Case: National Treasury Employees Union v. Office of Personnel Management

1:25-cv-03948 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Nov. 14, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case was filed to determine which federal employees would have their status changed from career civil service to political appointee, making it easier for the Administration to fire them, after President Trump issued Executive Order 14003. This EO is President Trump's effort to implement his "Schedule F" plan for the civil service that he previously tried to accomplish in his first administration by issuing EO 13857, which was rendered moot when President Biden withdrew it. On November 14,…

This case was filed to determine which federal employees would have their status changed from career civil service to political appointee, making it easier for the Administration to fire them, after President Trump issued Executive Order 14003. This EO is President Trump's effort to implement his "Schedule F" plan for the civil service that he previously tried to accomplish in his first administration by issuing EO 13857, which was rendered moot when President Biden withdrew it.

On November 14, 2025, the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) - a union representing about 160,000 federal employees - filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM). Filing under FOIA, Plaintiffs sought the release of records responsive to an August 2025 FOIA request filed to evaluate petitions that certain federal agencies have submitted to OPM as required by Executive Order 13957. These petitions contain the federal agency's plans for which employees would be changed from career civil service to political appointees. NTEU filed suit under FOIA because OPM failed to respond to NTEU's FOIA request within the 20 working day deadline.

This case was assigned to U.S. District Judge John D. Bates.

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Nick Martire (11/30/2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71913415/parties/national-treasury-employees-union-v-office-of-personnel-management/


Attorney for Plaintiff

Giles, Allison Conrey (District of Columbia)

Shah, Paras N. (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

1:25-cv-03948

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Nov. 14, 2025

Nov. 14, 2025

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71913415/national-treasury-employees-union-v-office-of-personnel-management/

Last updated April 20, 2026, 3:27 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Nov. 14, 2025

COMPLAINT against OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-12079788) filed by NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons, # 3 Summons, # 4 Summons)(Giles, Allison) (Entered: 11/14/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons

View on PACER

3 Summons

View on PACER

4 Summons

View on PACER

Clearinghouse
2 Nov. 14, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Allison Conrey Giles on behalf of NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (Giles, Allison) (Entered: 11/14/2025)

RECAP
3 Nov. 14, 2025

NOTICE of Appearance by Paras N. Shah on behalf of NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (Shah, Paras) (Entered: 11/14/2025)

RECAP
4 Nov. 14, 2025

LCvR 26.1 CERTIFICATE OF DISCLOSURE of Corporate Affiliations and Financial Interests by NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (Giles, Allison) (Entered: 11/14/2025)

RECAP
5 Nov. 17, 2025

SUMMONS (3) Issued Electronically as to OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(znmw) (Entered: 11/17/2025)

RECAP
Nov. 17, 2025

Case Assigned to Judge John D. Bates. (znmw)

Nov. 17, 2025

Case Assigned/Reassigned

6 Nov. 19, 2025

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 11/17/2025. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 12/17/2025. (Giles, Allison) (Entered: 11/19/2025)

RECAP
7 Dec. 1, 2025

Summons Returned Executed as to U.S. Attorney General

RECAP
8 Dec. 1, 2025

Summons Returned Executed as to Federal Defendant

RECAP
9 Dec. 15, 2025

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
10 Dec. 15, 2025

Answer to Complaint

RECAP
11 Dec. 17, 2025

.Order

RECAP
12 Dec. 22, 2025

Extension of Time to

RECAP
Dec. 22, 2025

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to AND Set/Reset Deadlines

13 Jan. 15, 2026

Extension of Time to

1 Text of Proposed Order

View on PACER

RECAP
Jan. 16, 2026

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to AND Set/Reset Deadlines

14 Jan. 23, 2026

Proposed Briefing Schedule

RECAP
15 Jan. 23, 2026

.Order AND ~Util - Set/Reset Deadlines

RECAP
16 March 27, 2026

Briefing Schedule

RECAP
17 March 27, 2026

Order on Motion for Briefing Schedule AND Set/Reset Deadlines

RECAP
18 April 1, 2026

Amended Complaint

RECAP
19 April 13, 2026

Answer to Amended Complaint

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 14, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiffs are the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents about 160,000 federal employees.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Federal

Office of Personnel Management

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Case Details

Causes of Action:

FOIA (Freedom of Information Act), 5 U.S.C. § 552

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:25-cv-03948

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Declaratory judgment

Document/Information

Relief Granted:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

General/Misc.:

Records Disclosure

Recommended Citation