Case: EEOC v. Olsten Staffing Services, Corp. and Adecco North America, Llc

1:02-cv-00786 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Filed Date: March 22, 2002

Closed Date: Sept. 29, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In March 2002, the Atlanta District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Olsten Staffing Services, Corp. and Adecco North America, L.L.C. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The only document publicly available regarding this case is the docket; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. After several discovery disputes, the parties settled in September 2003 through a settlement agreement.

Summary Authors

Michele Marxkors (6/19/2007)

People


Judge(s)

Cooper, Clarence (Georgia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

1:02-cv-00786

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Olsten Staffing Services, Corp. and Adecco North America, LLC

Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

Docket
32

1:02-cv-00786

Order [Grants Motion to Compel]

EEOC vs. ASI Staffing, Inc. d/b/a Olsten Staffing Services and Adecco North American, LLC

June 10, 2003

June 10, 2003

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 23, 2025, 9:19 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 March 22, 2002

COMPLAINT filed. Consent form to proceed before U.S. magistrate and pretrial instructions given to attorney; jury demand (syh) (Entered: 03/25/2002)

PACER
March 25, 2002

Summons issued for defendants. (slc) (Entered: 03/27/2002)

PACER
2 April 19, 2002

Return of service executed 3/27/02 as to Olsten Staffing Svc on original complaint (lme) (Entered: 04/22/2002)

PACER
3 May 6, 2002

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Adecco North America, mailed 4/30/02. Answer due by 6/29/02 for Adecco North America. (slc) (Entered: 05/08/2002)

PACER
4 May 7, 2002

Joint MOTION to extend time thru 06/3/02 for dfts to respond to [1-1] complaint . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 05/08/2002)

PACER
5 May 24, 2002

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [4-1] joint motion to extend time thru 06/3/02 for dft Olsten to respond to [1-1] complaint, Answer due 6/3/02 for Olsten Staffing Svc . (cc) (slc) (Entered: 05/29/2002)

PACER
6 June 3, 2002

Joint MOTION to extend time thru 06/10/02 w/in which dfts may respond to [1-1] complaint . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 06/05/2002)

PACER
7 June 10, 2002

ANSWER by defendant Olsten Staffing Svc to complaint [1-1]. Discovery ends 11/7/02. (slc) (Entered: 06/11/2002)

PACER
8 June 10, 2002

ANSWER by defendant Adecco North America to complaint [1-1]. (slc) (Entered: 06/11/2002)

PACER
9 July 10, 2002

Preliminary Report and Discovery Schedule. (to judge) (slc) (Entered: 07/11/2002)

PACER
10 July 15, 2002

ANSWERS TO INITIAL DISCLOSURES by plaintiff. (slc) (Entered: 07/17/2002)

PACER
12 July 18, 2002

AMENDED ANSWERS TO INITIAL DISCLOSURES by plaintiff. (slc) (Entered: 07/19/2002)

PACER
13 July 29, 2002

Dft's Certificate of interested persons. (to judge) (slc) (Entered: 07/30/2002)

PACER
14 Aug. 2, 2002

ANSWERS TO INITIAL DISCLOSURES by defendant Olsten Staffing Svc. (slc) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

PACER
15 Aug. 2, 2002

ANSWERS TO INITIAL DISCLOSURES by defendant Adecco North America. (slc) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

PACER
16 Aug. 2, 2002

Attorney appearance for plaintiff by Steven Mark Tapper. (slc) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

PACER
17 Nov. 8, 2002

CONSENT MOTION to extend time thru 12/25/02 of discovery period . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 11/13/2002)

PACER
18 Nov. 25, 2002

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [17-1] joint motion to extend time thru 12/25/02 of discovery period. Discovery ends 12/25/02 NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS. (cc) (slc) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

PACER
19 Dec. 24, 2002

MOTION by pla to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts , for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion , and to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery with brief in support. (lme) (Entered: 12/26/2002)

PACER
20 Jan. 7, 2003

CONSENT MOTION to extend time thru 02/04/03 within which defendants may file dispositive motions . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 01/08/2003)

PACER
21 Jan. 10, 2003

MOTION by defendants to extend time within which defendants may respond to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts with brief support and proposed order. (slc) (Entered: 01/13/2003)

PACER
22 Jan. 14, 2003

Amended MOTION by plaintiff amending [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, [19-2] motion for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion, [19-3] motion to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery . (slc) (Entered: 01/15/2003)

PACER
23 Jan. 28, 2003

CONSENT MOTION to extend time for the filing of dispositive motions for either 10 days following the entry of an order denying [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts or 20 days following the conslusion of discovery period . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 01/30/2003)

PACER
24 Feb. 5, 2003

MOTION by defendants to extend time within which to respond [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts . (slc) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

PACER
25 Feb. 5, 2003

Response by defendants in opposition to [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests. (slc) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

PACER
26 Feb. 6, 2003

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [23-1] joint motion to extend time for the filing of dispositive motions following a ruling on [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests. Court will establish a new deadline following a ruling on this motion. (cc) (slc) (Entered: 02/07/2003)

PACER
Feb. 12, 2003

SUBMITTED to Judge Clarence Cooper on [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, [19-2] motion for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion, [19-3] motion to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery. (slc) (Entered: 02/12/2003)

PACER
27 Feb. 24, 2003

CONSENT MOTION to extend time thru 02/26/03 within which plaintiff may file a reply to defendants' [25-1] response to plaintiff's [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 02/25/2003)

PACER
Feb. 25, 2003

SUBMITTED to Judge Clarence Cooper on [21-1] motion to extend time within which defendants may respond to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, [22-1] amend/amended motion [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, [19-2] motion for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion, [19-3] motion to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery, [24-1] motion to extend time within which to respond [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts. (FILE IN CHAMBERS) (slc) (Entered: 02/25/2003)

PACER
28 Feb. 26, 2003

REPLY by plaintiff to response to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts. (slc) (Entered: 02/28/2003)

PACER
29 March 3, 2003

CONSENT ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper, ALLOWING plaintiff to file excess pages in its reply brief to defendants' response in opposition to plaintiff's motion to compel . (cc) (slc) (Entered: 03/04/2003)

PACER
30 March 5, 2003

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [27-1] joint motion to extend time thru 02/26/03 within which plaintiff may file a reply to defendants' [25-1] response to plaintiff's [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts. (cc) (slc) (Entered: 03/06/2003)

PACER
31 March 12, 2003

MOTION by counsel for plaintiff, Amy Loggins for leave of absence of 12 weeks with brief in support. (slc) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

PACER
32 June 10, 2003

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, GRANTING [22-1] motion amending [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, [19-2] motion for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion, and [19-3] motion to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery, GRANTING [21-1] motion to extend time within which defendants may respond to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests to dfts, GRANTING [24-1] motion to extend time within which to respond [22-1] amended motion to [19-1] motion to compel responses to pla's discovery requests, DENYING [19-2] motion for sanctions for causing pla to file this motion by EEOC, GRANTING [19-3] motion to extend time for a period of 45 days for discovery; Discovery ends 7/25/03 GRANTING [20-1] joint motion to extend time thru 02/04/03 within which defendants may file dispositive motions. (cc) (slc) (Entered: 06/12/2003)

PACER
33 July 25, 2003

CONSENT MOTION to extend time thru 09/01/03 of discovery to take to deposition of Kathy Fionte . (to CC) (slc) (Entered: 07/29/2003)

PACER
35 Aug. 26, 2003

CONSENT MOTION to extend time for dispositive motion deadline throughand including 9/16/03 (to CC) (vs) (Entered: 08/27/2003)

PACER
36 Sept. 3, 2003

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper GRANTING [35-1] joint motion to extend time for dispositive motion deadline throughand including 9/16/03 (cc) (vs) (Entered: 09/04/2003)

PACER
37 Sept. 16, 2003

Notice of Settlement Agreement . (to cc) (vs) Modified on 09/17/2003 (Entered: 09/17/2003)

PACER
38 Sept. 26, 2003

ORDER by Judge Clarence Cooper pursuant to the Settlement Agreement filed with the court on 9/16/03, this action is hereby dismissed. (cc) (vs) Modified on 10/06/2003 (Entered: 09/29/2003)

PACER
Sept. 29, 2003

Case terminated. (vs) (Entered: 09/29/2003)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

Georgia

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 22, 2002

Closing Date: Sept. 29, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Adecco North America, LLC

Olsen Staffing Services, Corp.

Olsten Staffing Services, Corp.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Northern District of Georgia 1:02-cv-00786

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Voluntary Dismissal

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation