Case: Californians for Equal Rights Foundation v. University of California Board of Regents

3:25-cv-01808 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California

Filed Date: July 16, 2025

Closed Date: Oct. 20, 2025

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case is a lawsuit challenging a race-restricted scholarship program at the University of California San Diego (“UCSD”). On July 16, 2025, the Californians for Equal Rights Foundation (“CFER”) and a white student at UCSD filed a complaint against the University of California Board of Regents, UCSD and its chancellor, and The San Diego Foundation, which offers Black Alumni Scholarship Fund (“BASF”), and its board of executive chair. Plaintiffs brought suit in the U.S. District Court for the …

This case is a lawsuit challenging a race-restricted scholarship program at the University of California San Diego (“UCSD”).

On July 16, 2025, the Californians for Equal Rights Foundation (“CFER”) and a white student at UCSD filed a complaint against the University of California Board of Regents, UCSD and its chancellor, and The San Diego Foundation, which offers Black Alumni Scholarship Fund (“BASF”), and its board of executive chair. Plaintiffs brought suit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, alleging that the racial preferences in BASF scholarship program violated the equal protection of the Fourteenth Amendment, federal civil rights statutes and California Constitution. 

The plaintiffs alleged that UCSD created BASF in 1983 as a race-based program for black students, then transferred it to an off-campus profit in 1998 to avoid the prohibition on racial preferences in public education under the California Constitution. They claimed that despite the nominal transfer, UCSD continued to operate as a UCSD scholarship and conspired with BASF, including providing student racial information.

The plaintiffs sought declaratory relief, an injunctive relief to stop the alleged discriminatory practices, along with attorneys' fees and costs, and nominal damages. The case was assigned to Judge Roger T. Benitez, later reassigned to Judge Todd W. Robinson, and Magistrate Judge Daniel E. Butcher.

Only 3 months later, on October 20, 2025, the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the case. The background was not disclosed in any filing, but CFER reported on its website that the defendants offered and agreed to launch new scholarships to UCSD students based on individual needs, merit, and community service, to replace BASF.

The case has been settled and is now closed.

Summary Authors

Chise Mori (3/7/2026)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70814064/parties/californians-for-equal-rights-foundation-v-university-of-california-board/


Judge(s)

Robinson, Todd Wallace (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case
1

3:25-cv-01808

Complaint for Declaratory Relief and Damages

Californians for Equal Rights Foundation v. University of California

July 16, 2025

July 16, 2025

Complaint
25

3:25-cv-01808

Notice of Dismissal

Californians for Equal Rights Foundation v. University of California

Oct. 20, 2025

Oct. 20, 2025

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/70814064/californians-for-equal-rights-foundation-v-university-of-california-board/

Last updated April 14, 2026, 5:13 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 July 16, 2025

Complaint

1 Civil Cover Sheet

View on RECAP

Clearinghouse
2 July 16, 2025

Summons Issued

RECAP
3 July 16, 2025

Corporate Disclosure Statement

RECAP
4 July 16, 2025

Notice of Party With Financial Interest

RECAP
5 July 18, 2025

Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP
6 July 21, 2025

Order of Judge Transfer

RECAP
July 21, 2025

Order of Judge Transfer

7 July 25, 2025

Order re Pro Hac Vice Application

RECAP
8 July 28, 2025

Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP
9 July 29, 2025

Order re Pro Hac Vice Application

RECAP
10 Aug. 9, 2025

Summons Returned Executed

RECAP
11 Aug. 9, 2025

Summons Returned Executed

RECAP
12 Aug. 9, 2025

Summons Returned Executed

RECAP
13 Aug. 9, 2025

Summons Returned Executed

RECAP
14 Aug. 11, 2025

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
15 Aug. 12, 2025

Waiver of Service Executed

RECAP
16 Aug. 22, 2025

Notice of Appearance

RECAP
17 Aug. 22, 2025

Corporate Disclosure Statement

RECAP
18 Aug. 22, 2025

Notice of Party With Financial Interest

RECAP
19 Aug. 22, 2025

Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer

RECAP
20 Aug. 25, 2025

Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP
21 Aug. 25, 2025

Request to Appear Pro Hac Vice

RECAP
22 Aug. 25, 2025

Order re Pro Hac Vice Application

RECAP
23 Aug. 25, 2025

Order re Pro Hac Vice Application

RECAP
24 Aug. 26, 2025

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

RECAP
25 Oct. 20, 2025

Notice of Voluntary Dismissal

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Education

Public Accommodations/ Contracting/ Organizational Discrimination

Key Dates

Filing Date: July 16, 2025

Closing Date: Oct. 20, 2025

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

A non-profit organization founded in California for protecting equal rights; and a White junior university student, who could not apply for a scholarship program due to the racial limitation of the program

Plaintiff Type(s):

Non-profit NON-religious organization

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Non-profit or advocacy

The San Diego Foundation

State

University of California Board of Regents

University of California San Diego

Defendant Type(s):

College/University

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

42 U.S.C. § 1985

Title IV, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000c et seq.

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Southern District of California 3:25-cv-01808

Available Documents:

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Sought:

Attorneys fees

Damages

Declaratory judgment

Injunction

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Amount Defendant Pays: $0

Issues

General/Misc.:

Education

Funding

School/University policies

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Recommended Citation