Case: EEOC v. CHILI'S, INC. dba COZYMEL'S COASTAL MEXICAN GRILL

2:01-cv-02076 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee

Filed Date: Jan. 30, 2001

Closed Date: March 27, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Memphis office of the EEOC brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Tennessee, against Chili's Inc., d/b/a as Cozymel's Coastal Mexican Grill. The complaint, filed in January 2001, alleged sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; specifically that Defendant subjected charging party to sexual harassment.

The parties entered into a consent decree in March 2002. The decree provided for Defendant to pay a total of $117,000 to nine individuals, but the amounts were not specified in the decree. The decree also enjoined Defendant from discriminating in violation of Title VII and required Defendant to post a notice of non-discrimination at its facility, adopt an anti-sexual harassment policy and report regularly to the EEOC about any complaints of sexual harassment.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Glassman (7/10/2007)

People


Judge(s)

Allen, James H. Sr. (Tennessee)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Documents in this case

2:01-cv-02076

Docket

EEOC v. Chili's Inc., et al

March 27, 2002

March 27, 2002

Docket
30

2:01-cv-02076

Order on Plaintiff's Motion to Compel

EEOC v. Chili's Inc., et al

Aug. 21, 2001

Aug. 21, 2001

Order/Opinion
42

2:01-cv-02076

Order Denying Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal

EEOC v. Chili's Inc., et al.

Jan. 15, 2002

Jan. 15, 2002

Order/Opinion
43

2:01-cv-02076

Consent Decree

EEOC v. Chili's Inc., et al

March 27, 2002

March 27, 2002

Settlement Agreement

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 25, 2025, 8:22 a.m.

ECF Number Date Description Link
1 Jan. 30, 2001

COMPLAINT pursuant to 42 USC 2000e; (sex discrimination) (BAG) Modified on 01/31/2001 (Entered: 01/31/2001)

PACER
2 March 2, 2001

SETTING LETTER : scheduling conference set for 10:30 3/26/01, Courtroom 2 (YDS) (Entered: 03/02/2001)

PACER
3 March 9, 2001

SETTING LETTER ; scheduling conference set for 10:30 3/27/01 (EHG) (Entered: 03/12/2001)

PACER
4 March 22, 2001

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant Chili's Inc. by Thomas L. Henderson, (Michael Byrd, Ella J. Martinez, pending the Court's decision on dft's incontested motion for permission to participate) (BAG) (Entered: 03/23/2001)

5 March 22, 2001

MOTION by defendant Chili's Inc. for attorneys William Michael Byrd, Jr. and Ella J. Martinez to appear pro hac vice; w/attachments (BAG) (Entered: 03/23/2001)

6 March 22, 2001

CERTIFICATE Of Consultation by defendant Chili's Inc. re [5-1] (BAG) (Entered: 03/23/2001)

March 22, 2001

PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID: in the amount of $ 200.00 receipt # 063164 by Rebecca Williams (BAG) (Entered: 03/23/2001)

PACER
7 March 26, 2001

ORDER by Judge Bernice B. Donald granting motion for attorneys William Michael Byrd, Jr. and Ella J. Martinez to appear pro hac vice; w/attachments [5-1] to represent dft Chili's (cc: all counsel) (YDS) (Entered: 03/26/2001)

PACER
8 March 29, 2001

SETTING LETTER; scheduling conference reset for 9:00 4/17/01 (BAG) (Entered: 03/29/2001)

PACER
9 March 30, 2001

ANSWER by defendant Chili's Inc. to [1-1] (BAG) (Entered: 04/03/2001)

PACER
10 April 6, 2001

NOTICE of Change of Address & Firm Name by defendant Chili's Inc. eff. 4/1/01 name change to Jackson Walker LLP/901 Main Street, Ste 6000/Dallas, TX 75202 ph# 214-953-6000 (PWM) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

PACER
11 April 10, 2001

Report of RULE 26 (f) Planning Meeting by EEOC, Chili's Inc. (PWM) (Entered: 04/11/2001)

PACER
12 April 17, 2001

MINUTES: scheduling conference held 4/17/01; No consent to proceed before Mag Judge; Other preliminary matters addressed; joining parties ddl 7/31/01; Initial motions to dismiss: 8/31/01; amending pleadings ddl set 1/31/02; discovery ddl set 3/31/02; pla's experts: 10/31/01; dft's experts: 01/31/02; motion filing ddl set 4/30/02; jury trial set 9:00 7/22/02, 5 days; pretrial conference set 8:30 7/8/02; Deadline for Class Certification: 7/31/01; Orus Tenus motion to exceed 10 depositions- granted w/o prejudice Presiding Judge: Bernice B. Donald; PLA Atty: C. Owen; DFT Atty: T. Henderson/M. Byrd; C/R: None; (BAG) Modified on 04/18/2001 (Entered: 04/18/2001)

PACER
13 April 17, 2001

SCHEDULING ORDER 16(b) Judge Bernice B. Donald; The following dates were established as final dates for: Joiniing parties: pla- 6/29/01; dft- 7/31/01; Initial motions to dismiss: 8/31/01; amending pleadings: pla- 1/14/02; dft- 1/31/02; Discovery ddl: 3/31/02; document production: 3/31/02; dep/int/adm: 3/31/02; Identify Class Members by: 7/31/01; Pla's experts: 10/31/01; Dft's experts: 1/31/02; motion filing ddl: 4/30/02; Parties will be referred to Mag Judge for a settlement conf. after reasonable discovery; Trial set 7/22/02 at 9:00, est. 5 days; Pretrial conf. set 7/8/02 at 8:30; Joint pretrial order to be entered by 5:00 on 7/1/02; Absent good cause shown, schedulign dates set by this order will not be modified or extended; (cc: all counsel) (BAG) (Entered: 04/18/2001)

PACER
14 April 17, 2001

ORDER Of Reference by Judge Bernice B. Donald; Case referred to Mag Judge Allen for a settlement conf. after reasonable discovery; (cc: all counsel) (BAG) (Entered: 04/18/2001)

PACER
15 April 26, 2001

ORDER by Judge Bernice B. Donald; On 4/17/01 this Court heard pla's oral motion requesting that both pla and dft be allowed to take up to 20 depositions re [12-2]; Pla's motion is granted; (cc: all counsel) (BAG) (Entered: 04/26/2001)

PACER
16 May 31, 2001

NOTICE Of Change Of Name by Ella Martinez, counsel for defendant Chili's Inc.; Ella Martinez's name changed to Ella Schoeder Namaksy, firm name, address and telephone numbers remain the same; (BAG) (Entered: 06/01/2001)

PACER
17 June 29, 2001

SETTING LETTER settlement conference set for 10:00 4/5/02 before Mag Judge Allen in room 338; (BAG) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

PACER
18 June 29, 2001

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC for leave to file an amended complaint (adding as dfts Brinker Intl Payroll Corp. and Brinker Intl, Inc.) (BAG) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

PACER
19 June 29, 2001

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in support of motion for leave to file an amended complaint [18-1]; w/exhibits (BAG) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

PACER
20 June 29, 2001

CERTIFICATE Of Consultation by plaintiff EEOC re [18-1] (BAG) (Entered: 06/29/2001)

PACER
21 July 3, 2001

ORDER by Judge Bernice B. Donald granting motion for leave to file an amended complaint (adding as dfts Brinker Intl Payroll Corp. and Brinker Intl, Inc.) [18-1] ..plaintiff's motion is granted and pla may file its Amended Complaint. (cc: all counsel) (EHG) (Entered: 07/03/2001)

PACER
22 July 11, 2001

AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by plaintiff EEOC; adding Brinker Intl Payroll, Brinker Intl., Inc.; jury demand (BAG) (Entered: 07/11/2001)

PACER
23 July 31, 2001

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to compel discovery , and for extension of the deadline for identifying alleged victims of discrimination (BAG) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

PACER
24 July 31, 2001

MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EEOC in support of motion to compel discovery [23-1], and for extension of the deadline for identifying alleged victims of discrimination [23-2]; w/exhibits (BAG) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

PACER
25 July 31, 2001

CERTIFICATE Of Consultation by plaintiff EEOC re [23-1] (BAG) (Entered: 08/01/2001)

PACER
26 Aug. 2, 2001

SUPPLEMENTAL Memorandum Of Facts and Law by plaintiff EEOC in support of motion to compel discovery [23-1], and for extension of the deadline for identifying alleged victims of discrimination [23-2]; w/exhibits (BAG) (Entered: 08/03/2001)

PACER
27 Aug. 8, 2001

SECOND SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM in support of pla's motion to compel discovery by plaintiff EEOC re motion to compel discovery [23-1], and for Extension of the deadline for identifying alleged victims of discrimination; w/exhibits (BAG) (Entered: 08/09/2001)

PACER
28 Aug. 9, 2001

ORDER Of Reference by Judge Bernice B. Donald referring to Mag Judge James H. Allen the pla's motion to compel discovery [23-1], and for extension of the deadline for identifying alleged victims discrimination [23-2]; Any exceptions to Mag Judge's order shall be made by motion w/in 10 days of order; All exceptions shall be stated w/particularity; (cc: all counsel) (BAG) (Entered: 08/09/2001)

PACER
29 Aug. 15, 2001

RESPONSE by defendant Chili's Inc. to pla's motion to compel discovery [23-1], and for extension of the deadline for identifying alleged victims of discrimination [23-2]; w/exhibits (BAG) (Entered: 08/16/2001)

PACER
30 Aug. 21, 2001

ORDER On Plaintiff's Motion To Compel by Mag Judge James H. Allen granting EEOC's motion to compel discovery [23-1], granting motion for extension of the deadline for identifying alleged victims of discrimination [23-2]; Cozymels's must produce for inspection and copying by EEOC, w/in 15 DAYS of docketing this order, the mentioned portions of these employment applications or employee files; EEOC is given to and including 10/1/01 to identify class members; Cozymels is given to and including 11/1/01 to file any motion to dismiss; In all other respects, the court's order of 4/18/01 is in full force and effect; (cc: all counsel) (BAG) (Entered: 08/22/2001)

Clearinghouse
31 Aug. 22, 2001

NOTICE OF FILING OF Plaintiff's withdrawal of motion to compel discovery by plaintiff EEOC; ...dft has now produced documents sufficiently responsive to pla's second request for production of documents; (BAG) (Entered: 08/23/2001)

PACER
32 Aug. 24, 2001

SUPPLEMENTAL Response by defendant Chili's Inc. to pla's motion to compel discovery and for extension of deadline for identifying alleged victims of discrimination re motion response [29-1] (BAG) (Entered: 08/27/2001)

PACER
33 Aug. 27, 2001

ORDER by Judge Bernice B. Donald; Pla will be allowed until 10/31/01 to identify to dfts all alleged victims of discrimination for whom pla will seek remedies in this lawsuit; Dfts shall be allowed until 11/30/01 to file initial motions to dismiss; (cc: all counsel) (BAG) (Entered: 08/29/2001)

PACER
34 Sept. 7, 2001

ORIGINAl ANSWER by defendants to plaintiff's amended complaint [22-1] (BAG) (Entered: 09/07/2001)

PACER
35 Nov. 30, 2001

MOTION by defendants Chili's Inc., Brinker Intl Payroll, Brinker Intl., Inc. for partial dismissal (YDS) (Entered: 12/03/2001)

PACER
36 Nov. 30, 2001

BRIEF by defendants Chili's Inc., Brinker Intl Payroll, Brinker Intl., Inc. regarding motion for partial dismissal [35-1] (YDS) (Entered: 12/03/2001)

PACER
37 Dec. 27, 2001

RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS by plaintiff EEOC to motion for partial dismissal [35-1] (EHG) (Entered: 12/28/2001)

PACER
38 Dec. 27, 2001

MEMORANDUM OF FACTS AND LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS' PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS by plaintiff EEOC in support of motion response [37-1] (EHG) (Entered: 12/28/2001)

PACER
39 Jan. 8, 2002

MOTION by defendants for leave to file reply brief (in support of dft's motion for partial motion to dismiss) (BAG) (Entered: 01/08/2002)

PACER
40 Jan. 8, 2002

CERTIFICATE Of Consultation by defendants re [39-1] (BAG) (Entered: 01/08/2002)

PACER
41 Jan. 8, 2002

SETTING LETTER settlement conference set for 3:00 1/29/02 before Judge Arthur Tarnow; (BAG) (Entered: 01/09/2002)

PACER
42 Jan. 15, 2002

ORDER Denying Defendant's Motion For Partial Dismissal by Judge Bernice B. Donald denying dft's motion for partial dismissal [35-1]; Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to pla, as the EEOC may properly seek recovery for add'l similar acts of discrimination, the Court finds that the claims ... are not time-barred; Dft's motion to dismiss individual claims of Brasher-Zinn and Ferrer is DENIED; finding the motion for leave to file reply brief (in support of dft's motion for partial motion to dismiss) [39-1] moot. (cc: all counsel) (BAG) (Entered: 01/16/2002)

Clearinghouse
43 March 27, 2002

CONSENT DECREE by Judge Bernice B. Donald: EEOC and Cozymel's have agreed to this consent decree to settle all claims involved in this lawsuit; It is ORDERED: USDC ... will retain jurisdiction over this decree for purpose of enforcement and dispute resolution; Cozymel's agrees that its supervisors, managers... will not harass employees because of their sex; Cozymel's will pay a total of $117,500.00 to individuals... entitled to relief; Checks will be made payable to each individual in the amount specified by EEOC in Individual Remedy Distribution List (attached); Checks will be sent ... w/in 10 days after entry of this decree; W/in 10 days after entry of this decree, Cozymel's will post notice attached to this decree in a conspicious place at Memphis restaurant...; Notice will remain posted for 30 days; Cozymel's will submit a report to Carson Owen (EEOC) six months after entry of this decree...; EEOC and Cozymel's will each bear its own atty's fees and costs incurred in this action; (cc: all counsel) (BAG) (Entered: 03/27/2002)

Clearinghouse

Case Details

State / Territory:

Tennessee

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 30, 2001

Closing Date: March 27, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Private Entity/Person

Brinker International Payroll Corporation

Chili's, Inc.

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Other Dockets:

Western District of Tennessee 2:01-cv-02076

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Monetary Relief

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff OR Mixed

Relief Granted:

Damages

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Discrimination Prohibition

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Reporting

Amount Defendant Pays: 117500

Issues

Discrimination Area:

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination Basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex/Gender(s):

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Recommended Citation