Case: StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice v. Massachusetts Institute of Technology

1:24-cv-10577 | U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

Filed Date: March 7, 2024

Closed Date: Jan. 1, 2026

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenged the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) for allegedly permitting and failing to prevent and address pervasive antisemitism on its campus, particularly after the October 7 attacks, in violation of federal and state law. Other cases involving universities’ responses to speech and activity concerning Israel and Palestine, including matters involving antisemitism and/or anti-Palestinian expression, can be found here. On February 7, 2024, StandWithUs Center for Legal Jus…

This case challenged the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) for allegedly permitting and failing to prevent and address pervasive antisemitism on its campus, particularly after the October 7 attacks, in violation of federal and state law. Other cases involving universities’ responses to speech and activity concerning Israel and Palestine, including matters involving antisemitism and/or anti-Palestinian expression, can be found here.

On February 7, 2024, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice (SCLJ), three SCLJ members, and two Jewish students enrolled at MIT filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts against MIT. According to the plaintiffs, MIT permitted pro-Palestinian protests and other actions on campus that contributed to Jewish and Israeli students feeling harassed, unsafe, or excluded. The plaintiffs brought a claim under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and sought injunctive relief, damages, and attorneys’ fees. This case was assigned to Judge Richard G. Stearns.

In their complaint, the plaintiffs alleged that MIT violated Title VI by acting with deliberate indifference to severe and pervasive antisemitic and anti-Israeli harassment, creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students. They further claimed that MIT failed to act or applied its policies with leniency or delay when known or reported incidents involved antisemitism.

On February 18, 2024, MIT moved to dismiss the lawsuit for failure to state a claim and for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on May 17, 2024. The revised complaint added claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1986 (failure to prevent a conspiracy to interfere with civil rights), negligence, and breach of contract, and sought to convert the case into a class action on behalf of all Jewish and/or Israeli students enrolled at MIT after October 7, 2023, who did not participate in pro-Palestinian protests.

In light of the amended complaint, the February 18 motion to dismiss was rendered moot. Accordingly, MIT filed a motion to dismiss the revised complaint on June 14, 2024.

On July 30, 2024, the court denied MIT’s motion to dismiss for lack of standing but granted its motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. The court found that students had standing to seek prospective injunctive relief. However, the court determined that the complaint did not plausibly allege deliberate indifference under Title VI, as MIT’s response to campus protests was not clearly unreasonable given the circumstances, and MIT took steps to address escalating incidents. The § 1986 conspiracy claim was also dismissed, as the plaintiffs did not adequately allege a conspiratorial agreement to deprive them of civil rights. After dismissing all federal claims, the court declined to hear the remaining state-law negligence and breach of contract claims. 742 F. Supp. 3d 133. Accordingly, the case was formally dismissed by order entered on August 21, 2024.

On October 21, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit upheld the lower court’s decision. The appellate court found that most of the challenged actions were protected by the First Amendment as free speech on matters of public concern, and did not qualify as harassment under Title VI. The court rejected the plaintiffs’ argument that MIT lost its right to allow such speech by accepting federal funds and concluded the protests as a whole did not amount to race-based harassment under Title VI. The court also determined that the alleged antisemitic incidents were isolated, not severe or widespread enough, and not thoroughly reported to show a systemic denial of access to education. Additionally, it found MIT was not deliberately indifferent. The claim under § 1986 failed because there was no plausible evidence of a conspiracy. With all federal claims dismissed, the court also supported the decision not to consider the remaining state-law claims or allow further amendment of the complaint. 158 F.4th 1.

The plaintiffs filed a petition for rehearing en banc on November 25, 2025. On January 1, 2026, the Court of Appeals denied the petition because a majority of the active judges did not vote to rehear the case. Judge Dulap, concurring in the denial, also concluded that the circumstances did not meet the high standard required for full-court review.

This case is closed. 

Summary Authors

Dahlia Gottlieb (3/24/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68318970/parties/standwithus-center-for-legal-justice-v-massachusetts-institute-of/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Abrams, David (Massachusetts)

Boulton, Ashley

Danas, Glenn

Attorney for Defendant

Bhabha, Ishan (Massachusetts)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Bauman, Jared S.

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:24-cv-10577

Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial

March 7, 2024

March 7, 2024

Complaint
33

1:24-cv-10577

Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint

April 18, 2024

April 18, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief
36

1:24-cv-10577

First Amended Complaint and Demand for Jury Trial

May 17, 2024

May 17, 2024

Complaint
42

1:24-cv-10577

Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendant Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint

June 14, 2024

June 14, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief
53

1:24-cv-10577

Memorandum and Order on Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

July 30, 2024

July 30, 2024

Order/Opinion

742 F.Supp.3d 133

54

1:24-cv-10577

Order of Dismissal

Aug. 21, 2024

Aug. 21, 2024

Order/Opinion
55

1:24-cv-10577

Notice of Appeal

Aug. 29, 2024

Aug. 29, 2024

Pleading / Motion / Brief
108356105

24-01800

Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Oct. 21, 2025

Oct. 21, 2025

Order/Opinion

158 F.4th 1

58

1:24-cv-10577

Opinion By William J. Kayatta, United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Oct. 21, 2025

Oct. 21, 2025

Order/Opinion

158 F.4th 1

108393479

24-01800

Order of Court

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Jan. 21, 2026

Jan. 21, 2026

Order/Opinion

169 F.4th 97

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/68318970/standwithus-center-for-legal-justice-v-massachusetts-institute-of/

Last updated March 24, 2026, 11:40 p.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 March 7, 2024

COMPLAINT against Massachusetts Institute of Technology Filing fee: $ 405, receipt number AMADC-10306110 (Fee Status: Filing Fee paid), filed by Boukin Katerina, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Category Form)(Abrams, David) (Entered: 03/07/2024)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on RECAP

2 Category Form

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
2 March 7, 2024

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Case Assignment. Judge Richard G. Stearns assigned to case. If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Donald L. Cabell. (Phillips, Sophie) (Entered: 03/07/2024)

RECAP
3 March 7, 2024

Summons Issued as to Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Counsel receiving this notice electronically should download this summons, complete one for each defendant and serve it in accordance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 4 and LR 4.1. Summons will be mailed to plaintiff(s) not receiving notice electronically for completion of service. (Kinsella, Jaylannie) (Entered: 03/07/2024)

RECAP
March 7, 2024

Notice of Case Assignment

4 March 10, 2024

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Marlene J. Goldenberg Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10310104 by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit)(Abrams, David) (Entered: 03/10/2024)

1 Affidavit

View on RECAP

RECAP
5 March 11, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Marlene J. Goldenberg. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (Pacho, Arnold) (Entered: 03/11/2024)

RECAP
March 11, 2024

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear

6 March 14, 2024

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of NEIL SWARTZBERG Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10317166 by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Supporting Affirmation)(Abrams, David) (Entered: 03/14/2024)

1 Affidavit Supporting Affirmation

View on RECAP

RECAP
7 March 15, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Neil Swartzberg. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number under ADDITIONAL FILER INFORMATION on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (Pacho, Arnold) (Entered: 03/15/2024)

RECAP
8 March 15, 2024

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Melissa Weiner Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10319117 by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Supporting Affirmation)(Abrams, David) (Entered: 03/15/2024)

1 Affidavit Supporting Affirmation

View on RECAP

RECAP
9 March 15, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Melissa S. Weiner. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (McManus, Caetlin) (Entered: 03/15/2024)

RECAP
March 15, 2024

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear

10 March 18, 2024

AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE Executed by StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice, Marilyn Meyers, Katerina Boukin. Massachusetts Institute of Technology served on 3/14/2024, answer due 4/4/2024. Acknowledgement filed by StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice; Marilyn Meyers; Katerina Boukin. (Goldenberg, Marlene) (Entered: 03/18/2024)

RECAP
11 March 22, 2024

NOTICE of Appearance by Melissa S. Weiner on behalf of Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice (Weiner, Melissa) (Entered: 03/22/2024)

RECAP
12 March 25, 2024

NOTICE of Appearance by Neil Swartzberg on behalf of Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice (Swartzberg, Neil) (Entered: 03/25/2024)

RECAP
13 March 27, 2024

NOTICE of Appearance by Daryl J. Lapp on behalf of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Lapp, Daryl) (Entered: 03/27/2024)

RECAP
14 March 27, 2024

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Lapp, Daryl) (Entered: 03/27/2024)

RECAP
15 March 27, 2024

Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to April 18, 2024 to to Respond to the Complaint by Massachusetts Institute of Technology.(Lapp, Daryl) (Entered: 03/27/2024)

RECAP
16 March 27, 2024

Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Ishan K. Bhabha Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number BMADC-10337880 by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Attachments: # 1 Certification)(Lapp, Daryl) (Entered: 03/27/2024)

1 Certification

View on RECAP

RECAP
17 March 27, 2024

Assented to MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Lauren J. Hartz Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10337890 by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Attachments: # 1 Certification)(Lapp, Daryl) (Entered: 03/27/2024)

1 Certification

View on RECAP

RECAP
18 March 27, 2024

NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth H. Kelly on behalf of Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Kelly, Elizabeth) (Entered: 03/27/2024)

RECAP
19 March 27, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 15 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's response to the Complaint is due April 18, 2024. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 03/27/2024)

RECAP
March 27, 2024

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

20 March 28, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 16 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Ishan K. Bhabha. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (McManus, Caetlin) (Entered: 03/28/2024)

RECAP
21 March 28, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 17 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Lauren J. Hartz. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (McManus, Caetlin) (Entered: 03/28/2024)

RECAP
March 28, 2024

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear

22 March 29, 2024

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Jason P. Sultzer Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10340064 by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Supporting Affirmation)(Abrams, David) (Entered: 03/29/2024)

1 Affidavit Supporting Affirmation

View on RECAP

RECAP
23 April 1, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 22 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Jason P. Sultzer. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (McManus, Caetlin) (Entered: 04/01/2024)

RECAP
April 1, 2024

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear

24 April 2, 2024

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Janet R. Varnell Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10347036 by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Certification in Support of PHV Admission)(Abrams, David) (Entered: 04/02/2024)

1 Affidavit Certification in Support of PHV Admission

View on RECAP

RECAP
25 April 3, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 24 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice Added Janet R. Varnell. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual upgraded PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. Counsel may need to link their CM/ECF account to their upgraded individual pacer account. Instructions on how to link CM/ECF accounts to upgraded pacer account can be found at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-current-pacer-accounts.htm#link-account. (McManus, Caetlin) (Entered: 04/03/2024)

RECAP
26 April 3, 2024

MOTION for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice for admission of Pamela G. Levinson Filing fee: $ 125, receipt number AMADC-10348505 by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Certification in Support of PHV Admission)(Abrams, David) (Entered: 04/03/2024)

1 Affidavit Certification in Support of PHV Admission

View on RECAP

RECAP
April 3, 2024

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear

27 April 4, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 26 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Pamela G. Levinson. Attorneys admitted Pro Hac Vice must have an individual PACER account, not a shared firm account, to electronically file in the District of Massachusetts. To register for a PACER account, go the Pacer website at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/register-account. You must put the docket number under ADDITIONAL FILER INFORMATION on your form when registering or it will be rejected.Pro Hac Vice Admission Request Instructions https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/nextgen-pro-hac-vice.htm.A Notice of Appearance must be entered on the docket by the newly admitted attorney. (McManus, Caetlin) (Entered: 04/04/2024)

RECAP
28 April 4, 2024

Joint MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Memoranda of Law Up To 25 Pages In Support of and In Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Massachusetts Institute of Technology.(Lapp, Daryl) (Entered: 04/04/2024)

RECAP
29 April 4, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 28 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 04/04/2024)

RECAP
April 4, 2024

Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages

April 4, 2024

Order on Motion for Leave to Appear

30 April 11, 2024

NOTICE of Appearance by Janet R. Varnell on behalf of Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice (Varnell, Janet) (Entered: 04/11/2024)

RECAP
31 April 11, 2024

NOTICE of Appearance by Pamela G Levinson on behalf of Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice (Levinson, Pamela) (Entered: 04/11/2024)

RECAP
32 April 18, 2024

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and For Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction by Massachusetts Institute of Technology.(Bhabha, Ishan) (Entered: 04/18/2024)

RECAP
33 April 18, 2024

MEMORANDUM in Support re 32 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and For Lack of Subject-Matter Jurisdiction filed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit 10)(Bhabha, Ishan) (Entered: 04/18/2024)

1 Declaration

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit Exhibit 1

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit Exhibit 2

View on RECAP

4 Exhibit Exhibit 3

View on RECAP

5 Exhibit Exhibit 4

View on RECAP

6 Exhibit Exhibit 5

View on RECAP

7 Exhibit Exhibit 6

View on RECAP

8 Exhibit Exhibit 7

View on RECAP

9 Exhibit Exhibit 8

View on RECAP

10 Exhibit Exhibit 9

View on RECAP

11 Exhibit Exhibit 10

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
34 April 19, 2024

Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to 5/17/2024 to respond to Motion to Dismiss by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice.(Weiner, Melissa) (Entered: 04/19/2024)

RECAP
35 April 19, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 34 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiffs' response to the pending motion to dismiss is due May 17, 2024. (RGS, law3) (Entered: 04/19/2024)

RECAP
April 19, 2024

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

36 May 17, 2024

AMENDED COMPLAINT against Massachusetts Institute of Technology, filed by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Goldenberg, Marlene) (Entered: 05/17/2024)

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

2 Certificate of Service

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
37 May 21, 2024

Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to June 14, 2024 to to Respond to the Amended Complaint and Leave to File a Memorandum of Law up to 35 pages by Massachusetts Institute of Technology.(Lapp, Daryl) (Entered: 05/21/2024)

RECAP
38 May 22, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered finding as moot 32 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim in light of plaintiffs' filing an Amended Complaint. (Zierk, Marsha) (Entered: 05/22/2024)

RECAP
39 May 22, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 37 ASSENTED TO Motion for Extension of Time until June 14, 2024, to to Respond to the Amended Complaint and Leave to File a Memorandum of Law up to 35 pages by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Zierk, Marsha) (Entered: 05/22/2024)

RECAP
May 22, 2024

Order on Motion for Extension of Time

May 22, 2024

Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim

40 May 30, 2024

AMENDED COMPLAINT with Revised Formatting against Massachusetts Institute of Technology, filed by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Goldenberg, Marlene) (Entered: 05/30/2024)

1 Exhibit A

View on RECAP

2 Certificate of Service

View on RECAP

RECAP
41 June 14, 2024

MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction by Massachusetts Institute of Technology.(Bhabha, Ishan) (Entered: 06/14/2024)

RECAP
42 June 14, 2024

MEMORANDUM in Support re 41 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction filed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Jaren D. Wilcoxson in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 11, # 13 Exhibit 12, # 14 Exhibit 13, # 15 Exhibit 14, # 16 Exhibit 15, # 17 Exhibit 16, # 18 Exhibit 17, # 19 Exhibit 18, # 20 Exhibit 19)(Bhabha, Ishan) (Entered: 06/14/2024)

1 Declaration of Jaren D. Wilcoxson in Support of Defendant's Motion to Dism

View on RECAP

2 Exhibit 1

View on RECAP

3 Exhibit 2

View on RECAP

4 Exhibit 3

View on RECAP

5 Exhibit 4

View on RECAP

6 Exhibit 5

View on RECAP

7 Exhibit 6

View on RECAP

8 Exhibit 7

View on RECAP

9 Exhibit 8

View on RECAP

10 Exhibit 9

View on RECAP

11 Exhibit 10

View on RECAP

12 Exhibit 11

View on RECAP

13 Exhibit 12

View on RECAP

14 Exhibit 13

View on RECAP

15 Exhibit 14

View on RECAP

16 Exhibit 15

View on RECAP

17 Exhibit 16

View on RECAP

18 Exhibit 17

View on RECAP

19 Exhibit 18

View on RECAP

20 Exhibit 19

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
43 June 20, 2024

Assented to MOTION for Extension of Time to July 19, 2024 to File Response/Reply to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice.(Weiner, Melissa) (Entered: 06/20/2024)

RECAP
44 June 20, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Plaintiffs will file their opposition to MIT's motion to dismiss by July 12, 2024. (RGS, law4) (Entered: 06/20/2024)

RECAP
June 20, 2024

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

45 June 24, 2024

ELECTRONIC NOTICE Setting Hearing on Motion 41 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction : Motion Hearing set for 7/24/2024 03:00 PM in Courtroom 21 (In person only) before Judge Richard G. Stearns. (Maynard, Timothy) (Entered: 06/24/2024)

RECAP
June 24, 2024

Notice Setting or Resetting Hearing on Motion

46 July 12, 2024

MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 41 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction filed by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers, StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice. (Goldenberg, Marlene) (Entered: 07/12/2024)

RECAP
47 July 12, 2024

MOTION for Leave to File / Defendant Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Motion for Leave to File a Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint by Massachusetts Institute of Technology.(Bhabha, Ishan) (Entered: 07/12/2024)

RECAP
48 July 13, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 47 Motion for Leave to File Document. MIT may file a 10-page reply brief by July 19, 2024. (RGS, law4) (Entered: 07/13/2024)

RECAP
July 13, 2024

Order on Motion for Leave to File Document

49 July 19, 2024

REPLY to Response to 41 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction filed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. (Bhabha, Ishan) (Entered: 07/19/2024)

RECAP
50 July 24, 2024

Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Richard G. Stearns: Motion Hearing held on 7/24/2024 re 41 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM and for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction filed by Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The court hears argument from the parties; The court takes the matter under advisement. (Court Reporter: Catherine Zelinski at CAL.Zelinski.Steno@gmail.com.)(Attorneys present: Goldenberg, Weiner, Bhabha, Hartz, Lapp) (Maynard, Timothy) (Entered: 07/24/2024)

RECAP
July 24, 2024

Motion Hearing

51 July 26, 2024

Transcript of Motion Hearing held on July 24, 2024, before Judge Richard G. Stearns. The Transcript may be purchased through the Court Reporter, viewed at the public terminal, or viewed through PACER after it is released. Court Reporter Name and Contact Information: Catherine Zelinski at CAL.Zelinski.Steno@gmail.com. Redaction Request due 8/16/2024. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/26/2024. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/24/2024. (Cook, Savannah) (Entered: 07/29/2024)

RECAP
52 July 26, 2024

NOTICE is hereby given that an official transcript of a proceeding has been filed by the court reporter in the above-captioned matter. Counsel are referred to the Court's Transcript Redaction Policy, available on the court website at https://www.mad.uscourts.gov/caseinfo/transcripts.htm (Cook, Savannah) (Entered: 07/29/2024)

RECAP
July 29, 2024

Notice of Filing of Official Transcript

53 July 30, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered granting 41 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. MIT's motion to dismiss the federal claims (Counts I and II) is ALLOWED. The court declines to exercise jurisdiction over the state-law claims (Counts III and IV). The Clerk will close the case. (RGS, law4) (Entered: 07/30/2024)

Clearinghouse
54 Aug. 21, 2024

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. ORDER DISMISSING CASE. (McManus, Caetlin) (Entered: 08/21/2024)

Clearinghouse
55 Aug. 29, 2024

NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 53 Order on Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim, by Katerina Boukin, Marilyn Meyers Filing fee: $ 605, receipt number AMADC-10575876 Fee Status: Not Exempt. NOTICE TO COUNSEL: A Transcript Report/Order Form, which can be downloaded from the First Circuit Court of Appeals web site at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov MUST be completed and submitted to the Court of Appeals. Counsel shall register for a First Circuit CM/ECF Appellate Filer Account at http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/cmecf. Counsel shall also review the First Circuit requirements for electronic filing by visiting the CM/ECF Information section at http://www.ca1.uscourts.gov/cmecf. US District Court Clerk to deliver official record to Court of Appeals by 9/18/2024. (Weiner, Melissa) (Entered: 08/29/2024)

Clearinghouse
56 Aug. 29, 2024

Certified and Transmitted Abbreviated Electronic Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals re 55 Notice of Appeal. (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 08/29/2024)

RECAP
57 Aug. 30, 2024

USCA Case Number 24-1800 for 55 Notice of Appeal, filed by Marilyn Meyers, Katerina Boukin. (Paine, Matthew) (Entered: 08/30/2024)

RECAP
Aug. 30, 2024

USCA Case Number

58 Oct. 21, 2025

OPINION of USCA as to 55 Notice of Appeal, filed by Marilyn Meyers, Katerina Boukin. (MAP) (Entered: 10/22/2025)

Clearinghouse
59 Oct. 21, 2025

USCA Judgment as to 55 Notice of Appeal, filed by Marilyn Meyers, Katerina Boukin. AFFIRMED... (MAP) (Entered: 10/22/2025)

RECAP
60 Jan. 21, 2026

ORDER of USCA as to 55 Notice of Appeal, filed by Marilyn Meyers, Katerina Boukin. The petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc is denied. (MAP) (Entered: 01/21/2026)

RECAP
61 Jan. 29, 2026

MANDATE of USCA as to 55 Notice of Appeal, filed by Marilyn Meyers, Katerina Boukin. Appeal 55 Terminated (MAP) (Entered: 01/30/2026)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Massachusetts

Case Type(s):

Speech and Religious Freedom

Education

Special Collection(s):

Title VI Anti-Palestinian/Antisemitism cases

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 7, 2024

Closing Date: Jan. 1, 2026

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice (SCLJ), three SCLJ members, and two Jewish students.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Other

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)

Defendant Type(s):

College/University

Facility Type(s):

Non-government non-profit

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1985

State law

Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.

Other Dockets:

District of Massachusetts 1:24-cv-10577

U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit 24-01800

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Damages

Injunction

Relief Granted:

None

Source of Relief:

None

Issues

General/Misc.:

Education

School/University Facilities

School/University policies

Discrimination Basis:

National origin discrimination

Religion discrimination

Affected National Origin/Ethnicity(s):

Israeli

Affected Religion(s):

Judaism

Recommended Citation