Case: EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. STI HOLDINGS, INC.

3:03-cv-00543 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin

Filed Date: Sept. 30, 2003

Closed Date: Oct. 3, 2005

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2003, the EEOC district office in Milwaukee, Wisconsin brought this action against STI Holdings, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Although the complaint is unavailable, the EEOC litigation reports states that the EEOC alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 based on race and sex. Specifically, the EEOC alleged that the defendant utilized a preemployment test that was biased against Blacks and women. Within one week of…

In September 2003, the EEOC district office in Milwaukee, Wisconsin brought this action against STI Holdings, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin. Although the complaint is unavailable, the EEOC litigation reports states that the EEOC alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 based on race and sex. Specifically, the EEOC alleged that the defendant utilized a preemployment test that was biased against Blacks and women. Within one week of the complaint being filed, a consent decree was entered on 6 October 2003. However, over the following eight months, the parties moved several times to change the terms of the decree. In January 2005, the EEOC moved to enforce and extend the decree, but after briefing, the Court denied that motion in March 2005.

The EEOC litigation report and the consent decree states that the parties agreed that the defendant would pay the class a total of $180,000, refrain from using a biased preemployment test, hire at least twenty-seven qualified black applicants when assembler positions became available, and send out notifications of additional positions to interested class members. No fees or costs were awarded. The terms of the decree ran for two years and additionally required the defendant to post notice of rights.

Summary Authors

Keri Livingston (7/16/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11819185/parties/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-sti-holdings-inc/


Judge(s)

Shabaz, John C. (Wisconsin)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

3:03-cv-00543

Docket (PACER)

March 15, 2005

March 15, 2005

Docket
3

3:03-cv-00543

Consent Decree

EEOC v. STI Holdings, Inc. f/k/a Stoughton Trailers, Inc.

Oct. 3, 2003

Oct. 3, 2003

Settlement Agreement

EEOC Litigation Settlement Report (October 2003)

EEOC v. STI Holdings, Inc., f/k/a Stoughton Trailers, Inc.

No Court

Oct. 31, 2003

Oct. 31, 2003

Press Release

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/11819185/equal-employment-opportunity-commission-v-sti-holdings-inc/

Last updated March 25, 2026, 4:41 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Sept. 30, 2003

JS-44 (Entered: 10/01/2003)

RECAP
2 Sept. 30, 2003

COMPLAINT (Entered: 10/01/2003)

RECAP
Sept. 30, 2003

Jams Import Utility Entry

Sept. 30, 2003

NORTC - FEE PAID.

3 Oct. 6, 2003

CONSENT JUDGMENT. CC MLD. (Entered: 10/06/2003)

RECAP
4 Dec. 23, 2003

MOTION (JOINT) TO MODIFY TERMS OF CONSENT DECREE. (Entered: 12/23/2003)

RECAP
5 Dec. 29, 2003

ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY TERMS OF CONSENT DECREE. CC MLD (Entered: 12/29/2003)

RECAP
6 April 1, 2004

MOTION BY PLTF. TO MODIFY TERMS OF CONSENT DECREE. (Entered: 04/01/2004)

RECAP
7 April 2, 2004

ORDER GRANTING PLTF. MOTION TO MODIFY TERMS OF CONSENT DECREE. CC MLD. (Entered: 04/02/2004)

RECAP
8 April 30, 2004

PLTF. PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION LIST. (Entered: 04/30/2004)

RECAP
9 June 15, 2004

MOTION BY PLTF. TO APPROVE FINAL DISTRIBUTION LIST. (Entered: 06/15/2004)

RECAP
10 June 15, 2004

ORDER APPROVING FINAL DISTRIBUTION LIST. CC MLD. (Entered: 06/15/2004)

RECAP
11 June 29, 2004

MOTION BY DEFT. TO MODIFY TERMS OF CONSENT DECREE. (Entered: 06/29/2004)

RECAP
12 June 30, 2004

ORDER GRANTING DEFT. MOTION TO MODIFY TERMS OF CONSENT DECREE. CC MLD (Entered: 06/30/2004)

RECAP
13 Jan. 26, 2005

MOTION BY PLTF. TO ENFORCE CONSENT DECREE. (Entered: 01/26/2005)

RECAP
14 Feb. 2, 2005

NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF GARDNER CARTON & DOUGLAS LLP IN PLACE OF MICHAEL BEST & FRIEDRICH LLP. (Entered: 02/03/2005)

RECAP
15 Feb. 16, 2005

MOTION BY DEFT. TO AMEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLTF. MOTION TO COMPEL ENFORCEMENT OF CONSENT DECREE. (Entered: 02/16/2005)

RECAP
16 Feb. 16, 2005

AFFIDAVIT OF ERIC E. HOBBS. (Entered: 02/16/2005)

RECAP
17 Feb. 17, 2005

STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE; RESPONSE DUE 2/23/05; REPLY DUE 3/7/05. (Entered: 02/17/2005)

RECAP
18 Feb. 23, 2005

BRIEF IN OPPOSITION BY DEFTS. TO PLTF. MOTION TO ENFORCE CONSENT DECREE. (Entered: 02/24/2005)

RECAP
19 Feb. 23, 2005

AFFIDAVIT OF KATHRYN SCHIELDT. (Entered: 02/24/2005)

RECAP
20 March 7, 2005

BRIEF IN REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLTF. MOTION TO ENFORCE CONSENT DECREE. (Entered: 03/07/2005)

RECAP
21 March 7, 2005

AFFIDAVIT OF JEAN P. KAMP. (Entered: 03/07/2005)

RECAP
22 March 15, 2005

ORDER DENYING PLTF. MOT. TO ENFORCE CONSENT DECREE AND PLTF. MOT. TO EXTEND THE DECREE. (Entered: 03/15/2005)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Wisconsin

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 30, 2003

Closing Date: Oct. 3, 2005

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

The EEOC district office in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

STI HOLDINGS, INC.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Western District of Wisconsin 3:03-cv-00543

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Comply with advertising/recruiting requirements

Goals (e.g., for hiring, admissions)

Hire

Other requirements regarding hiring, promotion, retention

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Recordkeeping

Reporting

Utilize objective hiring/promotion criteria

Amount Defendant Pays: 180000

Order Duration: 2003 - 2005

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Impact

Disparate Treatment

Hiring

Testing

Discrimination Basis:

Race discrimination

Sex discrimination

Affected Race(s):

Black

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation