Case: EEOC v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

3:99-cv-00106 | U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Feb. 11, 1999

Closed Date: March 27, 2000

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In February 1999, the St. Louis District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. The complaint is unavailable; however, it appears from the judgment in this case that the complaint alleged that the defendant terminated the charging party, a female employee, in retaliation for her complaints of sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Settlement conferences were held…

In February 1999, the St. Louis District Office of the EEOC brought this suit against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. The complaint is unavailable; however, it appears from the judgment in this case that the complaint alleged that the defendant terminated the charging party, a female employee, in retaliation for her complaints of sexual harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Settlement conferences were held in November and December of 1999, but the case did not settle.

The case went to trial in March 2000. The jury found for the defendant, Wal-Mart, on the sexual harassment claim but found for the plaintiff on the retaliation claim. The plaintiff was awarded $2905.25 in costs, $7,000 for lost wages, and $100,000 in punitive damages. After trial, the plaintiff moved to modify the judgment to include injunctive relief, which was granted. Wal-Mart was also required to post notice of the case at the Glen Carbon, IL Wal-Mart store, put a memo detailing the results of the case in the charging party's personnel file, and to notify the St. Louis EEOC office of any employee discharges at its Glen Carbon store.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (9/24/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8409185/parties/eeoc-v-wal-mart-stores-inc/


Judge(s)

Herndon, David R. (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Hipkiss, James M. (Illinois)

Johnson, Robert G. (Illinois)

Kennedy, Melvin D. (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Muzingo, Gregory S. (Illinois)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

3:99-cv-00106

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

March 23, 2004

March 23, 2004

Docket
42

3:99-cv-00106

Order [Re: Motions in Limine]

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

March 10, 2000

March 10, 2000

Order/Opinion

2000 WL 1162009

62

3:99-cv-00106

Judgment in a Civil Case

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

March 24, 2000

March 24, 2000

Order/Opinion
72

3:99-cv-00106

[Opinion]

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

June 29, 2000

June 29, 2000

Order/Opinion

2000 WL 1162029

73

3:99-cv-00106

Amended Judgment in a Civil Case

EEOC v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

July 6, 2000

July 6, 2000

Order/Opinion

2000 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 13456

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8409185/eeoc-v-wal-mart-stores-inc/

Last updated March 25, 2026, 4:49 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Feb. 11, 1999

COMPLAINT (drl) (Entered: 02/11/1999)

RECAP
Feb. 11, 1999

Magistrate identification: Mag/Judge Gerald B Cohn (drl)

2 Feb. 16, 1999

CJRA Track B assigned by Judge David R. Herndon; presumptive jury trial set for month of 2/00 before Judge David R. Herndon in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (dlr) (Entered: 02/18/1999)

RECAP
March 4, 1999

WAIVER OF SERVICE executed upon defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc on 2/24/99 (dlr)

3 April 12, 1999

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc by Charles E. Reis IV (dlr) (Entered: 04/15/1999)

RECAP
4 April 12, 1999

ANSWER by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc to complaint [1-1] (dlr) (Entered: 04/15/1999)

RECAP
5 April 16, 1999

NOTICE of Sched/Disc Conf set for 8:30 AM 5/28/99 before Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (dmb) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

RECAP
May 3, 1999

PROPOSED joint report submitted by plaintiff EEOC, defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (fe)

6 May 5, 1999

SCHEDULING AND DISCOVERY ORDER by Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn discovery ddl set 10/29/99 ;disp mtn filing ddl 12/10/99 settlement conf set 1:30 PM on 11/16/99 before Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (jmf) (Entered: 05/06/1999)

RECAP
7 May 5, 1999

ORDER by Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn setting settlement conf at 1:30 PM on 11/16/99 before Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (jmf) (Entered: 05/06/1999)

RECAP
8 June 7, 1999

MOTION by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc for attorney Bryan W. Riley to appear pro hac vice (dmb) (Entered: 06/07/1999)

RECAP
9 June 7, 1999

ORDER (NGJ/dmb) granting motion for attorney Bryan W. Riley to appear pro hac vice [8-1] receipt #300 61017 $55.00 (cc: all counsel) (dmb) (Entered: 06/07/1999)

RECAP
10 June 7, 1999

MOTION by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc for attorney Gregory S. Muzingo to appear pro hac vice (dmb) (Entered: 06/07/1999)

RECAP
11 June 7, 1999

ORDER (NGJ/dmb) granting motion for attorney Gregory S. Muzingo to appear pro hac vice [10-1] receipt #300 61016 $55.00 (cc: all counsel) (dmb) (Entered: 06/07/1999)

RECAP
12 Sept. 29, 1999

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for entry of stipulated protective order (myz) (Entered: 10/05/1999)

RECAP
13 Oct. 6, 1999

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn : granting motion for entry of stipulated protective order [12-1] (cc: all counsel) (jmf) (Entered: 10/15/1999)

RECAP
14 Nov. 16, 1999

MINUTES (jms) of Settlement Conference hearing on 11/16/99 before Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn ; Settlement conf held 11/16/99 Case did not settle. ( C/R: N/A) (jms) (Entered: 11/17/1999)

RECAP
15 Nov. 17, 1999

NOTICE of hearing settlement conf set 9:00AM 12/14/99 before Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (jms) (Entered: 11/17/1999)

RECAP
16 Nov. 18, 1999

NOTICE of hearing final pretrl conf set for 10:00 AM on 1/19/00 before Judge David R. Herndon in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL (cc: all counsel) (pab) (Entered: 11/18/1999)

RECAP
17 Dec. 10, 1999

MOTION by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc to extend time to file a dispositive motion (tjh) (Entered: 12/15/1999)

RECAP
18 Dec. 14, 1999

MINUTES of hearing on settlement conference before Mag Judge Gerald B. Cohn ; Settlement conf held 12/14/99 case did not settle ( C/R: None) (jmf) (Entered: 12/17/1999)

RECAP
19 Dec. 17, 1999

ORDER by Judge David R. Herndon granting motion to extend time to file a dispositive motion [17-1] dispositive mtn ddl 12/17/99 (cc: all counsel) (pab) (Entered: 12/17/1999)

RECAP
20 Jan. 11, 2000

MOTION by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc for continuance of trial (dlr) (Entered: 01/11/2000)

RECAP
21 Jan. 13, 2000

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff EEOC by Melvin D. Kennedy (dlr) (Entered: 01/13/2000)

RECAP
22 Jan. 14, 2000

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion for continuance of trial [20-1] (dlr) (Entered: 01/18/2000)

RECAP
23 Jan. 19, 2000

MINUTES (pb) of hearing on final pretrial conference before Judge David R. Herndon, ; Final pretrial conf held 1/19/00; jury trial set for 3/13/00 before Judge David R. Herndon in the USDC/East St. Louis, IL finding the motion for continuance of trial [20-1] moot. ( C/R: none) (dmw) (Entered: 01/21/2000)

RECAP
24 Jan. 19, 2000

FINAL PRE-TRIAL ORDER by Judge David R. Herndon (cc: all counsel) (dmw) (Entered: 01/21/2000)

RECAP
25 Feb. 3, 2000

FIRST SUPPLEMENT TO LIST OF WITNESSESS IT EXPECTS TO CALL TO TESTIFY AT TRIAL (EXPERT WITNESS DESIGNATION) by plaintiff EEOC (dlr) (Entered: 02/08/2000)

RECAP
26 Feb. 16, 2000

SECOND SUPPLEMENT WITNESS DESIGNATION by plaintiff EEOC (jmf) (Entered: 02/23/2000)

RECAP
27 Feb. 22, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of previous legal or administrative proceedings involving Tammy Williams and suggestions in support (dlr) (Entered: 02/24/2000)

RECAP
28 Feb. 22, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' absences during her employment with defendant and suggestions in support (dlr) (Entered: 02/24/2000)

RECAP
29 Feb. 22, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC in limine to bar mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' marriages and divorces and suggesstions in support (dlr) (Entered: 02/24/2000)

RECAP
30 Feb. 22, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' medical complaints, conditions, injuries, treatments, or surgeries and suggestions in support (dlr) (Entered: 02/24/2000)

RECAP
31 Feb. 22, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of workers' compensation or unemployment compensation received by Tammy Williams and suggestions in support (dlr) (Entered: 02/24/2000)

RECAP
32 Feb. 22, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' performance with or termination by prior or subsequent employers and suggestions in support (dlr) (Entered: 02/24/2000)

RECAP
33 Feb. 22, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' termination by a prior employer, Edwardsville Care Center, or Ms. Williams' use of the phrase, "Layed Off" instead of "Terminated" on her Wal-Mart application and suggestions in support (dlr) (Entered: 02/24/2000)

RECAP
34 Feb. 25, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to file plaintiff's designated exhibits for trial with proposed exhibits (myz) (Entered: 02/29/2000)

RECAP
35 Feb. 29, 2000

ORDER by Judge David R. Herndon granting motion to file plaintiff's designated exhibits for trial [34-1] (cc: all counsel) (dlr) (Entered: 03/01/2000)

RECAP
36 Feb. 29, 2000

EXHIBIT/WITNESS list by plaintiff EEOC (dlr) (Entered: 03/01/2000)

RECAP
37 March 6, 2000

TRIAL BRIEF by plaintiff EEOC (dlr) (Entered: 03/06/2000)

RECAP
38 March 6, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to correct by interlineation its designated list of exhibits for trial (amend) (dlr) (Entered: 03/06/2000)

RECAP
39 March 6, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC in limine to bar mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' sexual relationships and suggestions in support (dlr) (Entered: 03/06/2000)

RECAP
40 March 6, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC in limine to exclude mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' sexual joking or conversations in defendant's workplace and suggestions in support (dlr) (Entered: 03/06/2000)

RECAP
41 March 7, 2000

RESPONSE by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc to motion in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' termination by a prior employer, Edwardsville Care Center, or Ms. Williams' use of the phrase, "Layed Off" instead of "Terminated" on her Wal-Mart application [33-1], motion in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' performance with or termination by prior or subsequent employers [32-1], motion in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of workers' compensation or unemployment compensation received by Tammy Williams [31-1], motion in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' medical complaints, conditions, injuries, treatments, or surgeries [30-1], motion in limine to bar mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' marriages and divorces [29-1], motion in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of previous legal or administrative proceedings involving Tammy Williams [27-1] (dlr) (Entered: 03/07/2000)

RECAP
43 March 8, 2000

ORDER by Judge David R. Herndon granting motion to correct by interlineation its designated list of exhibits for trial (amend) [38-1] (cc: all counsel) (tjh) (Entered: 03/10/2000)

RECAP
44 March 8, 2000

REPLY by plaintiff EEOC re defendant's response to plaintiff's motions in limine [40-1], re [39-1], re [33-1], re [32-1], re [31-1], re [30-1], re [29-1], re [28-1], re [27-1] (tjh) (Entered: 03/10/2000)

RECAP
42 March 10, 2000

ORDER by Judge David R. Herndon granting motion in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of previous legal or administrative proceedings involving Tammy Williams [27-1], granting in part and denying in part motion in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' absences during her employment with defendant [28-1], granting motion in limine to bar mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' marriages and divorces [29-1],granting motion in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' medical complaints, conditions, injuries, treatments, or surgeries [30-1], granting motion in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of workers' compensation or unemployment compensation received by Tammy Williams [31-1], granting motion in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' performance with or termination by prior or subsequent employers [32-1], denying as moot and granting in part motion in limine to prohibit mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' termination by a prior employer, Edwardsville Care Center, or Ms. Williams' use of the phrase, "Layed Off" instead of "Terminated" on her Wal-Mart application [33-1], granting motion in limine to bar mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' sexual relationships [39-1], granting motion in limine to exclude mention or evidence of Tammy Williams' sexual joking or conversations in defendant's workplace [40-1]; see order for specifics (cc: all counsel) (dlr) (Entered: 03/10/2000)

RECAP
45 March 10, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to substitute videotaped witness deposition in lieu of live testimony (dlr) (Entered: 03/14/2000)

RECAP
46 March 14, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to exclude defendant's exhibits for trial (dlr) (Entered: 03/14/2000)

RECAP
47 March 14, 2000

MEMORANDUM by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc in opposition to motion to exclude defendant's exhibits for trial [46-1] (dlr) (Entered: 03/14/2000)

RECAP
48 March 15, 2000

MINUTES OF DAY 1 OF JURY TRIAL (pab) before Judge David R. Herndon denying motion to exclude defendant's exhibits for trial [46-1], granting motion to substitute videotaped witness deposition in lieu of live testimony [45-1] ( C/R: Jennifer Robertson) (pab) (Entered: 03/16/2000)

RECAP
49 March 16, 2000

MINUTES OF DAY 2 OF JURY TRIAL (pab) before Judge David R. Herndon (C/R: Jennifer Robertson) (pab) (Entered: 03/16/2000)

RECAP
50 March 20, 2000

MOTION by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc for judgment as a matter of law on plaintiff's claim of sexual harassment of Ms. Williams as the close of plaintiff's case (pab) (Entered: 03/20/2000)

RECAP
51 March 20, 2000

MINUTES OF DAY 3 OF JURY TRIAL (pab) before Judge David R. Herndon denying motion for judgment as a matter of law on plaintiff's claim of sexual harassment of Ms. Williams as the close of plaintiff's case [50-1] ( C/R: Jennifer Robertson) (pab) (Entered: 03/21/2000)

RECAP
55 March 20, 2000

OBJECTIONS by plaintiff EEOC to defendant's proposed exhibits (myz) (Entered: 03/23/2000)

RECAP
March 20, 2000

DEPOSITION of Shannon Kelly Moore taken October 12, 1999 (pab)

52 March 21, 2000

MINUTES OF DAY 4 OF JURY TRIAL (pab) before Judge David R. Herndon ( C/R: Jennifer Robertson) (pab) (Entered: 03/21/2000)

RECAP
53 March 21, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for judgment as a matter of law that (1) Boyd Lance was a "supervision" under the Faragher/Ellerth employer liability standard and (2) defendant is not entitled to the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense pursuant to Rule 50(a). (pab) (Entered: 03/22/2000)

RECAP
March 21, 2000

TRANSCRIPT of cross examination of Tammy Williams; jury trial held March 16, 2000; 1 volume(s) Court Reporter: Jennifer Robertson (pab)

54 March 22, 2000

MINUTES OF DAY 5 OF JURY TRIAL (pab) before Judge David R. Herndon denying motion for judgment as a matter of law that (1) Boyd Lance was a "supervision" under the Faragher/Ellerth employer liability standard and (2) defendant is not entitled to the Faragher/Ellerth affirmative defense pursuant to Rule 50(a). [53-1] ( C/R: Jennifer Robertson) (pab) (Entered: 03/23/2000)

RECAP
56 March 23, 2000

MINUTES of hearing on day 6 (last) of jury trial before Judge David R. Herndon ; judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff on sex harrassment, for plaintiff and against defendant on retaliation (exhibit list attached) ( C/R: Jennifer Robertson) (dlr) Modified on 03/27/2000 (Entered: 03/27/2000)

RECAP
57 March 23, 2000

Stipulation for Release of Exhibits by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc, plaintiff EEOC (dlr) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

RECAP
58 March 23, 2000

ORDER by Judge David R. Herndon; the costs of the meal for the jury shall be borne by the USA (cc: all counsel) (dlr) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

RECAP
59 March 23, 2000

VERDICT for plaintiff EEOC against defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (dlr) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

RECAP
60 March 23, 2000

VERDICT for defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc against plaintiff EEOC (dlr) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

RECAP
61 March 23, 2000

VERDICT for plaintiff EEOC against defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (dlr) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

RECAP
March 23, 2000

EXHIBIT/WITNESS list by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc, plaintiff EEOC (dlr)

March 23, 2000

JURY INSTRUCTIONS (1 envelope) (dlr)

62 March 24, 2000

JUDGMENT (NGJ/pab); it is ordered and adjudged that judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff on the claim for the sexual harrassment of Tammy Williams; it is further ordered and adjudged that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the sum of $7,000.00 for lost wages on the claim for the retaliation against Tammy Williams; it is further ordered and adjudged that judgemnt is enterd in favor of plaintiff and against defendant for punitive damages in the sum of $100,000.00 terminating case (cc: all counsel) (dlr) (Entered: 03/27/2000)

RECAP
63 April 6, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to modify judgment (amend) (dlr) (Entered: 04/11/2000)

RECAP
64 April 6, 2000

BILL OF COSTS (Photocopy) submitted by plaintiff EEOC re [62-2] response due 4/16/00 (substituted per order at doc #68) (dlr) Modified on 04/24/2000 (Entered: 04/11/2000)

RECAP
65 April 7, 2000

MOTION by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc for judgment as a matter of law or in the alternative, motion for remittur (acm) (Entered: 04/11/2000)

RECAP
66 April 13, 2000

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in opposition to motion for judgment as a matter of law [65-1], motion or in the alternative, motion for remittur [65-2] (jmf) (Entered: 04/14/2000)

RECAP
67 April 14, 2000

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to substitute, and to file instanter corrected bill of costs (dlr) (Entered: 04/17/2000)

RECAP
68 April 19, 2000

ORDER by Judge David R. Herndon granting motion to substitute [67-1], granting motion to file instanter corrected bill of costs [67-2] (cc: all counsel) (dlr) (Entered: 04/24/2000)

RECAP
69 April 20, 2000

RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc to motion to modify judgment (amend) [63-1] (dlr) (Entered: 04/24/2000)

RECAP
70 April 25, 2000

COSTS taxed for plaintiff EEOC by Clerk of Court in the amount of $ 5,387.45 against defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc (cc: all counsel) (dlr) Modified on 04/25/2000 (Entered: 04/25/2000)

RECAP
71 April 25, 2000

REPLY by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc to response to motion for judgment as a matter of law [65-1], motion or in the alternative, motion for remittur [65-2] (acm) (Entered: 04/27/2000)

RECAP
May 5, 2000

TRANSCRIPT of jury trial; held 3/15/00,3/16/00,3/20/00,3/21/00,3/22/00; 5 volume(s) Court Reporter: Jennifer Robertson (dlr)

72 June 29, 2000

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge David R. Herndon denying motion for judgment as a matter of law [65-1], denying motion or in the alternative, motion for remittur [65-2], granting in part and denying in part motion to modify judgment (amend) [63-1] ;the parties have until 7/11/00 to submit proposed notices for the Court's review ; see order for specifics (cc: all counsel) (dlr) Modified on 06/30/2000 (Entered: 06/30/2000)

RECAP
73 July 6, 2000

AMENDED JUDGMENT approved by Judge David R. Herndon (pab); it is ordered and adjudged that judgment is entered in favor of defendant and against plaintiff on the claim for the sexual harassment of Tammy Williams; it is further ordered and adjudged that judment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the sum of $7,000.00 for lost wages on the claim for the retaliation against Tammy Williams; it is further ordered and adjudged that judgment is entered in favor of plaintff and against defendant for punitive damages in the sum of $100,000.00; it is further ordered and adjudged that judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the sum of $2905.25 for costs; see judgment for specifics (cc: all counsel) (dlr) (Entered: 07/10/2000)

RECAP
July 11, 2000

VOLUME NUMBER 2 created, beginning with document number 73. (fe)

74 July 12, 2000

MEMORANDUM TO CLERK (NOTICE) by defendant Wal-Mart Stores Inc, plaintiff EEOC regarding 6/29/00 Order of the Court (dlr) (Entered: 07/25/2000)

RECAP
July 12, 2000

PROPOSED Notice to be posted at Defendant's Wal-Mart store in Glen Carbon, IL submitted by plaintiff EEOC (pab)

75 July 24, 2000

ORDER by Judge David R. Herndon regarding memorandum to clerk [74-1]; the Court approves the notice and orders that it be posted in the Glen Carbon store, in a location readily visible to employees, on or before 8/5/00 (cc: all counsel) (dlr) (Entered: 07/25/2000)

RECAP
76 March 23, 2004

File Sent to FRC on 03/11/2004: accession number 021-04-0005, box number 28 of 112, location 425608-425719 BAN. (tmpemail2, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory:

Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Feb. 11, 1999

Closing Date: March 27, 2000

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Southern District of Illinois 3:99-cv-00106

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Content of Injunction:

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Reporting

Amount Defendant Pays: 109905.25

Order Duration: 2000 - 2002

Issues

General/Misc.:

Retaliation

Discrimination Area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation