Case: Clement v. California Department of Corrections

4:00-cv-01860 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Filed Date: May 23, 2000

Closed Date: April 20, 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On May 23, 2000, an inmate at the Pelican Bay State Prison filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the California Department of Corrections. The plaintiff, who was represented by the ACLU and private counsel, sought injunctive relief and damages, alleging (1) that the delay in his diagnosis of and treatment for colon cancer amounted to cruel and unusual punishment, (2) that the prison's refusal to provide him with medical…

On May 23, 2000, an inmate at the Pelican Bay State Prison filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the California Department of Corrections. The plaintiff, who was represented by the ACLU and private counsel, sought injunctive relief and damages, alleging (1) that the delay in his diagnosis of and treatment for colon cancer amounted to cruel and unusual punishment, (2) that the prison's refusal to provide him with medically necessary tennis shoes also amounted to cruel and unusual punishment, and (3) that the prison mail policy, which prohibited the receipt of mail containing Internet-generated materials, violated the his First Amendment rights.

The defendants moved for summary judgment. On September 9, 2002, the District Court (Judge Claudia Wilken) granted in part and denied in part the defendant's motion. Clement v. California Department of Corrections, 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (N.D. Cal. 2002). The court granted the defendant's motion for summary judgment regarding the plaintiff's cruel and unusual punishment claims. The motion regarding the plaintiff's First Amendment claims, however, was denied. The court reasoned that "a prisoner's right to receive information by incoming mail [was] undisputed" and that the mail policy did not serve a legitimate penological interest. On its own motion, the court granted the plaintiff summary judgment on the issue of the mail policy. By separate order, the court permanently enjoined the defendants from enforcing any policy prohibiting California inmates from receiving mail simply because it contained Internet-generated information.

The defendants appealed. On April 20, 2004, the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit (per curiam) affirmed the District Court's grant of summary judgment for the plaintiff and the permanent state-wide injunction against the enforcement of the internet mail policy. Clement v. California Department of Corrections, 364 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 2004). The court agreed with the District Court's reasoning. The court further reasoned that the injunction entered by the District Court was not too broad, because the injunction was no broader than the constitutional violation.

The case appears to be closed.

Summary Authors

Kaitlin Corkran (8/20/2005)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5937463/parties/clement-v-cdc/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Brick, Ann (California)

Clement, Frank (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Anderson, Robert R. (California)

Bowers, Jill Theresa (California)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Bankston, Kevin (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

4:00-cv-01860

Docket

Clement v. California DOC

June 16, 2005

June 16, 2005

Docket
70

4:00-cv-01860

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying Plaintiff's Motion for a Preliminary Injunction; Granting Plaintiff Partial Summary Judgment

Clement v. California DOC

Sept. 9, 2002

Sept. 9, 2002

Order/Opinion

220 F.Supp.2d 1098

71

4:00-cv-01860

Permanent Injunction

Clement v. California DOC

Sept. 9, 2002

Sept. 9, 2002

Order/Opinion
72

4:00-cv-01860

Judgment

Clement v. California DOC

Sept. 9, 2002

Sept. 9, 2002

Order/Opinion

03-15006

Opinion

Clement v. California DOC

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

April 20, 2004

April 20, 2004

Order/Opinion

364 F.3d 1148

121

4:00-cv-01860

Order Striking Treglia's Motion to Find Defendant in Contempt of Court

Clement v. California Department of Corrections et al.

May 23, 2012

May 23, 2012

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5937463/clement-v-cdc/

Last updated March 18, 2026, 5:30 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 May 23, 2000

COMPLAINT: NO Summons(es) issued; Fee status ifpp entered on 5/23/00; jury demand [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/24/2000)

RECAP
2 May 24, 2000

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken relating cases; 4:00-cv-1480 with member cases 4:00-cv-1860, Case reassigned to Judge Claudia Wilken ( Date Entered: 5/25/00) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/25/2000)

RECAP
3 June 9, 2000

IN FORMA PAUPERIS AFFIDAVIT by Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/13/2000)

RECAP
4 July 12, 2000

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting affidavit motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [3-1]; total filing fee is $150.00 with initial partial filing fee due at this time is $6.20; dismissing all claims against California Dept. of Corrections; dismissing plaintiff's first amendment claim WITH LEAVE TO AMEND within 30 days of the date of this order ( Date Entered: 7/14/00) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/14/2000)

RECAP
5 July 26, 2000

AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860; jury demand terminating defendant T. Puget in 4:00-cv-01860, defendant Dwight Winslow in 4:00-cv-01860, defendant Susan Steinberg in 4:00-cv-01860, defendant Auggie Lopez in 4:00-cv-01860, defendant Teresa Schwartz in 4:00-cv-01860; adding D. Stewart to case(s) 4:00-cv-01860, [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/27/2000)

RECAP
6 Feb. 28, 2001

MOTION before Judge Claudia Wilken by Plaintiff in to supplement complaint [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/01/2001)

RECAP
Feb. 28, 2001

RECEIVED supplemental complaint submitted by Plaintiff [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF)

7 April 13, 2001

EX-PARTE APPLICATION before Judge Claudia Wilken by Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 to substitute attorney [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/16/2001)

RECAP
8 April 17, 2001

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting motion to substitute attorney [7-1]; substituting attorney J. Bryce Kenny for plaintiff ( Date Entered: 4/18/01) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/18/2001)

RECAP
9 May 7, 2001

PROOF OF SERVICE by Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 of order [8-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/08/2001)

RECAP
10 July 10, 2001

Service ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING motion to supplement complaint [6-1] (Date Entered: 7/12/01) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/12/2001)

RECAP
11 July 10, 2001

SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff to complaint [5-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/12/2001)

RECAP
12 July 10, 2001

Clerk's LETTER dated 7/10/01 to Litigation Coordinator, Pelican Bay State Prison regarding service of complaint on defendants [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/12/2001)

RECAP
13 July 10, 2001

Clerk's LETTER dated 7/10/01 to Attorney General, State of California regarding service of complaint [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/12/2001)

RECAP
14 July 16, 2001

LETTER dated 7/13/01 from Cliff Threm (Litigation Coordinator) re: service could not be completed on Warden Robert Ayers, Associate Warden Lopez, and Dr. Steinberg; defendants no longer employed at Pelican Bay State Prison [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/16/2001)

RECAP
15 Aug. 7, 2001

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken regarding inability to serve defendants Ayers, Lopez and Steinberg; Clerk to send copies of this letter to plaintiff's counsel and to the served defendants; (Date Entered: 8/7/01) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/07/2001)

RECAP
16 Aug. 10, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE by Teresa Schwartz in 4:00-cv-01860 served on 8/8/01 in response to the Request for Waiver sent on 7/10/01 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/13/2001)

RECAP
17 Aug. 10, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE by K. Johns served on 8/8/01 in response to the Request for Waiver sent on 7/10/01 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/13/2001)

RECAP
18 Aug. 10, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE by T. Puget in 4:00-cv-01860 served on 8/8/01 in response to the Request for Waiver sent on 7/10/01 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/13/2001)

RECAP
19 Aug. 10, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE by D. Stewart in 4:00-cv-01860 served on 8/8/01 in response to the Request for Waiver sent on 7/10/01 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/13/2001)

RECAP
20 Aug. 10, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE by C. Broce served on 8/8/01 in response to the Request for Waiver sent on 7/10/01 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/13/2001)

RECAP
21 Aug. 10, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE by Cal Terhune in 4:00-cv-01860 served on 8/8/01 in response to the Request for Waiver sent on 7/10/01 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/13/2001)

RECAP
22 Aug. 15, 2001

WAIVER OF SERVICE by defendant Dwight Winslow served on 8/13/01 in response to the Request for Waiver sent on 7/10/01 [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/15/2001)

RECAP
23 Sept. 10, 2001

ANSWER by Cal Terhune in 4:00-cv-01860, D. Stewart in 4:00-cv-01860 to amended complaint [5-1]; jury demand [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/12/2001)

RECAP
24 Oct. 26, 2001

ANSWER by Susan Steinberg in 4:00-cv-01860, Robert Ayers in 4:00-cv-01860, Auggie Lopez in 4:00-cv-01860 to complaint [5-1], complaint [1-1]; jury demand [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/29/2001)

RECAP
25 Nov. 26, 2001

MOTION before Judge Claudia Wilken by defendants in 4:00-cv-01860 to extend time to file a dispositive motion [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/30/2001)

RECAP
26 Nov. 26, 2001

DECLARATION by Elizabeth S. Kim on behalf of defendant in 4:00-cv-01860 re motion to extend time to file a dispositive motion [25-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 11/30/2001)

RECAP
Nov. 26, 2001

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( defendant in 4:00-cv-01860) re: motion to extend time to file a dispositive motion [25-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF)

27 Dec. 4, 2001

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting motion to extend time to file a dispositive motion [25-1] until 1/24/02 ( Date Entered: 12/7/01) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 12/07/2001)

RECAP
28 Jan. 17, 2002

MOTION before Judge Claudia Wilken by defendants in 4:00-cv-01860 to extend time to file a dispositive motion [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/18/2002)

RECAP
29 Jan. 17, 2002

DECLARATION by Sara Turner on behalf of defendant in 4:00-cv-01860 re motion to extend time to file a dispositive motion [28-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/18/2002)

RECAP
Jan. 17, 2002

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( defendant in 4:00-cv-01860) re: motion to extend time to file a dispositive motion [28-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF)

30 Jan. 22, 2002

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting defendants' motion to extend time to file a dispositive motion [28-1] by 2/25/02 ( Date Entered: 1/24/02) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 01/24/2002)

RECAP
31 Feb. 25, 2002

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION WITH MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES before Judge Claudia Wilken by defendant in 4:00-cv-01860 for summary judgment with Notice set for 4/19/02 at 10:00am [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/26/2002)

RECAP
32 Feb. 25, 2002

DECLARATION by Linda L. Rianda on behalf of defendant in 4:00-cv-01860 re motion for summary judgment [31-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/26/2002)

RECAP
33 Feb. 25, 2002

DECLARATION by Julianne Mossler on behalf of defendant in 4:00-cv-01860 re motion for summary judgment [31-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/26/2002)

RECAP
34 Feb. 25, 2002

DECLARATION by Dwight Winslow M.D. on behalf of defendant in 4:00-cv-01860 re motion for summary judgment [31-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 02/26/2002)

RECAP
104 March 20, 2002

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING second request for extension of time to comply with the Court's 2/10/03 Order [102-1]; defendants must file their statement by 4/9/03; (Date Entered: 3/21/03) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (scu, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 03/21/2003)

RECAP
35 March 28, 2002

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken : vacating 4/19/02 hearing re motion for summary judgment [31-1] (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/01/2002)

RECAP
36 April 18, 2002

EX-PARTE APPLICATION before Judge Claudia Wilken by Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 to extend time to file opposition [4:00-cv-01860] (kk, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/19/2002)

RECAP
37 April 22, 2002

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting motion to extend time to file opposition [36-1] to 5/20/02 ( Date Entered: 4/25/02) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/25/2002)

RECAP
38 April 29, 2002

PROOF OF SERVICE by Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 of order [37-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 04/30/2002)

RECAP
May 14, 2002

RECEIVED notice of association of counsel and stipulated request for extension of time for filing plaintiff's opposition to motion for summary judgment and to set hearing date submitted by Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF)

39 May 22, 2002

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken : extending time to file opposition re: motion for summary judgment; setting hearing on motion for summary judgment [31-1] at 10:00am on 7/19/02; notice of association of counsel (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 05/30/2002)

RECAP
40 June 5, 2002

PROOF OF SERVICE by Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 of order [39-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/07/2002)

RECAP
June 6, 2002

RECEIVED stipulated request for extension of time for filing plaintiff's opposition to motion for summary judgment and for postponement of hearing date [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF)

41 June 10, 2002

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken : extending time to file an opposition re motion for summary judgment, and resetting hearing on motion for summary judgment [31-1] at 10:00am on 8/9/02 (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/13/2002)

RECAP
June 14, 2002

RECEIVED motion and proposed order for permission to file separate briefs in opposition re: motion for summary judgment submitted by Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF)

42 June 17, 2002

OPPOSITION by Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 to motion for summary judgment [31-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/19/2002)

RECAP
43 June 17, 2002

DECLARATION by Mike Godwin on behalf of Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 re opposition [42-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/19/2002)

RECAP
44 June 17, 2002

DECLARATION by Lara Stemple on behalf of Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 re opposition [42-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/19/2002)

RECAP
45 June 17, 2002

DECLARATION by Sheilah Glover on behalf of Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 re opposition [42-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/19/2002)

RECAP
46 June 17, 2002

DECLARATION by Beverly Lozano on behalf of Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 re opposition [42-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/19/2002)

RECAP
47 June 17, 2002

DECLARATION by Deirdre K. Mulligan on behalf of Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 re opposition [42-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/19/2002)

RECAP
48 June 17, 2002

DECLARATION by Heather MacKay on behalf of Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 re opposition [42-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/19/2002)

RECAP
49 June 17, 2002

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE by Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/19/2002)

RECAP
50 June 17, 2002

OPPOSITION by Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 to motion for summary judgment [31-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/19/2002)

RECAP
51 June 17, 2002

DECLARATION by Corey Weinstein on behalf of Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 re opposition [50-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/19/2002)

RECAP
52 June 17, 2002

DECLARATION by Frank Clement on behalf of Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/19/2002)

RECAP
55 June 19, 2002

Motion and ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken permitting plaintiff to file separate briefs in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment ( Date Entered: 6/25/02) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/25/2002)

RECAP
53 June 20, 2002

MOTION before Judge Claudia Wilken by Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 for preliminary injunction with Notice set for 8/9/02 at 10:00am [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/21/2002)

RECAP
54 June 20, 2002

MEMORANDUM by Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 in support of motion for preliminary injunction [53-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/21/2002)

RECAP
56 June 27, 2002

PROOF OF SERVICE by Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 of order [55-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 06/28/2002)

RECAP
July 3, 2002

RECEIVED stipulated request for permission to file objections to evidence and proposed order submitted by Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) Modified on 07/05/2002

57 July 9, 2002

REPLY by defendants in 4:00-cv-01860 to objections to evidence filed with motion for summary judgment [31-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/15/2002)

RECAP
July 9, 2002

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( defendant in 4:00-cv-01860) re: motion to extend time to file defendants' reply to plaintiff's opposition to motion for summary judgment [57-1], re: opposition [57-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF)

July 12, 2002

RECEIVED stipulation & order re: amended objections submitted by Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 [4:00-cv-01860] (kk, COURT STAFF)

58 July 15, 2002

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken granting request for permission to file plaintiff's objections to evidence (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (scu, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/19/2002)

RECAP
59 July 15, 2002

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken GRANTING motion to extend time to file defendants' reply to plaintiff's opposition to motion for summary judgment [57-1]; time is extended to and including 7/24/02; (Date Entered: 7/19/02) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (scu, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/19/2002)

RECAP
60 July 24, 2002

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken allowing plaintiff to file the final version of objections to defendants' evidence re: motion for summary judgment: (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/31/2002)

RECAP
61 July 24, 2002

OPPOSITION by Dwight, Winslow, T. Puget, et al to plaintiff's motion to strike evidence [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/31/2002)

RECAP
62 July 24, 2002

REPLY by Dwight Winslow, T. Puget, et al to opposition to motion for summary judgment [31-1]; OPPOSITION to motion for preliminary injunction [53-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 07/31/2002)

RECAP
July 25, 2002

RECEIVED stipulation and order correcting minor errors submitted by Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF)

66 July 26, 2002

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken correcting minor errors in plaintiff's opposition papers and conceding that plaintiff exhausted administrative remedies on tennis show claim: (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

RECAP
63 July 29, 2002

PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant in 4:00-cv-01860 of order [60-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/01/2002)

RECAP
64 July 30, 2002

REPLY by Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 to opposition to motion for preliminary injunction [53-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/02/2002)

RECAP
65 July 31, 2002

OBJECTIONS by Plaintiff Frank Clement in 4:00-cv-01860 to evidence in support of motion for summary judgment [31-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/02/2002)

RECAP
67 Aug. 5, 2002

PROOF OF SERVICE by defendants of order [60-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/06/2002)

RECAP
68 Aug. 8, 2002

NOTICE by defendants in 4:00-cv-01860 of change of attorney [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/09/2002)

RECAP
Aug. 8, 2002

Docket Modification (Administrative) to notice [68-1] withdrawing attorney Elizabeth S. Kim for D. Stewart in 4:00-cv-01860, attorney Elizabeth S. Kim for Robert Ayers in 4:00-cv-01860, attorney Elizabeth S. Kim for Cal Terhune in 4:00-cv-01860 and substituting attorney Linda Pancho [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF)

69 Aug. 9, 2002

MINUTES: before Judge Claudia Wilken ( C/R Peppina Thompson) ( Hearing Date: 8/9/02) that the motion for preliminary injunction [53-1] is submitted, that the motion for summary judgment [31-1] is submitted [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 08/16/2002)

RECAP
70 Sept. 9, 2002

ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken DENYING motion for preliminary injunction [53-1], GRANTING in part and DENYING in part motion for summary judgment [31-1]; plaintiff's objections ot evidence are overruled and request for judicial notice is granted; granting plaintiff summary judgment on his First Amended claim; (Date Entered: 9/10/02) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) Additional attachment(s) added on 12/19/2005 (cjl, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 09/10/2002)

Clearinghouse
71 Sept. 9, 2002

PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge Claudia Wilken; defendants as well as their officers, directors, employees, agents and those in privity with them are enjoined from enforcing any policy prohibiting California inmates from receiving mail because it contains Internet-generated information; (Date Entered: 9/10/02) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/10/2002)

Clearinghouse
72 Sept. 9, 2002

JUDGMENT: by Judge Claudia Wilken plaintiff take nothing on his claims alleging violation of his Eighth Amendment rights, that those claims be dismissed on the merits, defendants also take nothing; defendants are enjoined from enforcing a policy that prohibits California inmates from receiving mail because it contains Internet-generated material; terminating case; each party bear its own costs of action; appeal filing ddl 10/10/02 (Date Entered: 9/10/02) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/10/2002)

Clearinghouse
73 Sept. 20, 2002

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION before Judge Claudia Wilken by defendants in 4:00-cv-01860 to alter or amend the judgment with Notice set for 10/25/02 at 10:00am [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/24/2002)

RECAP
74 Sept. 20, 2002

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION before Judge Claudia Wilken by defendant in 4:00-cv-01860 to stay of enforcement of permanent injunction pending disposition of motion to alter or amend the judgment [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/24/2002)

RECAP
Sept. 20, 2002

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( defendant in 4:00-cv-01860) re: motion to stay of enforcement of permanent injunction pending disposition of motion to alter or amend the judgment [74-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF)

75 Sept. 23, 2002

NOTICE of amended hearing by defendants in 4:00-cv-01860 resetting motion to alter or amend the judgment [73-1] ; hearing set for 10:00am on 11/1/02 [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/25/2002)

RECAP
76 Sept. 23, 2002

Motion and ORDER by Judge Claudia Wilken extending time for plaintiff to submit a motion for attorneys' fees until 11/26/02 ( Date Entered: 9/25/02) (cc: all counsel) [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/25/2002)

RECAP
77 Sept. 24, 2002

MOTION before Judge Claudia Wilken by Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 to amend the judgment with Notice set for 11/1/02 at 10:00am [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 09/26/2002)

RECAP
Sept. 24, 2002

RECEIVED Proposed Order ( Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860) re: motion to amend the judgment [77-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF)

78 Sept. 30, 2002

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION before Judge Claudia Wilken by defendants to stay enforcement of permanent injunction with Notice set for 11/1/02 at 10:00 [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/04/2002)

RECAP
79 Sept. 30, 2002

LETTER to Judge Wilken, dated 9/26/02, from Danny Roman regarding enforcement of order [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/04/2002)

RECAP
80 Oct. 1, 2002

NOTICE by Plaintiff of entry of order [76-2] [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/04/2002)

RECAP
81 Oct. 4, 2002

OPPOSITION by defendant in 4:00-cv-01860 to motion to amend the judgment [77-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/08/2002)

RECAP
82 Oct. 11, 2002

OPPOSITION by Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 to motion to alter or amend the judgment [73-1], motion to stay of enforcement of permanent injunction pending disposition of motion to alter or amend the judgment [74-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/15/2002)

RECAP
83 Oct. 11, 2002

DECLARATION by Heather MacKay on behalf of Plaintiff in 4:00-cv-01860 re opposition [82-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (cp, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/15/2002)

RECAP
84 Oct. 17, 2002

REPLY by Plaintiff in support of motion to amend the judgment [77-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/21/2002)

RECAP
85 Oct. 25, 2002

REPLY by defendants to opposition to motion to stay of enforcement of permanent injunction pending disposition of motion to alter or amend the judgment [74-1], motion to alter or amend the judgment [73-1] [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/28/2002)

RECAP
86 Oct. 28, 2002

CLERK'S NOTICE that the motion to stay enforcement of permanent injunction [78-1] is submitted, that the motion to amend the judgment [77-1] is submitted, that the motion to stay of enforcement of permanent injunction pending disposition of motion to alter or amend the judgment [74-1] is submitted, that the motion to alter or amend the judgment [73-1] is submitted; hearing scheduled for 11/1/02 is VACATED [4:00-cv-01860] (kc, COURT STAFF) (Entered: 10/28/2002)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: May 23, 2000

Closing Date: April 20, 2004

Case Ongoing: No reason to think so

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

State inmate alleging that enforcement of policy prohibiting inmates from receiving mail containing material downloaded from the internet violated his First Amendment rights

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Prison Law Office

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

State

California Department of Corrections

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Other Dockets:

Northern District of California 4:00-cv-01860

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 03-15006

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Order Duration: 2000 - 2004

Issues

General/Misc.:

Mail

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Male

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Medical care, general

Medication, administration of

Recommended Citation