Case: State of Missouri v. Starbucks Corp.

4:25-cv-00165 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

Filed Date: Feb. 11, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This is a case about the legality of companies' diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. On February 10, 2025, the state of Missouri filed this lawsuit against Starbucks in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Missouri argued that various aspects of Starbucks' DEI program were discriminatory in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Missouri state law. Missouri sought a declaratory judgment that Starbucks…

This is a case about the legality of companies' diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. On February 10, 2025, the state of Missouri filed this lawsuit against Starbucks in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. Missouri argued that various aspects of Starbucks' DEI program were discriminatory in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as well as 42 U.S.C. § 1981 and Missouri state law. Missouri sought a declaratory judgment that Starbucks had violated the law, a temporary restraining order, preliminary and permanent injunctions, compensatory and punitive damages, disgorgement of money earned due to discriminatory practices, and attorneys' fees. 

Specifically, Missouri alleged that Starbucks discriminated on the basis of race and sex by 1) establishing goals for certain percentages of its workforce to be women or people of color; 2) creating monetary incentives for executives to reach these goals, and evaluating executives' performance based on whether they reached these goals; 3) creating mentorship programs and training opportunities for women, employees of color, and LGBTQ+ employees that were not available to other employees; 4) creating identity-focused "partner networks," such as the Black Partner Network or the Women's Impact Network, that allow employees to communicate with leadership and get additional training; and 5) setting diversity goals for the composition of its board of directors. Missouri alleged that these actions violated Title VII, which prohibits employment discrimination, and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, which prohibits discrimination in contracting.

This case was assigned to Judge Joseph S. Dueker. There have been no further developments as of March 31, 2025.

Summary Authors

Kaoru Terauchi (4/5/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69628540/parties/state-of-missouri-v-starbucks-corp/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Barceleau, Dominic (Missouri)

Attorney for Defendant

Bennett, James F. (Missouri)

Cantwell, Philip Allen (Missouri)

Carey, Ashanti D. (Missouri)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Grant, Christopher N. (Missouri)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

4:25-cv-00165

Complaint

State of Missouri v. Starbucks

Feb. 11, 2025

Feb. 11, 2025

Complaint

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69628540/state-of-missouri-v-starbucks-corp/

Last updated March 15, 2026, 4:31 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Feb. 11, 2025

COMPLAINT against defendant Starbucks Corporation with receipt number AMOEDC-11082321, in the amount of $405 Non-Jury Demand,, filed by State of Missouri ex rel. Andrew Bailey, Attorney General. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Original Filing Form, # 3 Summons)(Donohue, Peter) (Entered: 02/11/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on RECAP

2 Original Filing Form

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 Feb. 11, 2025

NOTICE of Filing Deficiency. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: Notice of Process Server form not filed. This deficiency must be filed in the case record immediately. (JBH) (Entered: 02/11/2025)

RECAP
3 Feb. 11, 2025

NOTICE OF PROCESS SERVER by Plaintiff State of Missouri Process Server: Stephen Waters (Donohue, Peter) (Entered: 02/11/2025)

RECAP
Feb. 11, 2025

Electronic Notice of Filing Deficiency (CSCI)

Feb. 11, 2025

Case Opening Notification

Feb. 11, 2025

Case Opening Notification. Judge Assigned: Honorable Joseph S. Dueker. 1 Summons(es) issued and emailed to Peter Francis Donohue, Sr. All parties must file the Notice Regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Form consenting to or opting out of the Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Click here for the instructions. Pursuant to Local Rule 2.09, every nongovernmental corporate party or nongovernmental corporation that seeks to intervene in any case, and every party or intervenor in an action in which jurisdiction is based upon diversity, must file a Disclosure Statement immediately upon entering its appearance in the case. Please complete and file the certificate as soon as possible. (moed-0001.pdf). (JBH)

4 Feb. 13, 2025

SUMMONS Returned Executed filed by State of Missouri. Starbucks Corp. served on 2/13/2025, answer due 3/6/2025. (Donohue, Peter) (Entered: 02/13/2025)

RECAP
5 Feb. 28, 2025

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Defendant Starbucks Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Bennett, James) (Entered: 02/28/2025)

RECAP
6 Feb. 28, 2025

ENTRY of Appearance by James F. Bennett for Defendant Starbucks Corp.. (Bennett, James) (Entered: 02/28/2025)

RECAP
7 Feb. 28, 2025

ENTRY of Appearance by Ashanti D. Carey for Defendant Starbucks Corp.. (Carey, Ashanti) (Entered: 02/28/2025)

RECAP
8 Feb. 28, 2025

ENTRY of Appearance by Philip Allen Cantwell for Defendant Starbucks Corp.. (Cantwell, Philip) (Entered: 02/28/2025)

RECAP
9 Feb. 28, 2025

DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Starbucks Corp., BlackRock Finance, Inc... (Bennett, James) (Entered: 02/28/2025)

RECAP
10 March 3, 2025

Docket Text ORDER granting 5 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer; answer due by April 7, 2025. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joseph S. Dueker on 3/3/25. (KJS) (Entered: 03/03/2025)

RECAP
March 3, 2025

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

March 4, 2025

Letter Magistrate Consent Non-Compliance

March 4, 2025

Notice from Clerk instructing Defendant Starbucks Corp., Plaintiff State of Missouri to submit Notice regarding Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Click here for the instructions. Notice re: Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction due by 3/11/2025. (KJS)

11 March 7, 2025

CJRA ORDER (NMG). Magistrate Judge Joseph S. Dueker termed. Case reassigned to Sr. District Judge John A. Ross and Sr. District Judge John A. Ross for all further proceedings (JMP) (Entered: 03/07/2025)

RECAP
12 March 12, 2025

ENTRY of Appearance by Victoria Lowell for Plaintiff State of Missouri. (Lowell, Victoria) (Entered: 03/12/2025)

RECAP
13 March 12, 2025

ENTRY of Appearance by J. Patrick Sullivan for Plaintiff State of Missouri. (Sullivan, J.) (Entered: 03/12/2025)

RECAP
14 March 31, 2025

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Esther Lander. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-11170085) by Defendant Starbucks Corp.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing for Esther Lander)(Lander, Esther) (Entered: 03/31/2025)

RECAP
15 March 31, 2025

Docket Text ORDER: Re: 14 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Esther Lander; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 3/31/2025. (TLR) (Entered: 03/31/2025)

RECAP
March 31, 2025

A Docket Text Order

16 April 7, 2025

MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and (2) and for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12 (B)(6) by Defendant Starbucks Corp.. (Bennett, James) (Entered: 04/07/2025)

RECAP
17 April 7, 2025

MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and (2) and for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12 (B)(6) filed by Defendant Starbucks Corp.. (Bennett, James) (Entered: 04/07/2025)

RECAP
18 April 14, 2025

First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss ;Extension to file the following: Memo in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss ;Proposed extension date May 21, 2025 by Plaintiff State of Missouri. (Donohue, Peter) (Entered: 04/14/2025)

RECAP
19 April 14, 2025

Docket Text ORDER: Re: 18 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; Extension to file the following: Memo in Opposition to Motion to Dismiss; ORDERED GRANTED. (Response to Court due by 5/21/2025.) Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 4/14/2025. (TLR) (Entered: 04/14/2025)

RECAP
April 14, 2025

A Docket Text Order with Schedules

20 May 20, 2025

ENTRY of Appearance by Dominic Barceleau for Plaintiff State of Missouri. (Barceleau, Dominic) (Entered: 05/20/2025)

RECAP
21 May 21, 2025

Consent MOTION for Leave to File in Excess of Fifteen Pages by Plaintiff State of Missouri. (Donohue, Peter) (Entered: 05/21/2025)

RECAP
22 May 21, 2025

Docket Text ORDER: Re: 21 Consent MOTION for Leave to File in Excess of Fifteen Pages by Plaintiff State of Missouri; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 5/21/2025. (LNJ) (Entered: 05/21/2025)

RECAP
23 May 21, 2025

ENTRY of Appearance by Christopher N. Grant for Amicus Workers United d/b/a Starbucks Workers United. (Grant, Christopher) (Entered: 05/21/2025)

RECAP
24 May 21, 2025

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Stacey Leyton. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-11270549) by Amicus Workers United d/b/a Starbucks Workers United. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing Stacey Leyton)(Grant, Christopher) (Entered: 05/21/2025)

RECAP
25 May 21, 2025

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Talia Stender. The Certificate of Good Standing was attached.(Filing fee $150 receipt number AMOEDC-11270584) by Amicus Workers United d/b/a Starbucks Workers United. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Good Standing Talia Stender)(Grant, Christopher) (Entered: 05/21/2025)

RECAP
26 May 21, 2025

MOTION to File Amicus Brief by Amicus Workers United d/b/a Starbucks Workers United. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment Brief of Amicus Curiae Workers United in Support of Defendant Starbuck's Motion to Dismiss)(Grant, Christopher) (Entered: 05/21/2025)

RECAP
27 May 21, 2025

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and (2) and for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12 (B)(6) filed by Plaintiff State of Missouri. (Donohue, Peter) (Entered: 05/21/2025)

RECAP
May 21, 2025

A Docket Text Order

28 May 22, 2025

NOTICE of Filing Deficiency re 24 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Stacey Leyton, 25 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Talia Stender. filed by Amicus Workers United d/b/a Starbucks Workers United. In accordance with Eastern District of Missouri Local Rules and the Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) Procedures Manual, a filing deficiency has been identified as follows: The attorney's signature on the signature block must match the name of the e-filer. This is an informational notice and no further action is needed at this time. All future filings must be in compliance with this rule. (JAB) (Entered: 05/22/2025)

RECAP
29 May 22, 2025

Docket Text ORDER: Re: 24 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Stacey Leyton by Amicus Workers United d/b/a Starbucks Workers United; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 5/22/25. (JAB) (Entered: 05/22/2025)

RECAP
30 May 22, 2025

Docket Text ORDER: Re: 25 MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Talia Stender by Amicus Workers United d/b/a Starbucks Workers United; ORDERED GRANTED. Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 5/22/25. (JAB) (Entered: 05/22/2025)

RECAP
May 22, 2025

A Docket Text Order

May 22, 2025

Electronic Notice of Filing Deficiency (Teams & Cape)

31 May 29, 2025

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Starbucks Corp.. (Bennett, James) (Entered: 05/29/2025)

RECAP
32 May 29, 2025

Docket Text ORDER: Re: 31 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Memorandum in Support of Its Motion to Dismiss by Defendant Starbucks Corp; ORDERED GRANTED. (Response to Court due by 6/16/2025.) Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 5/29/2025. (LNJ) (Entered: 05/29/2025)

RECAP
May 29, 2025

A Docket Text Order with Schedules

33 May 30, 2025

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to participate as amicus curiae, filed by Starbucks Workers United, is GRANTED. (Doc. 26 ). The Clerk of the Court is directed to detach the brief at Doc. 26-1. Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 5/30/25. (JAB) (Entered: 06/02/2025)

RECAP
34 May 30, 2025

AMICUS BRIEF re 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and (2) and for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12 (B)(6) by Amicus Workers United d/b/a Starbucks Workers United. (JAB) (Entered: 06/02/2025)

RECAP
35 June 16, 2025

REPLY to Response to Motion re 16 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) and (2) and for Failure to State a Claim Under Rule 12 (B)(6) filed by Defendant Starbucks Corp.. (Bennett, James) (Entered: 06/16/2025)

RECAP
36 Aug. 5, 2025

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney re attorney/firm Dominic X. Barceleau by Plaintiff State of Missouri. (Barceleau, Dominic) (Entered: 08/05/2025)

RECAP
37 Aug. 6, 2025

Docket Text ORDER: Re: 36 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney re attorney/firm Dominic X. Barceleau by Plaintiff State of Missouri; ORDERED GRANTED. Attorney Dominic Barceleau terminated. Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 8/5/2025. (TLR) (Entered: 08/06/2025)

RECAP
Aug. 6, 2025

A Docket Text Order AND ~Util - Add and Terminate Attorneys

38 Oct. 14, 2025

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file within fourteen (14) days of this order copies of the documents currently incorporated by reference in its complaint via electronic links. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. Signed by Sr. District Judge John A. Ross on 10/14/2025. (CLT) (Entered: 10/14/2025)

RECAP
39 Oct. 28, 2025

RESPONSE TO COURT ORDER re 38 Order, to file documents incorporated by reference in Complaint via electronic links by Plaintiff State of Missouri. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24, # 25 Exhibit 25, # 26 Exhibit 26, # 27 Exhibit 27, # 28 Exhibit 28, # 29 Exhibit 29, # 30 Exhibit 30, # 31 Exhibit 31, # 32 Exhibit 32, # 33 Exhibit 33, # 34 Exhibit 34, # 35 Exhibit 35, # 36 Exhibit 36, # 37 Exhibit 37, # 38 Exhibit 38, # 39 Exhibit 39, # 40 Exhibit 40, # 41 Exhibit 41, # 42 Exhibit 42, # 43 Exhibit 43, # 44 Exhibit 44, # 45 Exhibit 45, # 46 Exhibit 46, # 47 Exhibit 47, # 48 Exhibit 48, # 49 Exhibit 49)(Lowell, Victoria) (Entered: 10/28/2025)

RECAP
42 Feb. 12, 2026

ENTRY of Appearance by John Michael Patton for Plaintiff State of Missouri. (Patton, John) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

RECAP
43 Feb. 12, 2026

ENTRY of Appearance by Louis Joseph Capozzi, III for Plaintiff State of Missouri. (Capozzi, Louis) (Entered: 02/12/2026)

RECAP
44 Feb. 12, 2026

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 41 Order of Dismissal, 40 Memorandum & Order by Plaintiff State of Missouri. Filing fee $ 605, receipt number AMOEDC-11721889. (Entered: 02/12/2026)

RECAP
45 Feb. 13, 2026

NOTIFICATION OF APPEAL AND NOA SUPPLEMENT by clerk to USCA regarding 41 Order of Dismissal, 40 Memorandum & Order. Notice of Appeal filed on 2/12/26 by Plaintiff State of Missouri. NOTIFICATION TO COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTY: FILE REQUEST FOR TRANSCRIPT WITH DISTRICT COURT CLERKS OFFICE.(JWD) (Entered: 02/13/2026)

RECAP
46 Feb. 13, 2026

Initial Notification from USCA

RECAP
47 Feb. 13, 2026

Briefing Schedule from USCA

RECAP
48 March 2, 2026

Letter from USCA

RECAP
49 March 2, 2026

Briefing Schedule from USCA

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Missouri

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 11, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

State of Missouri

Plaintiff Type(s):

State Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Starbucks Corp.

Defendant Type(s):

Restaurant

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

State law

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of Missouri 4:25-cv-00165

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Hiring

Pay / Benefits

Training

Zoning

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected Race(s):

White

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Male

Recommended Citation