' motions for summary judgment 24 and 27 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL) (Entered: 12/17/2013)

RECAP
33 Jan. 6, 2014

INDEX in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment of Defendant John A. Gale, Nebraska Secretary of State, In His Official Capacity 27, MOTION for Summary Judgment 24 by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Amended Complaint CI4 10-cv-3001, # 2 Exhibit Gale Answer to Amended Complaint CI 4 10-cv-3001, # 3 Exhibit Order to file Stipulated Record CI 4 10-cv-3001, # 4 Exhibit Order Denying Motion to Dismiss (# 14, 16, & 28) CI 4 10-cv-3001, # 5 Exhibit Part 1 Stipulation of Facts CI 4 10-cv-3001, # 6 Exhibit Part 2 Stipulation of Facts CI 4 10-cv-3001-2, # 7 Exhibit Morfeld's Answer Amended Complaint CI 4 10-cv-3001, # 8 Exhibit Memorandum nd Order CI4 10-cv-3001, # 9 Exhibit Judgment CI4 10-cv-3001, # 10 Exhibit Kent Bernbeck Declaration, # 11 Exhibit Kent Bernbeck 2nd Declaration, # 12 Exhibit Clint Backhaus Declaration, # 13 Exhibit Fred Boehmke Declaration, # 14 Exhibit John Caldera Affidavit, # 15 Exhibit Paul Jacob Declaration, # 16 Exhibit Complaint, Amended Complaint, Judgment CI 12-2488)(Domina, David) (Entered: 01/06/2014)

RECAP
34 Jan. 6, 2014

BRIEF in opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment of Defendant John A. Gale, Nebraska Secretary of State, In His Official Capacity 27, MOTION for Summary Judgment 24 by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 01/06/2014)

RECAP
35 Jan. 10, 2014

ATTORNEY LETTER by Clerk that Attorney Megan N. Mikolajczyk has not registered for admittance to practice nor registered for the system. If the requested action is not taken within fifteen (15) days of the date of this letter, this matter will be referred to the assigned magistrate judge for the entry of a show cause order. (MLF, ) (Entered: 01/10/2014)

RECAP
36 Jan. 13, 2014

Unopposed MOTION to Extend by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendants John A. Gale and Charlotte TeBrink.(Bartel, L.) Modified on 1/13/2014 to add second defendant per attorney request and correct event type.(JAB) (Entered: 01/13/2014)

RECAP
37 Jan. 13, 2014

TEXT ORDER granting 36 Unopposed Motion for Extension. The defendants Charlotte TeBrink and John A. Gale, Nebraska Secretary of State, shall have an extension of time until January 24, 2014, to file a reply in support of their Motions for Summary Judgment 24 and 27 . Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL) (Entered: 01/13/2014)

RECAP
38 Jan. 13, 2014

APPLICATION/ORDER admitting for full-time admission Attorney Megan N. Mikolajczyk for Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck. Ordered by Deputy Clerk. (JSF) (Entered: 01/14/2014)

RECAP
39 Jan. 24, 2014

REPLY BRIEF in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment 24 by Attorney Stephen D. Mossman on behalf of Defendant Charlotte TeBrink.(Mossman, Stephen) (Entered: 01/24/2014)

RECAP
40 Jan. 24, 2014

OBJECTION to Index,,,, 33 by Attorney Stephen D. Mossman on behalf of Defendant Charlotte TeBrink.(Mossman, Stephen) (Entered: 01/24/2014)

RECAP
41 Jan. 24, 2014

REPLY BRIEF in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment of Defendant John A. Gale, Nebraska Secretary of State, In His Official Capacity 27 by Attorney Dale A. Comer on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Comer, Dale) (Entered: 01/24/2014)

RECAP
42 Jan. 24, 2014

OBJECTION to Index 33 in opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment 27 by Attorney Dale A. Comer on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale. (JSF) (Entered: 01/27/2014)

RECAP
43 Jan. 30, 2014

ORDER granting 21 Motion to sever. The Second Claim for Unlawful Distribution Requirement is dismissed as to defendant Charlotte TeBrink. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB) (Entered: 01/30/2014)

RECAP
44 Feb. 19, 2014

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that Defendant TeBrink's motion for summary judgment 24 is granted and she is dismissed from this case. The motions for summary judgment 24 and 27 are granted with regard to the issue of paid circulators. Defendant Gal e's motion for summary judgment against plaintiff for the residency requirements 27 is denied. The defendants' objection to indices 40 and 42 are denied. The magistrate judge is ordered to progress this case either to trial or schedule deadlines for cross-motions for summary judgments as to the merits of the residency requirement. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (JSF)

RECAP
45 March 4, 2014

TEXT ORDER SETTING HEARING: The court will hold a telephone conference on March 6, 2014, at 9:30 a.m. for the purpose of reviewing the preparation of the case to date and scheduling the case to trial. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the conference with the undersigned magistrate judge and participating counsel. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL) (Entered: 03/04/2014)

RECAP
46 March 6, 2014

LETTER by Attorney Stephen D. Mossman on behalf of Defendant Charlotte TeBrink.(Mossman, Stephen) (Entered: 03/06/2014)

RECAP
47 March 6, 2014

ORDER that this matter is before the court following a telephone planning conference with counsel on March 6, 2014. The parties agreed this matter can be submitted for a decision on a stipulated record with written briefs and arguments from the parties. Deadlines set forth in the order. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (ADB)

RECAP
48 May 2, 2014

STIPULATION regarding Order, Set/Reset All Deadlines, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,,, 47 by Attorney Dale A. Comer on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K)(Comer, Dale) (Entered: 05/02/2014)

RECAP
49 May 16, 2014

INDEX Order, Set/Reset All Deadlines, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,,, 47 by Attorney Dale A. Comer on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit L. Neal Erickson)(Comer, Dale) (Entered: 05/16/2014)

RECAP
50 May 16, 2014

DECLARATION of Kent Bernbeck by Attorney Megan N. Mikolajczyk on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Kent Bernbeck Third Declaration)(Mikolajczyk, Megan) (Entered: 05/16/2014)

RECAP
51 June 16, 2014

OBJECTION Written Evidentiary Objections By The Defendant John A. Gale by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Bartel, L.) (Entered: 06/16/2014)

RECAP
52 June 16, 2014

OBJECTION by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 06/16/2014)

RECAP
53 July 17, 2014

BRIEF Plaintiff's Trial Brief by Attorney Megan N. Mikolajczyk on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Mikolajczyk, Megan) (Entered: 07/17/2014)

RECAP
54 July 17, 2014

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Attorney Megan N. Mikolajczyk on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck. (Mikolajczyk, Megan) (Entered: 07/17/2014)

RECAP
55 Aug. 7, 2014

STIPULATION and Joint Motion to Modifiy Scheduling Order by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Bartel, L.) (Entered: 08/07/2014)

RECAP
56 Aug. 8, 2014

TEXT ORDER granting 55 the parties' Joint Motion to Modify Scheduling Order. The Order 47 is hereby amended to allow the defendant an extension of time until September 9, 2014, to file a brief and final argument together with his proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. The plaintiff shall have until October 1, 2014, to file a reply brief and rebuttal argument, whereupon the matter will be deemed submitted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Thomas D. Thalken. (TRL) (Entered: 08/08/2014)

RECAP
57 Sept. 9, 2014

BRIEF Trial Brief of Defendant John A. Gale, Nebraska Secretary of State by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Bartel, L.) (Entered: 09/09/2014)

RECAP
58 Sept. 9, 2014

PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale. (Bartel, L.) (Entered: 09/09/2014)

RECAP
59 Sept. 11, 2014

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - Defendants objections, Filing No. 51 , to written evidentiary materials are granted and denied as set forth herein. Plaintiff's objections to written evidentiary materials, Filing No. 52 , are denied at this time. Ordered by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (MKR)

RECAP
60 Oct. 1, 2014

BRIEF in Response to Defendant's Answer Brief by Attorney Megan N. Mikolajczyk on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Mikolajczyk, Megan) (Entered: 10/01/2014)

RECAP
61 Nov. 10, 2014

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that the court finds the distribution requirement set forth in the Neb. Const., art. III, §§ 2 and 4 unconstitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The court issues a permanent i njunction enjoining the defendant from enforcing the distribution requirement in Neb. Const., art. III, §§ 2 and 4. The plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this order to file a properly supported motion for costs and attorney fees. Thereafter, the defendant shall have 30 days to respond, and the plaintiff shall have 7 days to file a reply brief. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)

RECAP
62 Nov. 11, 2014

MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 11/11/2014)

RECAP
63 Nov. 19, 2014

Unopposed MOTION for Clarification of Defendant Gale by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Bartel, L.) (Entered: 11/19/2014)

RECAP
64 Nov. 19, 2014

ORDER - THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT the defendant's motion, Filing No. 63, is granted as set forth herein. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL) (Entered: 11/19/2014)

RECAP
65 Dec. 2, 2014

DECLARATION regarding MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses 62 Declaration of Kent Bernbeck by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 12/02/2014)

RECAP
66 Dec. 2, 2014

DECLARATION regarding MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses 62 Declaration of David A. Domina by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 12/02/2014)

RECAP
67 Dec. 2, 2014

DECLARATION regarding MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses 62 Megan Mikolajczyk Declaration by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 12/02/2014)

RECAP
68 Dec. 2, 2014

INDEX in support of MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses 62 by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 12/02/2014)

RECAP
69 Dec. 2, 2014

BRIEF in support of MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses 62 by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 12/02/2014)

RECAP
70 Jan. 2, 2015

BRIEF in opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Expenses by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Bartel, L.) (Entered: 01/02/2015)

RECAP
71 Jan. 2, 2015

INDEX in support of Brief 70 in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Attorneys Fees and Expenses by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Affidavit)(Bartel, L.) (Entered: 01/02/2015)

RECAP
72 Jan. 12, 2015

BRIEF in support of MOTION for Attorney Fees and Expenses 62 by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 01/12/2015)

RECAP
73 April 8, 2015

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER that plaintiff's Motion for Attorney Fees 62 is granted in part and denied in part as follows: The Court awards plaintiff $87,915.00 in attorneys' fees and $561.54 in costs. In all other respects the motion is denied. A separate judgment will be entered in accordance with this memorandum and order. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB)

RECAP
74 April 8, 2015

JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant pursuant to the memorandum and order 61 . Judgment for attorneys' fees is entered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant pursuant to the memorandum and order 73 . Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB) (Entered: 04/08/2015)

RECAP
75 April 23, 2015

MOTION to Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Bartel, L.) (Entered: 04/23/2015)

RECAP
76 April 23, 2015

BRIEF in support of MOTION to Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal 75 by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale.(Bartel, L.) (Entered: 04/23/2015)

RECAP
77 April 27, 2015

REPLY regarding MOTION to Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal 75 Plaintiff's Declination to Oppose Motion for Stay of Judgment Pending Appeal by Attorney David A. Domina on behalf of Plaintiff Kent Bernbeck.(Domina, David) (Entered: 04/27/2015)

RECAP
78 April 30, 2015

ORDER that the defendant's Motion for stay of judgment pending appeal 75 is granted. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (ADB) (Entered: 04/30/2015)

RECAP
79 May 5, 2015

NOTICE OF APPEAL regarding Order on Motion for Attorney Fees, 73, Judgment,, Terminated Case, 74, Memorandum and Order,, 61 by Attorney L. Jay Bartel on behalf of Defendant John A. Gale. Filing fee $ 505, receipt number 0867-2946428. (Bartel, L.) (Entered: 05/05/2015)

RECAP
80 May 5, 2015

NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by Clerk to USCA regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA 79, Memorandum and Order 61, Memorandum and Order 73 and Judgment 74 . Notice of Appeal filed on 5/5/15 by Defendant John A. Gale. (JSF) (Entered: 05/05/2015)

RECAP
81 May 11, 2015

SCHEDULING LETTER from USCA - 8th Circuit as to Notice of Appeal to USCA 79 . (Attachments: # 1 Transmittal Letter) (JSF) (Entered: 05/12/2015)

1 Transmittal Letter

View on PACER

RECAP
82 July 14, 2016

COPY of Opinion of USCA - 8th Circuit, Appellate Docket Number 15-1983, regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA 79 . Because we conclude Bernbeck does not possess standing to bring his Fourteenth Amendment claim, we are without authority to do anything but vacate that portion of the district court's judgment and remand with instructions to dismiss that claim without prejudice. (Attachments: # 1 Transmittal Letter, # 2 Letter to Publisher)(TCL) (Entered: 07/14/2016)

RECAP
83 July 14, 2016

Mail Returned as Undeliverable addressed to dale.comer@nebraska.gov regarding Opinion (Copy) of USCA 82 . E-mail not resent to dale.comer@nebraska.gov because the attorney is no longer with the Attorney General's Office. (TCL) (Entered: 07/14/2016)

RECAP
84 July 14, 2016

COPY of Order (Judgment) from USCA - 8th Circuit (15-1983) This appeal from the United States District Court was submitted on the record of the district court, briefs of the parties and was argued by counsel. After consideration, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the district court in this cause is vacated in part and the cause is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court. (TCL) (Entered: 07/14/2016)

RECAP
85 Sept. 7, 2016

COPY of Order from USCA - 8th Circuit (15-1983). The petition for rehearing en banc is denied. The petition for rehearing by the panel is also denied. Judge Murphy, Judge Smith and Judge Kelly would grant the petition for rehearing en banc. (GJG) (Entered: 09/07/2016)

RECAP
86 Sept. 14, 2016

MANDATE/JUDGMENT from USCA - 8th Circuit (15-1983) regarding Notice of Appeal to USCA, 79 . In accordance with the opinion 82 and judgment 84 of 07/14/2016, and pursuant to the provisions of Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 41(a), the formal mandate is hereby issued in the above-styled matter. (GJG) (Entered: 09/14/2016)

RECAP
87 Sept. 15, 2016

ORDER OF DISMISSAL - THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED THAT plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment claim, as discussed in Filing No. 82 , is dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Senior Judge Joseph F. Bataillon. (TCL)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Nebraska

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Special Collection(s):

Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 30, 2013

Closing Date: Sept. 15, 2016

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

An Omaha businessman who hoped to file a state-wide ballot initiative.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City

Clerk of the Village of Denton

State

Secretary of State of Nebraska

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Due Process: Substantive Due Process

Equal Protection

Freedom of speech/association

Petitions Clause

Other Dockets:

District of Nebraska 8:13-cv-00228

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit 15-01983

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Non-settlement Outcome

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

Voting:

Election administration

Vote dilution

Voting: General & Misc.

Recommended Citation