Case: EEOC v. Walmart Inc

2:25-cv-01480 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin

Filed Date: Sept. 25, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On September 25, 2025, EEOC brought suit against Walmart in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin. In their complaint, the EEOC alleges that Defendant Walmart Inc. discriminated against employees with intellectual disabilities who worked in Walmart’s retail store in Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin, by subjecting them to workplace harassment on the basis of disability, and by denying one of them a reasonable accommodation and constructively discharging him on the basis of disability, in violation of the American's with Disabilities Act (ADA).

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Claire Pollard (9/30/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71459299/parties/eeoc-v-walmart-inc/

Judge(s)

Joseph, Nancy (Wisconsin)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Carter, Leslie N (Wisconsin)

Mulaire, Justin (Wisconsin)

Vance, Carrie Noelle (Wisconsin)

Judge(s)

Joseph, Nancy (Wisconsin)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Carter, Leslie N (Wisconsin)

Mulaire, Justin (Wisconsin)

Vance, Carrie Noelle (Wisconsin)

Attorney Contact Information via CourtListener

Documents in the Clearinghouse

No documents yet available via the Clearinghouse.

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71459299/eeoc-v-walmart-inc/

Last updated April 14, 2026, 5:18 a.m.

ECF Number	Date	Description	Link
1	Sept. 25, 2025	COMPLAINT with Jury Demand; against EEOC by EEOC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vance, Carrie) 1 Civil Cover Sheet View on PACER	RECAP
2	Sept. 25, 2025	NOTICE of Appearance by Justin Mulaire on behalf of EEOC. Attorney(s) appearing: Justin Mulaire (Mulaire, Justin)	RECAP
3	Sept. 25, 2025	NOTICE of Appearance by Leslie N Carter on behalf of EEOC. Attorney(s) appearing: Leslie Carter (Carter, Leslie)	RECAP
	Sept. 25, 2025	Notice of Judge Assignment
	Sept. 25, 2025	NOTICE Regarding assignment of this matter to Magistrate Judge Nancy Joseph; Consent/refusal forms for Magistrate Judge Joseph to be filed within 21 days; the consent/refusal form is available here. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1 a disclosure statement is to be filed upon the first filing of any paper and should be filed now if not already filed. (nf)
4	Sept. 26, 2025	Notice of Appearance	RECAP
5	Sept. 29, 2025	Notice of Related Actions	RECAP
6	Sept. 29, 2025	Notice of Related Actions	RECAP
7	Oct. 1, 2025	Stay	RECAP
	Oct. 1, 2025	Order on Motion to Stay
8	Dec. 17, 2025	Notice of Appearance	RECAP
9	Dec. 17, 2025	Disclosure Statement	RECAP
10	Dec. 18, 2025	Waiver of Service Executed	RECAP
11	Dec. 18, 2025	Consent/Refusal to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge	RECAP
	Dec. 18, 2025	Notice by Clerk to Counsel Re Consent to Magistrate
12	Dec. 23, 2025	Notice of Withdrawal by Attorney	RECAP
	Dec. 23, 2025	Terminate Attorney - Notice Parties
13	Jan. 8, 2026	Consent/Refusal to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge	RECAP
	Jan. 9, 2026	Case Assigned/Reassigned
14	Jan. 12, 2026	Notice of Appearance	RECAP
	Jan. 12, 2026	Text Only Order
16	Jan. 16, 2026	Answer to Complaint	RECAP
17	Jan. 20, 2026	Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings	RECAP
18	Jan. 20, 2026	Notice of Appearance	RECAP
19	Jan. 21, 2026	Notice of Appearance	RECAP
20	Feb. 10, 2026	Notice of Appearance	RECAP
21	April 6, 2026	Report of Rule 26(f) Plan	RECAP

show / hide docket entries

Case Details

State / Territory:

Wisconsin

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Disability Rights

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 25, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”), is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and enforcement of Title I of the ADA.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Walmart

Defendant Type(s):

Retailer

Case Details