Case: Quinn v. Board of Education of The City of Chicago

1:16-cv-09514 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Oct. 5, 2016

Closed Date: Feb. 17, 2017

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

Plaintiffs, a group of registered voters in the city of Chicago, challenged Section 34-3 of the Illinois School Code.  They alleged that the appointive process for selecting members of Chicago’s Board of Education (“Board”) violated their constitutional due process rights and equal protection guarantees, and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Plaintiffs filed their complaint in October 2016 and a motion for a preliminary injunction in the United Sta…

Plaintiffs, a group of registered voters in the city of Chicago, challenged Section 34-3 of the Illinois School Code.  They alleged that the appointive process for selecting members of Chicago’s Board of Education (“Board”) violated their constitutional due process rights and equal protection guarantees, and Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Plaintiffs filed their complaint in October 2016 and a motion for a preliminary injunction in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in November, 2016.   

Specifically, Plaintiffs alleged that of the 859 public school districts in Illinois, only the city of Chicago school district has its school board members appointed by the mayor rather than elected, and that as a result, corruption and mismanagement have occurred, including financial crises, fraud, conflicts of interest and underfunding.  Prior to 1995, the appointment of Board members had to be confirmed by Chicago’s City Council, but this is no longer the case.

Plaintiffs' complaint included four main allegations, as follows: (1) discrimination in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the First Amendment on the ground that Section 34-3 deprives Chicago residents of the right enjoyed by Illinois citizens living outside of Chicago to vote for members of their district’s board of education; (2) pursuant to Section 34-3’s mayoral appointment system, the Board unlawfully exercises the power of taxation without representation in violation of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and of Article IV, section 4 of the Constitution; (3) Section 34-3 amounts to an electoral scheme resulting in the denial of the right to vote on account of race or color in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act; and (4) under 42 U.S.C § 1983 for the denial of the right to vote on account of race or color in violation of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief, including seeking an order that the defendants prepare a plan for the direct election of the Board, and an adequate remedy for the alleged violations.

Defendants filed motions to dismiss (one by the city and one by the state), arguing that the complaint failed to state a claim on which relief may be granted. They further argued that the Board was immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment and that because the plaintiffs did not argue any basis for disputing the assertion of immunity, they have conceded such argument. Defendants also argued that the plaintiffs lacked standing because they did not possess a right to elect the Board.

The court determined that the plaintiffs did have federal subject-matter jurisdiction to proceed.  The court agreed with the defendants’ argument that the Board should be immune from suit under the Eleventh Amendment, essentially because plaintiffs did not respond to those arguments directly and therefore conceded the argument. As to the various equal protection claims, the court applied rational basis review, noting that plaintiffs do not have a fundamental right to vote in school board elections as a matter of law and the fact that other citizens of the state do in their district, does not mean plaintiffs have a right to vote in Chicago.  The court further found that Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act cannot be used to compel elections for offices that the state has determined to fill through appointments. With respect to due process, the court found that plaintiffs offered no persuasive reason to make a distinction between taxation by a Board accountable to the City Council as compared to the mayor. The court further found that any racial discrimination claims were speculative.  The court granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss in February 2017.

Plaintiffs appealed to the Seventh Circuit. In its May 2018 opinion, the Seventh Circuit affirmed the District Court's order. 

This case is now closed. 

Summary Authors

Alicia Tschirhart (2/25/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5641380/parties/quinn-v-board-of-education-of-the-city-of-chicago/


Judge(s)

Bucklo, Elaine E. (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Geoghegan, Thomas Howard (Illinois)

Morales-Doyle, Sean (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Auyeung, Sabena (Illinois)

Jones, Walter Jones (Illinois)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:16-cv-09514

Complaint

Quinn v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Oct. 5, 2016

Oct. 5, 2016

Complaint
2

1:16-cv-09514

Civil Cover Sheet

Quinn v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Oct. 5, 2016

Oct. 5, 2016

Other
22

1:16-cv-09514

Defendants' Joint Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Plead

Quinn v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Nov. 2, 2016

Nov. 2, 2016

Pleading / Motion / Brief
25

1:16-cv-09514

Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Quinn v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Nov. 30, 2016

Nov. 30, 2016

Pleading / Motion / Brief
26

1:16-cv-09514

Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File a Brief in Excess of 15 Pages

Quinn v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Nov. 30, 2016

Nov. 30, 2016

Pleading / Motion / Brief
33

1:16-cv-09514

Plaintiffs' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Quinn v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Dec. 8, 2016

Dec. 8, 2016

Pleading / Motion / Brief

877 F.3d 322

33-14

1:16-cv-09514

Exhibit N - Thankless Task

Quinn v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Dec. 8, 2016

Dec. 8, 2016

Pleading / Motion / Brief

877 F.3d 322

34

1:16-cv-09514

State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint

Quinn v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Dec. 19, 2016

Dec. 19, 2016

Pleading / Motion / Brief

877 F.2d 322

35

1:16-cv-09514

State Defendants' Memorandum of Law in Support of Their Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint and In Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction

Quinn v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Dec. 19, 2016

Dec. 19, 2016

Pleading / Motion / Brief

877 F.3d 322

36

1:16-cv-09514

State Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Overlength Brief Instanter

Quinn v. Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Dec. 19, 2016

Dec. 19, 2016

Pleading / Motion / Brief

877 F.3d 322

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5641380/quinn-v-board-of-education-of-the-city-of-chicago/

Last updated April 16, 2026, 4:52 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Oct. 5, 2016

COMPLAINT filed by Jitu Brown, Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller, Marc Kaplan, Christopher Ball; Jury Demand. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0752-12436044.(Morales Doyle, Sean) (Entered: 10/05/2016)

Clearinghouse
2 Oct. 5, 2016

CIVIL Cover Sheet (Morales Doyle, Sean) (Entered: 10/05/2016)

Clearinghouse
3 Oct. 5, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Christopher Ball, Jitu Brown, Marc Kaplan, Antwain Miller, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Patrick Quinn, Irene Robinson by Sean Morales Doyle (Morales Doyle, Sean) (Entered: 10/05/2016)

Clearinghouse
4 Oct. 5, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Christopher Ball, Jitu Brown, Marc Kaplan, Antwain Miller, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Patrick Quinn, Irene Robinson by Thomas Howard Geoghegan (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/05/2016)

RECAP
5 Oct. 5, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Plaintiffs Christopher Ball, Jitu Brown, Marc Kaplan, Antwain Miller, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Patrick Quinn, Irene Robinson by Michael Paul Persoon (Persoon, Michael) (Entered: 10/05/2016)

RECAP
Oct. 5, 2016

CASE ASSIGNED to the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo. Designated as Magistrate Judge the Honorable Sheila Finnengan. (tm, )

Oct. 11, 2016

SUMMONS Issued as to Defendants Board of Education of the City of Chicago, Curt Bradshaw, Lula Ford, Steven Gilford, Melinda LaBarre, Craig Lindvahl, James Meeks, Eligio Cerda Pimentel, Cesilie Price, John Sanders, State of Illinois (pg, )

6 Oct. 13, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jitu Brown, Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller, Marc Kaplan, Christopher Ball as to Curt Bradshaw on 10/13/2016, answer due 11/3/2016. (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/13/2016)

RECAP
7 Oct. 13, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jitu Brown, Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller, Marc Kaplan, Christopher Ball as to Board of Education of the City of Chicago on 10/13/2016, answer due 11/3/2016. (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/13/2016)

RECAP
8 Oct. 13, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jitu Brown, Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller, Marc Kaplan, Christopher Ball as to Lula Ford on 10/13/2016, answer due 11/3/2016. (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/13/2016)

RECAP
9 Oct. 13, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jitu Brown, Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller, Marc Kaplan, Christopher Ball as to Steven Gilford on 10/13/2016, answer due 11/3/2016. (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/13/2016)

RECAP
10 Oct. 13, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jitu Brown, Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller, Marc Kaplan, Christopher Ball as to Melinda LaBarre on 10/13/2016, answer due 11/3/2016. (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/13/2016)

RECAP
11 Oct. 13, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jitu Brown, Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller, Marc Kaplan, Christopher Ball as to Craig Lindvahl on 10/13/2016, answer due 11/3/2016. (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/13/2016)

RECAP
12 Oct. 13, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jitu Brown, Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller, Marc Kaplan, Christopher Ball as to James Meeks on 10/13/2016, answer due 11/3/2016. (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/13/2016)

RECAP
13 Oct. 13, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jitu Brown, Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller, Marc Kaplan, Christopher Ball as to Eligio Cerda Pimentel on 10/13/2016, answer due 11/3/2016. (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/13/2016)

RECAP
14 Oct. 13, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller as to Cesilie Price on 10/13/2016, answer due 11/3/2016. (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/13/2016)

RECAP
15 Oct. 13, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jitu Brown, Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller, Marc Kaplan, Christopher Ball as to John Sanders on 10/13/2016, answer due 11/3/2016. (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/13/2016)

RECAP
16 Oct. 13, 2016

SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jitu Brown, Irene Robinson, Patrick Quinn, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Antwain Miller, Marc Kaplan, Christopher Ball as to State of Illinois on 10/13/2016, answer due 11/3/2016. (Geoghegan, Thomas) (Entered: 10/13/2016)

RECAP
17 Oct. 21, 2016

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Scheduling conference set for 12/9/2016 at 09:00 AM. Rule 26(f) planning report due 12/7/2016. (The form of the report can be found on Judge Bucklo's page at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov.) Mailed notice (reg) (Entered: 10/21/2016)

Clearinghouse
18 Oct. 21, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendants Curt Bradshaw, Lula Ford, Steven Gilford, Melinda LaBarre, Craig Lindvahl, James Meeks, Eligio Cerda Pimentel, Cesilie Price, John Sanders, State of Illinois by Sarah Hughes Newman (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 10/21/2016)

RECAP
19 Oct. 31, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago by Walter Jones, Jr (Jones, Walter) (Entered: 10/31/2016)

RECAP
20 Oct. 31, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago by Preston L Pugh (Pugh, Preston) (Entered: 10/31/2016)

RECAP
21 Oct. 31, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago by Stephen H. Pugh (Pugh, Stephen) (Entered: 10/31/2016)

RECAP
22 Nov. 2, 2016

MOTION by Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago for extension of time to file answer regarding complaint 1 Defendants' Joint Motion (Pugh, Stephen) (Entered: 11/02/2016)

Clearinghouse
23 Nov. 2, 2016

NOTICE of Motion by Stephen H. Pugh for presentment of motion for extension of time to file answer, motion for relief 22 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 11/9/2016 at 09:00 AM. (Pugh, Stephen) (Entered: 11/02/2016)

Clearinghouse
24 Nov. 3, 2016

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Defendants' Joint Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Plead 22 is granted to 12/19/2016. Scheduling conference is reset for 1/9/2017 at 9:30 a.m. Rule 26(f) planning report is due 1/6/2017. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) (Entered: 11/03/2016)

RECAP
25 Nov. 30, 2016

MOTION by Plaintiffs Christopher Ball, Jitu Brown, Marc Kaplan, Antwain Miller, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Patrick Quinn, Irene Robinson for preliminary injunction (Morales Doyle, Sean) (Entered: 11/30/2016)

Clearinghouse
26 Nov. 30, 2016

MOTION by Plaintiffs Christopher Ball, Jitu Brown, Marc Kaplan, Antwain Miller, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Patrick Quinn, Irene Robinson for leave to file a brief in excess of 15 pages (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Morales Doyle, Sean) (Entered: 11/30/2016)

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
27 Nov. 30, 2016

NOTICE of Motion by Sean Morales Doyle for presentment of motion for leave to file 26, motion for preliminary injunction 25 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 12/5/2016 at 09:00 AM. (Morales Doyle, Sean) (Entered: 11/30/2016)

Clearinghouse
28 Dec. 1, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago by Stephen H. Pugh Attorney Appearance Form Neil Pandey (Pugh, Stephen) (Entered: 12/01/2016)

RECAP
29 Dec. 1, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago by Stephen H. Pugh Attorney Apperance Form Sabena Auyeung (Pugh, Stephen) (Entered: 12/01/2016)

RECAP
30 Dec. 1, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago by Neil Raj Pandey (Pandey, Neil) (Entered: 12/01/2016)

RECAP
31 Dec. 1, 2016

ATTORNEY Appearance for Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago by Sabena Auyeung (Auyeung, Sabena) (Entered: 12/01/2016)

RECAP
32 Dec. 5, 2016

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo:Motion hearing held on 12/5/2016. Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 25 is continued to 1/27/2017 at 10:30 a.m. Defendant's motion to dismiss with supporting memoranda due by 12/19/2016. Responses are due by 1/6/2016. Replies are due by 1/17/2016. Ruling on the motion to dismiss before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 1/27/2017 at 10:30 a.m. Plaintiff's Motion for leave to file a brief in excess of 15 pages 26 is granted. Scheduling Conference date and date for submission of Rule 26 Report are stricken pending disposition of the motion to dismiss. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) (Entered: 12/05/2016)

RECAP
33 Dec. 8, 2016

MEMORANDUM by Christopher Ball, Jitu Brown, Marc Kaplan, Antwain Miller, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Patrick Quinn, Irene Robinson in support of motion for preliminary injunction 25 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P)(Morales Doyle, Sean) (Entered: 12/08/2016)

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit B

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit C

View on RECAP

4 Exhibit D

View on RECAP

5 Exhibit E

View on RECAP

6 Exhibit F

View on RECAP

7 Exhibit G

View on RECAP

8 Exhibit H

View on RECAP

9 Exhibit I

View on RECAP

10 Exhibit J

View on RECAP

11 Exhibit K

View on RECAP

12 Exhibit L

View on RECAP

13 Exhibit M

View on RECAP

14 Exhibit N

View on RECAP

15 Exhibit O

View on RECAP

16 Exhibit P

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
34 Dec. 19, 2016

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM or to stay or dismiss on abstention grounds (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 12/19/2016)

Clearinghouse
35 Dec. 19, 2016

MEMORANDUM by Curt Bradshaw, Lula Ford, Steven Gilford, Melinda LaBarre, Craig Lindvahl, James Meeks, Eligio Cerda Pimentel, Cesilie Price, John Sanders, State of Illinois in support of Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 34 and in opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. 25) (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, Complaint in Quinn v. Board of Ed., No. 16 CH 13159 (Cook Cty.))(Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 12/19/2016)

1 Exhibit A, Complaint in Quinn v. Board of Ed., No. 16 CH 13159 (Cook Cty.)

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
36 Dec. 19, 2016

MOTION by Defendants Curt Bradshaw, Lula Ford, Steven Gilford, Melinda LaBarre, Craig Lindvahl, James Meeks, Eligio Cerda Pimentel, Cesilie Price, John Sanders, State of Illinois for leave to file excess pages instanter (unopposed) (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 12/19/2016)

Clearinghouse
37 Dec. 19, 2016

NOTICE of Motion by Sarah Hughes Newman for presentment of motion for leave to file excess pages, 36 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 12/22/2016 at 09:30 AM. (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 12/19/2016)

RECAP
38 Dec. 19, 2016

MOTION by Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago to dismiss (Pugh, Stephen) (Entered: 12/19/2016)

Clearinghouse
39 Dec. 19, 2016

NOTICE of Motion by Stephen H. Pugh for presentment of motion to dismiss 38 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 12/22/2016 at 09:30 AM. (Pugh, Stephen) (Entered: 12/19/2016)

RECAP
40 Dec. 19, 2016

RESPONSE by Board of Education of the City of Chicagoin Opposition to MOTION by Plaintiffs Christopher Ball, Jitu Brown, Marc Kaplan, Antwain Miller, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Patrick Quinn, Irene Robinson for preliminary injunction 25 (Pugh, Stephen) (Entered: 12/19/2016)

Clearinghouse
41 Dec. 19, 2016

NOTICE by Board of Education of the City of Chicago re response in opposition to motion, 40 (Pugh, Stephen) (Entered: 12/19/2016)

RECAP
42 Dec. 21, 2016

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Per minute entry dated 12/5/2016, State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint 34 and Board of Education of the City of Chicago's Motion to Dismiss 38 a briefing schedule has been set. Ruling is set for 1/27/2017 at 10:30 a.m. State Defendants' Unopposed Motion for Leave to File Overlength Brief Instanter 36 is granted. No appearance required on 12/22/2016. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) (Entered: 12/21/2016)

RECAP
43 Jan. 6, 2017

RESPONSE by Plaintiffs Christopher Ball, Jitu Brown, Marc Kaplan, Antwain Miller, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Patrick Quinn, Irene Robinson to motion for preliminary injunction 25, motion to dismiss 38, Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim 34 (Combined Response to Motions to Dismiss and Reply in Support of Motion for Preliminary Injunction) (Morales Doyle, Sean) (Entered: 01/06/2017)

Clearinghouse
44 Jan. 17, 2017

REPLY by Curt Bradshaw, Lula Ford, Steven Gilford, Melinda LaBarre, Craig Lindvahl, James Meeks, Eligio Cerda Pimentel, Cesilie Price, John Sanders, State of Illinois to Response, 43 in further support of their motion to dismiss (Dkt. 34) (Newman, Sarah) (Entered: 01/17/2017)

Clearinghouse
45 Jan. 17, 2017

REPLY by Board of Education of the City of Chicago to Response, 43 to Motion to Dismiss 38 (Pugh, Stephen) (Entered: 01/17/2017)

Clearinghouse
46 Jan. 17, 2017

NOTICE by Board of Education of the City of Chicago re reply to response to motion 45 to dismiss (Pugh, Stephen) (Entered: 01/17/2017)

RECAP
47 Jan. 26, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 25 is continued to 2/10/2017 at 9:30 a.m.; Ruling on State Defendants' Motion 34 and Board of Education of the City of Chicago's Motion 38 to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint is reset to 2/10/2017. No appearance required on 1/27/2017. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) (Entered: 01/26/2017)

RECAP
48 Feb. 9, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 25 is continued to 2/17/2017 at 9:30 a.m.; Ruling on State Defendants' Motion 34 and Board of Education of the City of Chicago's Motion 38 to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint is reset to 2/17/2017. No appearance required on 2/10/2017. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) (Entered: 02/09/2017)

RECAP
49 Feb. 13, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction 25 is moot. State Defendants' Motion 34 and Board of Education of the City of Chicago's Motion 38 to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint are granted. Enter Memorandum Opinion and Orders. No appearance required on 2/17/2017. All pending dates and motions are terminated as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) (Entered: 02/13/2017)

RECAP
50 Feb. 13, 2017

MEMORANDUM Opinion and Order Signed by the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 2/13/2017. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) (Entered: 02/13/2017)

Clearinghouse
51 March 6, 2017

MOTION by Plaintiffs Christopher Ball, Jitu Brown, Marc Kaplan, Antwain Miller, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Patrick Quinn, Irene Robinson to clarify the Court's order of February 13, 2017 (Morales Doyle, Sean) (Entered: 03/06/2017)

Clearinghouse
52 March 6, 2017

NOTICE of Motion by Sean Morales Doyle for presentment of motion to clarify 51 before Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo on 3/13/2017 at 09:30 AM. (Morales Doyle, Sean) (Entered: 03/06/2017)

RECAP
53 March 9, 2017

MINUTE entry before the Honorable Elaine E. Bucklo: Plaintiff's motion for clarification of the court's order 51 is granted. The dismissal of this action by my order dated 02/13/2017 is with prejudice. No appearance required on 3/13/2017. Mailed notice. (mgh, ) (Entered: 03/09/2017)

RECAP
54 March 9, 2017

ENTERED JUDGMENT (mgh, ) (Entered: 03/09/2017)

Clearinghouse
55 March 15, 2017

NOTICE of appeal by Jitu Brown, Marc Kaplan, Antwain Miller, Daniel Morales-Doyle, Patrick Quinn, Irene Robinson regarding orders 54, 50 Filing fee $ 505, receipt number 0752-12964820. (Morales Doyle, Sean) (Entered: 03/15/2017)

Clearinghouse
56 March 16, 2017

NOTICE of Appeal Due letter sent to counsel of record regarding notice of appeal 55 . (smm) (Entered: 03/16/2017)

RECAP
57 March 16, 2017

TRANSMITTED to the 7th Circuit the short record on notice of appeal 55 . Notified counsel (smm) (Entered: 03/16/2017)

RECAP
58 March 16, 2017

ACKNOWLEDGMENT of receipt of short record on appeal regarding notice of appeal 55 ; USCA Case No. 17-1565. (jjr, ) (Entered: 03/17/2017)

RECAP
59 Nov. 17, 2017

NOTICE to Transmit Record on Appeal regarding notice of appeal 55 ; USCA Case No. 17-1565. Pursuant to Circuit Rule 11(b), the record is to be transmitted to this court immediately for use in the decision in the above named cause. Do not send the Exhibits unless the court specifically requests them. (ks, ) (Entered: 11/20/2017)

RECAP
60 Nov. 20, 2017

CERTIFIED and transmitted to the USCA for the 7th Circuit the long record on appeal 55 (USCA no. 17-1565) Via Email. (ek, ) (Entered: 11/20/2017)

RECAP
61 Nov. 27, 2017

USCA ORDER dated 11/27/2017 from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals regarding notice of appeal 55 ; Appellate case no. : 17-1565; Upon consideration of the MOTION OF DEFENDANT-APPELLEE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO TO POSTPONE ORAL ARGUMENT, filed on November 21, 2017, by counsel for Appellee Board of Education of the City of Chicago, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED and the oral argument in this appeal scheduled for January 9, 2018, is VACATED. (Entered: 11/28/2017)

Clearinghouse
62 May 2, 2018

CERTIFIED COPY OF USCA JUDGMENT dated 5/2/2018 regarding notice of appeal 55 ; USCA No. 17-1565.The judgment of the District Court is AFFIRMED, with costs, in accordance with the decision of this court entered on this date. (ks, ) (Entered: 05/02/2018)

Clearinghouse
63 May 2, 2018

MANDATE of USCA dated 5/2/2018 regarding notice of appeal 55 ;USCA No.17-1565 ; No record to be returned. (ks, ) (Entered: 05/02/2018)

Clearinghouse
64 May 2, 2018

CERTIFIED COPY OF OPINION from the USCA for the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals; Argued 3/28/2018; Decided 4/10/2018 in USCA case no. 17-1565 (ks, ) (Entered: 05/02/2018)

Clearinghouse
65 July 19, 2018

DOCUMENT ENTERED IN ERROR. Mailed notice (ef, ) Modified on 7/20/2018 (ef, ). (Entered: 07/20/2018)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Election/Voting Rights

Special Collection(s):

Law Firm Antiracism Alliance (LFAA) project

Key Dates

Filing Date: Oct. 5, 2016

Closing Date: Feb. 17, 2017

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Group of individuals who are registered voters, including former Illinois Governor Pat Quinn

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

City

Board of Education of the City of Chicago

Private Entity/Person

Individual Members of the City of Chicago Board of Education

State

Illinois State Board of Education

State of Illinois

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Voting Rights Act, section 2, 52 U.S.C. § 10301 (previously 42 U.S.C. § 1973)

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Fifteenth Amendment

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Illinois 1:16-cv-09514

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit 17-01565

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Non-settlement Outcome

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Sought:

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Order Duration: 2017 - 2017

Issues

Voting:

Candidate qualifications

Election administration

Voting: General & Misc.

Recommended Citation