Case: Jane Doe v. District of Columbia

1:92-cv-00635 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: March 11, 1992

Closed Date: Aug. 31, 1993

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In March 1992, inmates infected with HIV in the District of Columbia's Lorton Prison filed suit in the District of DC against the District of Columbia, represented by an attorney from the Open Society Initiative. Plaintiffs sued using pseudonyms under section 1983 for violation of their Fifth Amendment right to privacy and Eighth Amendment right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment. In addition, certain plaintiffs sued for violation of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. section 794, for …

In March 1992, inmates infected with HIV in the District of Columbia's Lorton Prison filed suit in the District of DC against the District of Columbia, represented by an attorney from the Open Society Initiative. Plaintiffs sued using pseudonyms under section 1983 for violation of their Fifth Amendment right to privacy and Eighth Amendment right to be free of cruel and unusual punishment. In addition, certain plaintiffs sued for violation of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. section 794, for discrimination in the participation of programs offered by the defendant. Plaintiffs also alleged violations of the DC Freedom of Information Law, D.C. Code section 1-1521, based on defendant's disclosure of confidential medical records. Finally, plaintiffs alleged breach of confidential relationship, invasion of privacy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Plaintiffs sought damages, declaratory relief, and a permanent injunction.

In May 1992, defendant moved to dismiss the action. In November 1992, at the hearing on that motion, defendant agreed that the motion should be treated as a motion for summary judgment and filed a statement of material facts not in dispute. Doe v. District of Columbia, 1993 WL 128496 (D.D.C. April 13, 1993). In his order dated April 1993, Judge Louis Oberdorfer denied defendant's motion for summary judgment due to lack of evidence of undisputable facts.

The docket reveals that the case subsequently settled. Although the underlying agreement itself does not appear in the docket, there is a motion for adoption of a consent order about attorneys' fees, as well as an order granting D.C. Prisoners Legal Services Project $37,500 in fees, and an August, 1993 stipulation dismissing the action with prejudice.

Summary Authors

John Maksymonko (8/1/2005)

People

Judge(s)

Oberdorfer, Louis Falk (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Hall, Aurie Talbor (Maryland)

Smith, Jonathan Mark (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Amato, Maria-Claudia T. (District of Columbia)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

1:92-cv-00635

Docket (PACER)

Doe v. DC

Aug. 31, 1993

Aug. 31, 1993

Docket
4

1:92-cv-00635

Complaint

March 11, 1992

March 11, 1992

Complaint
124

1:92-cv-00635

Memorandum and Order

April 13, 1993

April 13, 1993

Order/Opinion

1993 WL 128496

Docket

Last updated March 25, 2025, 8:42 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 March 11, 1992

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to seal the applications to proceed in forma pauperis, the affirmance and all subsequent pleadings using pseudonyms (adc) (Entered: 03/16/1992)

PACER
2 March 11, 1992

ORDER by Judge John G. Penn : granting motion to seal the applications to proceed in forma pauperis, the affirmance and all subsequent pleadings using pseudonyms [1-1] by SAMUEL ROE, JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE, JOHN DOE (N) (adc) (Entered: 03/16/1992)

PACER
3 March 11, 1992

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to proceed in forma pauperis placed under seal in the Vault in Room 1800 (adc) (Entered: 03/16/1992)

PACER
4 March 11, 1992

COMPLAINT filed summons (1) issued ; affirmation revealing the plaintiffs names placed under seal in the Vault in Room 1800 (adc) (Entered: 03/16/1992)

PACER
5 April 9, 1992

MOTION filed by defendant DC to extend time to 5/8/92 to respond to complaint (sm) (Entered: 04/10/1992)

PACER
7 April 14, 1992

INTERROGATORIES filed by plaintiff(s) to defendant DC (sm) (Entered: 04/15/1992)

PACER
8 April 15, 1992

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) in opposition to motion to extend time to 5/8/92 to respond to complaint [5-1] by DC (sm) (Entered: 04/16/1992)

PACER
9 May 1, 1992

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to 5/8/92 to respond to complaint [5-1] by DC brief due 5/8/92 ; (N) (sm) (Entered: 05/04/1992)

PACER
10 May 8, 1992

MOTION filed by defendant DC to extend time to 5/12/92 within which to respond to the complaint (sm) (Entered: 05/11/1992)

PACER
11 May 12, 1992

MOTION filed by defendant DC to dismiss (sm) (Entered: 05/13/1992)

PACER
12 May 12, 1992

MOTION filed by defendant DC for protective order (sm) (Entered: 05/13/1992)

PACER
13 May 19, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE, KAREN ZOE, JOHN DOE, SAMUEL ROE and JANE DOE of defendant DC at the Offices of the D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, at 10:00 a.m. on June 22, 1992 (adc) (Entered: 05/22/1992)

PACER
14 May 19, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE, KAREN ZOE, JOHN DOE, SAMUEL ROE and JANE DOE of Mary Campbell (9:00 a.m.) and William Hall, M.D. (1:00 p.m.) at the Offices of the D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc. (adc) (Entered: 05/22/1992)

PACER
15 May 26, 1992

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) in opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss [11-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 05/28/1992)

PACER
16 May 27, 1992

ERRATA by plaintiff(s) to correct an error in the Certificate of Service attached to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Complaint from May 25, 1992 to May 26, 1992 (adc) (Entered: 05/28/1992)

PACER
17 May 27, 1992

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff(s) in opposition to defendant's motion for protective order [12-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 05/28/1992)

PACER
18 May 27, 1992

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to compel discovery (adc) (Entered: 05/28/1992)

PACER
19 June 8, 1992

MOTION filed by defendant DC to extend time to within which to respond to plaintiffs' opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss and defendant's motion for a protective order (adc) (Entered: 06/11/1992)

PACER
20 June 16, 1992

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to 6/18/92 within which to respond to plaintiffs' opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss and defendant's motion for a protective order [19-1] by DC (N) (mon) (Entered: 06/16/1992)

PACER
22 June 16, 1992

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) in opposition to motion for protective order [12-1] by DC, motion to dismiss [11-1] by DC, motion to extend time to 5/12/92 within which to respond to the complaint [10-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 06/18/1992)

PACER
23 June 16, 1992

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to file affirmance under seal , and for a protective order (adc) (Entered: 06/18/1992)

PACER
24 June 16, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of plaintiff RICHARD POE on June 23, 1992 at 2:00 p.m. (adc) (Entered: 06/18/1992)

PACER
25 June 19, 1992

REPLY by defendant DC to plaintiffs' opposition to motion to dismiss [11-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 06/22/1992)

PACER
26 June 19, 1992

REPLY by defendant DC to plaintiffs' opposition to motion for protective order [12-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 06/22/1992)

PACER
27 June 19, 1992

RESPONSE by defendant DC in opposition to motion to compel discovery [18-1] by JANE DOE, SAMUEL ROE, JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (adc) (Entered: 06/22/1992)

PACER
28 June 22, 1992

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to compel discovery [18-1] by JANE DOE, SAMUEL ROE, JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE, denying motion for protective order [12-1] by DC motion hearing set for 1:45 9/11/92 on motion to dismiss ; (N) (mon) (Entered: 06/22/1992)

PACER
29 July 27, 1992

ANSWER by defendant DC to plaintiff's first set of interrogatories; attachments (adc) (Entered: 07/28/1992)

PACER
30 Aug. 5, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of John Noble at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc. on 9/23/92 at 1:00 p.m. (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

PACER
31 Aug. 5, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of David Roach on 9/23/92, at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc. at 9:30 a.m. (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

PACER
32 Aug. 5, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of Arthur Graves at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc., on 9/17/92, at 1:00 p.m. (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

PACER
33 Aug. 5, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION (amended) by plaintiff(s) of William Hall, M.D. at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc., on 8/25/92 at 10:00 a.m. (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

PACER
34 Aug. 5, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION (amended) by plaintiff(s) of Mary Campbell at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc., at 10:00 a.m., on 8/24/92 (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

PACER
35 Aug. 5, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of defendant DC on 8/19/92 at 10:00 a.m., at the offices of D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc. (adc) (Entered: 08/06/1992)

PACER
36 Aug. 14, 1992

ANSWER (supplemental) by defendant DC to plaintiff's first set of interrogatories; attachment (dot) (Entered: 08/17/1992)

PACER
37 Aug. 20, 1992

MOTION filed by defendant DC to continue the 9/11/92 hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss to 9/18/92 at 1:45 p.m. (adc) (Entered: 08/21/1992)

PACER
38 Aug. 31, 1992

ORDER by Judge Stanley Sporkin : granting motion to continue the 9/11/92 hearing on defendant's motion to dismiss to 9/18/92 at 1:45 p.m. [37-1] by DC motion hearing set for 1:45 9/18/92 ; (N) (mon) (Entered: 08/31/1992)

PACER
39 Sept. 1, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by plaintiff(s) of plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE on 9/14/92, at 11:00 a.m., at the Maximum Security Facility at Lorton, Virginia (adc) (Entered: 09/02/1992)

PACER
40 Sept. 4, 1992

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE, plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE, plaintiff(s) JOHN DOE, plaintiff(s) SAMUEL ROE, plaintiff(s) JANE DOE, plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE to amend complaint [4-1] ; EXHIBIT (SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT) (dot) (Entered: 09/08/1992)

PACER
41 Sept. 15, 1992

MOTION filed by defendant DC to continue motions hearing to 10/13/92 (adc) (Entered: 09/16/1992)

PACER
42 Sept. 21, 1992

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to continue motions hearing until further order of the Court. (N) (mon) (Entered: 09/21/1992)

PACER
43 Sept. 28, 1992

SECOND INTERROGATORIES and request to produce documents filed by plaintiff(s) JANE DOE, et al. to defendant DC (pob) (Entered: 09/29/1992)

PACER
44 Oct. 15, 1992

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) for discovery sanctions ; exhibits (7) (adc) (Entered: 10/16/1992)

PACER
45 Oct. 20, 1992

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
46 Oct. 20, 1992

REQUEST by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
47 Oct. 20, 1992

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) SAMUEL ROE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
48 Oct. 20, 1992

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) JOHN DOE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
49 Oct. 20, 1992

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) JOHN DOE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
50 Oct. 20, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE on 12/8/92 at 10:00 a.m., at the Medium Security Facility (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
52 Oct. 20, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of plaintiff(s) JOHN DOE on 12/9/92 at 10:00 a.m., at the Central Facility (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
53 Oct. 20, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of plaintiff(s) SAMUEL ROE on 12/9/92 at 2:00 p.m., at the Medium Security Facility (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
54 Oct. 20, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE on 12/10/92 at 10:00 a.m. at the Offices of Defense Counsel (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
55 Oct. 20, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of plaintiff(s) JANE DOE on 12/7/92 at 10:00 a.m., at the Minimum Security Facility (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
56 Oct. 20, 1992

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) JANE DOE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
57 Oct. 20, 1992

REQUEST by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) JANE DOE for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
58 Oct. 20, 1992

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
59 Oct. 20, 1992

REQUEST by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
60 Oct. 20, 1992

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE (adc) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

PACER
70 Oct. 20, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of Jean Coe on 12/8/92 at 2:00 p.m., at the Correctional Treatment Facility (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

PACER
71 Oct. 20, 1992

INTERROGATORIES (first set) filed by defendant DC Jean Coe (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

PACER
72 Oct. 20, 1992

NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION by defendant DC of Peter Foe on 12/10/92 at 10:00 a.m., at the office of defense counsel (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

PACER
73 Oct. 20, 1992

INTERROGATORIES filed by defendant DC of Peter Foe (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

PACER
74 Oct. 20, 1992

REQUEST by defendant DC to plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

PACER
75 Oct. 20, 1992

REQUEST by defendant DC for production of documents to Peter Foe (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

PACER
62 Nov. 3, 1992

MOTION filed by defendant DC to extend time to an additional two days to within which to oppose to plaintiffs' motion for discovery sanctions (adc) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

PACER
63 Nov. 5, 1992

MOTION filed by defendant DC to extend time to 11/30/92 to answer plaintiffs' second set of interrogatories and request for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 11/06/1992)

PACER
64 Nov. 5, 1992

RESPONSE by defendant DC in opposition to motion for discovery sanctions [44-1] by SAMUEL ROE, JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (adc) (Entered: 11/06/1992)

PACER
65 Nov. 10, 1992

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : motion hearing set for 1:45 11/12/92 ; (N) (mon) (Entered: 11/10/1992)

PACER
66 Nov. 10, 1992

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to an additional two days to 11/5/92 within which to oppose to plaintiffs' motion for discovery sanctions [62-1] by DC (N) (mon) (Entered: 11/10/1992)

PACER
67 Nov. 12, 1992

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) in opposition to motion to extend time to 11/30/92 to answer plaintiffs' second set of interrogatories and request for production of documents [63-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

PACER
68 Nov. 12, 1992

REPLY by plaintiff(s)to defendant's` response to motion for discovery sanctions [44-1] by SAMUEL ROE, JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

PACER
69 Nov. 12, 1992

RESPONSE (OPPOSITIONS) by plaintiff(s) to defendant's cross motion for sanctions and costs (adc) (Entered: 11/12/1992)

PACER
Nov. 13, 1992

STATUS HEARING before Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : plaintiffs' motion for sanctons is withdrawn. Reporter: Vernell Marshall (mon) (Entered: 11/13/1992)

PACER
76 Nov. 16, 1992

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to 11/30/92 to answer plaintiffs' second set of interrogatories and request for production of documents [63-1] by DC (N) (mon) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

PACER
77 Nov. 16, 1992

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to amend complaint [4-1] [40-1] by plaintiff(s)sssss (N) (mon) (Entered: 11/17/1992)

PACER
114 Nov. 16, 1992

AMENDED COMPLAINT (second) by plaintiff(s) adding JEAN COE, PETER FOE amending complaint [4-1] (adc) (Entered: 02/24/1993)

PACER
78 Nov. 18, 1992

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to extend time to 11/18/92 to file stipulation concerning discovery ; exhibit (adc) Modified on 11/19/1992 (Entered: 11/19/1992)

PACER
79 Nov. 18, 1992

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to 11/18/92 to file stipulation concerning discovery [78-1] by JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (N) (mon) (Entered: 11/20/1992)

PACER
80 Nov. 23, 1992

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) to defendant's request for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

PACER
81 Nov. 23, 1992

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to extend time to 12/2/92 to file executed interrogatory answers (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

PACER
82 Nov. 23, 1992

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

PACER
83 Nov. 23, 1992

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) JANE DOE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

PACER
84 Nov. 23, 1992

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) JOHN DOE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

PACER
85 Nov. 23, 1992

OBJECTIONS by plaintiff(s) SALLY ROE to request [74-1] by DC (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

PACER
86 Nov. 23, 1992

ANSWER by Jean Coe to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

PACER
87 Nov. 23, 1992

ANSWER by Peter Foe to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

PACER
88 Nov. 23, 1992

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

PACER
89 Nov. 23, 1992

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) SAMUEL ROE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

PACER
90 Nov. 23, 1992

REQUEST (supplemental) by plaintiff(s) to defendant DC for production of documents (adc) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

PACER
91 Nov. 23, 1992

NOTICE OF FILING by defendant DC the statement of material facts to which there is no genuine dispute (adc) (Entered: 11/24/1992)

PACER
92 Nov. 24, 1992

STIPULATION filed and fiated by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer regarding certain interrogatories; that plaintiffs withdraw their motion for sanctions without prejudie to refile and that defendant withdraws its cross motion for sanctions without prejudice to refile . (N) (pob) (Entered: 11/25/1992)

PACER
93 Nov. 30, 1992

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) KAREN ZOE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 12/02/1992)

PACER
94 Nov. 30, 1992

ANSWER by Jean Coe to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 12/02/1992)

PACER
95 Dec. 2, 1992

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) JANE DOE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) Modified on 12/03/1992 (Entered: 12/03/1992)

PACER
97 Dec. 2, 1992

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) SAMUEL ROE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 12/03/1992)

PACER
98 Dec. 2, 1992

ANSWER by plaintiff(s) RICHARD POE to defendant's first set of interrogatories (adc) (Entered: 12/03/1992)

PACER
99 Dec. 7, 1992

ORDER by Judge Louis F. Oberdorfer : granting motion to extend time to 12/2/92 to file executed interrogatory answers [81-1] by JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (N) (mon) (Entered: 12/07/1992)

PACER
100 Dec. 7, 1992

MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) for discovery sanctions (adc) (Entered: 12/08/1992)

PACER
111 Dec. 10, 1992

RESPONSE by plaintiff(s) in opposition to motion for summary judgment; exhibits (7) (adc) (Entered: 01/04/1993)

PACER
112 Dec. 11, 1992

MEMORANDUM by defendant DC in opposition to request for jury trial; "Let this be filed" (adc) (Entered: 01/04/1993)

PACER
101 Dec. 18, 1992

RESPONSE by defendant DC in opposition to motion for discovery sanctions [100-1] by JOHN DOE, KAREN ZOE, SALLY ROE (adc) (Entered: 12/22/1992)

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory:

District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 11, 1992

Closing Date: Aug. 31, 1993

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Five prisoners who are infected with HIV and are incarcerated in District of Columbia correctional facilities alleging correctional officials unlawfully and without permission revealed their HIV status to other prisoners and to correctional staff

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: Unknown

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Regional

District of Columbia Correctional Facilities

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

State law

Constitutional Clause(s):

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Due Process

Other Dockets:

District of District of Columbia 1:92-cv-00635

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Complaint (any)

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination Basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Medical care, general

Recommended Citation