Case: EEOC v. Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps

2:00-cv-01322 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of California

Filed Date: Feb. 7, 2000

Closed Date: June 18, 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Los Angeles Office of the EEOC filed this action in the District Court for the Central District of California. The Defendant was Luce, Forward, Hamilton, and Scripps, a law firm. The controversy involved the failure of the Defendant to hire the complainant after the complainant refused to sign a mandatory arbitration agreement, which the EEOC alleged was a violation of Title VII, the ADA, the ADEA, and the EPA. The lawsuit was filed in February 2000 and was initially resolved in December 20…

The Los Angeles Office of the EEOC filed this action in the District Court for the Central District of California. The Defendant was Luce, Forward, Hamilton, and Scripps, a law firm. The controversy involved the failure of the Defendant to hire the complainant after the complainant refused to sign a mandatory arbitration agreement, which the EEOC alleged was a violation of Title VII, the ADA, the ADEA, and the EPA. The lawsuit was filed in February 2000 and was initially resolved in December 2000 through summary judgment claims in favor of the defendant on the monetary damage claim, and in the EEOC's favor on the injunctive relief claim. The court held that the defendant would be enjoined from requiring applicants to arbitrate Title VII claims and from enforcing existing agreements to arbitrate those claims. EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, LLP, 122 F. Supp. 2d 1080 (C.D. Cal. 2000). The defendant appealed this decision, and the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded. EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, LLP, 303 F.3d 994 (9th Cir. 2002). An en banc Ninth Circuit rendered the same decision. EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, LLP, 345 F.3d 742 (9th Cir. 2003). After remand, the EEOC settled their case. The defendant agreed that if it required the signing of a pre-dispute arbitration agreement, it must comply at a minimum with applicable state and federal law. Also, the defendant agreed to give notice to employees of their independent right to file cases in the public interest. The complainant, who had intervened in the case, was not a part of this settlement. His separate claim was later dismissed through the defendant's summary judgment motion.

 

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (8/17/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11262684/parties/us-eeoc-v-luce-forward/


Judge(s)

Cooper, Florence-Marie (California)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Ehrlich, Anat (California)

Attorney for Defendant

Douglas, Kelly Capen (California)

Jensen, Michael Lee (California)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

Ehrman, Keith (California)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

00-57222

01-55321

2:00-cv-01322

Docket [For Court of Appeals Case 00-57222]

EEOC et al v. Luce, Forward, Ham.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

May 24, 2004

May 24, 2004

Docket

2:00-cv-01322

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Luce Forward

Aug. 12, 2004

Aug. 12, 2004

Docket
43

2:00-cv-01322

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment; Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiff's Partial Motion for Summary Judgment

EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP

Nov. 21, 2000

Nov. 21, 2000

Order/Opinion

122 F.Supp.2d 1080

46

2:00-cv-01322

Judgment

EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP

Dec. 11, 2000

Dec. 11, 2000

Order/Opinion

00-57222

01-55321

Opinion and Dissent [Court of Appeals]

EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Sept. 3, 2002

Sept. 3, 2002

Order/Opinion

303 F.3d 994

00-57222

01-55321

2:00-cv-01322

Order [For Court of Appeals to Rehear]

EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Feb. 7, 2003

Feb. 7, 2003

Order/Opinion

319 F.3d 1091

00-57222

01-55321

Opinion and Dissents [Court of Appeals]

EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Sept. 30, 2003

Sept. 30, 2003

Order/Opinion

345 F.3d 742

83

2:00-cv-01322

Settlement Agreement and Order Dismissing with Prejudice Claims by the US EEOC Only

EEOC v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP

June 18, 2004

June 18, 2004

Settlement Agreement
102

2:00-cv-01322

Order Re Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment

EEOC and Lagatree v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP

Aug. 4, 2004

Aug. 4, 2004

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11262684/us-eeoc-v-luce-forward/

Last updated March 21, 2026, 4:54 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Feb. 7, 2000

COMPLAINT filed Summons(es) issued referred to Discovery Ann I. Jones (jag) (Entered: 02/09/2000)

RECAP
2 Feb. 7, 2000

CERTIFICATION by plaintiff US EEOC of interested parties. (lk) (Entered: 02/10/2000)

RECAP
3 March 9, 2000

WAIVER OF SERVICE of SUMMONS signed for by Charles A Bird, Partner by defendant Luce Forward sent by plf on 2/28/00 (rrey) (Entered: 03/10/2000)

RECAP
4 April 10, 2000

ANSWER filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps LLP to complaint [1-1] (rrey) (Entered: 04/11/2000)

RECAP
5 April 10, 2000

PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Luce Forward on 4/7/00 of ans to cmp (rrey) (Entered: 04/11/2000)

RECAP
6 April 10, 2000

NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by defendant Luce Forward (rrey) (Entered: 04/11/2000)

RECAP
7 May 19, 2000

NOTICE AND REQUEST Of Settlement Procedure Selection fld Parties request to apr before Discovery Ann I. Jones for sttlmnt procdgs Order by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper granting settlement procedure selection request [7-1] (lk) (Entered: 05/22/2000)

RECAP
8 May 23, 2000

JOINT REPORT OF EARLY MEETING OF COUNSEL filed. Estimated length of trial three (3) to four (4) days (lk) (Entered: 05/25/2000)

RECAP
9 May 26, 2000

MINUTES: (In Chambers) mandatory status conference set on 9:30 6/26/00 ; trial cnsl are Ord to be present purs to Local Rule 6.4.1 by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper CR: Not Present (rrey) (Entered: 05/30/2000)

RECAP
10 June 26, 2000

MINUTES: ; mandatory status conference held . The crt will issue its trial order by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper CR: none (lk) (Entered: 06/27/2000)

RECAP
11 June 27, 2000

ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper: jury trial set on 9:00 1/30/01 ; cut-off date for joining ptys or amd pleadings on 11/27/00 ; mot cut-off on 11/27/00 ; pretrial conference on 9:00 12/18/00 ; discovery cut-off set on 9/30/00 (rrey) (Entered: 06/29/2000)

RECAP
12 Aug. 18, 2000

MINUTES: (IN CHAMBERS) settlement conference 10:00 10/23/00 ; IT IS FUR ORD that all persons whose consent is necessary to conclude a sttlmnt shall be present personally; IT IS FUR ORD that each pty shall deliver to the chambers of the Mag Judge a Confidential Sttlmnt Conf Stmt on or before Monday, 10/16/00 (see doc for fur details) IT IS SO ORD by Magistrate Judge Ann I. Jones CR: N/A (cc cnsl) (rrey) (Entered: 08/22/2000)

RECAP
13 Aug. 25, 2000

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by plaintiff for partial summary judgment purs to FRCP 56(c) ; motion hearing set for 10:00 9/18/00 Lodged Propsd Ord; S/J; stmt of U/C (rrey) (Entered: 08/25/2000)

RECAP
14 Aug. 25, 2000

MEMORANDUM OF P/A IN SUPPORT by plaintiff of motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] ; decls of Olophius E Perry; & Peter F Laura (rrey) (Entered: 08/25/2000)

RECAP
15 Sept. 8, 2000

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper IT IS SO ORD: continuing hearing on plfs motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] to 10:00 10/30/00 ; ptys fur agree that dft shall also file a mot for S/J so as to be heard on the same day 10/30/00 @ 10:00 ; EEOCs mot, dfts opp papers are to be fld and served (in person or by mail) NLT 10/10/00; EEOCs rply papers, if any, are to be fld and served NLT 10/23/00 ; as for dfts mot, the ptys shall file and serve their papers in acc w/ Local Rule 7 or any other applicable rules of Crt (rrey) (Entered: 09/11/2000)

RECAP
16 Sept. 20, 2000

MINUTES: (IN CHAMBERS): settlement conference cont to 11:00 10/24/00 ; all provisions of the Crts 8/18/00 Ord remain in effect IT IS SO ORD by Magistrate Judge Ann I. Jones CR: N/A (cc cnsl) (rrey) (Entered: 09/25/2000)

RECAP
17 Oct. 6, 2000

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION by defendant Luce Forward for summary judgment, or in the alt, for partial summary judgment ; motion hearing set for 10:00 10/30/00 Lodged stmt of U/F & jgm (jag) (Entered: 10/10/2000)

RECAP
18 Oct. 6, 2000

MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT by defendant Luce Forward of motion for summary judgment [17-1], motion for partial summary judgment [17-2] (jag) (Entered: 10/10/2000)

RECAP
19 Oct. 6, 2000

DECLARATION of MICHAEL L JENSEN by defendant Luce Forward in suppt of motion for summary judgment [17-1], motion for partial summary judgment [17-2] (jag) (Entered: 10/10/2000)

RECAP
20 Oct. 6, 2000

REQUEST by defendant Luce Forward for judicial notice in suppt of motion for summary judgment [17-1], re motion for partial summary judgment [17-2] (jag) (Entered: 10/10/2000)

RECAP
21 Oct. 6, 2000

NOTICE OF LODGEMENT by defendant Luce Forward of CA AUth in suppt of motion for summary judgment [17-1], motion for partial summary judgment [17-2] (jag) (Entered: 10/10/2000)

RECAP
22 Oct. 6, 2000

NOTICE OF LODGMENT by defendant Luce Forward in suppt of motion for summary judgment [17-1], motion for partial summary judgment [17-2] (jag) (Entered: 10/10/2000)

RECAP
23 Oct. 6, 2000

PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Luce Forward of ntc of mot for S/J or in the alt, partial S/J, memo of P&A in suppt, stmt of U/F & concl of law, etc; served upon Peter F Laura on 10/6/00 by personal svc (jag) (Entered: 10/10/2000)

RECAP
24 Oct. 10, 2000

MEMO OF P/A IN OPPOSITION by defendant to motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] (rrey) (Entered: 10/11/2000)

RECAP
25 Oct. 10, 2000

DECLARATION of Michael L Jensen by defendant in suppt of opp to motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] (rrey) (Entered: 10/11/2000)

RECAP
26 Oct. 10, 2000

REQUEST by defendant for judicial notice in suppt of its opp to motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] (rrey) (Entered: 10/11/2000)

RECAP
27 Oct. 10, 2000

NOTICE OF LODGMENT by defendant of California Auth in suppt of its opp to motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] (rrey) (Entered: 10/11/2000)

RECAP
28 Oct. 10, 2000

NOTICE OF LODGMENT by defendant in suppt of its opp to motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] (rrey) (Entered: 10/11/2000)

RECAP
29 Oct. 10, 2000

RESPONSE by defendant to plfs stmt of uncontroverted facts & concls of law in supp of its motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] (rrey) (Entered: 10/11/2000)

RECAP
30 Oct. 10, 2000

PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE by defendant on 10/10/00 of dfts memo of p/a in opp to plfs mot for partial S/J (see doc for fur details) (rrey) (Entered: 10/11/2000)

RECAP
31 Oct. 17, 2000

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper continuing hearing on motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] ; on motion for summary judgment [17-1], or for partial summary judgment [17-2] to 10:00 11/6/00 ; the EEOC shall serve its opp to dfts mot fro S/J and its rply to dft opp by fax and regular mail by 10/23/00 (rrey) (Entered: 10/17/2000)

RECAP
32 Oct. 23, 2000

OPPOSITION by plaintiff to motion for summary judgment [17-1], or for partial summary judgment [17-2] (rrey) (Entered: 10/24/2000)

RECAP
33 Oct. 23, 2000

EVIDENTIARY OBJECTIONS by plaintiff to evid submitted by dft in suppt of its opp to motion for summary judgment [17-1], or for partial summary judgment [17-2] (rrey) (Entered: 10/24/2000)

RECAP
34 Oct. 23, 2000

NOTICE OF LODGING THE DECLARATIONS of Donald C Lagatree & Peter F Laura by plaintiff in suppt of its opp to dfts motion for summary judgment [17-1], or in the alt for partial summary judgment [17-2] (rrey) (Entered: 10/24/2000)

RECAP
35 Oct. 24, 2000

MINUTES: (IN CHAMBERS) settlement conference held ; the case did not settle by Magistrate Judge Ann I. Jones CR: N/A (cc cnsl) (rrey) (Entered: 10/30/2000)

RECAP
36 Oct. 30, 2000

REPLY by plaintiff to dfts opp to motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] (rrey) (Entered: 10/31/2000)

RECAP
37 Oct. 30, 2000

REPLY STATEMENT OF Uncontroverted facts and concls of law by defendant in suppt of motion for summary judgment [17-1], or in the alt for partial summary judgment [17-2] (rrey) (Entered: 10/31/2000)

RECAP
38 Oct. 30, 2000

REPLY by defendant in suppt of motion for summary judgment [17-1], or in the alt for partial summary judgment [17-2] (rrey) (Entered: 10/31/2000)

RECAP
39 Oct. 30, 2000

PROOF OF PERSONAL SERVICE by defendant on 10/27/00 of dfts rply in suppt of its mot for S/J or in the alt partial S/J; rply stmt of uncontroverted facts and concls of law in suppt (rrey) (Entered: 10/31/2000)

RECAP
40 Nov. 1, 2000

MINUTES: The Crt, on its own mot hereby cont the hearing on motion for summary judgment [17-1] 10:00 11/13/00, cont hearing on motion for partial summary judgment [17-2] 10:00 11/13/00, cont hearing on motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] 10:00 11/13/00; the br sched is not changed by this ord; br will be due on the dates prev set by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper CR: not present (yl) (Entered: 11/02/2000)

RECAP
41 Nov. 13, 2000

MINUTES: Hearing on Plfs motion for partial summary judgment [13-1] & dfts motion for summary judgment [17-1] or in the alt for partial summary judgment [17-2] ; The Crt takes its ruling on the mots UNDER SUBMISSION and will issue its final Ord by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper CR: Pat Cuneo (rrey) (Entered: 11/15/2000)

RECAP
42 Nov. 15, 2000

RECEIPT OF TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 11/13/00 (Re: ) CR: Pat Cuneo (pjap) (Entered: 11/20/2000)

RECAP
Nov. 15, 2000

TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings held on 11/13/00 (pjap)

43 Nov. 21, 2000

ORDER by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper GRANT in part DENY in part dft LFHS motion for summary judgment [17-1], finding the motion for partial summary judgment [17-2] denied as moot; GRANT in part DENY in part plfs motion for partial summary judgment [13-1]; S/J in favor of dft is hereby GR to the extent the clms asserted in the cmp seek monetary relief (ENT 11/22/00) (SEND/NTC) (rrey) (Entered: 11/22/2000)

RECAP
44 Nov. 22, 2000

NOTICE OF CHANGE of Atty info by Julie A Vogelzang for defendant (rrey) (Entered: 11/27/2000)

RECAP
45 Nov. 22, 2000

PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Luce Forward on 11/21/00 of Ntc of change of attorney information (jp) (Entered: 11/28/2000)

RECAP
Nov. 22, 2000

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED: propsd statement of uncontroverted facts & conclusions of law by plaintiff; Lodged 8/25/00 (jp)

Nov. 22, 2000

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED: Statement of Uncontroverted Facts & Conclusions of Law in suppt of motion for S/J or, in the alt, partial S/J by plaintiff US EEOC; Lodged 10/23/00 (jp)

Nov. 22, 2000

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED: Propsd Judgment on dft motion for S/J or, in the alt, partial S/J; Lodged 10/6/00 (jp)

Nov. 22, 2000

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED: Statement of Uncontroverted Facts & Conclusions of Law in suppt of mot for S/J or, in the alt, partial S/J by defendant Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP; Lodged 10/6/00 (jp)

Nov. 22, 2000

PLACED IN FILE - NOT USED: Propsd Order GR patrial S/J by plaintiff US EEOC; Lodged 8/25/00 (jp)

46 Dec. 11, 2000

JUDGMENT by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper against defendant Luce Forward; (1) Jgm is entered in favor of plf EEOC & agnst dft LFHS re a perm injunction agnst dft LFHS; Jgm is entered in favor of dft LFHS & agnst plf EEOC to the extent the clms asserted in the cmp seek monetary relief; & (2) dft LFHS is perm enjoined from: (a) requiring or requesting its employees to agree to arbitration of their Title VII clms as a condition of employment; (b) attempting to enforce any such previously executed agreements to arbitrate Title VII clms terminating case (MD JS-6) (ENT 12/11/00) (send/ntc) (rrey) (Entered: 12/11/2000)

RECAP
47 Dec. 13, 2000

NOTICE OF APPEAL by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps LLP to 9th C/A from Dist. Court jgm fld & ent 12/11/00 [46-2] (cc: Charles A. Bird, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP; Mary Jo O'Neill, U. S. EEOC) Fee: Paid (wdc) (Entered: 12/13/2000)

RECAP
48 Dec. 13, 2000

REPRESENTATION STATEMENT re appeal [47-1] (wdc) (wdc) (Entered: 12/13/2000)

RECAP
50 Dec. 13, 2000

PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Luce Forward. (app) (Entered: 12/20/2000)

RECAP
51 Dec. 18, 2000

TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION and ordering form for dates: 11/13/00 re transcript [42-1] CR: P. Cuneo (app) (Entered: 12/20/2000)

RECAP
49 Dec. 19, 2000

REPRESENTATION STATEMENT re appeal by plf [47-1] (pjap) Modified on 12/20/2000 (Entered: 12/20/2000)

RECAP
52 Jan. 10, 2001

NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number appeal [47-1] 00-57222 (pjap) (pjap) (Entered: 01/10/2001)

RECAP
53 Jan. 25, 2001

CERTIFICATE of Record Transmitted to USCA-00-57222 (cc: all parties) (wdc) (wdc) (Entered: 01/25/2001)

RECAP
54 Feb. 8, 2001

NOTICE OF CROSS-APPEAL by plaintiff United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission to 9th C/A from Dist. Court jgm & ord fld 12/11/00 & ent 12/11/00 [46-2] and ord fld 11/21/00 & ent 11/22/00 [43-1] (cc: Peter F. Laura, Carolyn Wheeler, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP) Fee: Govt Waived (dlu) (Entered: 02/08/2001)

RECAP
55 Feb. 27, 2001

NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number appeal [54-1] 01-55321 (dlu) (Entered: 02/27/2001)

RECAP
56 Nov. 19, 2001

CERTIFICATE of Record Transmitted to USCA (cc: all parties) (01-55321) (fvap) (Entered: 11/19/2001)

RECAP
57 Nov. 21, 2001

ORDER FROM USCA: Plf's unopposed mot to Wv requirement to file excerpts of record w/answering/opening brief is GR. Clerk shall file prev rcd plf's answering/opening brief. Clk shall also file prev rcd dft's reply/answering brief. Court records do not currently reflect that dist court has issued certificates of record. Ptys shall monitor issuance of certificates. (00-57222, 01-55321) (pjap) (Entered: 12/04/2001)

RECAP
58 March 18, 2002

CLERK'S record on appeal transmitted to Circuit [54-1], [47-1] vols: 3 & 2 expandos folders of docket nos. 22 & 28; transcripts: 1 (pjap) (Entered: 03/18/2002)

RECAP
59 Sept. 17, 2002

RECORD on appeal returned from U.S. Court of Appeals re appeal [54-1], re appeal [47-1] vols: 3 & 2 bulky docs, #22, 28 transcripts: 1 (pjap) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

RECAP
60 Nov. 5, 2002

CLERK'S record on appeal transmitted to Circuit [54-1], [47-1], vols: 3; transcripts: 1; brown folders: 2, docs# 22 & 28. (00-57222, 01-55321) (cbr) (Entered: 11/05/2002)

RECAP
61 Dec. 18, 2003

MANDATE from Circuit Court of Appeals received in district court 12/22/03 vacating and remanding appeal [54-1], reversing decision of the District Court [Appeal [47-1]. Costx taxed of $693.00. (00-57222, 01-55321) (cbr) (Entered: 12/29/2003)

RECAP
62 Dec. 31, 2003

MINUTES: Order Setting Status Conference after remand from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court has reviewed the Mandate from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, received on December 22, 2003. The court hereby sets a Status Conference on 2/9/2004 at 09:30 AM before Honorable Florence-Marie Cooper. Court Reporter: Not Present. (bp, ) (Entered: 01/07/2004)

RECAP
63 Jan. 8, 2004

MINUTES: Pursuant to the Mandate of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued December 22, 2003, the judgment entered by this court on December 11, 2000, is hereby VACATED Judge Florence-Marie Cooper : Court Reporter: Not Present. (bp, (Entered: 01/09/2004)

RECAP
64 Jan. 22, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper : Continuing the Status Conference to 3/8/2004 09:00 AM before Honorable Florence-Marie Cooper.(bp, ) (Entered: 01/26/2004)

RECAP
65 March 5, 2004

NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT OF CASE due to Unavailability of Judicial Officer filed. The previously asssigned Magistrate Judge is no longer available. Pursuant to directive of the Chief Magistrate Judge and in accordance with the rules of this Court, the case has been returned to the Clerk for reassignment. This case has been reassigned to Discovery Magistrate Judge Carolyn Turchin. Case number will now read CV 00-1322 FMC (CTx). (kc, ) (Entered: 03/08/2004)

RECAP
66 March 8, 2004

MINUTES: Status Conference after remand from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court conferred with counsel concerning this matter on remand from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. There is some disagreement concerning the scope of issue which remain to be resolved by this court, and the EEOC and Luce, forward would like an opportunity to discuss settlement before legal issues are briefed. If the matter is not settled, the EEOC may move to reopen discovery. It is anticipated the matter will then be resolved by way of summary judgment. Further Status Conference set for 4/12/2004 10:00 AM before Honorable Florence-Marie Cooper. Court Reporter: Not Present. (bp, ) (Entered: 03/09/2004)

RECAP
67 March 26, 2004

NOTICE that Anat Ehlrlich is no longer an employee at the EEOC filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (bp, ) (Entered: 04/03/2004)

RECAP
68 April 12, 2004

MINUTES: Status Conference after remand from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The court, on its own motion and after telephonic consultation as to date, continues the matter to April 26, 2004, at 10:00 a.m. before Honorable Florence-Marie Cooper. Court Reporter: Not Present. (bp, ) (Entered: 04/13/2004)

RECAP
69 April 26, 2004

MINUTES: Further Status Conference after remand from Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal. The conference is held. The court's trial order will issue. Judge Florence-Marie Cooper : Court Reporter: Not Present. (bp, ) (Entered: 04/28/2004)

RECAP
70 April 26, 2004

AMENDED ORDER FOR COURT TRIAL. Cut-off date for discovery: N/A expired. Cut-off date for joining parties or amending pleadings: N/A expired. Cut-off date for hearing motions: August 9, 2004. Expert wintess exchange deadlines: in accordance with the rule. Trial date: 10/5/04, at 8:00 am. Judge Florence-Marie Cooper (bp, ) (Entered: 04/28/2004)

RECAP
72 May 3, 2004

NOTICE AND REQUEST of Settlement Procedure Selection (Sp1) filed; Parties request To Appear Before Magistrate Judge Turchin for settlement proceedings; Settlement procedure selection request SP1 By Order of Florence-Marie Cooper (bp, ) (Entered: 05/06/2004)

RECAP
71 May 4, 2004

MINUTES OF In Chambers held before Judge Carolyn Turchin: This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Turchin for settlement. IT IS ORDERED as follows:?1. Plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) shall confer immediately with each other and set a date and time for a settlement conference, after clearing the date with Magistrate Judge Turchin's clerk, Ms. Deborah Malone, (213)894-6513. The date selected must be soon enough to comply with any deadlines imposed by rule or by the district judge. Tape #: na. (dam) (Entered: 05/04/2004)

RECAP
73 May 13, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER tht the parties will schedule their respective summary judgment motions to be heard by the court on August 9, 2004 by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper (bp, ) (Entered: 05/14/2004)

RECAP
74 May 18, 2004

ORDER by Judge Carolyn Turchin, re In Chambers Conference, 71, Set Deadlines/Hearings: Confidential Settlement Statement due by 8/25/2004 Settlement Conference set for 9/1/2004 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Carolyn Turchin.(dam) (Entered: 05/18/2004)

RECAP
75 May 24, 2004

Appeal Record Returned from 9th CCA RE: CLERK'S record on appeal transmitted to Circuit [54-1], [47-1], vols: 3; transcripts: 1; brown folders: 2, docs# 22 & 28. (00-57222, 01-55321) (cbr) Received: Volume(s): 1 thru 3; Transcripts(s): 1; and 2 brown folder documents 22 and 28. (cbr, ) (Entered: 05/24/2004)

RECAP
76 June 17, 2004

NOTICE of Settlement filed by plaintiff U S Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.Settlement papers due by 6/17/2004. (bp, ) (Entered: 06/18/2004)

RECAP
83 June 18, 2004

STIPULATION AND ORDER that the Commission's claims in this lawsuit are hereby dismissed with prejudice. This court shall retain continuing jurisdiction to enforce the settlement of this lawsuit of a period of three years unless for good cause the court extends the jurisdiction beyond the three years by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper (bp, ) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

RECAP
84 June 18, 2004

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Intervenor Donald Lagatree. Motion set for hearing on 8/9/2004 at 10:00 AM before Honorable Florence-Marie Cooper. (bp, ) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

RECAP
85 June 18, 2004

NOTICE OF LODGING California Authorities in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment 84 filed by Intervenor Donald Lagatree. (bp, ) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

RECAP
86 June 18, 2004

NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge Florence-Marie Cooper ORDERING motion for summary judgment submitted by Intervenor Donald Lagatree received on 6/18/04 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk.(bp, ) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

RECAP
77 June 21, 2004

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. Motion set for hearing on 8/9/2004 at 10:00 AM before Honorable Florence-Marie Cooper. Lodged proposed statement and order. (bp, ) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

RECAP
78 June 21, 2004

MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment 77 filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. (bp, ) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

RECAP
79 June 21, 2004

DECLARATION of Kelly Capen Douglas in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment 77 filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. (bp, ) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

RECAP
80 June 21, 2004

REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment 77 filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. (bp, ) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

RECAP
81 June 21, 2004

NOTICE OF LODGMENT in support of MOTION for Summary Judgment 77 filed by defendants' Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. (bp, ) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

RECAP
82 June 21, 2004

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. re 79 Declaration (Motion related), 80 Motion Related Document, 81 Motion Related Document, 77 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 78 Memorandum in Support of Motion, was served on 6/18/04. (bp, ) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

RECAP
88 June 21, 2004

PROOF OF SERVICE filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. re 87 Response (non-motion), was served on 6/21/04. (bp, ) (Entered: 06/23/2004)

RECAP
87 June 22, 2004

RESPONSE by defendant Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLp to letter of June 18, 2004 re: dismissal (bp, ) (Entered: 06/23/2004)

RECAP
89 June 24, 2004

CERTIFICATION of Interested Parties filed by Intervenor Donald Lagatree. (bp, ) (Entered: 06/25/2004)

RECAP
90 July 7, 2004

OPPOSITION to MOTION for Summary Judgment 77 filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. (bp, ) (Entered: 07/08/2004)

RECAP
91 July 7, 2004

NOTICE OF LODGMENT in support of opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 84, MOTION for Summary Judgment 77 filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. (bp, ) (Entered: 07/08/2004)

RECAP
92 July 7, 2004

NOTICE OF LODGMENT in support of opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 84 filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. (bp, ) (Entered: 07/08/2004)

RECAP
93 July 7, 2004

RESPONSE to to intervenor's proposed statement of uncontroverted facts and conclusions of law re MOTION for Summary Judgment 84 filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. (bp, ) (Entered: 07/08/2004)

RECAP
94 July 7, 2004

DECLARATION of Kelly Capen Douglas in support of opposition to MOTION for Summary Judgment 84 filed by defendant Luce Forward Hamilton & Scripps. (bp, ) (Entered: 07/08/2004)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

California

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 7, 2000

Closing Date: June 18, 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Equal Pay Act, 29 U.S.C. § 206(d)

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Central District of California 2:00-cv-01322

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 00-57222

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit 01-55321

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Hiring

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation